| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ghost of Truth
State War Academy
Caldari State
0
   |
Posted - 2011.11.05 00:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
m3talc0re X wrote:PinkKnife wrote:I think originally that was the plan. If you'll notice the two types of command ships, one is more combat oriented. It makes perfect sense to have the field command ship be the teir 2 version. It would be easier to simply convert the stats over to the new ships. So the Absolution would then be a harbinger hull, instead of a prophecy hull.
Likewise you'd have a myrm and brutix command ship, a t2 hurricane and claymore, etc.
You would need some rebalancing of the bonuses and such, but it makes sense and keeps you from having to redesign/balance a whole new class of ship. This. I've been saying this for a while now. The command ships need to be one of each hull. Say Ferox = Vulture and Drake = Nighthawk. It just makes sense...
Agreed.Just take a T2 back And make a Drake/Cane etc new T2 with pros and cons for balance.Solved. |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 03:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
So much stupidity in this thread... I can't help smiling.
Your fugly drake was introduced at least a year later after NH and the same for the rest. So GFY.
And no, you can't get you already overpowered ships in tech2 hull. That's just too much to ask for.
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is"
2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?"
Nice progress, guys. |
Tyme Xandr
State Protectorate
Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 05:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:So much stupidity in this thread... I can't help smiling.
Your fugly drake was introduced at least a year later after NH and the same for the rest. So GFY.
And no, you can't get you already overpowered ships in tech2 hull. That's just too much to ask for.
I can feel the anger dwelling within you. |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 11:43:00 -
[34] - Quote
No anger, just sympathy for the ungifted ones. These pathetic threads pop up on a monthly basis.
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is"
2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?"
Nice progress, guys. |
Tyme Xandr
State Protectorate
Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:14:00 -
[35] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:No anger, just sympathy for the ungifted ones. These pathetic threads pop up on a monthly basis.
Gooooooooood. [ clasps hands together ] |
Jon Marburg
The Executioners
Merciless.
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:20:00 -
[36] - Quote
If CCP is going to make more Tech 2 battlecruisers, they are going to need to fill a different role than the current ones that already exist. There is no reason just to add more ships just to have more ships. Find a new purpose or reason for them, then we'll talk. |
Tyme Xandr
State Protectorate
Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:35:00 -
[37] - Quote
Jon Marburg wrote:If CCP is going to make more Tech 2 battlecruisers, they are going to need to fill a different role than the current ones that already exist. There is no reason just to add more ships just to have more ships. Find a new purpose or reason for them, then we'll talk.
But wouldn't it be nice?
As others have stated before it would be nice if the tier one BC's were the CS focused T2 BC's and the tier 2 BC's were the combat focused CS's.
Although, personally I think it would be nice if all T2 ships were altered to look different instead of an antenna here or there and an additional hard point slot on the recolored skin. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |