|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 48 post(s) |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
290
   |
Posted - 2013.05.08 18:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why not 8 probes?
Also, RIP Deep Space Probes. We had a good run. |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
290
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 18:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:XXSketchxx wrote:Why not 8 probes?
Also, RIP Deep Space Probes. We had a good run. There is no real need to 8 probes with the removal of DSP.
What does that have to do with DSP?
I'm referring to the ability to have probes scanning 2 targets at once. |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
290
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 18:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Deep Space Probe at the sun with the full system in its range, then 7 probes on the site or target.
Lol. You've been doing it wrong buddy. You don't need to move a DSP and you certainly don't need 7 probes to scan a single site.
Back to my original question, why the limit to 7 probes CCP? |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
290
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 18:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Paradox wrote:Honestly guys, I want feedback AFTER you have used the features. Not before!
Singularity will be up shortly.
I don't need to test it out. I can tell you right now that the removal of the 8th probe is stupid and screws over skilled combat probers. |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
291
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 18:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Fonac wrote:
The removal of deep space probe make me extremely nervous this is in many ways a total destruction of exploration as we know it.
Its not destruction of exploration at all you cry baby. You will just have to go back to probing like we did before everyone and their mother had deep space probes. |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
291
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 18:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
So how bout that 8th probe? |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
291
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 19:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Fonac wrote:XXSketchxx wrote:Fonac wrote:
The removal of deep space probe make me extremely nervous this is in many ways a total destruction of exploration as we know it.
Its not destruction of exploration at all you cry baby. You will just have to go back to probing like we did before everyone and their mother had deep space probes. Thank you for missing the point.(I just knew some cheesy guy and their "back in the days .. bla bla" Would come up) But that's ok, some people like to hit themself with a bat, others like me, do not.
Are you autistic or something? Removal of deep space probes changes things, but it is hardly THE TOTAL DESTRUCTION OF EXPLORATION. |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
293
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 19:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jesus.
No one is going to abandon probing because the precious DSP are gone. And we're not fully going back to "boring" probing, as these new formations will speed things up immensely.
You'll have to probe just a little bit more, but its going to be easier than ever, given new modules, skill shifts and the new mechanics.
Its going forward just fine, the benefit of DSP to filtering was something we discovered, not something that was intended, so I can see why they are being removed. And yet, as someone else has said, you can still filter with combat probes (even cores, it is just a bit harder - but you want everything handed to you on a silver platter, right?).
If you don't like scanning so much, go run anomalies. |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
293
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 20:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Yeah with the changes, its a good chance things will be even faster without the DSP.
8 probes are still pretty important for combat probing though. I don't understand the 7 probe limit other than as a direct nerf to scanning multiple targets. |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Test Alliance Please Ignore
295
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 20:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP Paradox wrote:
Not easier, but more accessible. We are not trying to reduce the art of scanning down to a simple click, we are aiming to make scanning more accessible to those who want to use it, but still requires you to master the art.
Weird, it already had a certain art to master. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|