| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lt Jones
   |
Posted - 2005.10.10 23:44:00 -
[1]
Hey all I'm looking to do some DED missions but I can't find an agent that will take me. I tried a lvl 1 -19 and it was no good. Any ideas on how I can start working for DED? I have a pos. sec. lvl so it shouldn't be a problem. Thanks for the help.
|
Deja Thoris
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 00:14:00 -
[2]
It's not possible to work for Concord.
|
patteSatan
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 00:17:00 -
[3]
I think it is, but you have to join them first??
Might be wrong, so dont take it for granted.
|
corporal hicks
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 01:21:00 -
[4]
You can not do missions for Concord, you were able to but they gave standing to all factions when you did them so were deemed abit broken.
Now days you do missions for the opposite faction you have to live with the standing loss no run to concord agent to get standing back up.
" Stay Frosty "
|
sonofollo
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 10:41:00 -
[5]
its a stupid situation that CCP havent fixed the concord agents why not just remove the *all* faction standing boost effect with concord agents and just give a standing boost with concord agents only - concord is meant to be indepandant of the empires
Surley CCP can very quickly find a fix if not just remove all concord agents the in between nothingness is plain dumb
|
Lt Jones
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 11:34:00 -
[6]
I agree, if we can't use them then remove them from the game.
|
Joshua Foiritain
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 11:47:00 -
[7]
 Originally by: Lt Jones
I agree, if we can't use them then remove them from the game.
That would be stupid, removing them plus putting them back in = 3 times as much work as leaving them in and enabeling them once CCP feels we should run missions for CONCORD. 
------------------
[Coreli Corporation Mainframe] |
Gabs
|
Posted - 2005.10.11 19:39:00 -
[8]
Your security rating is based on standing to concord the corp.
Completing a mission for them resulted in increased security rating. Much more than from killing rats.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |