EVE Search - Introducing myself and asking for help with balance!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Introducing myself and asking for help with balance!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 7 post(s)
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 858	Posted - 2013.03.21 15:13:00 - [1] - Quote welcome new balance overlord! umm... t3 bc's? nerf bat! personally i would make the 8th high slot utility only and slightly reduce the agility of them... as for bs's... it seems like we need more hulls 3 is too few... bs's should be like frigs... so we need perhaps 2 more hulls... i am thinking we need one attact bs two combat bs one logistics bs and one e-war bs... i would make the combat ones have current tier III ehp and the attack ones have current tier 1 ehp and the e-war/logi ones have current tier II ehp... thats all for now... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 858	Posted - 2013.03.21 15:21:00 - [2] - Quote apox could use an overhaul... get ride of the cap bonus and replace iwht drone hp/damage bonus... but keep the napoc the same... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 859	Posted - 2013.03.21 19:12:00 - [3] - Quote TrouserDeagle wrote: Abaddon still hasn't got its own role. . Stopped read right there... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 859	Posted - 2013.03.21 19:15:00 - [4] - Quote mynnna wrote: I don't have any thoughts (yet, I'll work on that), but the fact that you're asking for high level/meta discussion right now doesn't necessarily bode well for making the Summer release deadline that everyone at least thought you were aiming for. Have faith young padawan... The Cylons have a plan... and remember some of the better balance have come in the 1.1 version... perhaps 1.0 is new ships we have no idea about just yet.... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 860	Posted - 2013.03.21 19:18:00 - [5] - Quote Sigras wrote: I feel like the talos needs to lose its drones, and tracking bonus in exchange for a falloff bonus; this would make it the kitier bigger brother to the brawler brutix. As far as which amarr battleship should be changed, I kinda like where they all are right now, but if one has to be changed, I vote apoc; the fact that it out DPSs the Rokh at all ranges > 15km is just wrong to me . . . wow those changes to the talos would be sick! whats the range we are looking at with a 10% to falloff on large neutrons with null? with two te II? blasters the new autocannon? Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 860	Posted - 2013.03.21 19:21:00 - [6] - Quote Steel Roamer wrote: MeBiatch wrote: TrouserDeagle wrote: Abaddon still hasn't got its own role. . Stopped read right there... Maybe if you were literate you would understand that he is right. PLATES + PULSES = BRAWL is the formula for both. or plates and 1400's plus you get great dps without having to rely on the heavy drones... hands down the abbadon is the better ship... then the regular geddon... if any ship needs a change is the tech I apoc... then again tachs need a looking at too... but i am sure that will be looked at when they balance bs's... oh and see my sig for spelling... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 860	Posted - 2013.03.21 19:29:00 - [7] - Quote Sigras wrote: MeBiatch wrote: Sigras wrote: I feel like the talos needs to lose its drones, and tracking bonus in exchange for a falloff bonus; this would make it the kitier bigger brother to the brawler brutix. As far as which amarr battleship should be changed, I kinda like where they all are right now, but if one has to be changed, I vote apoc; the fact that it out DPSs the Rokh at all ranges > 15km is just wrong to me . . . wow those changes to the talos would be sick! whats the range we are looking at with a 10% to falloff on large neutrons with null? with two te II? blasters the new autocannon? while thats true, it would be far more vulnerable to being tackled by frigates because with no tracking bonus and no drones, a noobship could take it out. alpha it when its on low transversal? but thats also true for the other 3 ships too right? dont get me wrong i love the talos as is though i do heavily feel its op with 5 lights... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 860	Posted - 2013.03.21 20:11:00 - [8] - Quote ovenproofjet wrote: We all know you hate ECM. Could you just delete it and start again? i came up with this nifty idea where ecm no longer breaks the lock of a ship but actually helps in determining the quality of a hit! usually the chance to hit number is rated against x which is a random number generated between 0.001 to 1.0 which determind if a. the shot hits and b. how much damage the shot will do. so the better your ships sensor strength the less damage is done to you and i fyou have enough ecm on you your sensor strenth goes down to 0 where shots can start doing wreking damage more often and less slightly hit.. it would take alot of work but i feel it would make ecm a balanced and not op game mechanic Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
MeBiatch Republic University Minmatar Republic 877	Posted - 2013.03.22 19:05:00 - [9] - Quote Andrea Griffin wrote: I am not particularly interested in seeing EWar battleships. We have EWar frigates, cruisers, EAFs, and Recons to fill the EWar role. I would much rather see a line of battleships that were EWar-resistant instead. I'm not suggesting that it is a necessary or even needed role, just that between the two, I would pick the latter. What like bonus for romote assistance mods like rsb, tracking links, and eccm projected? Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.