| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

ShadowandLight
Black Aces Against ALL Authorities
83
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq4c-WCsS9c&feature
1080p version is also working.
My 2nd video on using ISBoxer with Eve.
|

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
1504
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
In before ISBoxer rage posts.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Hannah Flex
laissez-faire economics
300
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
congrats on soloing an MMO |

Sentamon
806
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
nice video ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Klymer
Hedion University Amarr Empire
179
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dammit, I'm out of popcorn 
will get some on the way home to watch this.. |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Diasaster
88
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 20:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nicely done, Tried ISboxer a while ago but never to that success. If you get the time you should make a video souly explaining your setup, the Tile layouts, multiple monitors etc broadcasts etc. \'''\<(o_O)>/'''/ |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
1701
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 21:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
It is all fun and games until half your fleet, including the logis, get disconnected.
R.I.P. my Raven Navy Issue.
I wasn't using ISboxer either, just dual monitors and clients in windowed mode.
|

Athena Maldoran
Special Nymphs On A Mission
2009
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 21:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Just ban isboxer already ^^ |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
2561
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 21:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Suicide logi-jamming anybody? |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
859
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 22:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
How well do they contest? Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an "ex"-Goon? |

Eram Fidard
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 02:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
So, CCP, is THIS in line with your design philosophy?
Clearly, we should all strive for the ultimate in risk-free isk-making, running these wonderful 'solo pve' sites CCP made for us in hi-sec.
....
............. |

Zeko Rena
ENCOM Industries
114
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 02:21:00 -
[12] - Quote
Quite impressive, still I am happy with my two account three monitor setup, it means I can have an account on each side screen and **** (why is pr 0n filtered) on the middle screen, what more could you ask for?  |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
558
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 02:23:00 -
[13] - Quote
The more characters you play at once, the more fun you have. "I do want to point out one "abuse" thing I did see however. *snipped* Please do not post details of possible exploits on the forums. - CCP Eterne" ... Because of Falcon. |

Klymer
Hedion University Amarr Empire
179
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 02:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
Eram Fidard wrote:So, CCP, is THIS in line with your design philosophy?
Clearly, we should all strive for the ultimate in risk-free isk-making, running these wonderful 'solo pve' sites CCP made for us in hi-sec.
....
.............
risk free?
.....only because you would rather whine about him on the forums rather than sac up, undock and go shoot him. |

The Baby-sitter
Vitriol Ventures Tribal Band
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 10:51:00 -
[15] - Quote
Its the ultimate - "We are legion!" tool. Love it.  |

Sentamon
806
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 10:56:00 -
[16] - Quote
Klymer wrote:
risk free?
.....only because you would rather whine about him on the forums rather than sac up, undock and go shoot him.
undocking is risky! are you mad sir?!!
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

0Lona 0ltor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
36
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 11:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
I make my ISK using market ''tools'' so I'd not be intrested in using ISO box to grind ISK or PVE.
I am considering using it for the purpose of controlling 20 or so noob acounts runing through a proxy so I can use noob accounts to sucide gank in high sec. That way with 10 to 20 accounts on 14 day trials I should be able to take down a freighter on my own and not have to worry about sec status? Has any one had any experince using this and is it EULA legal? |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Diasaster
88
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 11:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
0Lona 0ltor wrote:I make my ISK using market ''tools'' so I'd not be intrested in using ISO box to grind ISK or PVE.
I am considering using it for the purpose of controlling 20 or so noob acounts runing through a proxy so I can use noob accounts to sucide gank in high sec. That way with 10 to 20 accounts on 14 day trials I should be able to take down a freighter on my own and not have to worry about sec status? Has any one had any experince using this and is it EULA legal?
I think you will find its against the EULA to use disposable alts to negate the sec status hits and all that jazz. Also you will suffer terrible lag using a proxy for that many acounts \'''\<(o_O)>/'''/ |

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
447
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 14:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
Threads promoting cheating should be banned. |

Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
1487
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 14:35:00 -
[20] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Threads promoting cheating should be banned.
I quite agree and I keep a sharp eye out for them all day. Haven't seen any today so far.
Another 10/10 for the OP and his tear inducing video. Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel IG OOPE |

Stan'din
Incursion Squad Punkz 'n Monkeys
77
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 15:36:00 -
[21] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:How well do they contest?
Not well i am guessing Your about as much use as a condom dispenser in the Vatican. |

0Lona 0ltor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
36
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:16:00 -
[22] - Quote
I'm gonna give the ISO boxer proxy catalyst solo suicide 20 man gank squad a this weekend. I have 20 trial accounts banging out the skills now. Lag won't be an issue as long as all 20 accounts react within 5 to 10 seconds. If anyone else wants to try along side me send me an in game message. 40 Catalysts ganks with no subscription fee's split amongst 2 players wreaks of profit.
I bet we can get ISO boxer on a ban list very soon after doing this |

Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
1487
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
0Lona 0ltor wrote:I'm gonna give the ISO boxer proxy catalyst solo suicide 20 man gank squad a this weekend. I have 20 trial accounts banging out the skills now. Lag won't be an issue as long as all 20 accounts react within 5 to 10 seconds. If anyone else wants to try along side me send me an in game message. 40 Catalysts ganks with no subscription fee's split amongst 2 players wreaks of profit.
I bet we can get ISO boxer on a ban list very soon after doing this
More likely that you'll get yourself banned for using disposable trial accounts to suicide gank before you get Isboxer banned. Trial gankers are against the rules. Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel IG OOPE |

handige harrie
Hedion University Amarr Empire
51
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 21:06:00 -
[24] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:0Lona 0ltor wrote:I'm gonna give the ISO boxer proxy catalyst solo suicide 20 man gank squad a this weekend. I have 20 trial accounts banging out the skills now. Lag won't be an issue as long as all 20 accounts react within 5 to 10 seconds. If anyone else wants to try along side me send me an in game message. 40 Catalysts ganks with no subscription fee's split amongst 2 players wreaks of profit.
I bet we can get ISO boxer on a ban list very soon after doing this More likely that you'll get yourself banned for using disposable trial accounts to suicide gank before you get Isboxer banned. Trial gankers are against the rules.
were does the somethingstate you can't suicide gank with trial accounts? as long as you don't recycle them, I don't see how you break any rules. Baddest poster ever |

Alekksander Geinesa
Hateful Munitions
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 21:11:00 -
[25] - Quote
0Lona 0ltor wrote:I'm gonna give the ISO boxer proxy catalyst solo suicide 20 man gank squad a this weekend. I have 20 trial accounts banging out the skills now. Lag won't be an issue as long as all 20 accounts react within 5 to 10 seconds. If anyone else wants to try along side me send me an in game message. 40 Catalysts ganks with no subscription fee's split amongst 2 players wreaks of profit.
I bet we can get ISO boxer on a ban list very soon after doing this
Also its very obvious that you have no idea how a proxy really works. You will need 20 different proxies, not just one proxy haha! |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
1525
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 21:22:00 -
[26] - Quote
handige harrie wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote:0Lona 0ltor wrote:I'm gonna give the ISO boxer proxy catalyst solo suicide 20 man gank squad a this weekend. I have 20 trial accounts banging out the skills now. Lag won't be an issue as long as all 20 accounts react within 5 to 10 seconds. If anyone else wants to try along side me send me an in game message. 40 Catalysts ganks with no subscription fee's split amongst 2 players wreaks of profit.
I bet we can get ISO boxer on a ban list very soon after doing this More likely that you'll get yourself banned for using disposable trial accounts to suicide gank before you get Isboxer banned. Trial gankers are against the rules. were does the somethingstate you can't suicide gank with trial accounts? as long as you don't recycle them, I don't see how you break any rules.
You are not allowed to have more than one trial account running at the same time, if CCP finds out you somehow worked around that, expect a banhammer, temp-ban if you are lucky.
Stating you intend to game the trial account system by running 20 trial accounts via ISBoxer in CCPs forum was probably not such a good idea.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Trial_account_issues
CCP wrote: Furthermore, you can only have one trial account running on the same computer at any given time.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

handige harrie
Hedion University Amarr Empire
51
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 21:58:00 -
[27] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:handige harrie wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote:0Lona 0ltor wrote:I'm gonna give the ISO boxer proxy catalyst solo suicide 20 man gank squad a this weekend. I have 20 trial accounts banging out the skills now. Lag won't be an issue as long as all 20 accounts react within 5 to 10 seconds. If anyone else wants to try along side me send me an in game message. 40 Catalysts ganks with no subscription fee's split amongst 2 players wreaks of profit.
I bet we can get ISO boxer on a ban list very soon after doing this More likely that you'll get yourself banned for using disposable trial accounts to suicide gank before you get Isboxer banned. Trial gankers are against the rules. were does the somethingstate you can't suicide gank with trial accounts? as long as you don't recycle them, I don't see how you break any rules. CCP wrote: Furthermore, you can only have one trial account running on the same computer at any given time.
So you are allowed to gank with trial accounts. you just aren't allowed to run multiple trial accounts at the same time.
Which is kinda a big difference, although it leads to the same outcome. Baddest poster ever |

Tom Gerard
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
1006
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 22:21:00 -
[28] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Threads promoting cheating should be banned.
I was looking into starting a fleet of these, from what I've seen you still have to press 3 buttons to keep it legal under the EULA:
1 Button does a simple: Undock, Warp to Belt
Another extremely minor assistant: The 1 Button Lock, Approach, and start mining, (interrupting at 50% of the cycle)
And finally the not even a script really: 1 Button Cargo Check, and restart miners, else dock, unload cargo, and repair all
Its just sending keystrokes across multiple clients which is still one click per action, that action is just multiplied across n clients.
One of the oldest mission players in EVE designed a chart that explains stat priority in regards to mission running, compared Alpha, DPS, Ship Speed and Sig Radius and scores them. http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m24dbrfuWn1r86ax8o1_1280.jpg |

xarjin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 23:01:00 -
[29] - Quote
Legality of multiboxing in eve with isboxer or other legitimate multiboxing software was challenged and accepted by a senior GM years ago.
Don't risk your accounts trying to use throwaway alts if you value playing eve as you very well may be the person being banned for EULA violations.
Considering the senior GM Lelouch's stance on multiboxing having been updated within the last two months as stated below still supporting multiboxing in eve any attempts to violate the eula by using proxies and throwaway alts to protest allowed game behavior will likely not end favorably on your behalf.
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=1291641&page=10#274
Quote:Edited by: GM Lelouch on 18/02/2013 08:29:22 Addendum by GM Lelouch: This post was originally written almost three years ago and as software/hardware evolves, so must our stance on what goes within our game. It has become increasingly difficult for us to track the capabilities of various pieces of software over the years as their number, as well as the features they offer, increase greatly in number.
In other words, it is unfortunately impractical for us to evaluate whether specific pieces of software can be used without breaking EVE's EULA/ToS. This post should not be taken as endorsement for utilizing specific pieces of software/hardware with EVE, but as a guideline to what is acceptable.
Our general stance towards the concept of multiboxing has not changed but we cannot guarantee that the EULA is being upheld should you use any of the software/hardware mentioned by name in this post, nor will we at EVE customer support be able to officially endorse or sanction specific third party multiboxing programs.
Players wishing to multibox are responsible for familiarizing themselves with our EULA and Terms of Service, the following clauses in particular are of much relevance to this topic:
EULA: 6. CONDUCT A. Specifically Restricted Conduct 2. You may not use your own or third-party software to modify any content appearing within the Game environment or change how the Game is played. 3. You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play. You may not rewrite or modify the user interface or otherwise manipulate data in any way to acquire items, currency, objects, character attributes or beneficial actions not actually acquired or achieved in the Game.
ToS: 21. You will not attempt to decipher, hack into or interfere with any transmissions to or from the EVE Online servers, nor will you try to create or use any third party add-ons, extras or tools for the game.
The old, out of date, post can be seen below as it originally appeared:
"Hello there,
To make a long story short, automation of gameplay is not permitted; players must be manually issuing the commands to control their character(s) at all times.
Our stance on programs such as Synergy and hardware/software combination such as the G15 keyboard is that they can be legitimately used as long as gameplay isn't automated. Synergy allows you to move your mouse cursor to multiple different monitors which are hooked up to different computers and we do not have any qualms with players using the program for this purpose. If Synergy was used in some way to control your accounts for you without a need for you to be at your keyboard, then that would not be allowed, but I am not aware of such a functionality with this program. If Synergy is used in conjunction with some other program to automate gameplay, it would not be permitted. G15 "macros" which allow you to group different commands into one keypress are allowed. For example, setting your G1 key to press F1, F2, F3 and so on for you with one key press is allowed (although this specific command is not as useful as it was before now that we have weapon grouping).
An exceedingly complex G15 macro which would effectively automate gameplay, such as mining, without a need for the player to be present at his keyboard would be against the EULA, regardless of whether the player utilizing said macro is sitting at his keyboard at the time!
Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed. In the same vein as what has been stated above, the player must be manually sending the commands; if a program is automating those commands for you, then it would be considered a breach of our EULA.
I hope this clears up this matter." |

Olf Barrenbur
Guardians of Asceticism
21
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 23:12:00 -
[30] - Quote
I can't wait until someone starts suicide ganking freighters with IS Boxer (With subbed accounts of course). Oh, the tears. |

Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
1495
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 23:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
handige harrie wrote:Doc Fury wrote:handige harrie wrote: were does the somethingstate you can't suicide gank with trial accounts? as long as you don't recycle them, I don't see how you break any rules.
CCP wrote: Furthermore, you can only have one trial account running on the same computer at any given time.
So you are allowed to gank with trial accounts. you just aren't allowed to run multiple trial accounts at the same time. Which is kinda a big difference, although it leads to the same outcome.
You cannot use a disposable account to circumvent the negative sec loss status of your main account. Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel IG OOPE |

xarjin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 23:29:00 -
[32] - Quote
Olf Barrenbur wrote:I can't wait until someone starts suicide ganking freighters with IS Boxer (With subbed accounts of course). Oh, the tears.
There's one veteran player in eve who's multiboxer that i learned of recently that flies 20 tempests, owns two titans and three or four supercarriers. He's no less of a target than someone with one account.
The beauty of eve's game mechanics and pvp balance dont give any one person with 20 accounts more of an outright advantage over 20 players with one account.
There's likely a few Cap ship builders that multibox jump freighters to transport minerals to nullsec. If someone could manage to gank a frieghter as a multiboxer they don't get any more isk returned from pend insurance than 5 players ganking a freighter.
Inflicting and receiving tears are part of the fun of it  |

0Lona 0ltor
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 09:07:00 -
[33] - Quote
Yeah so it sounds like going through a proxy would be a ban so uhm I'm chickening out of this one. Maybe I will do a 5 man T1 tornado squad with sub'd accounts and only sub the extra accounts when I fancy doing high sec ganking. Just have an intesive 1 month sucide gank month every so often?
If anyone is intrested in joing me send me an eve mail and we can set up a small squad. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2515
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 11:33:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ban ISBotters
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

culo duro
Next Level Alcoholics
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 11:36:00 -
[35] - Quote
Roime wrote:Ban ISBotters
Please do learn what a "Bot" is before you use the term.
Also you could do the same thing, i really don't see the issue here. |

Herr Esiq
Dirt Nap Squad
23
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 11:49:00 -
[36] - Quote
Hannah Flex wrote:congrats on soloing an MMO Quite ironic that so many people like this post, as people use alts for capitals/missions/offgrid boosting/trading toon and much more. Yet ISBoxer gets frowned upon when people use it.
I do agree with your post and so far i've been flying alt-less. Its actually harder and takes more time to do even some 'trivial' tasks like having a gate scouted. I assume you do the same. |

Sentamon
811
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
culo duro wrote:Roime wrote:Ban ISBotters
Please do learn what a "Bot" is before you use the term. Also you could do the same thing, i really don't see the issue here.
I think he wants you to clean up his drool. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13582
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:17:00 -
[38] - Quote
Roime wrote:Ban ISBotters They already do.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

culo duro
Next Level Alcoholics
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:25:00 -
[39] - Quote
So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2515
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
culo duro wrote:Roime wrote:Ban ISBotters
Please do learn what a "Bot" is before you use the term. Also you could do the same thing, i really don't see the issue here.
In this context, ie. facilitating multiboxing on a scale which is not possible via normal gameplay- A program that sends control messages to a game client.
Sure, run as many clients as you like, just don't expect everyone to accept that you use a program to control the clients.
Ban ISBotters
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Nifter Telfo
Pen Cap Technologies
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:42:00 -
[41] - Quote
Thanks for uploading this! I was actually planning on doing the same thing this summer, but sadly got bored of EVE before I subbed all the extra accounts.
I ran the number on this if people are curious. You need about 2 months on each new account to get them ready for incursions. You could cut it down to 1 month if you're only trainning battleship pilots, but it's not advisable. Skills are just too low across the board in that case. You'll need a minimum of 2 months for the logistics pilots and off grid booster.
As for costs. Use buddy account promotions. That gives each account 4 months + 21 days for the price of $39 USD each (if you use the bonus PLEX as game time). Which comes down to ~$8.5 per month, which is a pretty good deal. Assuming you have 2 accounts already. 10 extra accounts nets you ~$400. Unless you have a lot of ISK, you will probably have to spend the bonus plexes on ISK in order to afford the battleships for each account though.
I have not tested how many clients you could run on one PC. I know 6 shouldn't be too big of a problem. I have a couple of PCs for working from home, so that's not an issue for me, but if it turns out that your PC is not powerful enough for 12 clients, another one will probably net you about $600.
As for internet bandwidth. Making a quick check on a single client showed really tiny upload amounts (~10 KBps), so your internet connection shouldn't be an issue even with ****** 512 KBps upload. Download is always higher and will definitely suffice unless you're sitting on dial up.
Once everyone's trained up, you should be able to coast with a plex for each in about 10-15 hours time. Assuming an average of 2 hours of gaming per day. You should be able to pay for all accounts in game in a week, and the next 3 weeks should be free. At which point you can start saving up for 22 accounts to run the Assault incursions.
Anything below 12 accounts is not worth it in terms of the hourly wage you would get at work, and you're better off just working an extra hour and buying plex to sell in game. 50 mill ISK per hour per accounts * 12 = ~1 plex per hour.
EDIT: Oh, forgot to mention that you should either have a stockpile of emergency ISK, or be prepared to buy and sell about $60 worth of plexes in case you lose connection. Since all of your accounts are going through the same connection. All of them will be disconnected at once.  |

Jess Maine
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
46
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:45:00 -
[42] - Quote
culo duro wrote:So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
It almost kills what an MMO is supposed to be about, the social aspect of finding pilots making friends and enemies along the way and completing or overcoming challenges with other pilots. Theres reasons why MMO's structure some of their content around player numbers or requiring a synergy ot different roles to complete an objective. Doing all of these by yourself means your not meeting anyone in the EVE Universe and your not having any impact on content generation. |

Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
1522
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 14:38:00 -
[43] - Quote
Jess Maine wrote:culo duro wrote:So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
It almost kills what an MMO is supposed to be about, the social aspect of finding pilots making friends and enemies along the way and completing or overcoming challenges with other pilots. Theres reasons why MMO's structure some of their content around player numbers or requiring a synergy ot different roles to complete an objective. Doing all of these by yourself means your not meeting anyone in the EVE Universe and your not having any impact on content generation.
That sounds like a load of bull. MMO stands for massive multiplayer online, not massive multiplayer online who all have to hug and be friends. Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel IG OOPE |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
388
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 15:12:00 -
[44] - Quote
culo duro wrote:So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
Instead of doing X klicks for X accounts, you only need to do 1 klick for X account. That means you save X -1 clicks.
The bot creates something out of no human player interaction. The "normal" user creates something out of one human player interaction. The IS Boxer creates X-1 out of one human player interaction.
They got the same feeling to the extra IS Boxer Chars as to a bot. They feel betrayed.
Do you get what i am trying to say? It's hard to write down what i got in mind. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

xarjin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 16:04:00 -
[45] - Quote
Jess Maine wrote:culo duro wrote:So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
It almost kills what an MMO is supposed to be about, the social aspect of finding pilots making friends and enemies along the way and completing or overcoming challenges with other pilots. Theres reasons why MMO's structure some of their content around player numbers or requiring a synergy ot different roles to complete an objective. Doing all of these by yourself means your not meeting anyone in the EVE Universe and your not having any impact on content generation.
Some folks would just rather enjoy a technical challenge than have to deal with an often volatile and unreliable social challenge. |

culo duro
Next Level Alcoholics
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 16:44:00 -
[46] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:culo duro wrote:So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
Instead of doing X klicks for X accounts, you only need to do 1 klick for X account. That means you save X -1 clicks. The bot creates something out of no human player interaction. The "normal" user creates something out of one human player interaction. The IS Boxer creates X-1 out of one human player interaction. They got the same feeling to the extra IS Boxer Chars as to a bot. They feel betrayed. Do you get what i am trying to say? It's hard to write down what i got in mind.
Not the way i use it. I manually control all of my logi for pvp, and manually control my dps aswell.
I just can't see a more optimal way of doing it even with such a program, but it helps having a video feed in a small size over 3 monitors over having x amount of monitors to support everything. |

Randi Fleetstalker
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 17:08:00 -
[47] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:culo duro wrote:So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
Instead of doing X klicks for X accounts, you only need to do 1 klick for X account. That means you save X -1 clicks. The bot creates something out of no human player interaction. The "normal" user creates something out of one human player interaction. The IS Boxer creates X-1 out of one human player interaction. They got the same feeling to the extra IS Boxer Chars as to a bot. They feel betrayed. Do you get what i am trying to say? It's hard to write down what i got in mind. I assure you, multiboxers get what you're saying about being able to control more than one character with the same button.
Some people feel cheated when they see that someone is able to accomplish more than them, for any reason. But just because you feel this way doesn't actually turn it into a bot and I think you and others who feel this way would probably do better if you can express yourselves without comparing multiboxing to botting, because it's simply not the same thing.
For example...
The biggest thing you might get out of botting is time to spend doing something else. You might argue "no, the biggest thing you get out of botting is a billion ISK" or so on, but that's not the truth, you could get the same billion ISK without the bot, you just have to actually be at the keys playing the game. With a bot, you let your bot do it just so you can get a billion ISK without spending that time in the game yourself. I spent a lot of time in the 90s botting MUDs and developing and selling bots for them, and bots were almost exclusively used to play catch-up in order to play with friends or adventure to the next cool area.
A multiboxer on the other hand is not interested in removing himself from the game... Just the opposite: he's trying to be a bigger part of the game. You can argue that the multiboxer is injecting additional time into the game as compared to a player with 1 account, and a botter is also likely injecting additional time into the game as compared to a typical player, but that's about where the direct comparison ends.
So I'm not saying that it's wrong for a player to somehow feel betrayed by this, that's an okay feeling to have. It's just not the same as botting. ;) |

Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
364
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 17:35:00 -
[48] - Quote
Awesome, nicely done, keep it up!
To the haters, CCP has made it clear that this is fine. They love all that extra cash from multiple accounts! 
No human at the computer = bad. Human at the computer = good. Get it through your head already. Post with your main, like a BOSS! |

Tarsas Phage
Freight Club
167
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 18:02:00 -
[49] - Quote
Jess Maine wrote: It almost kills what an MMO is supposed to be about, the social aspect of finding pilots making friends and enemies along the way and completing or overcoming challenges with other pilots.
Fair point, but with a ISboxer, there's still a human to interact with, whereas a traditional "real" bot isn't such a thing.
I'd say that someone with n accounts under ISboxer is more liable to create in-game situations and experiences (as in, content experiences) which otherwise wouldn't have occurred. |

Rosewalker
Khumaak Flying Circus
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 22:48:00 -
[50] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Roime wrote:Ban ISBotters They already do.
This is true. All botters who use bots based on Inner Space, the engine that runs ISBoxer, receive bans. In fact, those caught using these Inner Space-powered bots receive permanent bans for the first offense due to the use of code injection, which is considered a breach of the Terms of Service (point 21). The Nosy Gamer - Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength - Eric Hoffer |

Arronicus
Shadows of Vorlon The Marmite Collective
516
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 23:07:00 -
[51] - Quote
Can't get enough of the butthurt "Ban people using multi accounts. Ban ISboxer, Ban anyone who makes more money than me" Posts in this thread. Already gone through a 2L of Jergins and 3 packs of tissues. |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
389
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 23:13:00 -
[52] - Quote
Randi Fleetstalker wrote: For example...
The biggest thing you might get out of botting is time to spend doing something else. You might argue "no, the biggest thing you get out of botting is a billion ISK" or so on, but that's not the truth, you could get the same billion ISK without the bot, you just have to actually be at the keys playing the game. With a bot, you let your bot do it just so you can get a billion ISK without spending that time in the game yourself. I spent a lot of time in the 90s botting MUDs and developing and selling bots for them, and bots were almost exclusively used to play catch-up in order to play with friends or adventure to the next cool area.
No mate, the biggest thing you get out of a bot is to spend less time doing something to get Y amount of ISK.
To get Y you need to do Z amount of ingame commands. Isboxer: do Z / X amound of imgame commands. (x == amount of chars manage by IS boxer) German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
1556
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 23:19:00 -
[53] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Randi Fleetstalker wrote: For example...
The biggest thing you might get out of botting is time to spend doing something else. You might argue "no, the biggest thing you get out of botting is a billion ISK" or so on, but that's not the truth, you could get the same billion ISK without the bot, you just have to actually be at the keys playing the game. With a bot, you let your bot do it just so you can get a billion ISK without spending that time in the game yourself. I spent a lot of time in the 90s botting MUDs and developing and selling bots for them, and bots were almost exclusively used to play catch-up in order to play with friends or adventure to the next cool area.
No mate, the biggest thing you get out of a bot is to spend less time doing something to get Y amount of ISK. To get Y you need to do Z amount of ingame commands. Isboxer: do Z / X amound of imgame commands. (x == amount of chars manage by IS boxer)
I was told there'd be no math.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Jess Maine
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 00:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
xarjin wrote:Jess Maine wrote:culo duro wrote:So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
It almost kills what an MMO is supposed to be about, the social aspect of finding pilots making friends and enemies along the way and completing or overcoming challenges with other pilots. Theres reasons why MMO's structure some of their content around player numbers or requiring a synergy ot different roles to complete an objective. Doing all of these by yourself means your not meeting anyone in the EVE Universe and your not having any impact on content generation. Some folks would just rather enjoy a technical challenge than have to deal with an often volatile and unreliable social challenge.
Thats just one of the challenges that shouldn't easily overcome by just having more cash to pay for subs. Your going to meet volatile and unsocialable pilots in EVE, thats just how personalities go. If you simply didn't want the convinience of being anti-social and having no impact on the game that you should do missions, since thats what they were designed for - ultimate solitude while making a very small living.
It's the price you pay for not making waves in the EVE universe because most multboxers do what they do for self gain and thus contribute absoloutely nothing to the sandbox. |

Sentamon
812
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 00:22:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jess Maine wrote: It's the price you pay for not making waves in the EVE universe because most multboxers do what they do for self gain and thus contribute absoloutely nothing to the sandbox.
So like your alliance? ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
281
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 02:07:00 -
[56] - Quote
0Lona 0ltor wrote:I make my ISK using market ''tools'' so I'd not be intrested in using ISO box to grind ISK or PVE.
I am considering using it for the purpose of controlling 20 or so noob acounts runing through a proxy so I can use noob accounts to sucide gank in high sec. That way with 10 to 20 accounts on 14 day trials I should be able to take down a freighter on my own and not have to worry about sec status? Has any one had any experince using this and is it EULA legal?
Though not usally bannable, I've heard that CCP frowns heavily on creating throwaway characters to gank.
Though I could not point to a single instance where somoene has been banned for it.
Actually, from my understanding, you can only have one trial account per IP running at once. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
281
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 02:09:00 -
[57] - Quote
Arronicus wrote:Already gone through a 2L of Jergins and 3 packs of tissues.
Real men use spit and a dirty sock.
"Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Cazador 64
Nightmare Logistics
141
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 02:12:00 -
[58] - Quote
Good work bro I am jelly. Wish I could do this. |

Stonecrusher Mortlock
University of Caille Gallente Federation
116
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 05:23:00 -
[59] - Quote
im kinda said, you need to get this stream lined so the goon's can adopt it anduse all that tech isk to use plex to fund entier fleets ran by 5 guys.
1 FC with the DPS ships, 4 on logi.
o the tears just think you wont even need other people any more. just your ceo and his 5 best friends. |

Dread SinJin
Dark Energy.
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 05:26:00 -
[60] - Quote
This is posted by a allince who has been accused and found guilty of RMT |

ShadowandLight
Black Aces Against ALL Authorities
94
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 06:03:00 -
[61] - Quote
Jess Maine wrote:xarjin wrote:Jess Maine wrote:culo duro wrote:So why is it people hate ISBoxer?
It almost kills what an MMO is supposed to be about, the social aspect of finding pilots making friends and enemies along the way and completing or overcoming challenges with other pilots. Theres reasons why MMO's structure some of their content around player numbers or requiring a synergy ot different roles to complete an objective. Doing all of these by yourself means your not meeting anyone in the EVE Universe and your not having any impact on content generation. Some folks would just rather enjoy a technical challenge than have to deal with an often volatile and unreliable social challenge. Thats just one of the challenges that shouldn't easily overcome by just having more cash to pay for subs. Your going to meet volatile and unsocialable pilots in EVE, thats just how personalities go. If you simply didn't want the convinience of being anti-social and having no impact on the game that you should do missions, since thats what they were designed for - ultimate solitude while making a very small living. It's the price you pay for not making waves in the EVE universe because most multboxers do what they do for self gain and thus contribute absoloutely nothing to the sandbox.
http://i.imgur.com/fpEQ5Cx.png
Very anti-social helping friends rep POS's |

DelBoy Trades
Trotter Independent Traders.
524
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 07:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
In this thread:
People severely butthurt that they can afford neither a powerful enough computer nor the subscription costs to achieve what OP is doing. Regarding the "soloing an MMO" comment, how is this any different from solemnly warping from belt to belt killing rats on your lonesome or mining with your hulk in some shithole part of highsec? He's doing the exact same thing, but with multiple clients. Damn nature, you scary! |

Eric Ryan
The Scope Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 10:10:00 -
[63] - Quote
You are 11 archons short.
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2522
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 11:10:00 -
[64] - Quote
DelBoy Trades wrote:In this thread:
People severely butthurt that they can afford neither a powerful enough computer nor the subscription costs to achieve what OP is doing. Regarding the "soloing an MMO" comment, how is this any different from solemnly warping from belt to belt killing rats on your lonesome or mining with your hulk in some shithole part of highsec? He's doing the exact same thing, but with multiple clients.
Bloobloo, nobody is jealous of botters. Change the record.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
14702
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 13:56:00 -
[65] - Quote
Roime wrote:DelBoy Trades wrote:In this thread:
People severely butthurt that they can afford neither a powerful enough computer nor the subscription costs to achieve what OP is doing. Regarding the "soloing an MMO" comment, how is this any different from solemnly warping from belt to belt killing rats on your lonesome or mining with your hulk in some shithole part of highsec? He's doing the exact same thing, but with multiple clients. Bloobloo, nobody is jealous of botters. Change the record. If you have evidence the OP is botting, you should report it. Suggesting it here doesn't help. Malcanis for CSM 8. Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
310
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 14:31:00 -
[66] - Quote
Is this pulling enough isk profit for you?
i noticed that you completed single site in ~14min(assuming video speed is 2X)..i would kill my self if i need to farm isk in incursion with that low time.
Five tank mods..amar bs's ...orbiting..dipping to ~5% armor...good luck man. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

DelBoy Trades
Trotter Independent Traders.
526
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 20:53:00 -
[67] - Quote
Roime wrote:Bloobloo, nobody is jealous of botters. Change the record.
Do you even know what a bot is? ISBoxer is a key repeater, if you leave your computer everything stops, a bot keeps going without you. ISBoxer provides no automation whatsoever, you are a true moron. Damn nature, you scary! |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Diasaster
88
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 09:34:00 -
[68] - Quote
DelBoy Trades wrote:Roime wrote:Bloobloo, nobody is jealous of botters. Change the record.
Do you even know what a bot is? ISBoxer is a key repeater, if you leave your computer everything stops, a bot keeps going without you. ISBoxer provides no automation whatsoever, you are a true moron.
Finally someone who understands what ISboxer is \o/ really all you need to do this is a key and a mouse repeater, although isboxers videofx, repeater regions etc. are a very nice add-on. \'''\<(o_O)>/'''/ |

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
449
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 09:35:00 -
[69] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:DelBoy Trades wrote:Roime wrote:Bloobloo, nobody is jealous of botters. Change the record.
Do you even know what a bot is? ISBoxer is a key repeater, if you leave your computer everything stops, a bot keeps going without you. ISBoxer provides no automation whatsoever, you are a true moron. Finally someone who understands what ISboxer is \o/ really all you need to do this is a key and a mouse repeater, although isboxers videofx, repeater regions etc. are a very nice add-on.
Key repeating is a kind of automation. It saves you performing those key repeats on multiple machines therefor you gain an unfair advantage to a player that has to key repeat on each of those machines. |

Sentamon
815
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:44:00 -
[70] - Quote
unfair advantage! 
like buying plex like paying for alt accounts like owning a better computer like having a better internet connection like having more time to play like having some give you isk for nothing .. and so on
... don't know how you get up in the morning with life being so unfair
Fact is, an isboxer alt is at a huge disadvantage to a live player and so is the player trying to control several at once. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
97
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:46:00 -
[71] - Quote
xarjin wrote:If your mad because you cant multibox it's a hobby that you either wouldn't enjoy anyway or couldn't because of financial reasons or still owning a six year old "gaming" computer. Sorry i cant afford a Porche Carerra S either but it's fun for those than can.
i don't really care about people using ISbox, it's never bothered my game, but it's just weird that CCP consider AFK activites like farming plexes to be such an issue that drones now have to be **** but farming incursions with multiple accounts with ISBox control is legit. it would just be nice if CCP stopped nerfing the game for people on single accounts. freelance space bum |

Demolishar
United Aggression
861
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:51:00 -
[72] - Quote
PLEX is not skyrocketing - therefore multi-account usage is under control. That is all that really matters here. |

Sentamon
815
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:54:00 -
[73] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote: i don't really care about people using ISbox, it's never bothered my game, but it's just weird that CCP consider AFK activites like farming plexes to be such an issue that drones now have to be **** but farming incursions with multiple accounts with ISBox control is legit. it would just be nice if CCP stopped nerfing the game for people on single accounts.
Because one is a lifeless AFK for 23.5 hours a day activity and the other involves live players? ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Diasaster
88
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:58:00 -
[74] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:xarjin wrote:If your mad because you cant multibox it's a hobby that you either wouldn't enjoy anyway or couldn't because of financial reasons or still owning a six year old "gaming" computer. Sorry i cant afford a Porche Carerra S either but it's fun for those than can. i don't really care about people using ISbox, it's never bothered my game, but it's just weird that CCP consider AFK activites like farming plexes to be such an issue that drones now have to be **** but farming incursions with multiple accounts with ISBox control is legit. it would just be nice if CCP stopped nerfing the game for people on single accounts.
"AFK activities" Controlling logi as well as your own dps squad even with ISboxer certainly isn't a "AFK activity" Its actually very stressful and difficult to master.
If you want to highlight afk activities why not mention moon mining, market games - seeing as once you've placed a buy/sell order you are free to log off and your still making isk, or you know actual bots. As stated and proven by CCP ISboxer is not a botting automation program :P
Before repeaters and stuff people used to celotape mouse's together and try and engineer funny devices to control more then 1 computer.
Now if you really want to open up a whole shitstorm why not start mentioning spread sheets, market checkers as well as many other programs out there which "automate" a lot of activities for you.... Spread sheets - stops you having to make many calculations thus "automated"..... Market checkers - stops you having to fly "x" amount of jumps to go check different market regions for buy/sell orders. Hell even Evemon automates the game, meaning you don't have to log in and click on character sheet to check your skills..... :O even EFT, stops you having to buy and load out a ship to test and see what ehp/dps you get. \'''\<(o_O)>/'''/ |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
98
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 13:27:00 -
[75] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:[quote=Skeln Thargensen][quote=xarjin]"AFK activities" Controlling logi as well as your own dps squad even with ISboxer certainly isn't a "AFK activity" Its actually very stressful and difficult to master.
If you want to highlight afk activities why not mention moon mining, market games - seeing as once you've placed a buy/sell order you are free to log off and your still making isk, or you know actual bots. As stated and proven by CCP ISboxer is not a botting automation program :P
what i mean is that you can accomplish farming by using multiple accounts and ISbox instead of going AFK with drones not that using ISBox is AFK play. so, i guess ISK farming isn't a problem if you're multiboxing? freelance space bum |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Diasaster
88
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 16:42:00 -
[76] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:saltrock0000 wrote:[quote=Skeln Thargensen][quote=xarjin]"AFK activities" Controlling logi as well as your own dps squad even with ISboxer certainly isn't a "AFK activity" Its actually very stressful and difficult to master.
If you want to highlight afk activities why not mention moon mining, market games - seeing as once you've placed a buy/sell order you are free to log off and your still making isk, or you know actual bots. As stated and proven by CCP ISboxer is not a botting automation program :P what i mean is that you can accomplish farming by using multiple accounts and ISbox instead of going AFK with drones not that using ISBox is AFK play. so, i guess ISK farming isn't a problem if you're multiboxing?
The old drone mechanics ment you could pretty much achieve afk play, grab agro with a gun then afk till site was over.
There are only 2 ways you play eve, 1 your pvping 2 your "isk farming" to use your phrase. There is no other way to play the game, your either making isk or loosing isk.
The whole downside to soloing vanguards is just about any kitchen sink fleet will beat you in any contest, meaning you will waste a lot of time, also the added risk of loosing ships if your ISP drops or you get a socket closed error. So really to use another overused argument on here "risk vs reward" risk with isboxer is a lot higher then without.
CCP at the end of the day is a business and 1 person with 10 accounts is their ideal customer, they are after all paying 10 times that of the casual player \'''\<(o_O)>/'''/ |

DelBoy Trades
Trotter Independent Traders.
527
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 01:12:00 -
[77] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Key repeating is a kind of automation. It saves you performing those key repeats on multiple machines therefor you gain an unfair advantage to a player that has to key repeat on each of those machines. Yes, as an individual you are at an advantage, but as 11 paid for accounts, if anything you are at a disadvantage as there is only 1 brain controlling the whole lot compared to 11 brains. IE. 11 individuals flying one ship each have much better odds compared to one guy flying 11 ships, yet they both pay the same subscription costs.
If it came down to it, you could hire 10 Chinese gold farmers to come and live with you and play the auxiliary accounts, but no one likes house guests, so ISBoxer was born, deal with it.
Damn nature, you scary! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13592
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 01:19:00 -
[78] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Key repeating is a kind of automation. GǪin the same sense as riding a bicycle uphill is automation. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Tesal
285
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 01:30:00 -
[79] - Quote
At a certain point this stuff might get out of control. If everyone starts to do it, it will likely get banned. Its kind of dumb to spread this stuff around and make forum posts about it.
As for myself, I would be very glad to see it banned. It goes against the spirit of the game multi-boxing to the extreme. The game is EvE Online, not Mass Button Control. |

Wodensun
ZeroSec
87
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 02:14:00 -
[80] - Quote
Tesal wrote:At a certain point this stuff might get out of control. If everyone starts to do it, it will likely get banned. Its kind of dumb to spread this stuff around and make forum posts about it.
As for myself, I would be very glad to see it banned. It goes against the spirit of the game multi-boxing to the extreme. The game is EvE Online, not Mass Button Control.
So running multiple clients in windowed mode and just alt tabbing is ok? |

DelBoy Trades
Trotter Independent Traders.
558
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 04:35:00 -
[81] - Quote
Tesal wrote:At a certain point this stuff might get out of control. If everyone starts to do it, it will likely get banned. Its kind of dumb to spread this stuff around and make forum posts about it.
As for myself, I would be very glad to see it banned. It goes against the spirit of the game multi-boxing to the extreme. The game is EvE Online, not Mass Button Control. You are arguing against people having multiple accounts, not ISBoxer...."Oh CCP, please ban something that produces over half of your revenue stream!"
Yeah, good luck with that... Damn nature, you scary! |

Trevor Voss
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 09:07:00 -
[82] - Quote
Oh no! I make more isk with 3 trader chars then a multiboxing miner with less time effort! Unfair advantage! With this 3 chars/acc i can found my other 3 accounts too, plex shrink - omg.
BTW: Why multiboxing vanguards? Isn't it more profitable when you fly with other guys a HQ? |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2485
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 09:16:00 -
[83] - Quote
Omg! All the Internet economists are out in force today!
Gg OP! Poast more such tear inducing videos. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |