No.

We allready have science-fiction types of shield. In fact every ship got one. Aswell as your pod.

Fit your glass cannon BCs less glassy, fixed.

As a hole rat, I've been working on sniping instrumental sites. The BS sleepers there sometimes alpha strike our little glass cannon BCs, at times up to 250 out. It shouldn't happen but it does and thats what we sign up for in our C5. So I got to thinking: how could we balance this out a bit

That's a bit closed minded. There's balancing going on to add depth to Eve all the time. Also, it's clear that you don't understand WH life, or glass cannons.

[...] We try to maximize our earnings with the fewest members possible, [...]

Greed is bad.

As a hole rat, I've been working on sniping instrumental sites. The BS sleepers there sometimes alpha strike our little glass cannon BCs, at times up to 250 out. It shouldn't happen but it does and thats what we sign up for in our C5. So I got to thinking: how could we balance this out a bit, and it came to me - a balanced force field ship.

A ship that can be fitted with a mini force field, modded for size and balanced for effectiveness. For instance, one mod would project a force field small but very strong, while a larger field would be weaker. The field would work like typical science fiction shields; ships could move through without problems, and you can target and shoot through them but they protect 100% of objects inside of them up until enough damage has been taken, and then they shut down for core recharge, which could take cap booster type charges and would have a cool down timer. Logistics ships would be able to boost the field strength with a energy emissions mod, or some other type of logi effect.

And the best part, both tanker types wouldn't be able to complain because the skills for this ship and mods would be independent of tanking skills, which is why I called it a force field instead of a shield ship.

Ideas? Maybe we can get some CCP input?

You are under the false assumption that CCP wants your ship to stay alive. They do not.

You are asking for a new ship that makes your life easier.
I put up the theory of "if its easier it should earn you less then before".

Your answer is lol. Well thought.

If you can't fleet up 3 x tengus or carrier + 1+ DPS ship to kill those BSs, move to lower class WH

Its not that new gameplay mechanics are bad, its just that you're suggesting a gimmicky one to solve a non-problem. Pointing this out is not the same as being closed-minded. I may not understand WH life, but there are very few reasons to use t3 snipers over BS snipers when hp is an issue. If you're using attack BC's because of cost or ease of getting the hulls in, then you're just being lazy.

Some in here told you how it works. You just refuse to listen. And say things like "but, but, but..."

Do I have to quote this 2 or 3 times? Obviously someone posting it once wasn't enough to end the thread.

30 force field ships all working so that one will activate the second another one goes down. Sure, why the **** not.

Let me clarify my earlier 'Use BSs' comment.

We do double cap ship escalations in all sites in our C6 and its various attached static C5s and to be honest that seems to be where the real money is.
In an ideal world to maximise isk we should run just carriers, dreads and loki webs, but we do things a bit differently because like you not everyone can/wants to fly cap ships and the inclusion of everyone in corp activities who wants to join in is always a good thing. As such we run 2 carriers and BSs for dps, usually with a Tengu or two, the odd Drake and a Loki.

I've seen a sleeper BS spawn two-shot through a 70k ehp shield buffer and put a battleship into structure from over 100km away. It mght not be supposed to happen but it does. A BC just can't tank that sort of damage, even with carrier/logi support. You are also limiting your outgoing dps, and hence isk efficiency by using long range BCs with either long range ammo or fighting in deep falloff.
Our BSs generally put out ~1k dps each (depending on range/ammo ofc) and we recommend a minimum of about 80k ehp to avoid being alpha'd. You just can't do that efficiently in a sniper BC.

I can see what you are wanting to do in your BCs, and yeah, it's do-able if you are willing to trade it off for questionable isk efficiency and accept a few losses to sleepers here and there. Hell, it's probably even good fun, props for doing it 'outside the box'.
It is not, however how I believe the sites were designed to be run or indeed how they were balanced. They seem clearly designed around cap / BS / T3 fleets and glass cannon BCs will always have a bit of a hard time.

(Also if you get jumped a sniper BC fleet can be nuked by a few bombers, a 2 x carrier backed BS fleet - with pvp ships ready in the hanger - can put up a damn good fight)

As a hole rat, I've been working on sniping instrumental sites. The BS sleepers there sometimes alpha strike our little glass cannon BCs, at times up to 250 out. It shouldn't happen but it does and thats what we sign up for in our C5. So I got to thinking: how could we balance this out a bit, and it came to me - a balanced force field ship.

A ship that can be fitted with a mini force field, modded for size and balanced for effectiveness. For instance, one mod would project a force field small but very strong, while a larger field would be weaker. The field would work like typical science fiction shields; ships could move through without problems, and you can target and shoot through them but they protect 100% of objects inside of them up until enough damage has been taken, and then they shut down for core recharge, which could take cap booster type charges and would have a cool down timer. Logistics ships would be able to boost the field strength with a energy emissions mod, or some other type of logi effect.

And the best part, both tanker types wouldn't be able to complain because the skills for this ship and mods would be independent of tanking skills, which is why I called it a force field instead of a shield ship.

Ideas? Maybe we can get some CCP input?

Funny. Sounds like you're all doing the same thing. Glass houses, rocks, dude.

I take it you don't bother earning ISK then.