|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 16:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
So, since it is needed to be able to make a distinction between installed implants and other implants on the same mail, will we either get (a) pods with cargo (b) pods with fitting slots for implants? |

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 18:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
GokuZWar wrote:Might actually make pod ransoming make a come back.
Lack of implants was never the downfall of pod ransoms. In fact, with the implants on the mail, I do not see any reason why people should not ransom & kill anyway even more than they already do. Nice ransom and a juicy mail on top. |

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 18:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:GokuZWar wrote:+1 as well. Might be good to make it an encrypted ID number as well so that we can have a checker system to verify the mail is legit. but I'd only let the people who make these sites know how to confirm the check digit. lol what +1 to the lol what.
Although a verification API would be nice. Given two arguments kill_ID and kill_Hash it would simply return true or false. Even something crappy and cpu efficient like MD5 would suffice. After all, if someone launches a 2nd preimage attack on a killmail to get on a titan kill, let him have his 15 kilobytes of fame. |

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 18:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:While this would be fantastic, I'm sure there are a number of technical difficulties to overcome and there is surely better work to be done before they get to perfecting our epeen measuring devices.
Of course. But after the secret handshake was proposed as a verification method, it needed to be said that there are people out there who prefer it be done right or not at all. Siikriit killmail verification number nonsense....
|

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 20:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lord Helghast wrote:What do you think?
Only if all implants are always destroyed in highsec if you are not shot by a war target.
Because once your pod gets suicide ganked by an 8 hour old unskilled noobchar with civilian guns to harvest the implants this game is officially beyond rescue.
|

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Anvil44 wrote:Zydrine Megacyte wrote:Arana Mirelin wrote:[quote=Trader 99]*stuff* Think he meant that self-destruct should yield a killmail if someone was shooting them at the time. Granted, in the case of subcaps this shouldn't be that much of an issue, but when you start dealing with caps and supercaps it should give a mail. Perhaps a "Good Effort, you almost got him" mail? After all self-destruct, for whatever the reason, is still self-destruct. It should stay as is just for the LOLs. 
Yes. A failed-to-kill mail.
The moment you undock you not only consent to pvp, but also to not receiving a killmail for a self-destruct and possibly not finding suitable prey during the next roam. |
|
|
|