Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Royal Executioner Shazih
Viziam Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
5. Fabulous. the best pacth ever! 4. Good 3. Fine. It didn't affect me much 2. Bad 1. Terrible. I consider unsubbing 0. Already cancelled sub
Thank you |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1560
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
1.5 CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |
dexington
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
646
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
i would like to try it first, but i can't login.... I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |
Acwron
Meet The Fockers S2N Citizens
60
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
2 |
Amyclas Amatin
sleep Deprivation INC. LLC The Kadeshi
106
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
after today's downtime, you broke the launcher AGAIN!
I like the exploration changes, hate some of the nerfs. Particularly the resists and tracking computer/enhancers nerf.
3 Please help me with my survey on high-sec aggression: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1dLcM27c_qDyOIxFgE4Zan_T8j_eZDDeCUAEL4lwXGC8/viewform |
Uzbeg Khan
Phantom Squad Insidious Empire
12
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
You have to break it up a bit.
Most of the visual stuff: 2,5 (looks fancier, but makes the game alot more annoying) Moving the undock button: -10 Real changes like moving ice to anoms, ship rebalancing, mineral rebalancing: 4
I do find the scanner list of anomalies quite annoying. Fancier, but requires a much bigger portion of the screen to actually be useable. Things I hate: - Signatures - Irony - Lists |
Sex Slave Girl
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Uzbeg Khan wrote:You have to break it up a bit.
Most of the visual stuff: 2 (looks fancier, but makes the game alot more annoying) Moving the undock button: -10 Real changes like moving ice to anoms, ship rebalancing, mineral rebalancing: 4
I do find the scanner list of anomalies quite annoying. Fancier, but requires a much bigger portion of the screen to actually be useable.
you're score is now at -4.
Seeing 0 is the lowest, what's option -4?
Don't tell me you're gonna go on a rl shooting rampage |
Peter Raptor
THE AESIR. Get in the Van.
519
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
Overall 4 but making grav sites into just another asteroid belt called "An Anom" - Whhaaat? Evelopedia;-á
The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion -áGÇá-á-á |
Glasgow Dunlop
Gigaverse The Imperial Senate
78
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
Patch: 4 ( out of 5 )
Laucher: -infinity ( more hassle than its worth ) twitter: @glasgowdunlop-á GLASGOW MEET June 8th http://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=229549&find=unread
|
Liam Mirren
610
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Uzbeg Khan wrote:You have to break it up a bit.
Most of the visual stuff: 2 (looks fancier, but makes the game alot more annoying) Moving the undock button: -10 Real changes like moving ice to anoms, ship rebalancing, mineral rebalancing: 4
I do find the scanner list of anomalies quite annoying. Fancier, but requires a much bigger portion of the screen to actually be useable. you're score is now at -4. Seeing 0 is the lowest, what's option -4? Don't tell me you're gonna go on a rl shooting rampage
He'll start a youtube channel, show his **** and a year later he'll be employed by CCP and THEN he'll make his move. This was all planned at the 2006 BBQ.
Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.
|
|
Boris Sandstorm
Deep Space Intelligence
24
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
10/10 would patch again. |
xRyokenx
Mindstar Technology Fatal Ascension
245
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
Personally 4, undock button is my onky issue xRyokenx Mindstar Technology Fatal Ascension Rental Manager |
Uzbeg Khan
Phantom Squad Insidious Empire
12
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Uzbeg Khan wrote:You have to break it up a bit.
Most of the visual stuff: 2 (looks fancier, but makes the game alot more annoying) Moving the undock button: -10 Real changes like moving ice to anoms, ship rebalancing, mineral rebalancing: 4
I do find the scanner list of anomalies quite annoying. Fancier, but requires a much bigger portion of the screen to actually be useable. you're score is now at -4. Seeing 0 is the lowest, what's option -4? Don't tell me you're gonna go on a rl shooting rampage
Don't worry. I find it even harder to undock in RL.
Things I hate: - Signatures - Irony - Lists |
Lipbite
Express Hauler
657
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:47:00 -
[14] - Quote
3- / 2+
Gameplay is not affected except for crazy camera movement. 6 months of developers' time - it seems wasted. Yet another useless "free" "expansion" - I wouldn't pay a dollar for it if it was paid. |
Sentamon
1002
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:53:00 -
[15] - Quote
5+ due to Mintchip rage.
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
Luke Eskar
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
30
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:59:00 -
[16] - Quote
2 because of 3 things the undock button moved the cans that get launched are **** and the launcher is **** it would probably be a 4 if them 3 things was fixed This is bob. Copy and paste him so he can take over the eve forums. Gÿ+/ /Gûî /n++ \ |
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries Solar Assault Fleet
547
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
4
CCP Eterne: Silly player, ALL devs are evil. CCP Fozzie: When Veritas describes a programming challenge as "very hard" I tend to believe him.
|
Capqu
Love Squad
125
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
2
can't warp to anoms on the map
no new features, just ****** reworks of systems that didnt need fixing (probing)
ship reworks are cool
annoying sounds
annoying animations
did i mention no new features? i thought this was supposed to rival the wormhole patch http://pizza.eve-kill.net |
Darth Kilth
Silver Guardians Fidelas Constans
106
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:07:00 -
[19] - Quote
3.5
It's above acceptable, but doesn't really excel in anything. |
Xaveus Young
Ashrum Syndicate
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:13:00 -
[20] - Quote
Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:5. Fabulous. the best pacth ever! 4. Good 3. Fine. It didn't affect me much 2. Bad 1. Terrible. I consider unsubbing 0. Already cancelled sub
Thank you
The bad part is you said it right "Patch" this is a patch not expansion in my opinion.
An expansion adds content, most of the stuff here is re-balancing, moving content to new locations with just a few things added like mini-game and some NPC's.
As far as patch goes I give it a 5.
"All Men Shall Pay In Full" |
|
Aiko Hanomaa
State War Academy Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:13:00 -
[21] - Quote
1
Four fps at 5% gpu usage is just not playable. |
Mc Scam
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
47
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
Right now 3,5 , but I expect it to go to 4 once I get to know all the new stuff and CCP fixes all the minor issues. |
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon Drunk 'n' Disorderly
713
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:18:00 -
[23] - Quote
For new players 4 (intuitive training missions, easy to begin) casual gamer 3 (nice features, fancy graphics) solo players only gain is the graphic I guess...so 2,5 Multiboxer 1,5 (laggy animations...maybe will improve)
Me: had no time to test the new cane yet...
- so far I found scanning boring and to easy...you are finished with a average low sec system in under 5 minutes.
- The scanner is a fancy thing and it is ok because you can turn it basicly off....except for session changes where it can cause lag when in a bigger fleet I guess.
- some mean armageddon fits in eft....this is going to be fun
- undock button actually a good feature...two or three sessions and everyone is used to it. easier to abort undocking=good thing
- to be cont.
"Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|
Karig'Ano Keikira
Tax Cheaters
63
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
Personal comment: 'if it is not broken, perhaps think a bit about fixing it :('
Graphic improvements: or 'treatise on how to induce sea sickness in space...' (2, would be 4 if we had some control over it) - generally thumbs up, but please please please (please) make gate effects and that horrible scanner pulse optional; my scanner seems to be crazy and displays that effect every 5 sec no matter what I do, not nice - also why move blood undock button? sure, it is great way to induce nerd rage in random people, but cmon, really... sends me into clicking confusion each time I attempt to undock
Exploration changes: or 'competition on making ugly unintuitive gui' (2, don't really see how to fix problems here :( ) - now we have new exploration; it works same as old one with uglier gui, less features, less control over what I want to do, more annoyances and more graphical glitches; cmon, how can you call it improvement? - thumbs up for new modules - at least something for poor bastards who trained those skills to V - also where are our 'amazing visuals, great exploration experience, new sites and stuff?' - also, do you really thing I want to see those 40 anoms in my space? not to mention some weird graphical quirks - also, why I can no longer ignore single anom? not like I want those bloody ore sites on my scanning interface (and you know... someone might want to see combat sites are not ore sites, especially if searching for sleepers in wh)
Radial menus: or 'now i need more clicks for same effect'; again, great way for inducing nerd rage in random people who click their directional scanner and instead get some ugly small menu (1, just take it out, please...)
Rebalancing: still sceptical if battleship changes are step back or step forward; also are you sure that -resistance on poor drake (and most other effected ships) is needed? otherwise fine; great, new and cool? nah, but at least ok (3, time will tell, 3 for no ogb changes - imo far more needed then -5% on battleship no one uses hp)
Minerals, ice and stuff: not involved enough in it to comment, so i will rate it ok (3.5, neutral)
Final verdict: 2/5 ('generally poor job', with possible improvement to (2.5) 'meh, another expansion' or even (3) 'ok, I can see something being done' with significant iteration): - most of gui changes are step back - they display less information while using more space, provide unnecessary graphical clutter, are quirky and could really use 'toggle off button' or at least 'use old variant' button - exploration changes are well... one word: annoying; if expansion development results in making something annoying, one should ask himself what he was doing - rebalancing: let's face it - nothing really important was changed and important stuff was pushed back to 'some other time'; altogether decent job, but if some rebalancing is only point of expansion, it is called 'balance patch', right? :) - industry: might actually be high point of this expansion, so thumbs up here; however same problem - serious things were not touched (our refineries are still useless, out poses are still 10 years outdated, there is still no reason to produce anything or gather resources in anything but high-sec, more then few broken mechanics are still here...) - |
Darvaleth Sigma
Progressive State State Section 9
272
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
4.5 Give a man a match and you warm him for a day.
Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life! |
Asptar Monastair
Adventurers
11
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:32:00 -
[26] - Quote
4.5 I'll get over the undock button and as cool as it is the jump sequence gives me a headache. Exploration is awesome, don't understand everyone's gripe with anoms, one scan and you had them in the list anyway, not like you don't still need to scan them down now. Skill changes probably better in the long run didn't really affect me much. Nerfs are nerfs, it happens. New navys are great. Radial tool I'll have to use more to get the hang of it, not happy with the ranges on it though.
|
Terell Iondar
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:36:00 -
[27] - Quote
Mc Scam wrote:Right now 3,5
My opinion. I'm not so satisfied.
|
Kalpel
KBM
40
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
1 and I haven't even finished the patch! still reading the patch notes, got to this part " Strategic Cruisers have been removed from the list of ships allowed to enter 3/10 and 4/10 complexes." and said to myself ......
I've been playing EvE on and off since 2006, but nothing and I mean nothing pisses me off more than not being able to run DED high sec sites in my Tengu
I'll stick around for a few and see if CCP comes to their senses, if not, well then it's beed a good run and I'll be moving on You failed to target nothing!-áGëívGëí online |
John McCreedy
Eve Defence Force Tribal Band
101
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:52:00 -
[29] - Quote
4 but I (along with what seems most of Eve) utterly hate the position of the new undock button. That was an unnecessary change. |
Mr Bimble
Lost Ark Enterprises
25
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 13:03:00 -
[30] - Quote
2 |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |