EVE Search - m0o came to venal, they saw and logged

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Berd	Posted - 2003.07.30 16:09:00 - [1] Quote: Edited by: Morkt Drak on 30/07/2003 15:34:45 Skirmishes in Venal: MDW "sources" indicate that a couple of "small scale skirmishes" took place in Venal during which a total of three battleships were lost. These included a TTi Apocalypse-Class Battleship piloted by "Tolstoy" and a, as yet unidentified, Dominix-Class Battleship belonging to others in the VA. TTi also suffered the loss of a number of Cruiser-Class ships but suceeded in destroying the Scorpion-Class Batttleship of pilot "Shollos" from the piratical m0o-corporation. All sides reported high levels of "galactic radiation" causing delays to ship controls. Perhaps most interesting was that TTi could only muster two battleship-class ships in what must surely now be regarded as "their back yard." That's not exactly what I heard. But I should probably believe you, since you are an impartial and neutral publishing entity. Right?
Berd Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2003.07.30 16:09:00 - [2] Quote: Edited by: Morkt Drak on 30/07/2003 15:34:45 Skirmishes in Venal: MDW "sources" indicate that a couple of "small scale skirmishes" took place in Venal during which a total of three battleships were lost. These included a TTi Apocalypse-Class Battleship piloted by "Tolstoy" and a, as yet unidentified, Dominix-Class Battleship belonging to others in the VA. TTi also suffered the loss of a number of Cruiser-Class ships but suceeded in destroying the Scorpion-Class Batttleship of pilot "Shollos" from the piratical m0o-corporation. All sides reported high levels of "galactic radiation" causing delays to ship controls. Perhaps most interesting was that TTi could only muster two battleship-class ships in what must surely now be regarded as "their back yard." That's not exactly what I heard. But I should probably believe you, since you are an impartial and neutral publishing entity. Right?
Berd	Posted - 2003.07.30 17:49:00 - [3] Quote: IC: <<< Only a couple of corporations within the Venal Alliance engage in piracy >>> I dont care if only 1 Corporation engages in open piracy - it has pirates as welcome members and is therefore a Piratical Alliance. It is an Alliance with Pirates. Fact. Live with it and don't try to sugar-coat it. As it happens it is more than one corporation and if the VA isnt piratical it might want to reconsider having: "Paid Visitor Passes (Expire): NO SUCH THING Pirate them or otherwise remove them from region" stuck on their Neocom site. Honestly some people. The Venal Alliance has pirate corps in it = fact. The Venal alliance is a piratical alliance = opinion. Your opinion. Opinions are neither neutral nor impartial. All I am asking is how I should read your publication. Should I read it as a "news medium"; or should I read it as an editorial publication? Oh and if it is an editorial publication, should you not post a disclaimer stating that it is not "news", but opinion? [OOC] Up until this point, I have been in character, Morkt. Do you not think that members of a corporation are not going to attempt to refute negative stories published about them? rolls eyes [/OOC]
Berd Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2003.07.30 17:49:00 - [4] Quote: IC: <<< Only a couple of corporations within the Venal Alliance engage in piracy >>> I dont care if only 1 Corporation engages in open piracy - it has pirates as welcome members and is therefore a Piratical Alliance. It is an Alliance with Pirates. Fact. Live with it and don't try to sugar-coat it. As it happens it is more than one corporation and if the VA isnt piratical it might want to reconsider having: "Paid Visitor Passes (Expire): NO SUCH THING Pirate them or otherwise remove them from region" stuck on their Neocom site. Honestly some people. The Venal Alliance has pirate corps in it = fact. The Venal alliance is a piratical alliance = opinion. Your opinion. Opinions are neither neutral nor impartial. All I am asking is how I should read your publication. Should I read it as a "news medium"; or should I read it as an editorial publication? Oh and if it is an editorial publication, should you not post a disclaimer stating that it is not "news", but opinion? [OOC] Up until this point, I have been in character, Morkt. Do you not think that members of a corporation are not going to attempt to refute negative stories published about them? rolls eyes [/OOC]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.