Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Ugleb
Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 18:52:00 -
[31] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Shadowsword wrote:
Well, thanks for taking the time to answer, but I'll point out that keeping things like the number of security employees secret, while probably marginally beneficial to their efficiency, might have adverse effects that far outweight the benefit. Like the growing trend to believe, wether it's true or not, that null-sec is more and more dominated by RMT and that CCP do nothing about it...
I think that working on creative ways to report on that information would be far more effective to the playerbase than telling you how many people touch the problem, which is kinda the point. Communication about botting and RMT is certainly something we intend to be more open about in the future. I think as an example, I've given talks that have addressed the subject in a few venues in the past year but that information has never made its way to the forums, so I think maybe it's time to distill some of that into a blog and get it out to you guys to digest.
I would love to see an update from CCP on what is being done to combat botting/RMT in EVE. http://uglebsjournal.wordpress.com/ |

Florestan Bronstein
The Waterworks
101
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 19:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Rakshasa Taisab wrote:as such we can never know if CCP has, or has not, been taken over and turned into a vodka-subsidies based organization. it's beer, not vodka
icelandic guy goes to Russia founds a brewery in russia and makes many russian friends. Brewery is sold to Heineken in 2002. Icelandic guy is now rich and buys large share in CCP. Financial crisis hits and Icelandic guy is suddenly broke. Icelandic guy promises consortium of banks led to use any income from dividends or sale of his CCP stock for debt repayment. |

Alyssa Yotosala
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 19:55:00 -
[33] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:i do like the idea of zero plantations and slave masters though
we have a position open in the getting whipped department, I'll pass your resume along
lol, go boi go! get 'im!
can you give me a semi-witty reply to this post too?
Ill give you extra points if you can throw in an insult about me being a carebear, and bonus points if you can use at least two logical fallacies and an insult about my intelligence.
lol, u so funny. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
615
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 19:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
Alyssa Yotosala wrote:Weaselior wrote:i do like the idea of zero plantations and slave masters though
we have a position open in the getting whipped department, I'll pass your resume along lol, go boi go! get 'im! can you give me a semi-witty reply to this post too? Ill give you extra points if you can throw in an insult about me being a carebear, and bonus points if you can use at least two logical fallacies and an insult about my intelligence. lol, u so funny.
there is nothing I can do to insult you more than simply quoting this post |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
615
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 19:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
feeding rope, hanging self, etc etc |

Kengutsi Akira
34
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 20:05:00 -
[36] - Quote
pretty funny to see Sreegs in a thread with this much trolling with the blues saying how much they moderate trolling |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
615
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 20:15:00 -
[37] - Quote
it'd probably be bad form for him to moderate all the trolls about ccp and 0.0 rmting cause it'd look bad |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
80
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 20:20:00 -
[38] - Quote
For people asking how RMT effects them: If you subscribe via PLEX is certainly does. Maybe you have noticed the recent PLEX price rise? Some of the PLEX price is held up by the existence of RMT. People get ISK via RMT rather than purchasing a PLEX and trading it in game for ISK. The result is a lower PLEX supply and a higher PLEX price.
If you PvP, the guys you are fighting could have better stuff because they bought it with ISK obtained via RMT. RMT breaks the sandbox.
Also if more people purchased PLEX and sold them in game, lowering the isk price, then more subscriptions would be paid for via PLEX. A subscription paid for via PLEX gives CCP $17.50 a month, more than any other subscription option. Its in CCP's best interest to get rid of RMT for just this reason. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
146
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 20:25:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Shadowsword wrote:
Well, thanks for taking the time to answer, but I'll point out that keeping things like the number of security employees secret, while probably marginally beneficial to their efficiency, might have adverse effects that far outweight the benefit. Like the growing trend to believe, wether it's true or not, that null-sec is more and more dominated by RMT and that CCP do nothing about it...
I think that working on creative ways to report on that information would be far more effective to the playerbase than telling you how many people touch the problem, which is kinda the point. Communication about botting and RMT is certainly something we intend to be more open about in the future. I think as an example, I've given talks that have addressed the subject in a few venues in the past year but that information has never made its way to the forums, so I think maybe it's time to distill some of that into a blog and get it out to you guys to digest.
CCP has the feeling and it is of the opinion that the amount of people it has dedicated to fighting RMT is enough or more than enough. However, were they to divulge it people would say that its barely close to being enough and that CCP isn't working hard enough with only "that" amount of people.
In which case CCP would be forced to explain the work those few people do, which would be detrimental to their work. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

met worst
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 03:50:00 -
[40] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:For people asking how RMT effects them: If you subscribe via PLEX is certainly does. Maybe you have noticed the recent PLEX price rise? Some of the PLEX price is held up by the existence of RMT. People get ISK via RMT rather than purchasing a PLEX and trading it in game for ISK. The result is a lower PLEX supply and a higher PLEX price.
If you PvP, the guys you are fighting could have better stuff because they bought it with ISK obtained via RMT. RMT breaks the sandbox.
Also if more people purchased PLEX and sold them in game, lowering the isk price, then more subscriptions would be paid for via PLEX. A subscription paid for via PLEX gives CCP $17.50 a month, more than any other subscription option. Its in CCP's best interest to get rid of RMT for just this reason. Everything you say here is true except (underlined) this bit.
ISK CAN be purchased for real money regardless. Whether it hurts CCP's bottom-line or PLEX prices are the only variables - not whether your PvP is "fair" against little-rich-boy. |
|

Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 04:28:00 -
[41] - Quote
Callic Veratar wrote:Shadowsword wrote:Well, thanks for taking the time to answer, but I'll point out that keeping things like the number of security employees secret, while probably marginally beneficial to their efficiency, might have adverse effects that far outweight the benefit. Like the growing trend to believe, wether it's true or not, that null-sec is more and more dominated by RMT and that CCP do nothing about it... It irrelevant how many people are actually involved in RMT/bot detection. Even if it's ONLY CCP Sreegs, if the tools he develops are effective the job's being done. The actual number of RMTer/botters is likely far less that you believe, simply because some people tend to be paranoid and see conspiracies and corruption everywhere, even when it's not.
I get an increasing sense of paranoia everytime I read these forums. |

Ascendic
Macabre Votum Against ALL Authorities
37
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 04:58:00 -
[42] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Bloodpetal wrote:
The accusations of NC doing RMT by DRF are interesting, however I'd like to know how/why they think that...
Well I think that came from when the list of customers of one of the largest ISK-selling organisations got leaked and most of their largest buyers were... in the NC.
Right so some of the buyers were from the NC. The real question you need to ask is who are the suppliers? |

Mal Mandrake
Procellum Militis Veneratio
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 05:16:00 -
[43] - Quote
Thank you CCP for you answers to this question.
I imagine CCP employees have some hefty NDA type rules and regulations on their end. The best we can do is speculate and hatemonger. But hey what is a little bit of paranoia in a fair, open, game based on honesty and honorable fights?
RMT is an ubiquitous problem in MMO's and it is an endless, thankless battle for the companies who have to handle the problem. I mean **** if even one person gets mistakenly banned for botting the PR shitstorm would be extreme. Ever managed an IT department? I wager the new guy is stuck at his desk 8 hours a day looking at logs until his eyes bleed trying to root out RMT. Then one day he isn't the new guy anymore and he gets to sit at his desk spending 8 hours a day reading hate-forums and trying to respond without anger and banning everyone!
Hang in there Skreegs, customer support for any software company is job only for the brave. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
410
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 02:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote: I'll address this as well as possible ...
Thanks!
Quite vague but I would like to reiterate that bots tend to be non-communicative and follow some pretty exact activity patterns that could probably be detected heuristically; if you are not already trying to do so. Ideas and stuff EVE - the game of sand castles, either building them or kicking them down. |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
368
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 04:47:00 -
[45] - Quote
unholy rage made the players feel better. when ccp announced they have banned a few hundred or so bot accounts and other RMTers it just looks good for CCP and to the players. |

Jimi Crackcorn
Directed Evolution Corp
71
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 05:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:unholy rage made the players feel better. when ccp announced they have banned a few hundred or so bot accounts and other RMTers it just looks good for CCP and to the players.
Yeah, it looks real good for CCP, but how many of those 100s were actually botters authorized by CCP? None, it's just the little guys that get hurt. The one man corp botters. They take all the hits so CCP can keep botting those bots, all while making it look like they're actually working to stop bots. Which they may be doing, but it's just those bots they don't authorize that they're looking for. Can't have anyone cutting in on their profits now can they.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is a damn fool. PLEX is a clear sign of CCPs stance on RMT. |

Sellendis
The Ares project
41
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 12:32:00 -
[47] - Quote
What gets me pissed is when someone says, report bots. They investigate (soft off) and give a guy a warning...wow. 3 strikes and you are out, biggest load of bull i ever heard. How about not giving a warning, just follow the money, observe the bot, 100% sure its a bot? Ban the everliving crap of that account, follow the money transactions....ban more accomplices. Right now people sell the char when he got a warning for botting, how is the buyer to know what is he buying.
Reporting a bot? I would never do that out of shear principle, i pay to play a game, not to enforce CCP rules and do the job of a person that is getting paid for it. Economy and botting influence aside, you report 1-2 bots, they register 4 new accounts, even most dedicated player will sooner or later say screw this.
Want to get more bots reports? How about for each reported-investigated-confirmed-punished bot, a player that reported him (first) gets (just random number) 25-50m ISK from the bots account, and you get a whole new profession in EvE. You reward players for enforcing your rules and making your job easier. It can even go as far as a lore part, Concord confirmed drone (or whatever) infiltrators posing as pilots, offers bounty's for their identification and removal.
There are numbers of ways to reduce bot population and to fight them. To quote somebody "we watch what you do, not what you say", it seems CCP isnt doing a lot. |

Ratnose Banker
Pink Sockers
20
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 10:00:00 -
[48] - Quote
Report a bot doesn't do ****.
lol CCP Screegs coming on here saying the problem is the information from his presentations didn't make its way to the forums. Wrong! Problem is report-a-bot doesn't do anything and 3 strikes for botters while all of us see how bad EVE has caught the bot AIDS. It seems CCP has no problem flagging accounts for suspected rmt and suspending the accounts pending investigation. It would be simple to detect botting (or account sharing) server side by bounty logs. Why not??? We don't need more hot air...we need results. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
116
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 11:13:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mal Mandrake wrote: RMT is an ubiquitous problem in MMO's and it is an endless, thankless battle for the companies who have to handle the problem. I mean **** if even one person gets mistakenly banned for botting the PR shitstorm would be extreme.
This is not true. It's technically impossible.
There is not a single way provided by this game to prove someone's innocence about botting. CCP politic is "guilty unless proven innocent, but without any tool, log or software to prove yourself might be innocent".
This is expecially bad when they try detect new bots, they run heuristics based on a lot of parameters which lead to good accuracy but not 100% foolproof. What if someone happens to fit those parameters? Like Avira, you might get "flagged" just because of a matching signature.
Plus there's the forums peer pressure. Years of posting history show that anyone who ever posted about unjust banning has been dissed and flamed to death.
Therefore don't worry, there will never be any PR issue. |

Mai Khumm
Apple Construction Inc Northern Associates.
151
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 11:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
Since CCP is active in this thread, I might as well ask a few questions myself...
I was wondering if there was staff actually dedicated to hunting bots? It's always been stated by CCP, do it yourself, and let us know. It's also very hard to do so in deep null. Any SOV holding alliance who has half a brain would setup their entry points like a fortress... (I know that my space is more open then my exes legs, but security isn't my job so I don't give a ****.) Which makes it very hard for a small group of players to go into deep null and "hunt" said bots...
Wouldn't any alliance with an open "do not report bots" policy in place be a big target for CCP to investigate? Not to name anyone here, but there's a few big alliances with that policy, and doesn't hide that fact...
Ejit wrote: I personally believe CCP invests very little manpower, time and effort in the RMT war. Especially since some CCP staff have their fingers in the RMT pie as rumored.
CCP Sreegs wrote:Regarding insinuations of staff members being involved in RMT you may report allegations of misconduct to IA. Otherwise it would be pretty peachy if you would refrain from making allegations you have absolutely no reason to believe. If you have a reason to believe it and want it to stop I can only assume you'd report it. Otherwise the alternative is that you're just trying to cause trouble and that makes my job harder which is pretty uncool.
Just to expand on this a little. (Just stating a point, not trying to **** anyone off) But on our end (and your IA department) this is even more harder, simply because any CCP employee can divulge information to the player base by non-EVE communication tools. Unless said employee likes his job, he's not going to go around to every player in the game flaunting their rank within CCP. If any CCP employee does do this act, it'll only be to very select players.
(this last point is more of a joke then anything else.)
But can CCP release a tinfoil hat in the NEX store? James Hetfield, can you please hit the bottle again and make good music? |
|

Roime
UNFRL Fleet Operations CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
109
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 11:56:00 -
[51] - Quote
Common sense has left this topic as of first post ago
|

FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
58
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 12:37:00 -
[52] - Quote
Oh look. A thread full of tinfoil hat wearing ignorant people.
How refreshing. |

Kitten Arbosa
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 12:57:00 -
[53] - Quote
If CCP really wanted to go after RMT, they'd leverage the playerbase with more incentives. Set up sting operations with the players. "hey, if you buy $10 of ISK from RMT site X, send us a receipt for it and we'll monitor the buy. Successful bust nets you a plex."
You start making the RMT sites paranoid that every sell they make is gonna shut down parts of their network, I betcha they'll start vacating EVE. |

Rhinanna
CyberShield Inc ROMANIAN-LEGION
100
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:22:00 -
[54] - Quote
Kitten -> Worst idea ever, you realise that a lot of the RMT sites are scams and will just steal your credit card info? Lets not have CCP encouraging people to visit these sites please!
Everyone else accusing people of Botting/RMTing, either show some evidence or shut the hell up please. You are just making yourself look stupid (or more stupid in some cases)
While I'm sure there are botters and RMTers in game, the number from what I've seen that I would even think are bots not players is in the 0.1% range, aka not a massive problem and eventually they will get caught. The reason you often don't see action on the 'report bots' is because when they find a bot, they want to find where the money is going. There is no point in banning the botting account without banning the master and control accounts which are holding the ISK and doing the sales. These accounts been shut down are what really hurt the RMTers and thats why CCP target them. -The sword is only as sharp as the one who wields it! Other names: Drenzul (WoT, WoW, Lineage 2, WarH, BloodBowl, BSG, SC2 and lots more)-á |

Kitten Arbosa
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:57:00 -
[55] - Quote
Rhinanna wrote:Kitten -> Worst idea ever, you realise that a lot of the RMT sites are scams and will just steal your credit card info? Lets not have CCP encouraging people to visit these sites please!
Everyone else accusing people of Botting/RMTing, either show some evidence or shut the hell up please. You are just making yourself look stupid (or more stupid in some cases)
While I'm sure there are botters and RMTers in game, the number from what I've seen that I would even think are bots not players is in the 0.1% range, aka not a massive problem and eventually they will get caught. The reason you often don't see action on the 'report bots' is because when they find a bot, they want to find where the money is going. There is no point in banning the botting account without banning the master and control accounts which are holding the ISK and doing the sales. These accounts been shut down are what really hurt the RMTers and thats why CCP target them.
Trust me, RMT's don't keep much actual ISK itself stored, and they sure don't have it on a "master" account. Actual RMT on a large scale is more one guy monitoring 10-15 accounts running macros. Call will come in for a sell, RMT company will consolidate amount needed from bots, then send via a throwaway account. Very compartmentalized, no "master account" to compromise.
The only way to beat RMTers would be to intercept the payment to the RMT site before it happened, which is impossible. Once they have the $$$, who cares what happens to the ISK buyer. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
352
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:58:00 -
[56] - Quote
Gonna have to paraphrase you Sreegs cuz 1) it's fun and 2) I like reading between the lines.
CCP Sreegs wrote: I'll address this as well as possible though to be frank I don't think the answer is one you'll find 100% satisfactory.
- We are not going to divulge numbers of employees devoted to security tasks.
- Less than we're proud of mentioning, more than comes to work without a hangover after the weekend.
Quote: - We have old and continue to implement new detections for various types of activity regularly
- We do the usual, you know, when anyone starts moving in on our unofficially official friends' operations.
Quote: - Leniency is relative. The numbers we've been collecting show that the current system of administrative actions is effective at curbing the behavior.
- Gotta give our FoC's (friends of CCP) time to prep new accounts.
Quote: - Never. Security is a process not a powerpoint presentation or a graph.
- Never....again shall we ban +6,000 accounts. Revenue is important.
Quote: Regarding insinuations of staff members being involved in RMT you may report allegations of misconduct to IA. Otherwise it would be pretty peachy if you would refrain from making allegations you have absolutely no reason to believe. If you have a reason to believe it and want it to stop I can only assume you'd report it. Otherwise the alternative is that you're just trying to cause trouble and that makes my job harder which is pretty uncool.
Regarding insinuations...please stop. It's important that we not highlight the implications of such large null alliances allowed to have rampant botting. I mean, how else does one explain it other than a complete and utter failure of policing or an acquiescence? Now, CCP is a very capable company. And we collect data on all activities. But, some how, we're totally oblivious to someone running 23/7 doing the same activity for that time period. The only rational conclusion is the latter. Do you realize how much money is involved in such activities? Instead of wasting resources on policing such efforts it's more profitable to make money on the front end (plex) and the back end (RMT). And we make it more profitable by policing competing factions who are not under our control paying up to the corp. So just stop making the insinuations else people wise up. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Andrea Griffin
80
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 17:48:00 -
[57] - Quote
Callic Veratar wrote:It irrelevant how many people are actually involved in RMT/bot detection. Even if it's ONLY CCP Sreegs, if the tools he develops are effective the job's being done. I'm certain that CCP has more than just Sreegs working on security, but even if it IS just Sreegs, we're in good hands. There isn't a single other CCP Dev that posts on these forums with such a too-the-point, cut-the-BS style. This guy means business and he takes his job seriously.
Sreegs is a dangerous man and it would not be wise to anger him. : > It's not you guys who need to repair what has been broken, it's us. CCP Wrangler |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
257
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:11:00 -
[58] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:[ I think that working on creative ways to report on that information would be far more effective to the playerbase than telling you how many people touch the problem, which is kinda the point. Communication about botting and RMT is certainly something we intend to be more open about in the future. I think as an example, I've given talks that have addressed the subject in a few venues in the past year but that information has never made its way to the forums, so I think maybe it's time to distill some of that into a blog and get it out to you guys to digest.
CCP Sreegs, when you get around to figuring out how to report information, think about what would generate deterrence. Right now there is little that deters a player from RMT and botting the first time. Once they get caught you have said the repeat rate is low, but what deters them form doing it the first time?
The EULA? If they read the EULA then they will see its a EULA violation. But not many read it and many who do may think its just empty words. News of bans and RMT isk removal? There is no such news. Dev blogs? All previous RMT and botting blogs are buried deep in the archives, and any new ones will join them a month or two after being published. Posts in the forum? Many do not read the forums and posts where the OP says they got caught are few and far between. Looking over the forums a player could easily get the idea that they will never be caught. Word of mouth? Again few talk about getting caught. If anything word of mouth revolves around how to not get caught.
My vote for deterrence is to have published information on the log-in screen about the anti-botting and anti-RMT effort, information that is always there, always up to date, continuous and persistent. Something like "Last week xx players were banned for botting, yy were banned for RMT and zz billion isk bought via RMT was removed from the game". That will make sure everyone is always reminded that CCP Sreegs and customer services will come for any EULA violator. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. Subscribers can never answer a question posed to CCP. Only CCP can. |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
608
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 06:14:00 -
[59] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote: My vote for deterrence is to have published information on the log-in screen about the anti-botting and anti-RMT effort, information that is always there, always up to date, continuous and persistent. Something like "Last week xx players were banned for botting, yy were banned for RMT and zz billion isk bought via RMT was removed from the game". That will make sure everyone is always reminded that CCP Sreegs and customer services will come for any EULA violator.
Or at least a once-per-quarter banner ad on the login screen that shows up for a few days (or 1-2 days per month on a random schedule). Dunno that it needs to be full time. If you're reminding players of things in the EULA (RMT, botting, account sharing, etc) on a monthly basis, that may be enough.
It would be a definite improvement over today's "seems like it's only mentioned once every leap year" situation. |

Avensys
United Highsec Front The 99 Percent
87
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 07:36:00 -
[60] - Quote
Mai Khumm wrote:Since CCP is active in this thread, I might as well ask a few questions myself...
you realize that this thread was necro'd and that Sreegs wrote his replies 3 months ago?
have you seen the devblog he promised?
(neither have I) |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |