| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
255
   |
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Well i for one am not in favour of dumping the CSM elect....
Only because at a time like this, it's simply not a good thing to do. There is a time and a place for it, and that time has past.
I for one think CCP should introduce a new charter for every newly elected CSM member to represent the community of EVE. Literally. They should:
- Put up regular posts in a dedicated CSM forum here
- have voting buttons on what they think they should bring to CCPs attention, so the people can say 'yes please raise this issue' or 'no, thats not important' etc.
- Have CCP moderate the votes to allow only 1 vote per account and watch to see if the majority of votes are coming from 1 bloc only.
- The CSm must not be allowed to push their own agenda directly to CCP. They are there for the players ONLY. If they have an idea on a change, then they should propose it and promote discussion and debate about it.
- If CCP proposes a change to the CSM, then the CSM MUST convey that proposal to said forums and promote discussion and debate as to weather it is good/needed etc.
I don't want to see accountability.
I want to see transparacy, non bias and fairness from the CSM to and from CCP and us.
I think all these conditions (as an example) are fair. They should be straight forward to implement and would have no impact at all upon any NDAs under any circumstances.
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
257
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Karadion wrote:
1) They do that in their own blogging efforts, tentonhammer, k.com, and other various sites. You're just not looking hard enough.
2) They did that. The Empire pubbies just didn't care
3) Again they did implement that function which I was able to vote 1 vote per account that I owned.
4) They do that job because they represent the people who voted for their platform. Are they supposed to be an empty slate platform going "Vote for me, I got nothing."
5) They consistently do that especially censuring the minutes which got them in trouble.
Hiding under a rock have you?
1) is not EVEonline.com
2) They obviously didn't do that
3) That function needs to be streamlined into eveonline.com forums better
4) At least 5 CSm members got in from just voting bloc power. I voted for Whitetree because he was in TEST the same time i was. He also said he was pushing hard for a hybrid/Gallente buff, i am really glad that has been won 
5) Like i said, there is a lot to discuss that is not locked up under the NDA lock and key. New ideas the CSM members has. Permissable ideas to be discussed (eg new capital ship ideas etc)
Transparacy. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't mind if Brother Mittens is pushing hard to nerf ABC in low end WHs, as long as either his idea is supported by the players, or the players pushed that idea to him.
I don't want CSM members pushign their own agenda, or something that they have not discussed at all with anyone who has access to eveonline.com. I do not want to go view a short story at a third party website when it directly relates to EVE development.
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
259
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Karadion wrote:1) Ohh wahhh, you're selectively cherry picking where you want them to post. They do their job, you just want them to bend over backwards and give you what they want. Until they're told to post on CCP's website, this is a CCP oversight. They do blog about their efforts consistently.
2) Yes they do. That's why it's a CSM team and they raise issues that are most important to them and the people that their people voted for them on their platform
3) It was streamlined into the freaking account when you log on. "Do you want to vote in the CSM? Click here" in a propaganda advertisement similar to any article they deem posting. Because Empire pubbies dismisses it, it's not CCP's fault or is it the CSM's team for ignoring the election.
5) Again NDA will always apply and that's the unfortunate process of any development in commercial products. If you want CCP to change their way, become a minority or majority controller of the company.
Never stop posting
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
259
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Headerman wrote:Never stop posting I am well motivated.
It's just too bad ur pretty **** at it. Who sponsored you into the gewnies? I would like to chastise them.
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
259
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS  oh no you might report trolls who mock your horrible thread *backs slowly out of the forum* Reported for personal attack.
Reported for no content
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
| |
|