EVE Search - Sticky:[Odyssey] Module Rebalancing Part One: RSBs and TEs

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Odyssey] Module Rebalancing Part One: RSBs and TEs

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 23 post(s)
AlexKent Silver Guardians Fidelas Constans 0	Posted - 2013.03.27 08:08:00 - [1] - Quote For once there was a tiny bit of balance between races, now with this stupid TE you will be making Gallente and Minnie crap again... IMO this nerf is completely unjustified and will just cause more damage than good. Please don't fix what does not need fixing CCP.
AlexKent Silver Guardians Fidelas Constans 0	Posted - 2013.03.27 08:38:00 - [2] - Quote Naomi Knight wrote: AlexKent wrote: For once there was a tiny bit of balance between races, now with this stupid TE you will be making Gallente and Minnie crap again... IMO this nerf is completely unjustified and will just cause more damage than good. Please don't fix what does not need fixing CCP. so what dmg does it cause? huh? that shield tanked nano gall ships cant kite as good ? quess what they never intended for that role and for winmatar when was the last time minmatar was crap??? it has been years since matard is the dominant race in small pvp, cause they are so op , they loose like 0 dps due to insane falloff at kite range , machariel 80km+ falloff with a short range gun ,yeah that is so balanced Blasters will be ** again. Huge damage means nothing if you can't project it. Just because matar is the dominant race in pvp does not mean it needs a kick in the nuts, other races should be brought up to par. The reason minnie ships work is the AC falloff that compensates for arty being ** (besides alpha). Mach is 1.5b ship, it's supposed to be good as not everyone affords to buy and loose them. Look at the killboards, after last round of rebalancing you can see all kinds of ships being used, from small to big. Before that everyone was just flying drakes... Do you miss that? On topic: If this is supposed to be an AC nerf, just nerf the AC by reducing their falloff, don't nerf all the ships that use this module.
AlexKent Silver Guardians Fidelas Constans 0	Posted - 2013.03.27 08:45:00 - [3] - Quote Grath, Blaster-related do you consider this change to be necessary?
AlexKent Silver Guardians Fidelas Constans 0	Posted - 2013.03.27 08:57:00 - [4] - Quote In that case, maybe the TC needs a slight buff to compensate for the loss. I feel like blasters were finally decent, i really don't want to see blaster ships suffer from this change, IMO it's totally uncalled for. Maybe a small faloff buff is in order for blasters if this change makes it to TQ. Not enough to make them the new OP, FOTM guns, but just so they maintain current range.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.