Maybe something like this:
http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=4284

Perhaps combined with this:
http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=4280
and this
http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=3608

with a barge fitting this:
http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=3831
and this:
http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=2048

I think that should do what you want (and more).

You can fit more than enough local tank on any Exhumer (or Barge) to survive until shield reps land, and a Scimitar (heck, a Scythe) ready to rep will be more than enough to dissuade any ganker trying for any semblance of efficiency (because breaking reps or Alphaing you is fairly expensive).

No need for a tool that serves as an AFK replacement for Logi.

Or, you can just have a friend in an osprey sitting next to you transferring shields.

CCP has already given you all the modules you need to prevent ganks.

Beside the shield transfer and the warfare link you listed, teh 3 toher are all AFK enabling solution to ganking. The extender is 100% active while AFK, the DCU II is 99,9% AFK because you have to click it once then it will keep cycling. The extremely low cap requirement means it will not remove cap stability from your barge. The warfare link for shield resist only require another AFK account offgrind boosting.

His request is like a shild extender with the fitting requirement of "have a friend with battleship I on grid". If the guy want to sacrifice an account just to tank ONE ship, I think it's a fair tradeoff. Just make the cycle time high so it's not efficient to change your boost target and even add some kind of spoolup time so you cannot just wait for the target to be attacked and then reinforce that tharget. You get a lesser solution in multi ship use but easyer to manage for a single ship protection.

Do not run missions in a officer fitted faction ship in the most populair misson hubs

Does CONCORD not function inside of missions or something?

Not one account per ship. Nowhere did he say anything about limiting the number of these modules you could fit a Rokh with nothing but PDUs and LSEIIs and have 58.8k Shield HP to work with.

8 targets get some shield HP (thus EHP).
1 gets 14.7k => ~60k EHP added
2 gets 11.025
3 gets 8.2k
4 gets 6.2k
5 gets 4.6k
6 gets 3.4k
7 gets 2.6k
8 gets 1.96k => ~10k EHP added

For reference, a resist fit 3 MLU Mackinaw makes 15k EHP out of 3.75k HP with 3 MLU IIs, so at worst, you're just about doubling the EHP of 7 Mackinaws with 1 AFK ship in a way that's effective against both the expensive Alpha ganks and the cheaper DPS ganks.

More likely, you're protecting 8 targets because a ganker can't tell which one you activated the module on first. All completely AFK.

Most importantly, this would put the final nail in the coffin for the usefulness of the Procurer/Skiff, which are the ships designed to protect you from suicide ganking through high EHP.

If you want high EHP in a mining vessel, the Procurer/Skiff are the ships for you.

The amount of limitation that can be put on it is pretty large. It does not have to be as strong as you quite nicely illustrate it in this post.

Shhh.. Nobody tell him about the exhumer nerf yet.. lol

You mean like drones can if you're ATK?

Why else do Exhumers and Barges have silly high scan res? (Unfit Hulk locks a Destroyer in under 2s.)

Hey, a TD, some ECM, or ECM drones will all get you on their killmails, and could even prevent the gank from succeeding.

But then how will I use minning drones? I want to have kills + take maximum amount of space rock

i mean goddamn you AFK mine in an untanked exhumer (a ship not meant to be in combat) which still has more EHP than an unfit hictor (a ship meant to be in combat) because CCP realized that difficult choices like yield vs. tank are not acceptable for hisec miners, because hisec miners are special snowflakes who cannot be expected to put a single iota of thought into their gameplay

expecting them to put an iota of thought into their gameplay is unacceptable and they will throw tantrums and unsub because nobody else in the game is expected to make decisions like "DPS vs tank" or "DPS vs speed" or "tank vs utility" - forcing the miners to make such calls is unacceptable as mining must be bot-friendly and mindless gameplay

no, because shield modules go in mids and yield module go in lows.

you just pointed out a bunch of "pick 2 of the 3" scenarios.
miners don't have 3 things to pick from. they have tank, and they have yield. in your "pick 2 of the 3" logic, having tank AND yield is perfectly acceptable. two were picked.

you just pointed out a bunch of "pick 2 of the 3" scenarios.
miners don't have 3 things to pick from. they have tank, and they have yield. in your "pick 2 of the 3" logic, having tank AND yield is perfectly acceptable. two were picked.