| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
172
   |
Posted - 2011.10.19 00:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
Unfortunately what I'd recommend is the opposite direction CCP seems to be heading (sorry guys...), but it is similar... redistribution of resources. Not from high / wh space to null, but within null itself. There are too many pockets of high value with too much low value between. Moon goo... spread it out so the systems with value are too far between for any one alliance to own them all. Plexes, same thing... give all null systems a chance to have them. The more you spread it out, the more people will feel they have a chance to find their vein of gold so odds are more will go for it, knowing that by doing so they're not dedicating themselves to a particular mega-alliance.
There are a lot of empty systems out there. Give people a real reason to check them out. Hell, redistribute the resources and don't tell anyone where to look.
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
173
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 02:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Rellik B00n wrote:null is just pointless. Take it all away and replace it with an equal number of wormhole systems. Problem solved.
But what will the nullbears do without their sanctums?
Run Sleeper sites, then cry like hell when their crap fit null sanctum boats get blown to hell.
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
178
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 12:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ogi Talvanen wrote:For me to move to WH space they would have to get working local, jump bridges, gates and stations.
Why would you want to nerf wormholes to be like the lesser spaces?
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
178
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 12:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ogi Talvanen wrote:Its more like a buff then nerf.
How is it a buff? You'd be taking the best aspects of wormhole life away and turn it into the admittedly broken crap that exists in null. You notice noone's complaining that wormhole space needs to be fixed... it's all about fixing null.
If you want to see what null should have looked like, jump through a hole.
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
207
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 12:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:This thread is pretty awesome. You guys will get a few 0.0 changes this winter, smaller ones that should improve quality of life.
One thing I'm thinking about, but not entirely sure about is this: Putting bounties on drones instead of minerals. Mining used to be a viable way of making money in nullsec, but the increase in available minerals has driven the price down. I'm wondering if putting bounties on drones won't give mining a bit of a revival and put some life back in 0.0.
It would be a hell of a lot more effective and would make a whole lot more sense than nerfing the resoruces in wormholes.
+1
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
207
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 12:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mr Painless wrote:Jada Maroo wrote:I simply have no desire to be a pet or a slave to some monolithic 0.0 mega alliance. The only way I'd ever consider null is if it got shattered into lots of little pieces and large blocs were impossible to hold onto. Until that day, I'll stay in wormholes. ^This^ And kill local in nullsec. Or at least create a mechanic that will allow local to be shut down or avoided, like a "local cloaking device" or some destructible structure that enables/disables local in system. Something to make life harder on 0.0 bots.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=23439&find=unread
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
210
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 14:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
The idea of concentrating the choice resources does nothing more than isolate them from the majority of players by hiding them under mega-alliances. Smaller corps and alliances have no chance at them and won't even try.
Spread the resources out. The ultimate null-sec smear campaign! Spread the tech moons EVERYWHERE in null - break up the concentrations. Give people a reason to go anywhere and everywhere because they could do so, find the mega-alliance can't spread itself thin enough to get there, and actually succeed.
Give people reasons to go to the unoccupied (or low occupied) areas. Give 'em some goo. Give 'em some sanctums. Share the love.
That WILL encourage more people into null, knowing they now have a chance to carve out their own little corner of success.
it's really that simple.
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
435
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 13:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Cur wrote:effing forums, ccp please fix this bullshit "no html" code i get for using youre own "bold" function.
REMOVE STATISTIC REPORTING FROM 0.0
Not all of it, but the following:
Rats killed per system
The ability to remotely view soveregnity upgrade levels (force people to physically visit the system to see if its got it - only allow the corp that owns the tcu/ihub to remotely view)
Jumps per system
ITT - People trying to come up with creative ways to hide their bot activities.
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
| |
|