EVE Search - Veritas Immortalis, getting more than they bargained for?

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Veritas Immortalis, getting more than they bargained for?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zarthanon	Posted - 2005.11.06 02:27:00 - [1] Why would "V" declare the war with mercenary coalition mutual? It just doesn't make sense. The first day of the war they got hit pretty damn hard. But TBH, I've never seen a reputable merc corp lose a contract or anything for a sustained amount of time. This just allows MC to issue surrender terms, say maybe something having to do with V's cap II BPO (I'm 90% sure they have one), and just cost them more money. Bad choice if you ask me. Originally by: ParMizaN i mayv or may nit abe a bit drunk Originally by: Buddrow TO THETR DRUMNBS OF WAR WET GHO
Lunas Feelgood	Posted - 2005.11.06 02:33:00 - [2] Dear Zarthanon this is again lame ass flamebait and the honorfull V alliance doesnt need this crap. I sayd it again V is a tough bunch of peeps and they are one of the coolest alliance ingame.. mkaay??
Zarthanon	Posted - 2005.11.06 02:37:00 - [3] Originally by: Lunas Feelgood Dear Zarthanon this is again lame ass flamebait and the honorfull V alliance doesnt need this crap. I sayd it again V is a tough bunch of peeps and they are one of the coolest alliance ingame.. mkaay?? I want to know, and with the fact that Merc corps rarely ever lose I don't understand their reasoning for this. Especially since this makes it so the client of MC (wonder who?) doesn't really have to pay their mercs for the contract. I've said nothing about how V aren't honorable or anything like that, I'm just trying to figure out what their reasoning was. Now if you would kindly go back to your cage, so I can get my answer. K,thx,bye. Originally by: ParMizaN i mayv or may nit abe a bit drunk Originally by: Buddrow TO THETR DRUMNBS OF WAR WET GHO
Lunas Feelgood	Posted - 2005.11.06 02:52:00 - [4] Quote: Now if you would kindly go back to your cage, so I can get my answer. K,thx,bye. hehe, cage im not in a cage I live in a tech1 frig
Uggs386	Posted - 2005.11.06 02:53:00 - [5] Lunas go to sleep already its past your bedtime. Proud Member of the NUBSIES Alliance.
ParMizaN	Posted - 2005.11.06 02:58:00 - [6] zarth stfu :D now get back down there ^___^ really i dont think this ws a great move by v, but then it culd also annoy the mc to an extent. Phenomena of ironies, cast the litany aside How intelligible, blessed be the forgetful
Obidios	Posted - 2005.11.06 03:23:00 - [7] Originally by: Zarthanon Why would "V" declare the war with mercenary coalition mutual? It just doesn't make sense. The first day of the war they got hit pretty damn hard. But TBH, I've never seen a reputable merc corp lose a contract or anything for a sustained amount of time. This just allows MC to issue surrender terms, say maybe something having to do with V's cap II BPO (I'm 90% sure they have one), and just cost them more money. Bad choice if you ask me. Put your F-E alliance tagon in settings.... Oh, wait... -----------------
Pepperami	Posted - 2005.11.06 03:28:00 - [8] I dunno why it's mutual, but about this "only way to finish the war is to surrender".. Erm, there's a context menu to cancel mutual? /me shrugs. [We're Recruiting!] [http://spankage.co.uk/]
Specture	Posted - 2005.11.06 03:30:00 - [9] Originally by: Pepperami I dunno why it's mutual, but about this "only way to finish the war is to surrender".. Erm, there's a context menu to cancel mutual? /me shrugs.
Cmdr Sy	Posted - 2005.11.06 03:37:00 - [10] We have nothing to lose but our stations. Oh...wait...
pershphanie	Posted - 2005.11.06 04:02:00 - [11] Originally by: Pepperami I dunno why it's mutual, but about this "only way to finish the war is to surrender".. Erm, there's a context menu to cancel mutual? /me shrugs.
Shin Ra	Posted - 2005.11.06 04:02:00 - [12] By the same reasoning, when MC get their next contract, they are still gonna have to deal with V hunting them in empire. Sure they may get a lot of ganks, but its going to be a pain in the ass having the empire war forever.
juduzz	Posted - 2005.11.06 04:07:00 - [13] If it gives us targets who cares \o/ ---------------------------------------------- My vid(s) http://www.eve-files.com/media/07/VIDSKIE.wmv
Muthsera	Posted - 2005.11.06 04:14:00 - [14] Originally by: juduzz If it gives us targets who cares \o/ Hear yee, hear yee. SoonÖ
Cowboy	Posted - 2005.11.06 04:24:00 - [15] Originally by: Shin Ra ...but its going to be a pain in the ass having the empire war forever. Frankly the only pain in the ass is not being able to AP 30 jumps. But hell, i'd gladly trade that for something to shoot at. The more red the better i'm sure a large % of my alliance mates would agree.
Lek'karion	Posted - 2005.11.06 04:50:00 - [16] Red Flashies....that's all I need and look now we don't have to spend isk to keep our war active with V, I think it was down right nice of them. Well back to the breach and all that ....................................... FREEDING FRENZY ______)\______)\_____/(_______ ______)\______\o/____/(_______
Zarthanon	Posted - 2005.11.06 05:00:00 - [17] Originally by: Pepperami I dunno why it's mutual, but about this "only way to finish the war is to surrender".. Erm, there's a context menu to cancel mutual? /me shrugs. Since Persh has posted on here now, I have to say he's the one that said to end a mutual war both sides have to come to some sort of surrender terms otherwise it can't be ended. So blame it on him, but he's a little slow in the head, so lets not make him take it too hard for his incorrectness. Originally by: ParMizaN i mayv or may nit abe a bit drunk Originally by: Buddrow TO THETR DRUMNBS OF WAR WET GHO
Zarthanon	Posted - 2005.11.06 05:02:00 - [18] Originally by: Obidios Put your F-E alliance tagon in settings.... Oh, wait... We'll be back in a war with you guys shortly... I just had massive amounts of stuff around empire that I had to pick up, and you guys would have highly hampered that had I still had wars. Just about done, nother 195 jump trip in my hauler and I'll be ready. Originally by: ParMizaN i mayv or may nit abe a bit drunk Originally by: Buddrow TO THETR DRUMNBS OF WAR WET GHO
pershphanie	Posted - 2005.11.06 06:29:00 - [19] Originally by: Zarthanon Originally by: Pepperami I dunno why it's mutual, but about this "only way to finish the war is to surrender".. Erm, there's a context menu to cancel mutual? /me shrugs. Since Persh has posted on here now, I have to say he's the one that said to end a mutual war both sides have to come to some sort of surrender terms otherwise it can't be ended. So blame it on him, but he's a little slow in the head, so lets not make him take it too hard for his incorrectness. No, I believe im right. Both sides need to agree to end a mutual war. I could be wrong, I dont want to find out for sure cause id have to hit the retract button, if i did the war might retract and then there would be less targets
Seleene	Posted - 2005.11.06 06:57:00 - [20] Edited by: Seleene on 06/11/2005 07:02:08 TBH I had the same questions as Zarth. If V thinks that we are in this for fun or as some sort of amusement then they have grossly misread the situation. We are enjoying the fights and V seems to have a lot of heart, but when our contract comes to an end that will be the end of it. Regardless, even Stan and his boys in 5 left the 'mutual with MC' cat in the bag. They understand what the MC is. Wars don't last forever, even this big one and the last thing any alliance wants is over a hundred bored PvPers hunting down every stray indy and agent runner they have day in and day out. Right now this Great War is the 'cool thing to do'. Our pilots just want to make the blinking red boxes go boom. That's the only thing we care about. All of this talk about the mutual war seems to be left over from the days of the very start of the game. The "two people sitting in a station" stuff I have not seen anyone state that this is fact beyond the over three year old 'Gemini' documentation that existed even before the concept of mutual wars. Recently, FA declared war on ASCN. ASCN made it mutual and AFAIK, FA was able to retract the war with no problem. If that has changed though, V should know that Mercenary Empress can only fly a shuttle and she has everything delivered to her. You won't be seeing her going anywhere to 'surrender'. Edited for clarity and 7 in the morning grammer. - 'You have foolishly engaged the MC in Empire space. Prepare to suffer the consequences!'
Gaven Lok'ri	Posted - 2005.11.06 07:19:00 - [21] Well, All I had to do as the side declaring to end the mutual war with B-I a month ago was hit 'retract'. So all you really are doing by makeing a war mutual is cutting the fees for the agressor. God is with us.
Seleene	Posted - 2005.11.06 07:36:00 - [22] Originally by: Gaven Lok'ri Well, All I had to do as the side declaring to end the mutual war with B-I a month ago was hit 'retract'. So all you really are doing by makeing a war mutual is cutting the fees for the agressor. As I thought. Thank you, Gaven. - 'You have foolishly engaged the MC in Empire space. Prepare to suffer the consequences!'
Kcel Chim	Posted - 2005.11.06 08:56:00 - [23] Originally by: Zarthanon Originally by: Obidios Put your F-E alliance tagon in settings.... Oh, wait... We'll be back in a war with you guys shortly... I just had massive amounts of stuff around empire that I had to pick up, and you guys would have highly hampered that had I still had wars. Just about done, nother 195 jump trip in my hauler and I'll be ready. so youre publically stating that ure wardodging, a wise move.
Tamora	Posted - 2005.11.06 09:49:00 - [24] Originally by: Cmdr Sy We have nothing to lose but our stations. Oh...wait... roflmao @ sig. That owns.
Ugluuk	Posted - 2005.11.06 14:07:00 - [25] MC are just 1 of 4 wars...25% priority on my part..I fear NBSI more tbh.. The good thing bout MC is that you know where you have them.. If they have only 5 in local they have more on the other side.. The others are a bit harder to figure out.. MC are good but not uber like some people think.. http://bydi.digilo.net/forum/ http://bydi.digilo.net/evekill/
Xavier X	Posted - 2005.11.06 14:24:00 - [26] Originally by: Zarthanon Originally by: Obidios Put your F-E alliance tagon in settings.... Oh, wait... We'll be back in a war with you guys shortly... I just had massive amounts of stuff around empire that I had to pick up, and you guys would have highly hampered that had I still had wars. Just about done, nother 195 jump trip in my hauler and I'll be ready. ---- Some of you may remember when leaving a corp durring war and rejoining it just to avoid being shot at was considdered an exploit..........sound familiar?
Entschlossen	Posted - 2005.11.06 14:27:00 - [27] To make it mutual is a question of honor. If anybody decides to declare war on us, be shure we will make it mutual. Take Care Entschlossen
Jenny Spitfire	Posted - 2005.11.06 14:38:00 - [28] Begun... the Eve Wars have. ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
Admiral IceBlock	Posted - 2005.11.06 15:38:00 - [29] rarely is not never. "We brake for nobody"
Zarthanon	Posted - 2005.11.06 16:04:00 - [30] Edited by: Zarthanon on 06/11/2005 16:04:31 Originally by: Xavier X Originally by: Zarthanon Originally by: Obidios Put your F-E alliance tagon in settings.... Oh, wait... We'll be back in a war with you guys shortly... I just had massive amounts of stuff around empire that I had to pick up, and you guys would have highly hampered that had I still had wars. Just about done, nother 195 jump trip in my hauler and I'll be ready. ---- Some of you may remember when leaving a corp durring war and rejoining it just to avoid being shot at was considdered an exploit..........sound familiar? Some of you remember when people actually knew what they were talking about? My guess would be the time when the war bills were all messed up. Like when a corp left and then joined the alliance, the bill would go up like 10 fold, something like that. I'm definately exploiting here, sure. I think that anybody who leaves an alliance during a war should be banned from the game. That would take out roughtly 1/2 of what was the former Xetic Alliance, one corp from .5., some more from this current war, etc. Shutup dude, and get your facts straight. (I can't seem to get my opinions straight btw, but a CVA guy cleared that up) Originally by: ParMizaN i mayv or may nit abe a bit drunk Originally by: Buddrow TO THETR DRUMNBS OF WAR WET GHO

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.