|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |

Pesadel0
the muppets DARKNESS.
71
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 18:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would prefer a web bonus and slip turret and missile boat on the phoon than this farce of a raven armor tanking. |

Pesadel0
the muppets DARKNESS.
71
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 17:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote:CCP Rise wrote:Hey guys
We're going to post a few tweaks tomorrow based on feedback from all the threads, minmatar included.
To answer a couple things though -
I think the comparison between the raven and the typhoon is kind of surprising. Both ships will now be able to field 6 missile launchers, so they have that in common, but thats really where it stops. The typhoon is the fastest of all the battleships by a substantial margin. It has the fastest align time and fastest mwd speed of anything available. This strikes me as very 'minmatar'. Along with that, while its losing some of the extreme versatility it had before, it still supplies quite a few options both offensively and defensively, while the Raven is quite clearly a dedicated shield ship.
As for the tempest, I think what we are now looking at is having the tempest be part of the 'attack' category as well as the typhoon. It already behaves more or less like an attack ship, and maybe adding hp and increasing sig wasn't adding much to the overall ship. So we will likely bring the sig back down to near where it was before, take some of the hp back, and increase its speed slightly.
Both ships will still offer flexibility in the way they are used that is fairly unique to minmatar.
Check back for tweaks in the next couple days and keep the feedback coming =) see what you said there? the raven is useless and the typhoon got everything on its side? why the hell would anyone even waste time on a ******* raven?
so destroying the versatility of the thyphoon and making it a better armour tanking is better because? |

Pesadel0
the muppets DARKNESS.
71
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 14:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Another option would always be to give tempest antoher 600 PG and give it a 7th turret slot. After all an ATTACK battleship with 2 of its bonuses focuse don damage.. deserves to be deadly :P I woudl not evne care if its badnwidth was reduced to 25 m to compensate.
But the previous post ide is not bad as well. The Tempest already has a full rack of weapons. Players using the last two slots for things other than missiles is not the fault of the developers. MInmatar have always been a split weapon race.
yeah agreed tempest dhould be 4 turrets 4 missile turrets. |

Pesadel0
the muppets DARKNESS.
72
|
Posted - 2013.04.22 09:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sunuva Gunn wrote:Gal'o Sengen wrote:I've been toying with some Cruise Missile Typhoon fits and... Boy, it's a damn beast. For reference, the point of it all is a small (4-5 person), really cheap gang with large amounts of mobility.
This isn't being argued. We know it's a powerful ship... It's just... More Caldari than Minnie. Many of us would rather have it as it was.
Or grasp leave the drone bay alone? |

Pesadel0
the muppets DARKNESS.
72
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 11:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Deerin wrote:I think in the Pest vs Gal boats comparison the problem lies in the overcorrection of gal boats on their first pass.
Hyperion has everything pest has to offer + more. There is an illusion that assumes AC's outrange Blasters. A Neutron blaster with Null ammo outdps's a pest with barrage up to 25k (30k if both ships have two te's). Tempest is 26m/s(1067vs 1041) faster while hype is more agile. Hyp has same amount of med slots and higher base shield. Hyp has more low slots and higher base armor AND rep bonus. Oh it also has a full drone bay.....with spares!!
Same mobility Better DMG Better DMG projection at intended ranges Better Tank (Both shield and armor) Better Drones
What does pest have? A second neut.....and capless guns.
CCP RISE! READ THAT .. AND ANSWER!! HOW IN HELL a HYPERION that outdamages temepst inside long poitn range, is faster with MWD OVERHEATED!!! , tanks better have better slot layout have more droens is BALANCED AGAISNT THE USELESS TEMPEST?
That is a awkward comparison mainly because *grasp* isnt the tempest equal to the mega? so compare those two and see. |

Pesadel0
the muppets DARKNESS.
72
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 11:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kane Fenris wrote:Pesadel0 wrote: That is a awkward comparison mainly because *grasp* isnt the tempest equal to the mega? so compare those two and see.
thats just uber nonsense every ship is compareable with every other if you define the intended use and then compare every aspect. so the coparison between hyperion and tempest is completely viable until you proove he missed something. to make it even clearer why would anyone fly a ship thats outclassed by another in every or near every aspect?
Well because one its tier2 and the other is tier 3? I know they are going to destroy the tiers but they still exist and by that i mean that hyperion should be compared to the maelstrom so his argument is a bit naive.
Just for clarification i think the tempest is underpowred but comparing it against a hype it is not the way to go.Tempest should be rupture big daddy , full damage fast with a ****** tank. |

Pesadel0
the muppets DARKNESS.
73
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 09:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
Pattern Clarc wrote:Also, if CCP Rise was really honest about making a bigger battlecruiser for the Tempest, he would have started with combat battlecruiser stats for everything except the power grid and slots, and added or subtracted were necessary.
What we have now is a ship that's basically incompatible with the type of gangs that concept seemed to be centered around, is horribly inefficient at dealing with ABC's compared to the options now available, and is pretty much pray to all of it's peers.
Basically, I'm starting to believe that the dev's think the tempest is actually fine, the numbers will reflect it post release and that we're just over reacting - not the, we want to fix it but we don't know how.... :s
Well what i dont get is why state the tempest is fine then say if it is subpar they will revised it, i mean we all know how many times CCp revisited something that was mhee, on top of my head : HEL , Old typhoon , arties ...And i could go on , what it saddens me is that no sane people will fly tempest if they can fly another sip that does what supposedly the tempest should be doing .
But if rise says tempest is fine , well maybe we are all wrong . |
|
|
|