|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3441
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 18:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:How about a kind of structured seige system in high sec? I'm thinking along the lines of Lineage 2 castle seiges. Allow one corporation to effectively "schedule" an engagement with another corp over whatever control of whatever the station provides. Winner gets whatever control the station offers for a week or so, and then it becomes vulnerable again. I like this idea, make sure it has millions of HP (literally like hundreds of millions, remember - HIGHSEC) and then one side has to defend the structure and the other has to defeat them and then shoot hundreds of millions of hitpoints.
And the defender gets to choose the time. Of course, it will cost them stront.
To stront the station.
Which will be shot.
Wait... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3443
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 22:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Stray Bullets wrote:Industry needs to be phased out of NPC stations and into POSs ... if it makes people happer, allow small refineries in POSs in 0.5 systems. Make it a conflict driver! ;) Wait.
First we need to nerf wardecs more. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3447
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 05:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Stray Bullets wrote: Industry needs to be phased out of NPC stations and into POSs ... if it makes people happer, allow small refineries in POSs in 0.5 systems. Make it a conflict driver! ;)
You apparently never tried finding a free 0.5 sec office slot. Depending on season it can be really hard, and no, wardeccing somebody does not make them sign off an office rental. So, once you put up the 7-8 POSes and the system is full, where do you find slots? It'd make hi sec slots even more limited than null. Their are loads of free office space in 0.5 systems, just not in the ones close to trade hubs, to get closer you need to use a 0.6 or 0.7 system and they really have a lot of space available, so the should just allow refineries where ever you can anchor a POS. Player owned should always be better than NPC free. No, highsec should be like mount olympus, where the gods (CONCORD) preside over their heavenly realm.
All the nullsec dogs can scratch in the dirt like the violent animals they are. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3457
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 04:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: EvE is not for unique snowflakes who demand total and radical changes to the same mechanics that worked allright for everyone for 10 years
lol EVE is rife with total and radical changes demanded by players throughout its entire 10 year history Buff those mining barges even more please. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3457
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 04:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Yet CCP have never balked at removing NPC crutches once the player economy proved it was capable of handling the load; NPC buy orders for minerals, NPC goods, etc. Why would it be so conceptually difficult to transition the player economy away from NPC manufacturing facilities? Because players aren't capable of moving to POSes. For one, it's troublesome when your POS corp gets wardecced, unlike the miners and PI and industry characters.
Wardecs need a massive nerf before forcing players to use things like POSes will be anywhere resembling "acceptable" (it won't actually be acceptable of course, expect shooting of jita structures) to the highsecers.
Though I'm sure they wouldn't mind a massive nerf to wardecs just on the principle of it. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3457
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 05:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yonis Kador wrote:Whereas, now I am able to mine in an unlimited number of systems, have perfect refining at all the stations owned by 14 npc corps (so far) and can manufacture at any npc station, anywhere at all. Highsec, the best place ever.
Never nothing but joy and happiness in HIGHSEC. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3459
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 20:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
Stray Bullets wrote:Murk Paradox wrote:Stray Bullets wrote:Murk Paradox wrote:Again, it has to make sense. WHY should null have equal or better facilities? Sorry but it just sounds weird. Indeed, you need to make sense. Why should the least risky environment have the best of any part of the game? Why shouldn't nullsec have the best facilities if it has the greater risk? Your logic is completely screwed up  Because you answered your own question.... in the world of research and industry, why would the most volatile and rudimentary of services be the best? Why would a backwater town, so to speak, have better facilities than an area that is a well established secured utopia? I'm sorry but a small town of 2,000 will not have better industry than a cosmopolitan city. It just won't. My bad. I thought we were discussing the lack of risk vs reward regarding nullsec vs highsec. The topic on the thread is obviously missing the part where it's a RP discussion. I'm very sorry and I'll retire from this discussion  First you must self-destruct your pod in shame.
I hope your clone lives a more ~honorable ~internet forums life than you have.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3459
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 21:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
samualvimes wrote:sigh I never thought I'd like a post by you Frying but you've grown on me :).
Exactly right. Why should paying someone to do all the work be cheaper than having your own facilities? where does that make sense anywhere? Because CONCORD loves us, just like CCP. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3460
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 21:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
samualvimes wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:samualvimes wrote:Frying Doom wrote: So what you are saying is that facilities in more developed areas (Hi-sec) should cost more than for the other areas of space.
Good to see you agree on that, now I just need to convince you of why owning your own facilities should be more profitable within the same area.
sigh I never thought I'd like a post by you Frying but you've grown on me :). Exactly right. Why should paying someone to do all the work be cheaper than having your own facilities? where does that make sense anywhere? Yeah it's not like China does not exist, Korea does not exist, Taiwan did not exist, Hong Kong + Malaysia did not exist and so on. Let me tell how good it went with those first world countries having their own facilities vs those who outsourced in there. Also, Apple: outsourced manufacturing and very succesful branding campaings. I'm not sure I'm getting where this affects my point. MY point is that all in the same country owning your own facilities is almost intrinsically better than hiring work out to others especially in manufacturing as you do not need to factor in everyone upon the chains markup for profit. In the company I work for we only hire out work to toll manufacturers for prototypes after that we try and backintegrate fully for the larger scale as it's a lot cheaper. nowhere did I mention outsourcing to cheaper labour countries. Stealth edit: If it was in other countries then there is still the gradient between your own facilities in that country and outsourcing to facilities owned by others in that country. We outsource "our" protection to CONCORD, what's the problem with asking Caldari Navy to make our weapons of mass explosions... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3460
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 23:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Yes those companies that out source do so not due to cheaper manufacturing facilities but cheaper wages.
In a lot of cases moving manufacturing to other countries costs millions and is a longer term project as they make their money back by a savings in wages, health care plans, superannuation, sick leave and holiday pay and wage taxes.
They also have cheaper manufacturing facilities. I know, the last company I have worked for, designed and produced those manufacturing facilities for a lot of Chinese factories. So cheaper that it costed less to have their facilities designed and produced in Europe and shipped to them to produce in there, than any production done in Europe or USA. You completely lost me on that one. Are you saying that you built the facilities and then sold them to China at a lower price than you do to Europe? Or are you saying that you built the facilities and then rented them to china, so they cost the Chinese less to operate? I think they mean they produced machines in Europe, sent them to China, and had the chinese use the imported machines to make goods and ship the goods to Europe.
And this was apparently cheaper than making and using machines in Europe.
Europe has got nothing on highsec, then. You don't even have to make facilities, the NPCs let you use them for nearly nothing. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3460
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 00:19:00 -
[11] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:I'm glad people are taking the time here to ensure that my internet spaceship industry mirrors as closely as possible their bastardized version of economic history. The one where highsec is the best ever, forever, I hope. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3460
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 00:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP I request a downvote button specifically for Buzzy Warstl's posts.
I haven't seen so much kneejerk since they decided to buff mining barges and exhumers. Downvoting should be a thing, perhaps.
Will it hurt the nullsec posters? Please say yes. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3464
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 02:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP I request a downvote button specifically for Buzzy Warstl's posts.
I haven't seen so much kneejerk since they decided to buff mining barges and exhumers. Downvoting should be a thing, perhaps. Will it hurt the nullsec posters? Please say yes. Mostly depends on the ratio of high sec poster to null sec poster. If it follow in-game population, null sec poster are doomed to negative likes count... That would totally hurt them btw. Just like the CSM elections. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3487
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 20:30:00 -
[14] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Malcanis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Arcosian wrote:My thoughts for fixing null:
1. Lower cost to build outposts and allow them to be built on any planet in nullsec systems. Yeah that's what we need! EVEN MORE SOV GRIND. Outposts aren't related to sov. Yes, yes they are... Quote:An online TCU is invulnerable unless both of the following conditions are fulfilled:
- Sovereignty Blockade Units are anchored and onlined at more than 50% of the gates in the system.
- The sovereign entity over the system does not possess an Outpost/Conquerable Station nor an online Industrial Hub within the system.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Sovereignty_guide#Claiming_Sovereignty Our FORTRESS DEKLEIN has outposts everywhere, so more structures for you to shoot if you decide to take the bold step of attacking us. I am a nullsec zealot. |
|
|
|