EVE Search - Multi-boxing Navy Omens in EVE using ISBoxer

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Multi-boxing Navy Omens in EVE using ISBoxer

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ShadowandLight Gladiators of Rage R O G U E 69	Posted - 2013.04.07 06:15:00 - [1] - Quote http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlm4XrR0VvU Let me know what you think. Ill make another video soon showing mining and how to effectively use multiple accounts.
Domina Trix McKNOBBLER DRINKING CLAN 30	Posted - 2013.04.07 09:45:00 - [2] - Quote considering the popularity of multi-boxing I can see this thread going downhill quickly Two of the defining characteristics of a carebear are wanting other players to play the way the carebear wants and whining on the forums for the game to change when they don't. Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about wanting the game changed to suit them.
Thelonious Blake 46	Posted - 2013.04.07 10:06:00 - [3] - Quote Doesn't having multiple accounts make the game to feel too much as a "job"? Maybe it's just me, but I prefer playing with only one account at a time. I currently have only 1 account, and haven't had another one ever. I can "afford it" (via PLEXes) but I'm afraid it will suck out the fun of the game for me.
Rebecha Pucontis Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic 124	Posted - 2013.04.07 10:19:00 - [4] - Quote Nice video. But I don't think I would particularly enjoy running 16 accounts like that myself.
Sentamon 806	Posted - 2013.04.07 10:28:00 - [5] - Quote Thelonious Blake wrote: Doesn't having multiple accounts make the game to feel too much as a "job"? Maybe it's just me, but I prefer playing with only one account at a time. I currently have only 1 account, and haven't had another one ever. I can "afford it" (via PLEXes) but I'm afraid it will suck out the fun of the game for me. No ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~
Thelonious Blake 46	Posted - 2013.04.07 10:51:00 - [6] - Quote Sentamon wrote: No OK.
Sentamon 806	Posted - 2013.04.07 11:03:00 - [7] - Quote Thelonious Blake wrote: Sentamon wrote: No OK. Good! ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~
Brooks Puuntai Solar Nexus. 1290	Posted - 2013.04.07 11:27:00 - [8] - Quote Thelonious Blake wrote: Doesn't having multiple accounts make the game to feel too much as a "job"? Maybe it's just me, but I prefer playing with only one account at a time. I currently have only 1 account, and haven't had another one ever. I can "afford it" (via PLEXes) but I'm afraid it will suck out the fun of the game for me. Depends. Having 2-3 isn't bad, more so then that yes. Don't Vote for Malcanis New Eden Training Simulation. -áIdea to improve NPE.
Tauranon Weeesearch 143	Posted - 2013.04.07 11:35:00 - [9] - Quote Thelonious Blake wrote: Doesn't having multiple accounts make the game to feel too much as a "job"? Maybe it's just me, but I prefer playing with only one account at a time. I currently have only 1 account, and haven't had another one ever. I can "afford it" (via PLEXes) but I'm afraid it will suck out the fun of the game for me. Having one account in an orca effectively caddying a set of spaceships around for me is fun, and other ways the 2 accounts work together. That and having a full trained indy acct, that isn't messed in with this characters combat training. What I didn't find fun was plexing an account, so I wound up paying for both of mine, so that eve doesn't become like 9-5.
Ace Uoweme Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 99	Posted - 2013.04.07 13:42:00 - [10] - Quote Domina Trix wrote: considering the popularity of multi-boxing I can see this thread going downhill quickly It's not that multiboxing is evil (I multibox), it's when players don't use good judgment when using so many alts. If you were in a game and met a 40+ multiboxer, you'll learn quickly to dislike them being in group activities (no real way to counter them. Tactics like identifying and killing the main don't even work anymore). It makes a game not a "game" anymore. In WoW it's gotten to be in PvP with such multiboxers it's which team with less bots and multiboxers wins. Lead a BG there when a 40 boxer showed up. Manage to make the dude wait almost 2hrs for his "guaranteed win", but the outcome was assured as there's no means in the instance to remedy the situation. Solo activities no one cares. But in groups it becomes a bot vs bot fest. That isn't good. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
Jack Miton Aperture Harmonics K162 1576	Posted - 2013.04.07 13:54:00 - [11] - Quote I have no idea why CCP do not consider this an exploit but they really should. I run multiple accounts a LOT myself but don't use any lame ass software to bot it. If I was to change one single thing about EVE EULA it's make this garbage a ban-able offense.
ShadowandLight Gladiators of Rage R O G U E 74	Posted - 2013.04.07 15:23:00 - [12] - Quote Thelonious Blake wrote: Doesn't having multiple accounts make the game to feel too much as a "job"? Maybe it's just me, but I prefer playing with only one account at a time. I currently have only 1 account, and haven't had another one ever. I can "afford it" (via PLEXes) but I'm afraid it will suck out the fun of the game for me. There is certainly a point of diminishing returns depending on what you want to do with your alts. Dual boxing PVP accounts is pretty doable but beyond that it becomes hard to keep track of the battlefield. Thats why mining (for an example) is one area where you can maximize the effectiveness of your alts, although keeping up with the hauling can be tough :)
Sentamon 806	Posted - 2013.04.07 15:42:00 - [13] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: I have no idea why CCP do not consider this an exploit but they really should. I run multiple accounts a LOT myself but don't use any lame ass software to bot it. If I was to change one single thing about EVE EULA it's make this garbage a ban-able offense. rage! I think you should use a separate computer for each of your accounts, and with specs that only CCP allows! So there mr smart guy! ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~
Sentamon 806	Posted - 2013.04.07 15:45:00 - [14] - Quote Ace Uoweme wrote: In WoW it's gotten to be in PvP with such multiboxers it's which team with less bots and multiboxers wins. Lead a BG there when a 40 boxer showed up. Manage to make the dude wait almost 2hrs for his "guaranteed win", but the outcome was assured as there's no means in the instance to remedy the situation. Solo activities no one cares. But in groups it becomes a bot vs bot fest. That isn't good. Mutiboxers can only beat terrible players in PvP, and I mean REALLY terrible players. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~
Ace Uoweme Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 101	Posted - 2013.04.07 16:13:00 - [15] - Quote Sentamon wrote: So how exactly does the OP hurt you in EVE. Jump in with a small fleet and watch his computer melt. Easy kills. Have you met a multiboxer with such software? I show who I met... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amDdn8Iiqc0 Managed to ride his tail for almost 2hrs (only option available, as 35 accounts shooting at you is instagib). We pulled back so he wouldn't get his IWINs, and did our best to waste his time. Until he had a friend on OUR side who did his best to give him 40+ deaths by running up to him to die. That's how these dudes "win". You face that, you will never think it's "easy" to kill them, nor that it should be in the game. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
Thelonious Blake 47	Posted - 2013.04.07 18:28:00 - [16] - Quote Ace Uoweme wrote: Sentamon wrote: So how exactly does the OP hurt you in EVE. Jump in with a small fleet and watch his computer melt. Easy kills. Have you met a multiboxer with such software? I show who I met... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amDdn8Iiqc0 Managed to ride his tail for almost 2hrs (only option available, as 35 accounts shooting at you is instagib). We pulled back so he wouldn't get his IWINs, and did our best to waste his time. Until he had a friend on OUR side who did his best to give him 40+ deaths by running up to him to die. That's how these dudes "win". You face that, you will never think it's "easy" to kill them, nor that it should be in the game.
xarjin Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 13	Posted - 2013.04.07 18:54:00 - [17] - Quote ShadowandLight wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlm4XrR0VvU Let me know what you think. Ill make another video soon showing mining and how to effectively use multiple accounts. Great video thanks. more transparency and direction about multiboxing in eve is whats needed. this can only serve to further help dilute misunderstanding about multiboxing being botting. As someone that knows dozens of people within the multiboxing community including the author of pwnboxer who liked your video aswell i might add i'll be sure to pass this video around to others to promote eve multiboxing :) Another friend of mine multiboxes eve with 9 carcals and he'e been playing for around month and lives in nullsec. Multiboxing 9 Carcals
Deriah Book Fox Clan The Brotherhood Alliance 26	Posted - 2013.04.07 22:26:00 - [18] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: I have no idea why CCP do not consider this an exploit but they really should. I run multiple accounts a LOT myself but don't use any lame ass software to bot it. If I was to change one single thing about EVE EULA it's make this garbage a ban-able offense. That being said, I have met players in Eve for whom this type of box control would be, not only not a benefit, but a hindrance to their effectiveness. So the question is, does this type of functionality hurt Eve? If that mini swarm in the video came upon you, would it enhance your game? Sure, there is a lot of DPS. But there is also a fundamental flaw in how the pilot approaches the engagement mentally. Strategically.
I Love Boobies All Hail Boobies 411	Posted - 2013.04.07 23:20:00 - [19] - Quote Be a man, try that without a cheat program. removed inappropriate signature - CCP Eterne
James Amril-Kesh 4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance 4538	Posted - 2013.04.08 00:42:00 - [20] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: I have no idea why CCP do not consider this an exploit but they really should. I run multiple accounts a LOT myself but don't use any lame ass software to bot it. If I was to change one single thing about EVE EULA it's make this garbage a ban-able offense. More quality posts from Jack Miton. Apparently multiboxing software is "botting". Malcanis for CSM 8 Module activation timers are buggy - CCP please fix
James Amril-Kesh 4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance 4538	Posted - 2013.04.08 00:44:00 - [21] - Quote Ace Uoweme wrote: Sentamon wrote: So how exactly does the OP hurt you in EVE. Jump in with a small fleet and watch his computer melt. Easy kills. Have you met a multiboxer with such software? I show who I met... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amDdn8Iiqc0 Managed to ride his tail for almost 2hrs (only option available, as 35 accounts shooting at you is instagib). We pulled back so he wouldn't get his IWINs, and did our best to waste his time. Until he had a friend on OUR side who did his best to give him 40+ deaths by running up to him to die. That's how these dudes "win". You face that, you will never think it's "easy" to kill them, nor that it should be in the game. LOL You used a WoW video to explain why multiboxing shouldn't be in EVE... Malcanis for CSM 8 Module activation timers are buggy - CCP please fix
Roime Shiva Furnace 2444	Posted - 2013.04.08 05:37:00 - [22] - Quote Ban ISBoxer -á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars -
Ace Uoweme Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 127	Posted - 2013.04.08 07:32:00 - [23] - Quote James Amril-Kesh wrote: You used a WoW video to explain why multiboxing shouldn't be in EVE... Correct. Because an EvE bot-a-thon would put everyone to sleep. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 445	Posted - 2013.04.08 07:34:00 - [24] - Quote Multiboxing automation should be banned as it gives an unfair advantage over normal players. This iswhat is wrong with gaming today... lazy people who cheat.
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 1587	Posted - 2013.04.08 12:29:00 - [25] - Quote ShadowandLight wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlm4XrR0VvU Let me know what you think. Ill make another video soon showing mining and how to effectively use multiple accounts. Nice video, even if it is from a firefighter (cops rule, hose-draggers drool :) ) .
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 1587	Posted - 2013.04.08 12:36:00 - [26] - Quote Thelonious Blake wrote: Doesn't having multiple accounts make the game to feel too much as a "job"? Maybe it's just me, but I prefer playing with only one account at a time. I currently have only 1 account, and haven't had another one ever. I can "afford it" (via PLEXes) but I'm afraid it will suck out the fun of the game for me. Not if you do it right. I don't use ISBoxer, but I do use two ships to run missions and when it's fairly safe to do so, three ships to rat/do anoms in null sec. In high sec missions I do a Mach supported by a Fof missle Tengu. In Null Sec I use mach or (if thats to dangerous) a Maelstrom + two Dominixes (Dominii, whatever lol) Among MMOs, EVE is just about uniquely set up to allow multiboxing unassisted by outside programs. Fleet Warping, FoF missles, The ability to assist drones and assign fighters etc etc. Because my crappy Commodore 64-like PC can't really handle more than 4-5 clients at a time, I don't have much incentive to use stuff like ISBoxer.
Skeln Thargensen Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp 84	Posted - 2013.04.08 13:17:00 - [27] - Quote Miilla wrote: Multiboxing automation should be banned as it gives an unfair advantage over normal players. This iswhat is wrong with gaming today... lazy people who cheat. I put effort into having fun in a game, i actually play the game without any "attachments" to boost my "capabilities". You must be really shat at gaming if you have to resort to "tools". And what annoys me more is CCP's attitude to it, only because these people pay more in subscriptions. Well fine, but that means if they start leaving it hurts more, than a large volume of single account owners which can spread the loss of income wheras one player with 10 automated accounts is harder to absorb the loss with. If CCP focused on making the game fun, and started to ban multiboxers, they should focus on having a large number of single account owners instead of depending on multi account owners which is a huge business risk as we saw during Incarna. while i agree the game would be better without alts and multiboxing it's obvious from the marketing that not only is it legit but encouraged. It doesn't annoy me that people do this so much as CCP still pretends this is a single account game, though at least they changed the bounty system at last. cool vid though, was wondering the logistics of that. freelance space bum
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force 1696	Posted - 2013.04.08 13:34:00 - [28] - Quote What if CCP would just put this kind of functionality (but better) into the regular client ? :p http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T T2 BPO poll: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=114789 Buying this: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=147098
Miilla Hulkageddon Orphanage 445	Posted - 2013.04.08 13:37:00 - [29] - Quote Akita T wrote: What if CCP would just put this kind of functionality (but better) into the regular client ? :p They cannot put effort into a simple expansion theme / feature nevermind add something to automate something. They did talk about having some automation that you could pay for, presumably with AUR :) The game is dying enuf as it is, why add more death features.
Skeln Thargensen Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp 84	Posted - 2013.04.08 13:44:00 - [30] - Quote well, given how simple it is to do this, I can't imagine the functionality could be that hard to implement. And any rage from us poors would be silenced by simply unlocking our two other slots for training and simultaneous use in-game. PLEX or pay for more extra toons instead of accounts. freelance space bum

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.