|
| Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
 Reto The Last Resort    |
Posted - 2006.12.31 00:23:00 -
[1] Edited by: Reto on 31/12/2006 00:25:00 Edited by: Reto on 31/12/2006 00:23:50 [replying to a fake necroed thread] alright i just read w0lverines post and cba to read the rest. back to topic. cargobay size is imo fair. cap booster charges + intese ammo use for blasters make it clearly necessary in my eyes. imo all ammo using ships especially ac and blasters need a bay which can carry enuff for extended fights. especially since ccp decided to make combat last longer. and btw: caracal 450m¦ stabber 420m¦ zealot 450m¦ thorax 450m¦ all of those are ships which depend on intense use of ammo/missles or capbooster charges. i for my part think the rax is not overpowered here by any means. P.S. w0lverine u owe me 2 valuable minutes of my life replying to ur thread and explaining u the mysteries of logic... [/replying to a fake necroed thread]
|
Originally by: s4mp3r0r| Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,13s, ref 20251021/1748 EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP. |
| COPYRIGHT NOTICE EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website. |