| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ponch Valdez
Dark Energy.
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 15:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Just to give you some background I recently sunk a lot of isk into a few items speculating on the changes coming up, these items il give you in percentage of portfolio but I will say a number of billion have been invested. Zydrine 25%, Isotopes 15%, fuel blocks 15%, moon goo that will be used in new composites and intermediates and lastly 25% t1 BS hulls in the hope of tiericide pushing prices up and some mining hulls cough cough venture 20% as I assume a lot of people will want to do mining with the changes coming. Things have been looking promising with the way ice prices are ramping up and I cant imagine this changing before the patch drops and we actually see how hard/easy it is to mine the ice. Im kinda thinking the zydrine may have been a bad call though..since I bought in prices have been dropping a little. You guys think minerals in general are a bad bet right now? Im also seeing some t1 bs hull prices dropping GÇô is this because of the mineral prices looking set to drop hulls will be cheaper to produce?.. i want some advise on what i should dump before taking too big a loss, feel free to pm me or evemail or post here and i realise it is all speculatory |

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
first off all I-¦d invest in pargraph-¦s they are heavily underated these days.
oh and yea, investing minerals right now is probably a rather bad idea. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
557
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
I like your diversity approach to balance risk, but I would have gone a different way on percentages and, possibly, left yourself a few more options to compound your profits by flipping commodities where possible.
Other People's ISK, Best ISK. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Secret Squirrell
Allied Press Intergalactic
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sabre Rolf wrote: oh and yea, investing minerals right now is probably a rather bad idea.
Well minerals could go up, while the minerals/m^3 of nullsec ore is going up, increasing isotope prices may cause enough miners to harvest ice that there is still a net reduction in mineral supply. Very speculative, but not illogical. |

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 17:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Secret Squirrell wrote:
Well minerals could go up, while the minerals/m^3 of nullsec ore is going up,
huh?
sure minerals could go up, why not. But then it would be the same thing to say the water might drain away again after your ship rammed a iceberg.
somewhen in the future sure, prices might go up, but right now they are sinking like a stone, and with the coming changes I'm affraid its not getting better.
|

Secret Squirrell
Allied Press Intergalactic
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 17:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sabre Rolf wrote:Secret Squirrell wrote:
Well minerals could go up, while the minerals/m^3 of nullsec ore is going up,
huh?  sure minerals could go up, why not. But then it would be the same thing to say the water might drain away again after your ship just rammed an iceberg with full throttle. somewhen in the future sure, prices might go up, but right now they are sinking like a stone, and with the coming changes I'm affraid its not getting better.
If Ice prices go up high enough, 0.0 miners start mining ice instead of ore. If they do that, the increased minerals in the changed 0.0 ore wont actually result in more minerals entering the market. You would also see more miners chasing the despawning highsec ice, rather then mining ore. Whether Ice gets high enough that it drives up ore prices with it is speculative, but entirely possible. |

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 18:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Secret Squirrell wrote:
If Ice prices go up high enough, 0.0 miners start mining ice instead of ore. If they do that, the increased minerals in the changed 0.0 ore wont actually result in more minerals entering the market. You would also see more miners chasing the despawning highsec ice, rather then mining ore..
why?
phew, sounds a bit like wish-thinking to me tbh. with the coming changes I see rather more ppl mining ore instead of ice.
|

Secret Squirrell
Allied Press Intergalactic
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 18:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sabre Rolf wrote:Secret Squirrell wrote:
If Ice prices go up high enough, 0.0 miners start mining ice instead of ore. If they do that, the increased minerals in the changed 0.0 ore wont actually result in more minerals entering the market. You would also see more miners chasing the despawning highsec ice, rather then mining ore..
why? phew, sounds a bit like wish-thinking to me tbh. with the coming changes I see rather more ppl mining ore instead of ice.
I wouldn't invest in minerals right now myself, just saying I can understand a thought process that would lead someone to, and that its not crazy. |

Ponch Valdez
Dark Energy.
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 18:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
Can we infer from this that if one is to believe minerals are heading south T1 BS hulls will too even with tiericide? |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
598
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 19:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
Secret Squirrell wrote:Sabre Rolf wrote: oh and yea, investing minerals right now is probably a rather bad idea.
Well minerals could go up, while the minerals/m^3 of nullsec ore is going up, increasing isotope prices may cause enough miners to harvest ice that there is still a net reduction in mineral supply. Very speculative, but not illogical.
Actually, totally illogical!
Ice harvester duration will be cut in half. So, twice as much ice per unit of time spent harvesting ice.
The cap on ice will be availability. The anoms will get mined out quickly, they players will have to wait 4 hours for it to respawn. And what are they going to be doing in that extra wait time? Yeah, probably a lot of them are going to switch ships and go mineral mining.
So, we'll need half as many ice mining man hours to produce the same amount of ice... unless you assume all those miners are going to be sitting around doing nothing for 4 hours waiting for respawn.
|

Umar Umarhabib
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 21:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ponch Valdez wrote:Just to give you some background I recently sunk a lot of isk into a few items speculating on the changes coming up, these items il give you in percentage of portfolio but I will say a number of billion have been invested. Zydrine 25%, Isotopes 15%, fuel blocks 15%, moon goo that will be used in new composites and intermediates 25% and lastly t1 BS hulls in the hope of tiericide pushing prices up and some mining hulls cough cough venture 20% as I assume a lot of people will want to do mining with the changes coming. Things have been looking promising with the way ice prices are ramping up and I cant imagine this changing before the patch drops and we actually see how hard/easy it is to mine the ice. Im kinda thinking the zydrine may have been a bad call though..since I bought in prices have been dropping a little. You guys think minerals in general are a bad bet right now? Im also seeing some t1 bs hull prices dropping GÇô is this because of the mineral prices looking set to drop hulls will be cheaper to produce?.. i want some advice on what i should dump before taking too big a loss, feel free to pm me or evemail or post here and i realise it is all speculatory
I think it's a bad idea to invest into anything that can be manufactured, where your only hope of making a profit is a sudden increase in Demand. Because in the best case scenario, supply will catch up quickly. Worst case scenario, you don't make any ISK or you lose ISK.
So unless there is a change in Manufacturing Cost (i.e. decrease in Ore Yield, increase manufacturing cost, etc.), it would be a bad idea to invest more than a few miniscule Billion into anything that can be manufactured. |

YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
721
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 22:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Me thinks that the MD has gotten a little quiet in the last days.
... the speculators are afoot
yk |

Ardaeik Marconea
Akimamur Industries Heimatar Fleet Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 01:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
The ice belts are starting to fill up already. The minerals buy should pay off soon |

Ambo
I've Got Nothing
45
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 07:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
The other thing to consider is the reason behind CCP increasing the low end minerals in 0.0 ores: They want people to be building more stuff in 0.0 rather than having to take everything to high sec.
If that does actually happen then you might see some of the high-end ores becoming a little more scarce in high sec.
In either case, low-ends look certain to decrease in price.
disclaimer: No I haven't invested off the back of this, it's waaaay too speculative. I'm mostly just interested to see what happens :) |

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
139
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 15:51:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ambo wrote:The other thing to consider is the reason behind CCP increasing the low end minerals in 0.0 ores: They want people to be building more stuff in 0.0 rather than having to take everything to high sec.
If that does actually happen then you might see some of the high-end ores becoming a little more scarce in high sec.
In either case, low-ends look certain to decrease in price.
disclaimer: No I haven't invested off the back of this, it's waaaay too speculative. I'm mostly just interested to see what happens :)
If you consider the new composition of ABC and a potential source for selfsufficiency on TRT and PYR in null, then you will see a resulting further oversupply of ZYD and MEG..
Also in the first 3-4 weeks after Odyssey launch a huge reduction in labor on mining will influence the supply of all minerals.
The shifted labor later on of miners from traditional ORE onto ICE will further increase the value of base minerals.
My bet is TRT and PYR will go rather high as a result of this patch.
The changes in general are hard to pin down, because there are so many things affecting them.
Here is a little piece with math and projections.
Ice Ice Baby
|

Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
522
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 16:19:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ambo wrote:The other thing to consider is the reason behind CCP increasing the low end minerals in 0.0 ores: They want people to be building more stuff in 0.0 rather than having to take everything to high sec.
If that does actually happen then you might see some of the high-end ores becoming a little more scarce in high sec.
In either case, low-ends look certain to decrease in price.
disclaimer: No I haven't invested off the back of this, it's waaaay too speculative. I'm mostly just interested to see what happens :)
Same here. Null Sec is still a NAP train. I see no new demand and supply without demand is just manipulation. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1796
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 16:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Currently high sec ice provides over 90% of the ice in the game. The new spawn mechanic will reduce that to 80% at best, most likely lower. In addition ice harvesters run twice as fast. Net result: the total number of ice miners operating in high sec will drop by a factor of about three. More miners just cannot be supported by the available ice.
So what will those miners do? Possibilities: Mine ore is a possibility, driving prices down. Or cancel extra accounts and run missions with their main account, keeping a few accounts for occasional mining. Which would leave prices stable as players trade off mission income with mining income. That could also drop the price of the PLEX as multi-boxing ice miners no longer has a use for a large number of accounts.
Another possibility: Move to Null and mine there. Here I'm assuming those that move their mining to Null already live there, but keep alts for mining in high sec as other than high ends there is little reason to mine in Null. In Null sec they already mine more high ends than they need, exporting the excess to high sec. With the change they most likely will mine more, resulting is still more high ends than they need. High end minerals could well drop.
The increase in ice prices is getting many to consider closing their POS operations. Result: Less T2 invention and less T2. That could drive T2 prices up while at the same time dropping income from moon mining. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
962
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ponch Valdez wrote:Can we infer from this that if one is to believe minerals are heading south T1 BS hulls will too even with tiericide?
Yes... sort of. Minerals probably aren't going to fall as far as people think they are, though. We'll see trit at 4ish, pyerite at 8, but we're not going back to 3 isk/unit trit and 5 isk/unit pyerite. If you figure 4/unit for trit, 8/unit for pyerite, 35 for mex and 90 for isogen, and then just because say that nocx goes to 600, zyd to 700 and megacyte to 2000, a Maelstrom still costs 140m to build, and it's the cheap one. An abaddon is 187m, a hyperion is 181m, and a rokh is 151m.
For the purposes of tiericide, then, it's an "it depends on what they do." If they go ahead and equalize all the prices up near even what a maelstrom costs, that's a big leap in build cost for the tier 1 battleships - at the current mineral prices, those cost around 77m on the low end (domi and geddon) and 87-90m on the high end (scorp and typhoon). So, build cost increasing to the price of a maelstrom is a pretty big jump even with deflated mineral prices, much less if they do something like average the tier 3 prices and increase everything up to that (as well as balancing the tier 3s too). So basically, if they do "good things" for battleship mineral changes, everyone who is blindly panicking and dumping minerals right now is giving anyone else who hasn't bought minerals yet a good deal. We'll find out next week, though... CCP claims new stuff will be up on SiSi then.
e: For the record, I do have 200b isk worth of Tier 1 BS in my hanger, so that should tell you what I think in terms of the safety of the bet. I'm confident that I will at least not lose money. 
Another factor to consider on long term mineral prices, by the way, is that right now, it's not worth building any battlecruiser that isn't an Attack battlecruiser - the formerly tier 1 and tier 2 are still under build cost, though with falling prices they're getting close. Many cruisers are still under build cost as well. So what we're seeing right now is also a factor of lessened demand for minerals as a result of that, probably by 10-15% or so. As minerals continue to fall post-odyssey, though, we'll see that demand come back into play. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
974
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 20:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
Ardaeik Marconea wrote:The ice belts are starting to fill up already. The minerals buy should pay off soon
YEPPERZ ICE belts are definitely begining to get get crowded! So crowded you may want to look into purchasing the ORE Faction ICE harvestors I put up for sale in Jita that increase your range & make bumping that much more difficult!
Also once Odyssy hits & ICE starts depleteing faster then an ice cube in hell these ORE Faction harvetors will give you an edge in fast draining the next ICE slab thats just out of reach to the poor noobs that don't have the boosted range you'll have! An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta theTerminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system'scrashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children' |

YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 20:44:00 -
[20] - Quote
Fozzie said something interesting on the GD.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=230660&p=4
Quote:You're reading it wrong. Highsec will only spawn enough ice to meet 80% of the whole universe's demand. It will spawn roughly 800% of what it needs to meet Highsec's demand.
Quote:Currently 98.4% of all isotope ice is mined in highsec.
While highsec uses less than 15% of the isotopes in EVE.
So right now 98.4% of all ice is mined in hisec with 85% of that ice ending up in LowSec, NullSec, and WH POSs. After the patch, roughly 80% (rather tan 98.4%) of ice will be mined in high sec.,
Am I right to think that the change only represents a 18% decrease in the amount of hi-sec supply. The major low-sec/null sec power blocks will need to mine approximately 20% more than pre-patch to meet the demand. So the prices change long term will likely not produce so much of a supply/demand mismatch.
That being said, if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease.
yk |

Carton Mantory
Occassus Republica
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:11:00 -
[21] - Quote
ICE and byproducts will be depleted. Logistics for null sec is based on the resources in ICE. null sec will become its little high sec.
The cost of POS will go up.
Think about how many cap ships are on the market. This is how ICE will be. Why sell ICE to your enemies soo they can do logistics.
EVE is in for a shift. Null sec was suppose to be a community not a place for PVP. They will now allow for communities to live in null sec and grow. High sec will be only for the extreme rich as it should be. |

Claire Voyant
139
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:28:00 -
[22] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease. What if they schedule their ice mining ops in hisec and deplete the high sec belts while ganking any other miners. That way they not only get ice for themselves, but they prevent their enemies from obtaining ice on the market at cheap prices. The thing that people don't see is that ice will become a strategic material that it never was before. It wouldn't really matter if hisec ice supplied 120% of demand, once you put a limit on it it becomes a whole new ball game.
|

Kithran
54
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:Fozzie said something interesting on the GD. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=230660&p=4Quote:You're reading it wrong. Highsec will only spawn enough ice to meet 80% of the whole universe's demand. It will spawn roughly 800% of what it needs to meet Highsec's demand. Quote:Currently 98.4% of all isotope ice is mined in highsec.
While highsec uses less than 15% of the isotopes in EVE. So right now 98.4% of all ice is mined in hisec with 85% of that ice ending up in LowSec, NullSec, and WH POSs. After the patch, roughly 80% (rather tan 98.4%) of ice will be mined in high sec., Am I right to think that the change only represents a 18% decrease in the amount of hi-sec supply. The major low-sec/null sec power blocks will need to mine approximately 20% more than pre-patch to meet the demand. So the prices change long term will likely not produce so much of a supply/demand mismatch. That being said, if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease. yk
Nope - you've missed one very important fact - high sec mining will meet 80% of needs if _every_ high sec anomaly is mined out as soon as it appears.
Information already given shows you need approx 25 miners to mine out an anomaly fast enough to keep up with that 80% figure.
Have a look at where the ice belts are, have a look how many people are in there now - while there are mining systems with lots more ice miners than that post Odyssey you will not be able to double output by doubling the number of miners in a system. |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
978
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:19:00 -
[24] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:Fozzie said something interesting on the GD. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=230660&p=4Quote:You're reading it wrong. Highsec will only spawn enough ice to meet 80% of the whole universe's demand. It will spawn roughly 800% of what it needs to meet Highsec's demand. Quote:Currently 98.4% of all isotope ice is mined in highsec.
While highsec uses less than 15% of the isotopes in EVE. So right now 98.4% of all ice is mined in hisec with 85% of that ice ending up in LowSec, NullSec, and WH POSs. After the patch, roughly 80% (rather tan 98.4%) of ice will be mined in high sec., Am I right to think that the change only represents a 18% decrease in the amount of hi-sec supply. The major low-sec/null sec power blocks will need to mine approximately 20% more than pre-patch to meet the demand. So the prices change long term will likely not produce so much of a supply/demand mismatch. That being said, if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease. yk
A subtle point.
Right now 98.4% of ALL ICE is mined in highsec, with no word as to actual demand for the resulting products.
Post-patch, a maximum of 80% of DEMAND will be supplied by highsec.
Keep in mind that in another thread, Fozzie said that the supply of ice right now is so high as to be effectively infinite, though to be fair it wasn't clear if he meant the available supply or the mined supply. Still, "98.4% of all ice mined" and "80% of supply met" are not comparing equivalent numbers. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:13:00 -
[25] - Quote
Claire Voyant wrote:YuuKnow wrote:if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease. What if they schedule their ice mining ops in hisec and deplete the high sec belts while ganking any other miners. That way they not only get ice for themselves, but they prevent their enemies from obtaining ice on the market at cheap prices. The thing that people don't see is that ice will become a strategic material that it never was before. It wouldn't really matter if hisec ice supplied 120% of demand, once you put a limit on it it becomes a whole new ball game.
Not something that can be predicted IMHO. But that type of economic warfare in the the game-verse would make the economics of Eve more dynamic. Competition over resource control is an important catalyst for conflict is probably what is intended and welcome.
yk |

Traedar
InterStellar Trading Syndicate
11
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:23:00 -
[26] - Quote
mynnna wrote:YuuKnow wrote:Fozzie said something interesting on the GD. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=230660&p=4Quote:You're reading it wrong. Highsec will only spawn enough ice to meet 80% of the whole universe's demand. It will spawn roughly 800% of what it needs to meet Highsec's demand. Quote:Currently 98.4% of all isotope ice is mined in highsec.
While highsec uses less than 15% of the isotopes in EVE. So right now 98.4% of all ice is mined in hisec with 85% of that ice ending up in LowSec, NullSec, and WH POSs. After the patch, roughly 80% (rather tan 98.4%) of ice will be mined in high sec., Am I right to think that the change only represents a 18% decrease in the amount of hi-sec supply. The major low-sec/null sec power blocks will need to mine approximately 20% more than pre-patch to meet the demand. So the prices change long term will likely not produce so much of a supply/demand mismatch. That being said, if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease. yk A subtle point. Right now 98.4% of ALL ICE is mined in highsec, with no word as to actual demand for the resulting products. Post-patch, a maximum of 80% of DEMAND will be supplied by highsec. Keep in mind that in another thread, Fozzie said that the supply of ice right now is so high as to be effectively infinite, though to be fair it wasn't clear if he meant the available supply or the mined supply. Still, "98.4% of all ice mined" and "80% of supply met" are not comparing equivalent numbers.
No, the non-high sec folks currently mine 1.4% of Isotopes in Eve. After patch they will need to mine 20% of Isotopes in Eve. This means they will need to mine over 10x more Isotopes than they currently do.
I'm pretty sure CCP Fozzie has based these numbers on the high sec hidden ice belts being mined 5x per day. Yet they respawn 4 hours after being depleted. So I wonder if some will be cleared more than 5x per day, meaning high sec could supply more than 80% of Isotopes.
|

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
579
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
Traedar wrote: I'm pretty sure CCP Fozzie has based these numbers on the high sec hidden ice belts being mined 5x per day. Yet they respawn 4 hours after being depleted. So I wonder if some will be cleared more than 5x per day, meaning high sec could supply more than 80% of Isotopes.
That 80% assumes all available ice reaches the market. EVE is not that predictable.
It's entirely possible that many "vested interests" will go to whatever means necessary to make sure ice doesn't respawn.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
998
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:14:00 -
[28] - Quote
Traedar wrote:mynnna wrote:YuuKnow wrote:Fozzie said something interesting on the GD. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=230660&p=4Quote:You're reading it wrong. Highsec will only spawn enough ice to meet 80% of the whole universe's demand. It will spawn roughly 800% of what it needs to meet Highsec's demand. Quote:Currently 98.4% of all isotope ice is mined in highsec.
While highsec uses less than 15% of the isotopes in EVE. So right now 98.4% of all ice is mined in hisec with 85% of that ice ending up in LowSec, NullSec, and WH POSs. After the patch, roughly 80% (rather tan 98.4%) of ice will be mined in high sec., Am I right to think that the change only represents a 18% decrease in the amount of hi-sec supply. The major low-sec/null sec power blocks will need to mine approximately 20% more than pre-patch to meet the demand. So the prices change long term will likely not produce so much of a supply/demand mismatch. That being said, if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease. yk A subtle point. Right now 98.4% of ALL ICE is mined in highsec, with no word as to actual demand for the resulting products. Post-patch, a maximum of 80% of DEMAND will be supplied by highsec. Keep in mind that in another thread, Fozzie said that the supply of ice right now is so high as to be effectively infinite, though to be fair it wasn't clear if he meant the available supply or the mined supply. Still, "98.4% of all ice mined" and "80% of supply met" are not comparing equivalent numbers. No, the non-high sec folks currently mine 1.4% of Isotopes in Eve. After patch they will need to mine 20% of Isotopes in Eve. This means they will need to mine over 10x more Isotopes than they currently do. I'm pretty sure CCP Fozzie has based these numbers on the high sec hidden ice belts being mined 5x per day. Yet they respawn 4 hours after being depleted. So I wonder if some will be cleared more than 5x per day, meaning high sec could supply more than 80% of Isotopes.
What I'm saying is that it's a minimum of a 15x increase, since "80% of the demand" is not directly comparable to "98.4% of everything that is mined". "Everything that is mined" may in fact exceed supply by a great deal on its own, which Fozzie hinted at - that's what I think the "supply is so large as to be effectively infinite" comment he posted elsewhere meant. You can draw real world evidence for this from the ice interdiction, incidentally. Despite cutting off the vast majority of supply for gallente ice, it took a long time for prices to get up to their highest levels, because there were plentiful stockpiles that people were happy to sell.
As to getting a sixth spawn, it is mathematically possible if you mine every spawn in 48 minutes or less - realistically, more like 40 minutes or less to leave time to mine the sixth one. However, the absolute minimum pilot count to mine a site that quickly is 56 - one fully skilled orca pilot with mindlinks, plus 55 fully skilled hulk pilots with 5% mining implants. Every single site across Empire being mined out in full six times a day this way would thus require a minimum of 5432 pilots on each and every time the belts respawned.
I doubt there are that many highsec miners in the game, especially when you start to factor in things like "time zones". So while I've no doubt that some systems will get six spawns a day (probably mostly Caldari systems that will owe it to their proximity to Jita) I'm also fairly confident many systems will be neglected, and things will average out. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:53:00 -
[29] - Quote
mynnna wrote:As to getting a sixth spawn, it is mathematically possible if you mine every spawn in 48 minutes or less - realistically, more like 40 minutes or less to leave time to mine the sixth one. However, the absolute minimum pilot count to mine a site that quickly is 56 - one fully skilled orca pilot with mindlinks, plus 55 fully skilled hulk pilots with 5% mining implants. Every single site across Empire being mined out in full six times a day this way would thus require a minimum of 5432 pilots on each and every time the belts respawned.
That sounds like a challenge worth of the Goons. Get to it!
yk
|

Claire Voyant
139
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 14:15:00 -
[30] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:Claire Voyant wrote:YuuKnow wrote:if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease. What if they schedule their ice mining ops in hisec and deplete the high sec belts while ganking any other miners. That way they not only get ice for themselves, but they prevent their enemies from obtaining ice on the market at cheap prices. The thing that people don't see is that ice will become a strategic material that it never was before. It wouldn't really matter if hisec ice supplied 120% of demand, once you put a limit on it it becomes a whole new ball game. Not something that can be predicted IMHO. But that type of economic warfare in the the game-verse would make the economics of Eve more dynamic. Competition over resource control is an important catalyst for conflict is probably what is intended and welcome. Thought that kindof stuff can happen now. Doesn't need to wait for the patch. It didn't wait for the patch. Do you remember the ice interdiction? I think it can be predicted. Whether it works or not is another thing. You should really check out mynnna's new and improved politically correct and slightly less overtly anti-semitic signature sometime. (If you want to be a space politician nowadays you gotta clean up your act, right?) |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1031
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 14:31:00 -
[31] - Quote
I don't think my sig was politically incorrect or anti-semetic before  Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Claire Voyant
139
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 14:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
mynnna wrote:I don't think my sig was politically incorrect or anti-semetic before  I don't think I ever said it was. I said it was new and improved. And "cabal" is also politically correct and slightly less overtly ant-semetic than "Jewbal" but I'm sorry if anyone got the impression that your signature was ever anti-semetic. |

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
mynnna wrote:YuuKnow wrote:Fozzie said something interesting on the GD. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=230660&p=4Quote:You're reading it wrong. Highsec will only spawn enough ice to meet 80% of the whole universe's demand. It will spawn roughly 800% of what it needs to meet Highsec's demand. Quote:Currently 98.4% of all isotope ice is mined in highsec.
While highsec uses less than 15% of the isotopes in EVE. So right now 98.4% of all ice is mined in hisec with 85% of that ice ending up in LowSec, NullSec, and WH POSs. After the patch, roughly 80% (rather tan 98.4%) of ice will be mined in high sec., Am I right to think that the change only represents a 18% decrease in the amount of hi-sec supply. The major low-sec/null sec power blocks will need to mine approximately 20% more than pre-patch to meet the demand. So the prices change long term will likely not produce so much of a supply/demand mismatch. That being said, if the major null/low sec power bloc start actively incorporating large mining divisions with scheduled ICE ops into their alliances, then the Ice supply over the long term may actually increase rather than decrease. yk A subtle point. Right now 98.4% of ALL ICE is mined in highsec, with no word as to actual demand for the resulting products. Post-patch, a maximum of 80% of DEMAND will be supplied by highsec. Keep in mind that in another thread, Fozzie said that the supply of ice right now is so high as to be effectively infinite, though to be fair it wasn't clear if he meant the available supply or the mined supply. Still, "98.4% of all ice mined" and "80% of supply met" are not comparing equivalent numbers.
The only thing that makes them not equivalent is people stockpiling or getting rid of stockpiles. Other than that, they are equivalent. In other words, the ice that is mined gets used at roughly the same rate. |

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 04:33:00 -
[34] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Ardaeik Marconea wrote:The ice belts are starting to fill up already. The minerals buy should pay off soon YEPPERZ ICE belts are definitely begining to get get crowded! So crowded you may want to look into purchasing the ORE Faction ICE harvestors I put up for sale in Jita that increase your range & make bumping that much more difficult! Also once Odyssy hits & ICE starts depleteing faster then an ice cube in hell these ORE Faction harvetors will give you an edge in fast draining the next ICE slab thats just out of reach to the poor noobs that don't have the boosted range you'll have!
All I see here is "buy my gank magnets" |

Joan Greywind
I Moan ALOT We Moan ALOT
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 09:26:00 -
[35] - Quote
I would just like to point out that ice in high sec will cover 80% of "current" demand. But as ice prices increase the demand will decrease (basic demand supply curve), so at the end we might see that high sec ice minning will be sufficient to cover the new demand (at higher prices of course). The question we have to ask , is it going to rise high enough to make nullsec ice minning worth it?
(the correct answer is, it is never worth it to mine ice)
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4040
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 19:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote:The question we have to ask , is it going to rise high enough to make nullsec ice minning worth it?
(the correct answer is, it is never worth it to mine ice)
That's what I have told in another thread, but they won't believe me. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Rhivre
TarNec
121
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 20:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote:I would just like to point out that ice in high sec will cover 80% of "current" demand. But as ice prices increase the demand will decrease (basic demand supply curve), so at the end we might see that high sec ice minning will be sufficient to cover the new demand (at higher prices of course). The question we have to ask , is it going to rise high enough to make nullsec ice minning worth it?
(the correct answer is, it is never worth it to mine ice)
If High sec can cover 80% of current demand, and null sec currently uses 85%, while producing 2%, do I think ice mining will increase in null?
If all 97 belts are mined out 5* a day (Yes, including the ones in pockets), and high sec removes all use of ice related products, then null only needs to increase from 2-5%
*shrugs*
I dont see what price has to do with it. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
603
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 20:33:00 -
[38] - Quote
The fun part is that CCP wants ice to be a "conflict driver". If 80% doesn't encourage any nastiness, then those spawning ice field anomalies might spawn less and less frequently until CCP is happy with the results.
Sure, stockpiles will make up the difference and buffer the market demand for awhile -- but all good things must come to an end. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
1000
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 21:16:00 -
[39] - Quote
mynnna wrote:I don't think my sig was politically incorrect or anti-semetic before 
Then Next time try Harder I do believe my sig is anti-fowl and am proud of it An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta theTerminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system'scrashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children' |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
1000
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 21:19:00 -
[40] - Quote
Correct me if I'm wrong please but don't all racial ices only spawn in Empire so NULL will still be forced to import those to fuel thier POS's? An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta theTerminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system'scrashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children' |

Airto TLA
Puppeteers of Doom
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 22:26:00 -
[41] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Joan Greywind wrote:The question we have to ask , is it going to rise high enough to make nullsec ice minning worth it?
(the correct answer is, it is never worth it to mine ice)
That's what I have told in another thread, but they won't believe me.
THe question is 2,500 ice blocks going to be from one big block or 50 different "astroids", becasue if they are there is going to be more interactivity required. Also twice the pull rate may make sense for Ice farming beyond the 20+ ship one man shops, finally. Grabbing a hour worth for 10 + million while doing something on an alt, may be worth doing ,the old return and farming rate was jsut awful (except to the mass AFK collective). |

Joan Greywind
I Moan ALOT We Moan ALOT
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 04:19:00 -
[42] - Quote
Airto TLA wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Joan Greywind wrote:The question we have to ask , is it going to rise high enough to make nullsec ice minning worth it?
(the correct answer is, it is never worth it to mine ice)
That's what I have told in another thread, but they won't believe me. THe question is 2,500 ice blocks going to be from one big block or 50 different "astroids", becasue if they are there is going to be more interactivity required. Also twice the pull rate may make sense for Ice farming beyond the 20+ ship one man shops, finally. Grabbing a hour worth for 10 + million while doing something on an alt, may be worth doing ,the old return and farming rate was jsut awful (except to the mass AFK collective).
It is all about oppurtunity cost. Let us assume that the price of ice doubles and now you can make 15m an hour ice minning (I won't even consider the hauling costs, even if you own the freighter it is not free). Now remember ratting in null sec won't be harder than ice minning, press f1. So to actually to have null ice minning as a viable option it should make in an hour at least as much as the next option, which is of course ratting. In this case it will not be a viable option (for the common sense users of course)
On the other hand let us assumes it quadruples in price. Now you will be making 30m an hour which is maybe to some people as good as ratting, now it becomes a viable option. I dont want to go all technical in an eve forum but it will all actually depend on the elasticity of the ice demand curve. If it is high and a little increase in price will make a lot more people use less ice (carebears with manufacting poses that make little profit for example), then null sec ice minning won't be viable. If is low and people will still demand ice (relatively) at the higher prices then we will see ice minning in null sec (and new bot programs that know how to hit the scan and warp to the anamoly) I hope that was clear enough.
Disclaimer: we are talking about eve and we see a lot of people with the I mine it so it is free mentality, but we are only discussing its viability here from a common sense perspective. |

Danni stark
201
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 08:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
Airto TLA wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Joan Greywind wrote:The question we have to ask , is it going to rise high enough to make nullsec ice minning worth it?
(the correct answer is, it is never worth it to mine ice)
That's what I have told in another thread, but they won't believe me. THe question is 2,500 ice blocks going to be from one big block or 50 different "astroids", becasue if they are there is going to be more interactivity required. Also twice the pull rate may make sense for Ice farming beyond the 20+ ship one man shops, finally. Grabbing a hour worth for 10 + million while doing something on an alt, may be worth doing ,the old return and farming rate was jsut awful (except to the mass AFK collective).
from screenshots of sisi, the asteroids in the high sec ice anoms contain 90-150 units each. null sec is 140-175 or so, for the racial ices. less for the non racial ice. Ice Mining Skill Plan. |

Milegherete
Avarice Unlimited
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 08:28:00 -
[44] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote:Airto TLA wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Joan Greywind wrote:The question we have to ask , is it going to rise high enough to make nullsec ice minning worth it?
(the correct answer is, it is never worth it to mine ice)
That's what I have told in another thread, but they won't believe me. THe question is 2,500 ice blocks going to be from one big block or 50 different "astroids", becasue if they are there is going to be more interactivity required. Also twice the pull rate may make sense for Ice farming beyond the 20+ ship one man shops, finally. Grabbing a hour worth for 10 + million while doing something on an alt, may be worth doing ,the old return and farming rate was jsut awful (except to the mass AFK collective). The numbers below might not represent the "true" numbers, they are just there to ease the demonstration of the idea. It is all about oppurtunity cost. Let us assume that the price of ice doubles and now you can make 15m an hour ice minning (I won't even consider the hauling costs, even if you own the freighter it is not free). Now remember ratting in null sec won't be harder than ice minning, press f1. So to actually to have null ice minning as a viable option it should make in an hour at least as much as the next option, which is of course ratting. In this case it will not be a viable option (for the common sense users of course) On the other hand let us assumes it quadruples in price. Now you will be making 30m an hour which is maybe to some people as good as ratting, now it becomes a viable option. I dont want to go all technical in an eve forum but it will all actually depend on the elasticity of the ice demand curve. If it is high and a little increase in price will make a lot more people use less ice (carebears with manufacting poses that make little profit for example), then null sec ice minning won't be viable. If is low and people will still demand ice (relatively) at the higher prices then we will see ice minning in null sec (and new bot programs that know how to hit the scan and warp to the anamoly) I hope that was clear enough. Disclaimer: we are talking about eve and we see a lot of people with the I mine it so it is free mentality, but we are only discussing its viability here from a common sense perspective.
Quadruple 15 is not 30, i cannot agree with any other words after this. |

Danni stark
201
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 09:13:00 -
[45] - Quote
Milegherete wrote:Joan Greywind wrote:Let us assume that the price of ice doubles and now you can make 15m an hour ice minning Quadruple 15 is not 30, i cannot agree with any other words after this.
considering you're not quadrupling 15, you're doubling it again... Ice Mining Skill Plan. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
45
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 10:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
strontium  |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
605
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:15:00 -
[47] - Quote
Some pilots seem to think the doubling of ice harvester cycle speed will be some sort of "silver bullet" in their favour.
It will be interesting to see how that works out for them given the upcoming changes in game mechanics and how "competitive" more and more pilots will be as the price of ice rises higher and higher.
Fun times.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Danni stark
202
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:26:00 -
[48] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Some pilots seem to think the doubling of ice harvester cycle speed will be some sort of "silver bullet" in their favour.
It will be interesting to see how that works out for them given the upcoming changes in game mechanics and how "competitive" more and more pilots will be as the price of ice rises higher and higher.
Fun times.
it is in their favour, it doubles the isk/hour of the activity. ice sites are a fixed amount of m3/isk/whatever, so the faster you deplete one, the better. Ice Mining Skill Plan. |

Idol1
IGI Purchasing
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 02:35:00 -
[49] - Quote
The math doesn't really work. Even though you can mine ice twice as fast, that 4 hours you can't mine ice is a money loser. Unless,of course, so many people quit ice mining that the belt stays there for four hours and you have the good fortune to start mining the minute the belt appears. It is absolutely possible that so many people quit ice mining that the spawns get thrown off to just a few a day.
So in the end high sec ice mining is going to be random and a matter of luck. If you play when no one else does your golden. If you play prime time your screwed. It will never get better because it will always be variable. One day you log on there will be ice and the next you have to wait four hours. THAT does not make for a very stable market. |

Joan Greywind
I Moan ALOT We Moan ALOT
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.11 05:26:00 -
[50] - Quote
Quadruple 15 is not 30, i cannot agree with any other words after this.[/quote]
Your reading comprehension is flawed at best, please read again before you throw hasty posts. It doesn't matter if you agree or not, these aren't my ideas it's simple economic theory.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |