| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3090
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 02:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Kara Khanate wrote:I don't think that the "Resource Redistribution" mentioned for Odyssey is completely designed to promote exploration. I do have some ideas on what it could involve.
Moon Mining
I think that the real intent for this change are the Tech moons, which I don't believe is an issue but rather a strategic monopoly. For Resource Redistribution of moon mining, I think the worst change (for players) is to add a max quantity available in each moon. Each DT, all moon goo types that were depleted the previous day are redistributed amongst all mine-able moons. This would require corporations to scout out new supplies of moon goo every time they deplete a moon. This could make the most valuable moons worthless overnight, and worthless moons valuable.
1. How many systems of Moons have you scanned?
2. There are ~500 Tech Moons* and ~265,000 mineable moons* in EVE. Assuming 30s per moon (incredibly conservative), and that everyone scanning moons shares information perfectly so there's no overlap(Haha), that's 2200 man hours of horrible work being inflicted on the playerbase every [period of time] (you chose: Day. You monster.).
3. Most small entities would not want a Tech moon popping up under their POS. They know it will get taken from them by a bigger entity well before the Tech output covers the value of the POS (if they even notice). This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3090
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 03:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:I can't believe you are actually excited about sneaking into someones space and mining. It would be like breaking into a house and stealing a bic pen out of their desk doing your taxes with their pen then giving yourself a hug about it.
FYP. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3090
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 03:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:SmilingVagrant wrote:I can't believe you are actually excited about sneaking into someones space and mining. It would be like breaking into a house and stealing a bic pen out of their desk then giving yourself a hug about it. Now listen carefully, Grasshopper: swarms come in all sorts of variety. There's your type of swarm of kids without a clue. There's swarms that fight like killer bees; and there's swarms of blowflies that lay eggs and eat their hosts inside out. Ninja mining is the latter. Blob meet the ultimate blob eater. 
Yes, steal from the unlimited font of ore available from Industry sites. That'll show them.
By the way, a more effective way to harass people in Nullsec would be to sneak in and take assets from them that have... well... actual value. Like ratting ships. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3093
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 05:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:I'm talking about all out resource warfare.
One little parasite at a time about 10000001x a day.
Nibbling on ore by one swarm. Moon goo swarm on another. Exploration swarm on gas harvests.
There's no Orkin in space and three things that will always survive: roaches, ants and flies.
No, what you're doing is demonstrating that you have no knowledge of the game mechanics you're discussing.
Quick quiz: What do you think happens to a Sov-Upgrade Grave Site when the Ore in it is Exhausted: a) Respawns Immediately b) Respawns the next day c) Never respawns
Quote:You can get rats anywhere, but moon goo/ABC ore/choice gas clouds are in null.
You know that as well.
If you can get your sister corps to mine the high-sec ore wholesale, well enterprising indys can launch their own...swarms.
And as you can personally understand, it adds up quick.
I used to argue with the WoW devs about their philosophy of switching comfort zones regularly, but I can truly see it's value in EvE.
Ratting ships. As in the ships they use to rat. Why spend 20 hours [max, Rorq boosted Hulk] "removing" 1b ISK worth of Ark (which the system owner isn't likely interested in, and if they are will respawn as soon as they finish mining out the site) when you can spend 5 minutes (plus some time hunting) removing a ratting Vindicator (worth at least 1.5b) from them?
Again, nothing's stopping you from being an effective thorn in the side of the people you dislike (aside from your inane insistance that ninja mining is "annoying" or "effective" or "worth doing ever," of course). This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3093
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 05:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Steve Spooner wrote:Take all you want, the real valuable stuff are in the sites and good luck getting in to those without being instagibbed on warpin. This is the problem: you think XYZ is what indys just all want. If you're a ship builder you need mats that doesn't exist in high-sec (or even low-sec). High volume producers just buy the mats, but those who are being more self-sufficient and isk conscious, need small batches for their own supply. And there's many more of them than high volume producers.
.... and no surprise, you're one of the "Minerals I mine are free" crowd. Explains so much. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3094
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 07:23:00 -
[6] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:And that MACK cannot make it 24x7 unlike the POS, at most 23.5x7; if it tried CCP would be flagging it as a probable BOT
Nobody can ever have more than 500 Tech Moons. Ever.
There are sure as hell more than 500 Mackinaws mining at any given time. And you can create more at will (4 Mackinaws Multiboxing, which is trivial to control will earn more in 5 hours than a Tech moon earns in a day). This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3094
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 07:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Malcanis wrote: You seem to have some wrong assumptions about the value of mining Technetium. A Tech pos makes 7.2 million ISK per hour. A Mack mining Veldspar in empire makes about 10M/hr last I checked.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/TechnetiumMalcanis, how independent are you again?
100 units per hour. 24 hours a day. Look up market price for yourself and do the math. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3094
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 07:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:RubyPorto wrote: 100 units per hour. 24 hours a day. Look up market price for yourself and do the math.
Scroll down and read some...ah...history.
What is 75,000 ISK/unit times 100 Units?
Is it: a) 7.5 million ISK or b) some other number?
Also notice what happened to the largest Tech holding Bloc in the game in your "historical link". This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3103
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 22:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Also notice what happened to the largest Tech holding Bloc in the game in your "historical link". You're very selective in reading...
You seem to have no understanding of the actual events that that mediocre summary claims to represent.
And, last I checked, the NC held more Tech moons than the CFC does now.
So, what happened to the largest Tech holding bloc in the game? Curbstomped by a non-Tech holder. (I literally was there.)
And Tech prices now are far lower now than they were at the height of the NC*, so there's that.
*Primarily because of PT Alchemy. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3106
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 02:04:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:RubyPorto wrote:You seem to have no understanding of the actual events that that mediocre summary claims to represent. So you're saying to the world Evelopedia is lying? EvE has it on it's link bar, so would believe it's official even. So official site and history, and you're claiming it's all lies? /popcorn
It's written by volunteers that may not have taken any part in the events that they are writing about.
Even if we ignore the fact that EVElopedia often has wrong or misleading information about objectively measurable game mechanics, they may not be operating with enough information to write a good history book, and they are constrained by their format to writing a summary that leaves lots of things out.
It's like saying: "Here's what I read on the intro section of the WWII Wikipedia page, and that's all there is to know on the subject."
And again, the group that held the most Tech moons ever (at least since the R64 Nerf/Tech buff when Tech started mattering) was the NC. They got their **** kicked in by the DRF which did not own any Tech moons until they took them from the NC.
The CFC owns fewer Tech moons and earns less income per Tech moon than the Northern Coalition did. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3107
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 04:40:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sure. When you start demonstrating that you read and understand posts before responding to them. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3112
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 17:31:00 -
[12] - Quote
Murk Paradox wrote:You know, if moongoo is such a worthless commodity and doesn't really drive any conflict, let's just make it worthless.
All the people in charge of handling it are saying it's worthless, everyone who doesn't involve it aren't going to be involved, all it does is allow forum posts to get locked and spammed.
And, as seems to be the case whenever you claim people are saying something, nobody is saying that it's worthless.
We are just saying that it is Not True that "nobody can compete with Tech Income." And we've demonstrated (repeatedly), exactly how one person (or a group of people) can (and have) compete[d] with Tech Income. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3115
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 18:25:00 -
[13] - Quote
Nobody's saying that it wasn't broken, so what's your point?
Now there's Alchemy.
Murk Paradox wrote:Rephrased.
And no, you haven't demonstrated. You've used instances that don't compare to say they don't compare, but compete, which they don't, because they are different.
Income stream is income stream right?
First you used ice mining and 500 mackinaws as comparison to the # of tech moons. then you used the people who own set # of tech moons, then you used different levels of rates (Tippia did as well) to convalute such an idea back and forth to make it illegible.
Then claimed to have proven it? You've wrecked any sort of order out of the situation. You didn't prove or demonstrate anything to show how it could be compared or competed with (you keep saying you aren't trying to compare but in essence that needs to be done) , but used an entire seperate formula to come to the same number.
If you can reliably make more than 5b per month doing any activity, you can, individually, compete with the income from a Tech moon (which no individual can successfully hold). If your group of 10,000 (parity with GSF) can reliably make more than 250m/month doing any activity, you can compete with the sum total income from all Tech moons in the game.
That's all I've been saying. Ice mining was just an example of how trivial it is to compete with the income from a Tech moon. And to point out that there's a fixed number of Tech moons (under 500), so 500 Mackinaws mining Ice will produce more income than the sum total income of all Tech moons for the time that they are mining.
Quote:That's like saying you can scam 1 person out of 5bil at one time logging in once per month and that would be competitive to moon mining. Nope.
Quote:There's has even been seperate arguments to use fleets and defenses and cta's and man hours to show different variables that do not apply to ice mining, because if they were, the figures would be way different.
You even used stocks and bonds as an argument!
They aren't competitive or comparable either! They are 2 very seperate and different ways to make money. One matures over time, the other is using a variable market to change prices based on what someone is willing to pay for them (most tech moon holders I don't think even want to sell the moongoo based on the use of production).
And yet, though they're not directly comparable, stocks and bonds are competitive income sources.
Quote:You can't even state a simple sentence of explanation without using variables to try to prove a point. --> "And we've demonstrated (repeatedly), exactly how one person (or a group of people) can (and have) compete[d] with Tech Income."
Mine Ice 24/7 or Run missions for 5 hrs a day, or run ~5 reaction POSes, or run Incursions for an hour and a half a day.
All ways for an individual to compete with the income from a Tech moon.
A comparable group of people to the owners of Tech moons has it even easier. 25hrs of Ice mining/month per person, or 5hrs of Missions per month, or 2 and a half hours of Incursions per month. And that's to match the sum total income of All Tech moons in the game. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3117
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 20:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog wrote:That's definitely one way to look at it - nerf a portion of the game that people actually interact with on a regular basis to bring it down to what you consider average moon goo profit levels.
Or, we could go the other way with it, and compare moon goo to something that actually makes sense - PI. Let's just make it so PI pulls in about 7 million isk/hour, like moon goo! That'll make moon goo largely useless, and generate a lot more bottom-up revenue!
Stop with the full ****** analogies, the forums are dumb enough as it is.
How many systems have you scanned for moon goo?
Having moongoo redistribute among the 160,000 mineable moons would be akin to having l4 agents be randomly redistributed among all stations with no agent finder.
It's a pretty apt analogy.
He's not suggesting that CCP do either. He's just pointing out the scale on which redistribution schemes for moongoo are ****. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3117
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 20:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
Emu Meo wrote:The thread is missing the real point here in my opinion. Yes it is possible to compete with moon goo income, the issue is, is moon mining in its current form conducive to interesting a fun gameplay?
In my opinion, and also I believe CCPs opinion, it is not. It encourages a static and defensive behaviour with null entities unwilling to fight. So in essence, I think CCP will overhaul things as they clearly say they want null sec to become vibrant again as the clear opinion is that it has stagnated.
Arguing against tech moon changes is like trying to argue against the tide coming in.
1. Nobody's arguing against Tech changes*. Just against bad ones.
2. Tech is not the reason for stagnation (If it were, why isn't the NC still around?). And (as evidenced by the recent Sov changes in the East) the so-called "static" nullsec isn't very.
*I have my personal favorite suggestion: roll back the blueprint changes introduced with the R64 nerf, let R64s be the income moons (because they're distributed all over the map), and fix Sov. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3121
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 23:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Emu Meo wrote:Here is another anology - Tech moons in their current form is akin to having all wormhole and exploration signaures static and fixed in space never respawning. Ie once you've scanned them down, you never need to scan them down again.
Part of the interesting behaviour of wormholes and exploration sites are their dynamic behaviour.
You can make these analogies comparing apples to onions as the previous poster said, usually they are not of much use though. And interestingly enough, comparing "tech moons" to wormholes and exploration signatures is also comparing apples to oranges, because wormholes and exploration signatures don't need you to spend hours anchoring a POS and setting up a reaction farm to take proper advantage of a wormhole or an exploration signature, whereas to take advantage of any moongoo, the least amount of effort you have to do is haul in and anchor a POS with a miner and a silo, and to do a proper job of it you need to react that as well. And I'm going to bet on you not having spent any time, at all, with the POS interface in this fashion.
Also the sites being made static would be paying out a heck of a lot more than a Tech moon, and there are a lot more of them. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
| |
|