|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3606
   |
Posted - 2013.06.07 06:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
I should camp more now that we are ~officially~ invading.
But then again they're evacing all the PVE stuff anyway so there would be no point I guess.
I am a nullsec zealot. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3606
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 07:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
BadAssMcKill wrote:Pls no more "afk cloakers are ruining my system" threads or I will cry
I'm not sure f those tears or the "afk cloakers are ruining my system" tears are better...
I am a nullsec zealot. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3606
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 09:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mrs Management wrote:10,000 CPU to fit cloak and give ships that are design to cloak a -99% reduction to cpu usage.
Cloakers Cloak all other ship cannot fit them ..... problem solved.
Isn't that what happens with covert ops cloaks?
I am a nullsec zealot. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3607
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 09:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:Mark Androcius wrote:I will not make any suggestions here but, i will list the things impacted by afk cloaking.
1. undock your carrier with a neut in system ( afk cloak or otherwise ) = kick from alliance in most cases.
2. undock and rat in your 300 mil plus ship with a neut in system = alliance will not be to happy with you and a kick isn't uncommon at all.
3. undock a miner barge with a neut in system = possible corp aggravation and long term kick potential.
Business stops all the way, the entire system is basically locked, whether the neut is afk or not ( we can not know this after all ).
The new changes that came with Odyssey, also made it a lot easier to find stuff, meaning that an afk cloaker can stay in system for days, check everything out, get everyone comfortable with the situation and strike just when everybody think "meh, it's just an afk dude".
In my opinion, cloaking is a legitimate mechanic, but seeing that it has no counter ( in terms of modules ) it does seem kinda weird. Really if an alliance is threating to kick you because you lost "your" ship I would tell them to feck off.
Agree. At most you have people laughing at you on Jabber.
Well, I think trying to fine people is going a bit far, since losing a carrier is already quite an incentive to not be a moron with a carrier.
I am a nullsec zealot. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3607
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 09:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:There are plenty of corps and alliances that aren't such sad little carebears. Rather than cower in fear in their pos they might do things like ... I don't know, maybe play the game? Bait the other guy? Rat in ships that are a bit more capable for pvp rather than minmaxed pve turds? Have a small fleet set up so they can do things with protection? Actually defend the space they're in? Idk these are all crazy ideas I guess!
There's a funny story. A neutral once came into one of our systems and warped to an anomaly, hoping to catch a tengu or something whith his Rapier.
He ran into a fleet of newbies ratting in rail feroxes.
He died. The end.
I am a nullsec zealot. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3607
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 09:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bertrand Butler wrote:If afk cloaking did not have any influence on other players, then noone would afk cloak. Its pretty simple really.
CCP has said its going to take a look at this, so the current mechanic is probably going to be changed. I do not agree with this, but thats irrelevant anyway since I'm not affected.
The reverse tears will definitely be sweet though...XD
Yeah, if it's useful then it probably hurts someone.
I am a nullsec zealot. |
|
|
| |
|