| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 63 post(s) |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
111
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 16:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is just stupid you giving control away again to the people who are not using it or who will just abuse it ; as far i know fom my fellow players most of them don't like the idea of making pi a corporate thing and you just did that
Bad concept ccp bad concept I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
111
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 17:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jake Centauri wrote:The new CO's could also be used for industrial griefing in the following manner: say you find a good planet with a CO open to the public for 9% tax. You install PI on the planet and come back the following day only to find either the tax raised to 100% or, the CO standings were changed to blue only. Your PI installation becomes unexpectedly isolated (no CO) or way too expensive to use. I mean, who is gonna _trust_ that neutral CO's settings will remain stable....I won't.
This this is one of my main concerns most older players in high sec have their installations in low sec and they probably form the biggest percentage of pi production and like i said before you are just giving the control away to people who are not using it or will just use it to grief others
besides who i s going to invest time and money into placing this stupid thing will the first idiot who comes along can blow it up while you are at work or asleep oor does CCP presumes we all play EVE 23/7
No ccp you not been thinking straight
it is about time you stop pampering those 10% of pvp onlyplayers in null sec and do something for all of us this certainly doesn't help
and indeed if this go ahead like it stands now please refund my 1,6 mil sp on my 3 other accounts I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
114
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 18:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
ok i calmed down a bit but tell us why ccp i read the blog 3 times now
I can understand you allow this in nullsec where nullsec allances a can control who acces their planets and get some profit out of it ; tho like a previous poster wrote ' if you can't control acces to your systems you don't deserve sov
But why low sec aswell , it is empire controlled right , sure there is no concord but it is empire controlled Alot of us already taking a risk , granted a low risk doing pi in low sec so why make it harder and more cumbersome for us
honestly i don't see any pro in this except if you are a large nullsec alliance I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
114
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 18:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:If you launch items from a container at the command center (not using customs office) can you evade the taxes?
How does that work? your journal under the tab planetary launches you can launch a limited amount of your pi into orbit with your command center I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
114
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 19:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
first thank you ccp omen for allowing us to give you feed back on this idea ? it looks already massive and i do hope you find is very useful to develop this concept even further
Actually i do like the concept tho i stay with my previous opinion that this as it stands now is too easy to grief all those who go into low sec for their pi ? i thought it was ccp goal to get more people into low sec with this even lass people are likely to venture out there Second there is no way to stop a large alliance to blockade every useful planet between their space and highsec..... barren; lave ;plasma and in lesser degrees ice and storm planets....... you know pos fuels
Yes you can avoid this by launching your cargo into space . but atleast enlarge the cargospace on the command centers it can now barely hold a day production for some items and not everyone has the time to empty their production planets twice a day
uumm maybe a system of being able to lease a CO for a certain time to a certain numbers of corporations will help just a idea I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
118
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 16:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
44 pages in less than 48 hours i am impressed
i just repeating my opinion then
While i like the idea the way like it stands now i think will not really work ; there are some good valid points made against this in low sec
so why not instead of taxes rent custom space out for a limited time period to as many individuals you want could be done in contractform i think
or why not XXX isk/m-¦ I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
317
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 17:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
So CCP here are 67 pages of feedback
Are you still reading and what are your conclusions
While the majority is in favor of the concept , it seems the impact it makes on low sec pi ( where most goods are extracted) seems to be overwhelming negative in its current form
will it be like it stands now or are you making changes
please let us know I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
317
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 08:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
First thank you for your time reading this feed back CCP
My main concern like so many of my fellow PI ers is that we will be locked out from all the usefull planets in low sec by larger entities just because they can and they will , acces should be allowed for all, i think most will not be that concern about 100%tax or atleast enlarge the command centre hold and payload significant, if you not going to change the standing acces , at the moment it can barely hold a day worth of p1 production at best and most of us don't have the time to come and empty it twice a day
The debate about if POCO should be destructable or not is interesting and some good valid points beeen made for both sides , i just keep a open mind
I think the majority of us like to know what you will be changing from your original concept
I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |
| |
|