EVE Search - Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 56	Posted - 2011.10.19 03:28:00 - [1] - Quote Basic question. Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy? Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
EVE Stig Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 22	Posted - 2011.10.19 03:30:00 - [2] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: Basic question. Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy? Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies... Id guess you... Whats the new policy lol "Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!
Darth A30NZ Society Of New Eden Studies Violent Society 5	Posted - 2011.10.19 03:32:00 - [3] - Quote CCP: Yo dawg I hear you like War Dec\s so we put a War dec in your war dec so you can declare war while at war. Me: Oh cool
The Apostle The Black Priests 507	Posted - 2011.10.19 03:44:00 - [4] - Quote Risk reduction? Where? When? Who? Oh, you mean it MIGHT cost more so that 2 dollar, 5 minute corps can't wardec everyone for the fun of it? Or will it mean if you intend to wardec someone you better also be wantin' to actually fight? Or will it mean $2 corps can only afford to wardec $2 corps leaving the big boys to slug it out with dragons instead of gnats? Nah. 0/10. Doesn't reduce risk, just means wannabes are turned into doabees. A good thing yeah.... Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
shashe sin State War Academy Caldari State 2	Posted - 2011.10.19 03:48:00 - [5] - Quote cry moar pls
non judgement Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance 79	Posted - 2011.10.19 03:54:00 - [6] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: Basic question. Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy? Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies... Well, if this isn't Poetic Stanziel's alt. I'm going to be really confused.
The Apostle The Black Priests 507	Posted - 2011.10.19 03:58:00 - [7] - Quote non judgement wrote: Har Harrison wrote: Basic question. Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy? Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies... Well, if this isn't Poetic Stanziel's alt. I'm going to be really confused. Can't be. OP has got 56 likes which means he musta said something clever once or twice. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
non judgement Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance 79	Posted - 2011.10.19 04:09:00 - [8] - Quote Just incase the OP doesn't know. I'd like to point out that Poetic Stanziel killed this topic a few days ago. By killed I mean a slow, drawn out, painful process and in the end it just became a really, really, really bad joke. I think the Goons even got tired of it. Hmmmm, I wonder how long it takes to create 56 alts.
Simetraz State War Academy Caldari State 100	Posted - 2011.10.19 04:15:00 - [9] - Quote I could really care less if CCP gives EVE Uni complete immunity to War Dec's for free.
EVE Stig Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 22	Posted - 2011.10.19 04:27:00 - [10] - Quote non judgement wrote: Just incase the OP doesn't know. I'd like to point out that Poetic Stanziel killed this topic a few days ago. By killed I mean a slow, drawn out, painful process and in the end it just became a really, really, really bad joke. I think the Goons even got tired of it. Hmmmm, I wonder how long it takes to create 56 alts. hm... assuming one account, you make two every ten hours so 280 hours "Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!
The Zerg Overmind Rule Reversal Dec Shield 10	Posted - 2011.10.19 04:49:00 - [11] - Quote The new system is great. Now we can offer wardec removal services to the public! Sign up now! Only 50mil! War Dec Removal Service - 50mil
Taedrin Kushan Industrial 112	Posted - 2011.10.19 05:01:00 - [12] - Quote Someone correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't maintaining the dec shield cost at least as much as it would cost to war dec EVE Uni? Meaning that EVE Uni is paying at least as much as it would cost to dec them in order to avoid the decs. By this reasoning, if EVE Uni can afford to maintain the dec shield, any organization with the same or greater amount of money could therefore dec them.
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 57	Posted - 2011.10.19 05:11:00 - [13] - Quote I got the likes for championing FW fixes mostly. The thread is in response to the GM declaration that people can freely hop corps and corps can hop alliances etc..., meaning high sec wars are all but impossible to run as anybody can run from them, thereby making high sec risk free. The dec shield is supposed to cost that much Tae, but there has been speculation that they have a way to make it much cheaper... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 57	Posted - 2011.10.19 05:14:00 - [14] - Quote Link for people to GM post https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19881&find=unread There is a post later on that says it is not allowed to join corp while in space to gank someone (since they didn't see you as red when u parked next to them in mission, then jumped into corp), but they allow people to avoid wars, which people have legitimately paid their fees for... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Myxx Atropos Group 81	Posted - 2011.10.19 05:17:00 - [15] - Quote Meh, I think its stupid but whatever. I had a couple wardecs going that effectively had two corps station camped for the last month. They got merc'd because they were decidedly more annoying than they're worth. This will just increase the level of stupid behaviour that goes without reprocussions. CCP really need to fix crimewatch and revamp the war system anyway. People who baselessly accuse others of random **** and expect to not be hunted down for smacktalking the wrong person honestly need to not have that level of protection. That said, on the flipside, griefers of all kinds are crying about it... so whatever. Kinda indifferent about it. It makes getting my point across a little harder with mercs, though.
Poetic Stanziel Arrakis Technology 122	Posted - 2011.10.19 05:20:00 - [16] - Quote non judgement wrote: Well, if this isn't Poetic Stanziel's alt. I'm going to be really confused. In preparation for this thread, I created an alt before I even started playing EVE Online. What God Wants, God Gets, God Help Us All
Headerman Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx 241	Posted - 2011.10.19 05:21:00 - [17] - Quote In these part o' town, everyday's a war day. [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img]
non judgement Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance 81	Posted - 2011.10.19 05:23:00 - [18] - Quote Very tricky indeed.
Shadowsword The Rough Riders Ares Protectiva 29	Posted - 2011.10.19 05:44:00 - [19] - Quote The war dec system is screwed anyway. You have nobodies in hi-sec declaring war on 0.0 alliances in the hope they might catch a lone freighter around Jita. But as soon as something that can fight back come, they dock. That's why 0.0 alliances use alts for moving stuff, and don't bother wasting time trying to catch the nobodies. So the war might as well not exist. I'm in favor of anything that can turn wannabe high-sec piracy into real war, and that include raising the cost of war-deccing.
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 62	Posted - 2011.10.19 06:38:00 - [20] - Quote Shadowsword wrote: The war dec system is screwed anyway. You have nobodies in hi-sec declaring war on 0.0 alliances in the hope they might catch a lone freighter around Jita. But as soon as something that can fight back come, they dock. That's why 0.0 alliances use alts for moving stuff, and don't bother wasting time trying to catch the nobodies. So the war might as well not exist. I'm in favor of anything that can turn wannabe high-sec piracy into real war, and that include raising the cost of war-deccing. Read what has been said. This change has made it such that the corp that is decced can RUN from the war without being forced to defend their corp/alliance. It basically means there is no point in trying to perform war in high sec - it is now carebear heaven as the only way to lose a ship now is by suicide gank or stupidity... And the war deccer meanwhile gets to pay isk for concord to allow them to have a war dec issued which is now meaningless... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
non judgement Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance 81	Posted - 2011.10.19 06:43:00 - [21] - Quote I always think the idea of them fixing the bounty system somehow would be good. I used to always imagined people waiting outside stations for people with large bounties to come out. Pity there isn't another way of having bounties that does away with alts and friends collecting them. They should have a thing where you can select who can collect the bounty. So you just add a corp/alliance and/or single person you'd like to be able to collect the bounty you have put on someones head. They would then receive a bounty notice about it. Ofc it could be (ab)used a bit like the wardec system tho. But at least it'd be a bit harder for that persons alt/friend to collect bounties.
Naran Eto Kut-n-Run 22	Posted - 2011.10.19 06:51:00 - [22] - Quote Simetraz wrote: I could really care less if CCP gives EVE Uni complete immunity to War Dec's for free. Could care less
Htrag The Carebear Stare Hydroponic Zone 6	Posted - 2011.10.19 06:55:00 - [23] - Quote Its not that I dont like it, I just think its distasteful for something to be deemed no longer an exploit, presumably because enforcement is a pain in the nuts. Noob: Our corp just got war decced, what do we do? Buddy: Well you can setup 18 alt corps and have them all war dec your corp so the costs for the true war dec will be outrageous. Broken.
Naran Eto Kut-n-Run 23	Posted - 2011.10.19 07:00:00 - [24] - Quote Htrag wrote: Its not that I dont like it, I just think its distasteful for something to be deemed no longer an exploit, presumably because enforcement is a pain in the nuts.. You think this is bad, you should see what happened over on starwars galaxies, they ended up with so many people running combat macros and afk farming spawns that they turned round and said they would no longer enforce anti-bot rules unless the bot was specifically effecting another players gameplay (ie afk farming a quest spawn and stopping anyone else from running the quest) because it was taking up too much of their GM time.
Herping yourDerp Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 168	Posted - 2011.10.19 07:02:00 - [25] - Quote Pros Isk sink helps prevent single person griefing a large alliance war requires more commitment griefer tears Cons bad forum post if you can't afford a dec shield your gonna be deced
Poetic Stanziel Arrakis Technology 123	Posted - 2011.10.19 07:16:00 - [26] - Quote Herping yourDerp wrote: Isk sink Unless you game the system, so that you pay only a small fraction of the intended cost. What God Wants, God Gets, God Help Us All
Skunk Gracklaw GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 162	Posted - 2011.10.19 07:18:00 - [27] - Quote If there is a game mechanic that makes Poetic Stanziel mad then I'm all for it.
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 62	Posted - 2011.10.19 07:43:00 - [28] - Quote Skunk Gracklaw wrote: If there is a game mechanic that makes Poetic Stanziel mad then I'm all for it. What about if there is one that makes other people unhappy??? You know, since it allows person who knows the magic hax to have free dec shield while everyone else has to pay full isk??? You know, kind of like when monkeysphere magic was happening and he was a l33t pvp person and everyone else sucked as they didn't know how to do it... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Skunk Gracklaw GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 164	Posted - 2011.10.19 07:46:00 - [29] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: Skunk Gracklaw wrote: If there is a game mechanic that makes Poetic Stanziel mad then I'm all for it. What about if there is one that makes other people unhappy??? You know, since it allows person who knows the magic hax to have free dec shield while everyone else has to pay full isk??? Considering the kinds of corps that regularly wardec eve-uni they have it coming. There is also no hacking involved with what they are doing and CCP has stated that it's not an exploit.
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 62	Posted - 2011.10.19 07:48:00 - [30] - Quote Skunk Gracklaw wrote: Har Harrison wrote: Skunk Gracklaw wrote: If there is a game mechanic that makes Poetic Stanziel mad then I'm all for it. What about if there is one that makes other people unhappy??? You know, since it allows person who knows the magic hax to have free dec shield while everyone else has to pay full isk??? Considering the kinds of corps that regularly wardec eve-uni they have it coming. There is also no hacking involved with what they are doing and CCP has stated that it's not an exploit. And what about corps that want to dec corps besides Eve Uni??? What if a corp wanted to dec a corp to push players out of a system or remove a POS etc... and the players jump corp and laugh or the POS is untouchable due to moving to a new alliance... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 643	Posted - 2011.10.19 07:54:00 - [31] - Quote The whole wardec system is so broken that it's hard to get excited about this change, tbh. As soon as CCP have got the 0.0 rework well underway, then hi-sec needs to be next. CONCORD, bounty hunting, wardecs, sec status, all need reworking into some kind of a coherent system. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
Louis deGuerre Malevolence. Void Alliance 40	Posted - 2011.10.19 08:09:00 - [32] - Quote While I disapprove of their new policy I agree it does not matter much. Highsec wardec mechanics have been broken forever. It should always be possible to attack someone anywhere without having to pay billions. Maybe leave NPC corp as a haven for the true carebears, but there should be some (expensive) bounty hunting mechanic to get at them too. FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES !
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 62	Posted - 2011.10.19 08:10:00 - [33] - Quote Malcanis wrote: The whole wardec system is so broken that it's hard to get excited about this change, tbh. As soon as CCP have got the 0.0 rework well underway, then hi-sec needs to be next. CONCORD, bounty hunting, wardecs, sec status, all need reworking into some kind of a coherent system. Except that there is no need for war decs in 0.0 as you don't get concorded... Kind of an issue in high sec, hence this change has removed the ability to pvp in high sec... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Jennifer Starling Imperial Navy Forum Patrol 78	Posted - 2011.10.19 08:12:00 - [34] - Quote Malcanis wrote: The whole wardec system is so broken that it's hard to get excited about this change, tbh. As soon as CCP have got the 0.0 rework well underway, then hi-sec needs to be next. CONCORD, bounty hunting, wardecs, sec status, all need reworking into some kind of a coherent system. Agreed. The whole wardec-for-a-dime, standings, bounties thing definitely aren't EVE's best assets.
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops 671	Posted - 2011.10.19 09:01:00 - [35] - Quote I don't particularly care about the decshield part. What I do care about is the decshedding implications (which I intend to abuse the **** out of until they reverse that piece of idiocy) and the fact that all of this basically came from them giving up on policing what they previously considered exploits. As it is, they've just declared all POSes in highsec to be permanent structures. If you don't own a moon right now, you' never will, so get cracking on parking those towersGÇª GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á
Rellik B00n Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage 8	Posted - 2011.10.19 09:14:00 - [36] - Quote to repeat my original answer: its a dreadful decision.
March rabbit Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx 12	Posted - 2011.10.19 09:58:00 - [37] - Quote what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time?
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 644	Posted - 2011.10.19 10:16:00 - [38] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: Malcanis wrote: The whole wardec system is so broken that it's hard to get excited about this change, tbh. As soon as CCP have got the 0.0 rework well underway, then hi-sec needs to be next. CONCORD, bounty hunting, wardecs, sec status, all need reworking into some kind of a coherent system. Except that there is no need for war decs in 0.0 as you don't get concorded... Kind of an issue in high sec, hence this change has removed the ability to pvp in high sec... Bolded the part of my post you should have read. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
Rodj Blake PIE Inc. 318	Posted - 2011.10.19 10:34:00 - [39] - Quote People shouldn't be able to avoid wars by abusing mechanics - and that includes using alt corps to bump up the price of declaring war. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
non judgement Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance 82	Posted - 2011.10.19 10:44:00 - [40] - Quote You know, I haven't seen too many people talking about just how much extra work the GMs had because of this. Maybe the GMs wanted a break from all the petitions about this sort of thing. Might have been a lot of hard work. Or maybe, something new is going to come out soon that will replace wardecs? Why else would they stop worrying about wardecs? eh?
Ogi Talvanen Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore 21	Posted - 2011.10.19 12:10:00 - [41] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: Basic question. Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy? Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies... Poetic is that you?
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 63	Posted - 2011.10.19 12:13:00 - [42] - Quote March rabbit wrote: what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time? I'm in faction warfare, so umm, no!!! Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Ogi Talvanen Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore 21	Posted - 2011.10.19 12:16:00 - [43] - Quote :notsureiftrue:
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 63	Posted - 2011.10.19 12:23:00 - [44] - Quote Malcanis wrote: Har Harrison wrote: Malcanis wrote: The whole wardec system is so broken that it's hard to get excited about this change, tbh. As soon as CCP have got the 0.0 rework well underway, then hi-sec needs to be next. CONCORD, bounty hunting, wardecs, sec status, all need reworking into some kind of a coherent system. Except that there is no need for war decs in 0.0 as you don't get concorded... Kind of an issue in high sec, hence this change has removed the ability to pvp in high sec... Bolded the part of my post you should have read. That would be the 0.0 plan that was supposed to be over 5 years??? Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
The Thrill 0	Posted - 2011.10.19 12:35:00 - [45] - Quote Simetraz wrote: I could really care less if CCP gives EVE Uni complete immunity to War Dec's for free. Great idea, after all they are just an extension of the Career stuff and NPC starter corps. Incarna - exceedingly pointless - one cancellation already, *** going for two now....
Rellik B00n Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage 8	Posted - 2011.10.19 13:05:00 - [46] - Quote March rabbit wrote: what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time? March rabbit wrote: TLDR: you only need to gather some info and choose your style 0.0 alliance to get in there. Ask people who live in 0.0 about this place. 0.0 space is for people who play multiplayer game. High-sec is for those who like to play solo game. That's why concord. That's why wardecs. That's why missions and agents. lookit that you answered your own question! Clever you! post number 61
Cedar Locus Superfission 13	Posted - 2011.10.19 13:33:00 - [47] - Quote it sucks. eve is gonna die
March rabbit Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx 12	Posted - 2011.10.19 13:38:00 - [48] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: March rabbit wrote: what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time? I'm in faction warfare, so umm, no!!! and in FW you have no targets so you need to wardec carebears?
non judgement Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance 82	Posted - 2011.10.19 13:46:00 - [49] - Quote Lot's of FW targets, but they're too good for him. It's easier to pick on poor innocent carebears. Disclaimer: I don't know what happens in FW. So I don't know what I'm talking about. Am currently thinking about putting a sock in my mouth.
Wacktopia Sicarius. Legion of The Damned. 18	Posted - 2011.10.19 13:52:00 - [50] - Quote How about either listing the changes or linking an official reference in the OP?
Gogela Freeport Exploration 73	Posted - 2011.10.19 14:00:00 - [51] - Quote I'll say it again here just to put in my two ISK... With the mechanic and policy allowing corps to avoid war decs... why even have war decs? I don't see the point. If they want to turn Empire into fairy fun-time sparkle pony land... than why pretend? Maybe we should be able to send out hugs and kisses decs to corps... or interbus cookies and milk delivery... should be pretty easy to change the war dec mechanic as it is now into something more useful like that... ALL GëívGëí Ships \| Odd-áGëívGëí Items \| <-- Links to showInfo in-game
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 63	Posted - 2011.10.19 14:51:00 - [52] - Quote March rabbit wrote: Har Harrison wrote: March rabbit wrote: what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time? I'm in faction warfare, so umm, no!!! and in FW you have no targets so you need to wardec carebears? Who said this character is war deccing carebears??? non judgement wrote: Lot's of FW targets, but they're too good for him. It's easier to pick on poor innocent carebears. Disclaimer: I don't know what happens in FW. So I don't know what I'm talking about. Am currently thinking about putting a sock in my mouth. That might be a good idea... I am taking exception with the principle. Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 63	Posted - 2011.10.19 14:53:00 - [53] - Quote Wacktopia wrote: How about either listing the changes or linking an official reference in the OP? It was linked on page 1, but it is kind of hard to miss - big sticky on top of general discussion explains it all... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Kengutsi Akira 54	Posted - 2011.10.19 15:28:00 - [54] - Quote Htrag wrote: Its not that I dont like it, I just think its distasteful for something to be deemed no longer an exploit, presumably because enforcement is a pain in the nuts and whoever decides the game mechanics hasn't come up with a more elegant solution. Yeah, like recycling ganking alts that used to be an exploit every time. Now, with the Goons' Ice Interdiction, Its on a case-by-case basis and there arent enough ppl to enforce it Louis deGuerre wrote: It should always be possible to attack someone anywhere without having to pay billions. It is possible. You just need to not like your ship much if youre in high sec What Mittani wants, Mittani gets, Mittani help us all
Jack bubu GK inc. Pandemic Legion 51	Posted - 2011.10.19 15:46:00 - [55] - Quote Its not like the old wardec policy was ever enforced anyway, so :shrug:
Poetic Stanzitroll BLOG University 14	Posted - 2011.10.19 17:08:00 - [56] - Quote Poetic Stanziel wrote: non judgement wrote: Well, if this isn't Poetic Stanziel's alt. I'm going to be really confused. In preparation for this thread, I created an alt before I even started playing EVE Online. I'm 3.785 times as confused -Check out my blog, it's the best!
Igualmentedos Shadow Veil Industrial Shadow Directive 10	Posted - 2011.10.19 17:39:00 - [57] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: Basic question. Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy? Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies... I'm starting a tear collection for all the butthurt "leet PvPers." Your contribution is greatly appreciated.
Skunk Gracklaw GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 171	Posted - 2011.10.19 18:32:00 - [58] - Quote Kengutsi Akira wrote: Yeah, like recycling ganking alts that used to be an exploit every time. Now, with the Goons' Ice Interdiction, Its on a case-by-case basis and there arent enough ppl to enforce it Well look at you not having a clue
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 63	Posted - 2011.10.20 02:39:00 - [59] - Quote Igualmentedos wrote: Har Harrison wrote: Basic question. Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy? Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies... I'm starting a tear collection for all the butthurt "leet PvPers." Your contribution is greatly appreciated. Glad you have read the thread and seen the bit where I said I am in FW. As such, you would have also checked my kb stats and seen pretty much all my kills have been in low sec... So yeah - I'm totally crying... In other news I am collecting funds to allow people to learn to read and comprehend English so they can at least troll me with some form of understanding due to being able to read what has been posted PRIOR to them shooting off prematurely. Failing that, I think you can get a nasal spray to assist you there.... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
SHAMESHAME Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2011.10.20 02:44:00 - [60] - Quote Dear Pssy, if you had any balls or self respect you'd go to nullsec or low sec. You're bullsht arguments would carry more weight if you weren't hiding behind Concord.
The Apostle The Black Priests 552	Posted - 2011.10.20 02:52:00 - [61] - Quote SHAMESHAME wrote: Dear Pssy, if you had any balls or self respect you'd go to nullsec or low sec. You're bullsht arguments would carry more weight if you weren't hiding behind Concord. So are you calling out the PvP'ers who stay in highsec and have no balls or self respect to go to lowsec/nullsec or the carebears who have no balls or self respect staying in highsec and not going to lowsec/nullsec? I'm confused. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
Russell Casey One Ton THREE WOLF 30	Posted - 2011.10.20 02:53:00 - [62] - Quote Considering how many war dec'ers use alts to gather intel, move stuff around and RR, I think CCP just decided to level the playing field a bit.
SilentSkills Estrale Frontiers 6	Posted - 2011.10.20 03:04:00 - [63] - Quote extends the hand out while holding a bucket Your tears here please :)
Toshiroma McDiesel Lupus Draconis Dragehund 0	Posted - 2011.10.20 03:54:00 - [64] - Quote Why does this sound familiar....wait, several months back there was a guy posting in forums throwing a hairy snaz fit that after he wardec'ed a 0.0 corp, all their highsec indy's left corp, He was so pissed about all those juicy freighters no longer being legal targets. Of course the rest of the corp offered to fight with him, if he came out to Null sec.......he throw a bigger sh.. fit about that I wonder if the old link to that post works still? lol Edit : I found it =) http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1524880 my favorite post in it would have to be : Maybe you are dumb for not reading properly. Or do you need glasses? Our Logistics pilots leave corp. IE - the people that do the JF runs to empire, and the ones that purely run around empire in freighters making a profit of hauling crap from A to B so it can be jumped out to 0.0 Everyone else hasnt moved an inch. I still think you're **y becuase the "easy" targets, the ones which have no gunslots on their ships to fight back - arnt stupid enough to stick around and let you interfere with their daily tasks. You're more than welcome to come out to 0.0 where the rest of us are and get pewpew's - Heck you dont even need a wardec for that! But again - you're ***ing because what you want - the easy freighter/Jf kills - the ones you're so eagerly camping Jita 4-4 for. Arnt stupid enough to stay in corp for the duration of the wardec to give you easy kills. Refer again to grow some balls. P.S you're tears are delicious. p.p.s - No corps have left our alliance for the wardec. Only INDIVIDUAL logistic pilots. QQ moar. p.p.p.s - You're QQing when you're Wardeccing 0.0 alliances - which you know - live out in 0.0. The only people running around highsec are the logistcs guy's - or newbies skilling up in prep for coming out. Perhaps you'd find some more of our pilots if you diddnt soley camp Jita.
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 63	Posted - 2011.10.20 06:30:00 - [65] - Quote SHAMESHAME wrote: Dear Pssy, if you had any balls or self respect you'd go to nullsec or low sec. You're bullsht arguments would carry more weight if you weren't hiding behind Concord. Who is this comment aimed at? I have NO idea what you are saying... Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Joan Avon The 0rigin 2	Posted - 2011.10.22 04:26:00 - [66] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: Skunk Gracklaw wrote: Har Harrison wrote: Skunk Gracklaw wrote: If there is a game mechanic that makes Poetic Stanziel mad then I'm all for it. What about if there is one that makes other people unhappy??? You know, since it allows person who knows the magic hax to have free dec shield while everyone else has to pay full isk??? Considering the kinds of corps that regularly wardec eve-uni they have it coming. There is also no hacking involved with what they are doing and CCP has stated that it's not an exploit. And what about corps that want to dec corps besides Eve Uni??? What if a corp wanted to dec a corp to push players out of a system or remove a POS etc... and the players jump corp and laugh or the POS is untouchable due to moving to a new alliance... Then I guess you'll have to find something else to occupy your time with. Think of the Dec-Shield as a Vaccine, protecting us all from the annoyances of the social deviants. In time high sec will be cleansed of them. Progress! Let us begin....
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 63	Posted - 2011.10.24 02:35:00 - [67] - Quote Joan Avon wrote: Har Harrison wrote: Skunk Gracklaw wrote: Har Harrison wrote: Skunk Gracklaw wrote: If there is a game mechanic that makes Poetic Stanziel mad then I'm all for it. What about if there is one that makes other people unhappy??? You know, since it allows person who knows the magic hax to have free dec shield while everyone else has to pay full isk??? Considering the kinds of corps that regularly wardec eve-uni they have it coming. There is also no hacking involved with what they are doing and CCP has stated that it's not an exploit. And what about corps that want to dec corps besides Eve Uni??? What if a corp wanted to dec a corp to push players out of a system or remove a POS etc... and the players jump corp and laugh or the POS is untouchable due to moving to a new alliance... Then I guess you'll have to find something else to occupy your time with. Think of the Dec-Shield as a Vaccine, protecting us all from the annoyances of the social deviants. In time high sec will be cleansed of them. Progress! Out of curiosity - how many war dec shields are YOU running??? Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.