|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Takseen
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
354
   |
Posted - 2013.03.12 18:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sariah Kion wrote:Andski wrote:Andski wrote:Sariah Kion wrote:No, no its not. okay guy since you clearly know about sovereignty, explain the process of taking a station system in detail notice that the npc alt has not responded to this question Becasue its a strawman. Its common knowledge how SOV works.
I don't know how SOV works, and I've been playing for years. I hear that's its kinda like FW Sov, but without any of the anti-blob mechanics, and more EHP. |
Takseen
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
354
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 18:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Klymer wrote:Andski wrote:also i don't mean bumping npc corp taxes to 35%
i quite literally mean a hisec-wide tax That wouldn't make a difference really as everything on the market would just increase by at least that much if not more to make up the difference. I'd also wager that you would see a large number of subscriptions lapse.
Once you dig deep enough this seems to be the main argument against nerfing highsec. Honestly if someone making slightly less spacebucks every month makes them quit Eve, were they really having that much fun to begin with? |
Takseen
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
354
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jireel wrote:Just wanting to point out that being bored with highsec and having no interest in nullsec, there is still the third option avaliable, that is to say hello to sleepers.
Are there enough livable wormholes to support nullsec's population? |
Takseen
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
354
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sariah Kion wrote:
I dont think Malcanis is fooling many voters honestly. I think most take his rhetoric as just trying to pander to the Null Alliance voting block. He is definitely not the type of candidate that is in the best interests of the majority of players in High Sec. and I would suspect he will get minimal votes from them.
He's got my vote anyway. CCP has already adopted a good chunk of his manifesto, here's hoping they get the rest of it done too.
My favourite position of his is the recognition that highsec has moved on from the "newbie area that everyone is expected to leave eventually", to just a place for a more casual and relaxed operating environment. |
Takseen
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
354
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Takseen wrote:Jireel wrote:Just wanting to point out that being bored with highsec and having no interest in nullsec, there is still the third option avaliable, that is to say hello to sleepers. Are there enough livable wormholes to support nullsec's population? If they stopped blobbing and a whole ton of them ~manned up~ and went back to highsec, why not.
Your response didn't make any sense. Was it supposed to be from your Sarah Kion account? |
Takseen
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
355
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jireel wrote:Takseen wrote:Jireel wrote:Just wanting to point out that being bored with highsec and having no interest in nullsec, there is still the third option avaliable, that is to say hello to sleepers. Are there enough livable wormholes to support nullsec's population? Considering C4 are completely desert and the ridiculous shittons of money you can make out of a C5-C6 when done correctly, yes
Oh good. On the other hand, they're kinda hard and stuff... |
|
|
| |
|