| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 27 post(s) |
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
7706
   |
Posted - 2013.04.28 08:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
John McCreedy wrote:Regarding Outpost upgrades, let me say one word: Super Capitals. Almost no one uses CSMAs because the risk of them being inaccessible and loosing your 25+ billions ISK ship without at least a fighting chance is completely unappealing. What I propose is why not get rid of the CSMA altogether and replace it with a very expensive Outpost upgrade that allows for at least Super Carriers, to be docked? I'm pretty sure this would top most Super Cap pilot's wish list of Outpost upgrades.
Hell no. If you want to fly a supercapital, either dedicate a character to it or get a holding alt. Supercaps are difficult enough to catch and kill; allowing them to dock is beyond stupid.
mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
[url]http://themittani.com/[/url]: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
7732
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 10:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:That is only if Null is unable to attract miners to Null, but after years of carebear abuse, I would not blame miners for not wanting to go to Null.
Someone will mine those rocks even if hiseccers don't want to.
mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
7734
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 02:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
Holderof Corp wrote:Fun fact, CCP have stated multiple times that they want to see highsec as a training ground and not as a permanent home.
True fact, Several highsec isk generating systems have been nerfed/downgraded over the oast 3 years. Lets start with Incursions, the only equivelent to isk generation that nullbears have as standard (hi there forsaken cashcows!!). Several "balances" have been made to them ALL being negative to isk generation.
Lets take missions and the deployment of sleeper esque AI. Great, slightly smarter rats that decide that drones, even when idle, are Adolf Hitlers lovechildren and must be executed regardless of the tactical situation. Thank you and goodnight anyone wishing to use drones, oh and the 2009 "balance" pass on missions that killed the reward system. Add in the inclusion of the mostly abused Faction Warfare LP giveaway that further drives certain popular mission corps LP value into the ground.
So excuse us highsec dwellers, we tend to look down on risk averse moon goo/OMFGForsaken Isk/RMT fueled windowlickers that think just because they are in null they are the pinnacle of the game.
what did hiseccers do to earn and keep their ability to run incursions?
absolutely nothing, get lost
mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
7734
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Holderof Corp wrote:Quality input from a Goon.
The fact remains that Incursions are universal content, the problem of course is that the organised pilots who run them are well aware of certain entities and have taken steps to ban them. U kelmad Goon?
Yet more proof of the mindless narrative that certain nullsec dwellers insist on perpetuating to justify their griefing.
It's a welfare ISK fountain and you seem unaware that many of those running them in the very same fleets as you are nullseccers
mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
7734
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 15:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Andski wrote:what did hiseccers do to earn and keep their ability to run incursions?
absolutely nothing, get lost They pay a sub, like (perhaps) you do.
This is a dumb argument and you should feel bad. Such high income levels were previously not feasible outside of sanctums which spawned only in low truesec 0.0 systems, which have been targets for roaming gangs for years, at least until CCP decided that hisec should have that same opportunity, only without the need to defend it, without the need to hide from those looking to disrupt your income, without the need to settle in a system in the first place - all provided for free in the safety and comfort of hisec, taking on an "invading force" that somehow coexists with CONCORD responding just as fast as always.
Incursions were the dumbest thing CCP has introduced since T3s. Putting them in the safest space was even dumber - if they had been exclusive to lowsec, nobody would be complaining about lowsec being a ghost town. I mean goddamn, they're still more lucrative than most stuff you can do in nullsec short of blitzing forsaken hubs in a Vindicator - oh wait, CCP is also nerfing that because they want more people in highsec.
mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
7734
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 15:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
My question for Fozzie is when are you actually making small changes to hisec incursions to "help keep the risk involved with this activity where it should be?" Because well there's literally no "risk" to it whatsoever
mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
7768
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 10:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
Crexa wrote:A. You have provided no facts.
B. You are a Goon, not exactly the most trusted.
C. Provide link or GTFO.
just sayin.
he's still right and you're still wrong
mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
7990
|
Posted - 2013.05.25 06:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
if your changes turn out to "ruin the 0.0 community" are you going to break your cycle to fix everything and get it back to an imbalanced state for us ASAP like you did for the incursion communities, which probably have a lower percentage of "people who actually pay out of pocket for eve online" than every other group in the game, including full-time wormhole dwellers
mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
| |
|