| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
269
|
Posted - 2013.06.18 18:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:We're not getting a 64 bit client until they get 64 bit servers...
EQ2 got them in 2009.
WoW got them around 2011.
EvE??? "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
269
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 03:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Explorer wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote:Azami Nevinyrall wrote:We're not getting a 64 bit client until they get 64 bit servers... EQ2 got them in 2009. WoW got them around 2011. EvE??? EVE's server has been 64-bit since September 2008. If I may refer you to my devblog at the time: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/eve64/
Meanwhile...running 3x WoW clients @ 64bit.
1+1=2
RubyPorto wrote:DevBlogged!
No...WoWed.  "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
269
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 08:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:You seem confused about the difference between a server and a client.
My first computer was a kit built Timex-Sinclair back in 1983.
Were you even born then to built one?
RubyPorto wrote:Also, a 64 bit client would do very little (if anything) for an EVE client, as it doesn't use anywhere near the 4GB limit of addressable space that a 32 bit program can use... which you'd know if you'd been paying attention to the thread.
When you running 3 clients.......................
 "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
270
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 11:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:CCP Explorer wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Also, a 64 bit client would do very little (if anything) for an EVE client, as it doesn't use anywhere near the 4GB limit of addressable space that a 32 bit program can use... which you'd know if you'd been paying attention to the thread. When you running 3 clients.......................  If you run multiple clients then each has its own addressable memory space. Well to be fair, it doesn't work like that on a Timex Sinclair.
Oh, and don't forget picking up the dev's hat on the way out, CSM. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
270
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 12:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: You could have simply admitted you were in error
There's nothing to admit right or wrong, since I simply wrote a few sentences. Whatever you're feeding on, isn't anything I've written in itself.
Making anthills out of molehills, I guess that's a CSM's role, huh? "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
270
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 14:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪand (also again) that's before we even begin to discuss the costs, such as potential loss of middleware components, loss of subscribers (or increased dev load from duplicating their efforts across two clients), increased memory footprints, etc. 64-bit may be the best thing since sliced bread, but that doesn't matter if EVE happens to be on a yoghurt-only diet and would turn inside-out and explode if you fed it some fibre.
Even Blizzard told players they'll stop supporting the oldest of old videocards and OSes.
Progress is like that. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
274
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 21:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote:There's nothing to admit right or wrong, since I simply wrote a few sentences. GǪwhich suggested that running 3 clients was in any way relevant to the 32 vs 64bit client discussion. This suggestion is incorrect. Also, my first computer was a PDP-11. Now shush.
Huh?
Suggestion?
You guys are reading into things that never was written.
Perhaps it's better to pull back from the agendas and read things as is, and not make up things, instead.
"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
275
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 04:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
Still arguing over nothing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projective_identification
Not very smart or wise. 
You're trying to frame the discussion to what YOU think it meant.
You don't put words in other people's mouths, then falsely claim it's A or B. That's where you guys are wrong (and always will be wrong). So busy trying to frame the discussion over your agendas, to see even reality.
The fault? You're dinosaurs protecting turf. Same dinosaurs that drive games into the ground. 500k worth, while the elephant in the room enjoys 8 million.
...Says more about who's right and what works with proof... "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|
| |
|