| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
StiZum Hilidii
   |
Posted - 2005.08.31 22:40:00 -
[91]
saladin maybe you can point out when this has occured as i have never been in an atuk login trap.
your rage towards us gives us alot of laughs but serious dude your obsession with us would even worry bush voters.
seriously dude. with this much rage you must find it hard to see our killboards and stuff.
it must really rage you to realise you will never have the same impact on the game that atuk does.
oh well
sucks for you
show me an atuk login trap though as i would like to know who did it.
STAN
FACTA NON VERBA
BRING BACK MMO CASINO |
Marcus Aurelius
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 22:41:00 -
[92]
Login traps were no logner an exploit because there are not that many waprs ingame that take longer to complete then it takes 10 people to logon coordinatedly and take control of theri ships after they exit warp.
That means that a logon trap had very little chance of success seeing how targets could run when they saw local jumping up. Still, that was not satisfactory since it allows for logogn traps to be used effectively when there's an ongoing fight already, but al teast it was somewhat under control.
But, frieghters and dreads chagne that with their slow warps. You can now log in and know that freighter is still in warp to you, just because it is so damn slow.
Still takes very good timing, but nonetheless a good reason for CCP to reevaluate their GM instructions.
|
Elenia Kheynes
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 22:47:00 -
[93]
 Originally by: Acier
Olly - we did scout.. do you really think that the corp who makes you stay in your SS many a day on your alts didn't scout this freighter route properly and watch.. they did a login trap m8.. the thing moves at .6au.. they were on the gate and no matter how many ships we had (unless it was like 40) they could pop the poor thing.. it was just a very well planned and done login trap. There was NO one in any neighboring system, the right side of screen lit up - they logged in - they showed up at gate in jump range.. choices were limited and they do know how to gank well.
I didn't only stay in my safespot my dear 
I also ganked a few sponsored corps around and tried to set up a warp bubble camping 4 jumps from your HQ 
Anyway... I guess if RAT got a spy in your corp you'll have to be careful while at a safespot... Maybe I should contact them to see if I can work with their spy (well, I would prolly have to buy a russian translator tho... hmmm... sucks  )
Dear friendly customer... Can I have your money ?
|
Vince Draken
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 23:27:00 -
[94]
Originally by: Corak
CCP you can work or you can only do **** in this game if your GM is ideots or they work on 1 said its your problem .
we send your GM`s lot petitions about logoff and login tactic who use enemies 1 year ago and your GM`s send back - this is not exploit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ meby 10 BS RAT crashed at gate atm in this pache its can be posible 5 times in 1 h .
if you replace this friter to The Five member meby you replace us losts BS who we lost in wars VS XANADU or in HED-GP i remember XIF members login when we be in fight vs same forses and kill ~6 us BS ????????????? (we send petition to your GM`s and they answere be - its not exploit !!!!!!!!
WTF you do CCP ????
want baned me go do this but your GM`s not play clear its 100% .
i can post lot things were they work on 1 said .
when tis last pache be in game we lost lot of POSes were [5] use drones and we send lot petitions and don`t got unswere from GM`s only they send to us - this is not us problem *GM`s .
your GM`s have alts who mining and sell isks on ebay and you don`t do nothing.
60% of all EVE players sell isks on ebay its easy found but your GM`s do only what they need .
its not to all GM`s but CCP if you create this cool game meby you can work for peoples who give every months money ????????????
|
Ruffio Sepico
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 23:33:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Vince Draken
Originally by: Corak
CCP you can work or you can only do **** in this game if your GM is ideots or they work on 1 said its your problem .
we send your GM`s lot petitions about logoff and login tactic who use enemies 1 year ago and your GM`s send back - this is not exploit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ meby 10 BS RAT crashed at gate atm in this pache its can be posible 5 times in 1 h .
if you replace this friter to The Five member meby you replace us losts BS who we lost in wars VS XANADU or in HED-GP i remember XIF members login when we be in fight vs same forses and kill ~6 us BS ????????????? (we send petition to your GM`s and they answere be - its not exploit !!!!!!!!
WTF you do CCP ????
want baned me go do this but your GM`s not play clear its 100% .
i can post lot things were they work on 1 said .
when tis last pache be in game we lost lot of POSes were [5] use drones and we send lot petitions and don`t got unswere from GM`s only they send to us - this is not us problem *GM`s .
your GM`s have alts who mining and sell isks on ebay and you don`t do nothing.
60% of all EVE players sell isks on ebay its easy found but your GM`s do only what they need .
its not to all GM`s but CCP if you create this cool game meby you can work for peoples who give every months money ????????????
Yeah well, just imagine a lot of chinese players
Home: http://www.hidden-agenda.co.uk
HiD Kills: http://eve.hidden-agenda.co.uk/kill_list.php
|
YZAAR
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 23:33:00 -
[96]
If you want to kill a Freighter make a blockade with Battleships, Support ships, bubbles, drones and what u want.. But a login trap...shame on you. nothing to be proud...
|
Vince Draken
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 23:42:00 -
[97]
Originally by: Ruffio Sepico
Originally by: Vince Draken
Originally by: Corak
CCP you can work or you can only do **** in this game if your GM is ideots or they work on 1 said its your problem .
we send your GM`s lot petitions about logoff and login tactic who use enemies 1 year ago and your GM`s send back - this is not exploit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ meby 10 BS RAT crashed at gate atm in this pache its can be posible 5 times in 1 h .
if you replace this friter to The Five member meby you replace us losts BS who we lost in wars VS XANADU or in HED-GP i remember XIF members login when we be in fight vs same forses and kill ~6 us BS ????????????? (we send petition to your GM`s and they answere be - its not exploit !!!!!!!!
WTF you do CCP ????
want baned me go do this but your GM`s not play clear its 100% .
i can post lot things were they work on 1 said .
when tis last pache be in game we lost lot of POSes were [5] use drones and we send lot petitions and don`t got unswere from GM`s only they send to us - this is not us problem *GM`s .
your GM`s have alts who mining and sell isks on ebay and you don`t do nothing.
60% of all EVE players sell isks on ebay its easy found but your GM`s do only what they need .
its not to all GM`s but CCP if you create this cool game meby you can work for peoples who give every months money ????????????
Yeah well, just imagine a lot of chinese players
Not laughing at the grammer, just the redicliusness of it. I think someones smoked a little too much tbfh.
I dont know what part is better, the ebaying GM part, or the part where he suggests they 'crashed', despite them admitting they pulled a login trap.
Either way, its great stuff and saved to a text file for future references.
|
MOHOMAX
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 23:52:00 -
[98]
Originally by: YZAAR
If you want to kill a Freighter make a blockade with Battleships, Support ships, bubbles, drones and what u want.. But a login trap...shame on you. nothing to be proud...
If you want you freighter to arrive intact to its destination have a proper escort traveling with it. Scouts, shmouts ... Just admit it, you did not have enough firepower to protect 2bil ship designed to for cargo capacity, not for combat. Act like men, accept you loss and continue to fight.
|
Randorial
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 23:54:00 -
[99]
Originally by: MOHOMAX
Originally by: YZAAR
If you want to kill a Freighter make a blockade with Battleships, Support ships, bubbles, drones and what u want.. But a login trap...shame on you. nothing to be proud...
If you want you freighter to arrive intact to its destination have a proper escort traveling with it. Scouts, shmouts ... Just admit it, you did not have enough firepower to protect 2bil ship designed to for cargo capacity, not for combat. Act like men, accept you loss and continue to fight.
The thing is, even if they brought 40 bs
There could be 60 logged off. Which makes the game ghey. funny seeing russians use "debatable" tactics.
|
Virgo I'Platonicus
|
Posted - 2005.08.31 23:56:00 -
[100]
Originally by: FOEHAMMER006
You guys are upset that you lost a freighter, Get over it. You lost it, done and done. The GMs said themselves they saw no illegal activity, So get over it. End of story.
We didnt start this thread. We lost a useful and expensive ship. I think we have the right to be a little annoyed when some1 starts making thread like this afterwards.
br,
V.
Soči------------------------
Krasna si bistra hči planin,
bistra v prirodni si lepoti,
ko ti prodornih globočin,
nevihte temne srd ne zmoti.
-----------S. Gregorčič |
j0sephine
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 00:01:00 -
[101]
"Scouts, shmouts ... Just admit it, you did not have enough firepower to protect 2bil ship designed to for cargo capacity, not for combat."
If the protection was so inadequate, why stoop to the desperate login trap tactics in the first place..?
Rod wins the thread, btw. >>;
|
The Slayer
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 00:02:00 -
[102]
Bad tactics well used. Had it been left at that I spose I might have given props for the first freighter kill, but to drag it into the forums like this..... low.
_______________________________________________________
|
ezzle
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 00:09:00 -
[103]
Double standards in EVE?
Surely you jest!
|
IamBen
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 00:16:00 -
[104]
"Why dont you just ban all accounts from russian speaking players. Seems that we are too hardcore, to mess with."
lol.
|
thoradh
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 00:28:00 -
[105]
Edited by: thoradh on 01/09/2005 00:29:45
War is hell.
Good kill RAT 
>
> Noli illegitimi carborundum!
> |
MOHOMAX
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 01:15:00 -
[106]
Originally by: j0sephine
"Scouts, shmouts ... Just admit it, you did not have enough firepower to protect 2bil ship designed to for cargo capacity, not for combat."
If the protection was so inadequate, why stoop to the desperate login trap tactics in the first place..?
Desperate tactics? Pah-leez. Blocade, scores of battleships, bubbless ... Not even [5] would try and run a freighter through this, they use scouts, right? In fact, the _only_ way to kill a freighter is a surprise attack.
Now, as it was said many times on this thread, this is a war (which we did not start, BTW). There is a warfare concept called "risk management". [5] did not have to run a freighter through 0.0. We don't do it. This has nothing to do with cowardise. Overconfidence gets punished. They gambled, they lost, nothing more to it.
Hint: if you really have to run a freighter through 0.0 do it at 6am Moscow time. Hey, this is using "game mechanics" of sorts, right?
Desperate .. huh ... Running to GMs crying is desperate (for an alliance of 1135 members)
|
Metal Dude
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 01:21:00 -
[107]
What goes around, comes around. Enough said. Good kill.
The truth will set you free
* Proud to be ATUK * |
FOEHAMMER006
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 01:29:00 -
[108]
Originally by: Metal Dude
What goes around, comes around. Enough said. Good kill.
Finally someone that can accept a loss. 
Diplomat at your service |
StiZum Hilidii
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 01:30:00 -
[109]
Edited by: StiZum Hilidii on 01/09/2005 01:30:44
Originally by: MOHOMAX
Originally by: j0sephine
"Scouts, shmouts ... Just admit it, you did not have enough firepower to protect 2bil ship designed to for cargo capacity, not for combat."
If the protection was so inadequate, why stoop to the desperate login trap tactics in the first place..?
Desperate tactics? Pah-leez. Blocade, scores of battleships, bubbless ... Not even [5] would try and run a freighter through this, they use scouts, right? In fact, the _only_ way to kill a freighter is a surprise attack.
Now, as it was said many times on this thread, this is a war (which we did not start, BTW). There is a warfare concept called "risk management". [5] did not have to run a freighter through 0.0. We don't do it. This has nothing to do with cowardise. Overconfidence gets punished. They gambled, they lost, nothing more to it.
Hint: if you really have to run a freighter through 0.0 do it at 6am Moscow time. Hey, this is using "game mechanics" of sorts, right?
Desperate .. huh ... Running to GMs crying is desperate (for an alliance of 1135 members)
i think after what you wrote about 6am moscow time we all know your style.
you said 6am moscow time was game mechanics
LOGIN TRAPS ARE NOT.. i wrote that in capitals cos i know it takes a while for something to get through to you guys.
but yes your right about the 5am moscow thing. thats the only mechanic russian alliance knows. wait until all enemy are logged of and then proceed to erect pos.
funny we were told at the begining of this omg russians know how to fight.
well tbh i dunno what happened to russian alliance but they have yet to put up a proper fight for their space.
RAT you scored a high cost kill with very questionable tactics. nothing more.
well see you on the battle field rat
well see your handy work red alliance / shame we wont see you in person though :(
STAN
FACTA NON VERBA
BRING BACK MMO CASINO |
j0sephine
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 02:43:00 -
[110]
"Desperate tactics? Pah-leez. Blocade, scores of battleships, bubbless ... Not even [5] would try and run a freighter through this, they use scouts, right? In fact, the _only_ way to kill a freighter is a surprise attack."
The bold part rings about true; the desperate tactics part would be, that the only way of organizing surprise attack you were capable of, was a login trap.
Kinda sucks first freighter to be blown up in game went in lame way... but oh well.
|
|
Abdalion
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 02:44:00 -
[111]
Locked pending review.
Click.
--
I ♥ You.... ® Shepherd of the [23] |
|
|
Abdalion
|
Posted - 2005.09.01 02:49:00 -
[112]
Post will remain locked for posting private communications with a GM.
StayClick.
--
I ♥ You.... ® Shepherd of the [23] |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |