Originally by: dirtydave

---

im still wondering why mass an mass slave corps are flying along side virii when they have openly described the as "scum". Wasnt it these same slave corps that went whining to trigger that SE had let pirates roam SE space at will? and here they are now doing the exact same thing yet another two faced responce from these backstabbers.

---

Originally by: dirtydave

---

im still wondering why mass an mass slave corps are flying along side virii when they have openly described the as "scum". Wasnt it these same slave corps that went whining to trigger that SE had let pirates roam SE space at will? and here they are now doing the exact same thing yet another two faced responce from these backstabbers.

---

Originally by: Svabbi k

---

WTF?

---

Originally by: TIvian

---

Edited by: TIvian on 11/09/2005 11:10:10

Originally by: dirtydave

---

im still wondering why mass an mass slave corps are flying along side virii when they have openly described the as "scum". Wasnt it these same slave corps that went whining to trigger that SE had let pirates roam SE space at will? and here they are now doing the exact same thing yet another two faced responce from these backstabbers.

---

WTF did you just say? is it just me that doesn't understand what he is saying?
PIRATES!!! WHERE???? Yarrr

---

Originally by: Trakh Shardan

---

HAIL TRIGGER AND HAIL ME SELF

and ofc ood luck VIRII

---

Originally by: Gypsy Djinn

---

VIRII hereby publically announces mission "Seek and Destroy". We have begun actively hunting down, in their home space, ALL corporations and alliances who are public allies of the [5]. We will be moving in force into the respective "claimed" space of said allies and by luck of the draw the first area of operation is Stain Empire "controlled" space. SE has been given prior warning of our intent and this notice is to any other corporations or Alliances who maybe working in the area, as due to the flawed standings system in EVE VIRII work on a positive/hostile (there are no nuetrals) system, which is to say that we shoot all non-positive standing pilots wherever we encounter them. Please note that being active enemies of the [5] does not automatically preclude you from being fired on upon by VIRII pilots, although we certainly we be receptive to requests for non aggressive agreements with any group that actively fires on [5]. If your organization does not yet have a NAP with VIRII and would like to seek one please eve mail Lord Cyric, Gypsy Djinn or Jake Sisko in-game, post your request in our public Diplomacy forum or contact any VIRII member in game who will forward on your request (any group that has any mention of friendship of [5] corporations or publically admits same need not bother). Those groups who wish to avoid our presence in their space are directed to remove all mention of friendship to [5] corporations in bio's be it alliance, corporate or personal and contact us to inform us of same.

Please let the inevitable flames from [5] members, allies and alts commence but if you are a SE pilot might I suggest that you 1st check with your alliance mates as to the results of our 1st evening of limited incursions into your space before posting as not to look foolish when corrected, perhaps a better use of time would be to contact your new "allies" and ask for help, I am sure they will have no problem traveling up to help, being the trustworthy and honorable friends that they are.



V I R I I HeadQuarters
http://virii.homeip.net




V I R I I - We Are Here For Your Daughters

---

Originally by: Elenia Kheynes

---

Decision to support SA against SE was taken before the [5] gave support to SA.
We still shoot [5]. No hypocrisy from our part, it's just bull****ty politics from [5] & bandwagon that are messing up the whole thing.

---

Originally by: shivan

---

Originally by: Elenia Kheynes

---

Decision to support SA against SE was taken before the [5] gave support to SA.
We still shoot [5]. No hypocrisy from our part, it's just bull****ty politics from [5] & bandwagon that are messing up the whole thing.

---

That is 100% grade A BS and you know it, your intentions where to kill the [5] and ALL there allies, well SA are now alligned with [5] and we are fighting [5].

So your still digging yourself a deeper hole, would you like me to get you a bigger shovel?

---

Originally by: SPUFFofDoG

---

no problem really, your already at -10 along with every Satin Allaince member.

(typo intended unlike some did)

---

Originally by: Elenia Kheynes

---

Decision to support SA against SE was taken before the [5] gave support to SA.
We still shoot [5]. No hypocrisy from our part, it's just *snip* politics from [5] & bandwagon that are messing up the whole thing.

---

Originally by: shivan

---

Edited by: shivan on 11/09/2005 14:11:10
and i quote

Originally by: Gypsy Djinn

---

VIRII hereby publically announces mission "Seek and Destroy". We have begun actively hunting down, in their home space, ALL corporations and alliances who are public allies of the [5]. We will be moving in force into the respective "claimed" space of said allies and by luck of the draw the first area of operation is Stain Empire "controlled" space. SE has been given prior warning of our intent and this notice is to any other corporations or Alliances who maybe working in the area, as due to the flawed standings system in EVE VIRII work on a positive/hostile (there are no nuetrals) system, which is to say that we shoot all non-positive standing pilots wherever we encounter them. Please note that being active enemies of the [5] does not automatically preclude you from being fired on upon by VIRII pilots, although we certainly we be receptive to requests for non aggressive agreements with any group that actively fires on [5]. If your organization does not yet have a NAP with VIRII and would like to seek one please eve mail Lord Cyric, Gypsy Djinn or Jake Sisko in-game, post your request in our public Diplomacy forum or contact any VIRII member in game who will forward on your request (any group that has any mention of friendship of [5] corporations or publically admits same need not bother). Those groups who wish to avoid our presence in their space are directed to remove all mention of friendship to [5] corporations in bio's be it alliance, corporate or personal and contact us to inform us of same.

Please let the inevitable flames from [5] members, allies and alts commence but if you are a SE pilot might I suggest that you 1st check with your alliance mates as to the results of our 1st evening of limited incursions into your space before posting as not to look foolish when corrected, perhaps a better use of time would be to contact your new "allies" and ask for help, I am sure they will have no problem traveling up to help, being the trustworthy and honorable friends that they are.



V I R I I HeadQuarters
http://virii.homeip.net




V I R I I - We Are Here For Your Daughters

---

Orignal Post

---

Originally by: Elenia Kheynes

---

Decision to support SA against SE was taken before the [5] gave support to SA.
We still shoot [5]. No hypocrisy from our part, it's just *snip* politics from [5] & bandwagon that are messing up the whole thing.

Flame removed.Laurelin

---

Originally by: Drilla

---

Originally by: Elenia Kheynes

---

Decision to support SA against SE was taken before the [5] gave support to SA.
We still shoot [5]. No hypocrisy from our part, it's just *snip* politics from [5] & bandwagon that are messing up the whole thing.

Flame removed.Laurelin

---

Whatever excuse that let's you sleep better at night.

Fact of the matter is that you saw the chance for easy kills and took it regardless of your previous statements or intentions. If you were a corp that was true to your word you'd have helped SE against SA/5 but wait, that would mean no easy kills and people who can fight you back.

---

Originally by: Saladin

---

Its amazing how the bandwagon references come from people far removed from the region in question.

VIRII lived in stain for 2 months so far without problems. We fought, we npc'd, we did agent missions. There were only 2 days out of those 2 months where SE camped us in contunously with ridiculous numbers. On the second day we undocked, still outnumbered, and forced them to flee. VIRII went to great pains to find fights in Stain, in many instances engaging superior numbers (2:3 odds against us was not unsual) and jumped in on camps on several occassions. We are called station huggers but the fact remains that we never played the undock/dock game the way our enemies did. When hostiles were hard to come by, sure we put up a few bubbles to see what fish we would catch. In fact what impressed me most with VIRII was the degree of specialization of its members and the way everyone was willing to think outside the box and take calculated risks. This was never a quality I have found in any of my enemies, who only know one trick: Outnumber them and then get them to aggro. The One-trick ponies know who they are.


Drilla and others can re-post old posts until they are blue in the face. Policy change is something everyone goes through, and for us we felt that finishing off SE remnants and getting the current objective done was more important than going back to a policy statement months ago and see what to do next. We never anticipated that so many SE corps would join SA. Our corporation will always do what its members feel is best at the current time, and we will not be held hostage by PR statements and policy delcarations that were issued for a different set of circumstances. If you want to find a policy to lock us in to, then I will say that what VIRII wants from EVE is the same as what everyone else wants: Fun.

---

Originally by: Joshua Calvert

---

Bandwagons 4tw.

---

Originally by: Saladin

---

Drilla and others can re-post old posts until they are blue in the face.

---

Originally by: Saladin

---

Its amazing how the bandwagon references come from people far removed from the region in question.

VIRII lived in stain for 2 months so far without problems. We fought, we npc'd, we did agent missions. There were only 2 days out of those 2 months where SE camped us in contunously with ridiculous numbers. On the second day we undocked, still outnumbered, and forced them to flee. VIRII went to great pains to find fights in Stain, in many instances engaging superior numbers (2:3 odds against us was not unsual) and jumped in on camps on several occassions. We are called station huggers but the fact remains that we never played the undock/dock game the way our enemies did. When hostiles were hard to come by, sure we put up a few bubbles to see what fish we would catch. In fact what impressed me most with VIRII was the degree of specialization of its members and the way everyone was willing to think outside the box and take calculated risks. This was never a quality I have found in any of my enemies, who only know one trick: Outnumber them and then get them to aggro. The One-trick ponies know who they are.

Drilla and others can re-post old posts until they are blue in the face. Policy change is something everyone goes through, and for us we felt that finishing off SE remnants and getting the current objective done was more important than going back to a policy statement months ago and see what to do next. We never anticipated that so many SE corps would join SA. Our corporation will always do what its members feel is best at the current time, and we will not be held hostage by PR statements and policy delcarations that were issued for a different set of circumstances. If you want to find a policy to lock us in to, then I will say that what VIRII wants from EVE is the same as what everyone else wants: Fun.

---

Originally by: EB Xile

---

Originally by: Joshua Calvert

---

Bandwagons 4tw.

---

Bandwagons? We were killing SE before it became cool. We are not aligned with [5] in any form, if we see them, we shoot them. Now, the politics that led to our alignment with SA is entirely different. As our objective was: Destroy Stain Empire. Now, we are stuck in an odd situation. We were Allied with SA before [5]'s declaration of support who up to that time had been backing SE.
Now, here comes the tricky part for the rest of you folks. We decided to KEEP our alignment and finish off SE, because we are men of our word. Because [5] is a bunch of nap-a-holics doesnt mean we should change our stance toward SA. Our policy is proactive and reactive, not stagnent.

oh, btw there is no bandwagon...

---