|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
theRaptor
   |
Posted - 2005.08.06 14:49:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Ovaron
To example, in en Fantasy RGP , if you get the monster in a zone , who can't defend herself , and your are able to attack them without any danger. You would see this as an "normal" way to kill this monster?
And you are allowed to distract NPC's using light drons. And also against players, for example using light drones to shield against FoF's.
Why the hell is it suddenly an exploit when used against POS?
CCP can say anything is an exploit and you better obey or you will get a ban. It doesnt mean they have given a good reason or that it makes sense.
God mode for POS needs to end. But 5 need to stop whining about GM favouritism, Im sure it just makes the GM's less likely to listen to you.
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.
-- Ancient "Dirt" Religious figure. |
theRaptor
|
Posted - 2005.08.06 15:13:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood
OMFG [5] stop this whinning **** and get ower it. we all know you are using lag tactics in fleet battles and now you are doing it to a POS.
No the lag is CCP's fault. Or are people not allowed to use drones in fleet? It would be simple to write some code that made drones one object for fleet battles. The fact that I get lag in high pop systems when *nobody* is at the gate is a joke.
The use of light drones against POS is an obvious tactic. My alliance has discussed it several times. Its CCP's fault for doing half the work and not accounting for obvious player tactics.
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.
-- Ancient "Dirt" Religious figure. |
theRaptor
|
Posted - 2005.08.06 17:14:00 -
[3]
Originally by: ParMizaN
Clearly it was not intended for a fully armed pos to shoot at drones instead of players.
Then CCP should have written the code right back when they released them. Using drones to confuse POS is about the second tactic people come up with after trying to snipe. And if CCP cant program a contingency to take account of this bloody obvious tactic then I can't wait to see all the other exploits they didnt account for.
Its been most of a year since POS came out, and in all this time they couldnt spare a programmer for a day to do the code?
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.
-- Ancient "Dirt" Religious figure. |
theRaptor
|
Posted - 2005.08.06 17:32:00 -
[4]
Originally by: mahhy
Personally I'm expecting that CPP will class this as an exploit until they can code turrets not to target drones.
Dude thats about two lines of code. Thats what gets me.
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.
-- Ancient "Dirt" Religious figure. |
theRaptor
|
Posted - 2005.08.06 21:01:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Amthrianius
Sooooooooo now we do it without drones, just incase :/
Lets see if F12 works this time olyyy
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.
-- Ancient "Dirt" Religious figure. |
|
|
| |
|