|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 63 post(s) |
Paski
Alchemy Enterprises Corporation
14
   |
Posted - 2011.10.20 10:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Omen wrote: Also, the "little" guy is adviced to use CONCORD's customs offices in High-Sec.
Regards
Omen
did you really say that the little guy can get out of low sec and null sec and should just stay in empire, did you not read CCPs own design principles for Null Sec Design Principles, you have just taken the one activity that a careful solo indy player can do in low/null and opened them to the mercy of the bored blob
and your apparently professional CCP Dev response is "get back to empire, null sec and low sec belong to the blob" you should be ashamed of such an ill considered approach
|
Paski
Alchemy Enterprises Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 10:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Omen wrote:You have some cool ideas but why do you assume the larger corporation won't tolerate you? Do people hate money all of a sudden?  On a serious note, do you actually think they are more likely to disallow you? We are operating under the assumption that most PCO owners will allow "neutral" at least for the extra dough. If they indeed don't allow you, I would bet there will be wormholes that operate free for all COs for profit. At least that's what we hope.
This post and the quotes from the dev prove that CCP Omen has not a clue about human nature and how eve works, he sounds like Alan Greenspan thinking that the financial markets will self-regulate themselves based on logic, and look where that got us
and he says that if it does not work the way he expects then he has other plans, by then it is broken mate, too late
wake up a realise what you are doing, your theories might work in a spreadsheet in a perfect world but they certainly won't work in eve, can we get a real dev without training wheels to step in and bring a little CCP sense to this, you guys seem to be doing a great job lately, now this
|
Paski
Alchemy Enterprises Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lord Timelord wrote:
Do the above and the 'small guys' will still be able to have some fun in low-sec. Avoid my advice at the risk of loosing many subscriptions (yet again).
maybe you won't lose many but the players you do will be long term players with multiple accounts, many of whom have been around a while and who like doing stuff in low sec for a bit of excitement, who don't want to be part of a big corp/alliance yet are not prepared to risk wasting their time (don't mind risking a ship) having mindless greifer gangs (which like living in lowsec) disrupte and hold chokepoints over their systems, I don't mind risking isk/ships, but I am not going to waste my time |
Paski
Alchemy Enterprises Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 04:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
personally I am just annoyed at this whole thing
after all the hassles recently and the mea culpa from CCP high command to release this with the arrogance and lack of forethought shows me that it will take a while before the words are put into action
how hard would it have been to put this forward as a discussion thread rather than an announcement
how hard would it have been to put a bit of thought into how this negatively impacts low sec dynamics
how hard would it have been to have a thought for the smaller player
answer, not hard at all
CCP seemed to have come so far recently and then Dev idiot pops up with this ill prepared idea, I am sure (I hope) changes will be made, but it could have been handled so much more professionaly
guys, lift your game, your leaders seem to have, about time you do to |
Paski
Alchemy Enterprises Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 10:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
can we just get on with this, make your amendments and publish so we can get on with our stuff
and it has to be said that of all the exciting and major annoucments that have been made recently in a very obvious focus by CCP to support FiS, that this one has the worst planned and the most badly thought through, topped off by the most arrogant attitude I have seen by a dev, overall a very unimpressive display |
|
|
| |
|