| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
|
CCP Guard
C C P
C C P Alliance
3537
   |
Posted - 2013.04.16 11:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tune in to our Twitch channel today at 16:00 GMT for a chat with some of the big guns of the EVE Universe!
CCP Unifex - Executive Producer for EVE Online
CCP Seagull - Senior Producer for EVE Online
CCP Ripley - Development Director for EVE Online
CCP torfifrans - Creative director for EVE IP Development Division
Our esteemed guests will talk about their work and take your questions.
We'll be collecting questions from this thread as well as from Twitter, Facebook and of course the Twitch chat channel.
See you on the internet!
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
Isbariya
The Dancer.
Initiative Mercenaries
39
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 12:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
When will supercarriers and carriers be buffed in size ? They are way too small consudering the fact that you can store up to 4 battleships in them.
Will supers ever again be able to use normal drones ? Would be ok if it were to be only 5 of them but to have a carrier completely without any drones seems more then odd to me. |
ChromeStriker
The Riot Formation
Unclaimed.
529
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 12:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
What is the meaning of life? The answer to the ultimate question? and of course what is the ultimate question?
-
Nulla Curas |
Walextheone
The Red Circle Inc.
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 12:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
1. Will there by any focus on small gang pvp to force more conflicts outside of the big wars and structure grind?
2. Now when TE modules and speed of popular tier 3 bc gets nerfed, big gangs will have more of a upper hand. Will there be something in place to "compensate"? |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
1883
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 12:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
When will we see progress on the modular LEGO POS idea?
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
Salpun
Paramount Commerce
491
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 12:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
How is the community web page improvement progression going?
When will the wiki get its needed update?
Will there be video casts after fan fest when you can actually talk about what is coming and give up to date answers to players questions?
Dev posts on the forums have dropped off again except for two or three devs. What are you going to do to increase the communication level again?
|
Beaver Retriever
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 12:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
Followup from the previous thread - the skill queue. Will this ever be extended? Or will we be able to set it via a mobile app in the near future?
I realize that you guys want people to log in every now and then but if certain people are only logging in to set skills, what are you losing? The problem there is that those people need something to do in game, not to be forced to log in every time a skill finishes to pad your PCU count.
I am asking on behalf of those of us that have jobs that require us to be away from home, the internet, and actual computers that can run Eve Online (a spaceship game). Pretty much everyone that is deployed in the military, working on a ship or an oil rig or otherwise working overseas in less than stellar places have this issue.
Getting family members to log in and set queues is not only impractical, but also violates the EULA. |
Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
The Fourth District
361
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
CCP torfifrans \o/
Torfi is awesome, I will forever remember his joke at one of the fanfests about how every time he should come with a warning that his crazy ideas may never come to EVE, or something like that.
I love hearing him speak about the EVE universe and his vision for it, always dark, cruel and compelling.
/me end fanboi mode
*Edit* Might as well ask a question...
When can we have more WIS? There are still many of us who love the ideas and opportunities it creates and would like to see EVE expanded both gameplay and lore wise with WIS.
Lieutenant Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
The Fourth District |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1758
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
What are the plans for avatar based game-play? Common areas? Establishments? Wreck diving? Releasing already created clothing assets? Anything?
http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Indahmawar Fazmarai
1500
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:What are the plans for avatar based game-play? Common areas? Establishments? Wreck diving? Releasing already created clothing assets? Anything?
+1 that. Also, what about portrait/avatar customization?
The Greater Fool Bar-áis now open for business, 24/7. Come and have drinks and fun somewhere between RL and New Eden!-áIngame chat channel: The Greater Fool Bar |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
4008
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
In what ways have you found the CSM useful in the past year, and how do you see their role expanding during CSM8's term?
Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|
GeeShizzle MacCloud
321
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:26:00 -
[12] - Quote
How convoluted is the current Overview legacy code?
have any devs personally observed the famed overview bug?
Are we going to see iterations on the overview code other than cosmetic UI changes?
what is CCP's end goal or preferred direction to making capital and supercapital warfare more interesting?
(how do you want to iterate on it?) |
BEPOHNKA
Guerrilla Army
S2N Citizens
74
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
At this point many of us love the idea of the fixes, but it's time for the oh god feature to come back in play for a but with new content for us all to enjoy. Keep doing the fixing in small parts but in the bigger picture we need newer stuff. |
Amallya Trueshot
Dirt Nap Squad
Dirt Nap Squad.
20
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 13:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
do you ever talk about getting "small scale" pvp to a priority on nullsec versus the blob/coalition pvp way?
best regards from Portugal |
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad
Dirt Nap Squad.
2868
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 14:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:In what ways have you found the CSM useful in the past year, and how do you see their role expanding during CSM8's term?
Answer will be: "CSM has been incredibly useful, and everyone on CSM has been great, except for Hans Jagerblitzen, who is a total spergelord"... 
Click here to vote for Trebor GÇó Candidacy Thread GÇó CSM Blog |
Rees Noturana
Red Rock Mining Company
185
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 14:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Torfi fanboi signing in. We need more of his crazy big visions for EVE.
-á |
Creinar
Blackwater Company
C0VEN
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 14:42:00 -
[17] - Quote
Isbariya wrote:When will supercarriers and carriers be buffed in size ? They are way too small consudering the fact that you can store up to 4 battleships in them.
+1 I also wanted to post a suggestion on supercapital and bridge balance.
Could we instead of the bridge mechanic get some sort of docking option on supercaps?
Increase the size of fighters/bombers and get fleet to choose if they want to get a support fleet with them or a bunch of drones.
Meaning you can jump with fighters/bombers OR a support fleet.
People wouldn't bridge blobs just anywhere because they would risk loosing a SC, also the Mothership would finally earn it's name.
War Kitten wrote:When will we see progress on the modular LEGO POS idea?
+1 AND can we see poses above districts, maybe even limited in size as a orbital defence / customs platform.
Vincent Athena wrote:What are the plans for avatar based game-play? Common areas? Establishments? Wreck diving? Releasing already created clothing assets? Anything?
I would be very happy if we could at least squeze in some changes suggested in the "What to do with the panels in Quarters" topic.
Watching tournaments on those would be epic, and don't forget about corp news. |
Midnight Hope
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
86
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 14:48:00 -
[18] - Quote
1. UI improvements. Specifically around drones and the d-scanner. Any improvements planned in the short term?
2. Are there short term plans to add WIS play to EVE? We have these cool looking avatars and CQs and I would love to have more play options around them. |
|
CCP Guard
C C P
C C P Alliance
3537
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
Keep in mind that these are the high level decision makers and visionaries, they won't necessarily be the best people to answer questions on percentage bonuses of specific ships wheras they will be able to share their mad visions for the future of EVE more likely :)
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
Ali Aras
Valkyries of Night
Of Sound Mind
250
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:19:00 -
[20] - Quote
Are you happy with the new player experience as it is? If not, what's your vision for it?
Ali Aras for CSM8
Warp to Sun (my blog) |
Salpun
Paramount Commerce
491
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Keep in mind that these are the high level decision makers and visionaries, they won't necessarily be the best people to answer questions on percentage bonuses of specific ships wheras they will be able to share their mad visions for the future of EVE more likely :)
Vision Smidgeon
Real eve players only care about what we can actually shoot pilots with.
All these video casts have been mainly about vision we want some meat and potatoes |
Mizhir
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
13631
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:38:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:What are the plans for avatar based game-play? Common areas? Establishments? Wreck diving? Releasing already created clothing assets? Anything?
I would like to know more about this as well.
and also: Are you going to release some of the clothing that is already in the database but not available?
We will never forget you Saede!
I bet you dont see things like this so often in EVE |
Seismic Stan
391
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:41:00 -
[23] - Quote
As EVE moves into its Second Decade, the disparity between slick new elements and old is becoming increasingly noticeable. Great progress has already been made on this front, but this stratification can be clearly seen throughout EVE. For example, there are at least 3 distinct UI styles (legacy/PI/modern), convoluted processes (starbases) and unappealing interfaces (corp management) which are less and less acceptable to today's gamer make hard work of many of EVE's gameplay elements. Whilst these elements can be explained by EVE's age, do you think they can be overcome, or will EVE's age and the underlying development challenges always hamper its continued growth?
Could CCP Unifex enlighten us regarding his new role in mobile strategy? Will we see Planetary Interaction on tablets as he suggested at the CSM Summit?
Freebooted - Tech4 News - Incarna: The Text Adventure - Guild Launch EVE Correspondent |
Knorkor
Ministry of Silly Walk
23
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:47:00 -
[24] - Quote
Do we get free Titans for watching? |
GeeShizzle MacCloud
323
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:50:00 -
[25] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Keep in mind that these are the high level decision makers and visionaries, they won't necessarily be the best people to answer questions on percentage bonuses of specific ships wheras they will be able to share their mad visions for the future of EVE more likely :)
this videocast has the possibility to raise expectations from us players towards ccp just to have them dashed again.
if this videocast is really about the PAST, present and future of eve, then i hope you devs appearing on it have learned how dashed expectations based on 'blue sky dreaming' about future posibilities of eve online kill players desires and excitement about your core product.
plz plz i emplore you, dont talk about stuff that 'could' be, whether its a could be in 5 years, 2 years or the end of the year. plz talk about things that matter to the playerbase (your customers) and that we are likely to see and be a part of in the near future.
because if this videocast is going to be about random wishings of ccp employees that dont have a clue on the real posibilities of actually achieving it, then i know I wont be watching it for long at all. |
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
1152
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 16:11:00 -
[26] - Quote
Are you happy with CCP's level of involvement during CSM elections of the past and is there anything more CCP plans doing this or next year to bring player participation in the CSM to the next level?
Either a softball or awkwarrrrrrd
"Alekseyev Karrde: mercenary of my heart."-á
-Arydanika, Voices from the Void
Hero of the CSM
Noir./Noir. Academy Recruiting: www.noirmercs.com |
Jelani Akinyemi Affonso
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 16:44:00 -
[27] - Quote
I am really happy that CCP is trying to improve the game to incorporate all different types of play styles. This should help give the game more diversity, and help create a more vibrant EVE and more interesting EVE and better sandbox. |
GeeShizzle MacCloud
323
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 16:45:00 -
[28] - Quote
possibly the most devoid of content random videocast that said nothing new or hinted to anything exciting.
45 minutes of my life gone and never gonna get it back.
:( |
Raven Solaris
The Legion of Spoon
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
12
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 17:06:00 -
[29] - Quote
Summary: For the answers to all of your questions, buy the HD Stream. |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
1883
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 17:20:00 -
[30] - Quote
Salpun wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Keep in mind that these are the high level decision makers and visionaries, they won't necessarily be the best people to answer questions on percentage bonuses of specific ships wheras they will be able to share their mad visions for the future of EVE more likely :) Vision Smidgeon Real eve players only care about what we can actually shoot pilots with. All these video casts have been mainly about visionpracticing live-streaming on twitchtv, we want some meat and potatoes
Fixed that for you...
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |