Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
I love EVE, I think most of all for it's sandbox. Also because of the space genre. They fit perfectly and there's so much to do with this, my mind imagination is constantly exploding from it as I know other people's are as having spoken to them over the years. That being said the DUST issue brings up an interesting problem. Even though I love EVE and want CCP to do well with it, everything I know tells me DUST is a failure.
So is it more morally right to support EVE and DUST until it bleeds EVE dry and dies, or to call it out as it is now and ask CCP to put an end to it?
What is your opinion on DUST? |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
12626
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's ok, it's been banished to the underworld of consoles where it will remain "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á
Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?-á http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
231
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
It won't bleed EvE dry. Two different markets.
The problem is DUST isn't a standalone MMOFPS. It needs it's own space, literally. Not piggybacked on an established IP.
The gaming world is littered with such attempts. They fail because it's half of what they could've been if not tethered to an established IP.
It's like Blizzard tying Diablo III into WoW. It wouldn't work, and it hampers both franchises if it were linked. Two different worlds, two different play styles. Best in their own. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Barakkus
1908
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
I don't want them to abandon it, I want them to port it to PC so I can play it. I would probably be all over that. http://youtu.be/yytbDZrw1jc |

Iszi
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
18
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
I don't have any console gaming systems, and I have no plans to get one. That being said, I think the gaming communities from each are different. I don't think merging them will be easy.
If CCP falls into the money>content trap, neither project will do well - however if they don't take ALL players into consideration, the game(s) will stagnate and lose money anyway. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:It won't bleed EvE dry. Two different markets.
The problem is DUST isn't a standalone MMOFPS. It needs it's own space, literally. Not piggybacked on an established IP.
The gaming world is littered with such attempts. They fail because it's half of what they could've been if not tethered to an established IP.
It's like Blizzard tying Diablo III into WoW. It wouldn't work, and it hampers both franchises if it were linked. Two different worlds, two different play styles. Best in their own.
But there's a difference between a symbiotic relationship and a parasitic one. DUST will never be able to bring to EVE what EVE is bringing to it.
I know CCP is given to pie in the sky projections, and that isn't necessarily a bad thing. But I know DUST will never be a success in it's own right, I know that as a fact, as I'm sure many people do. I really wish people who already know this, would stop protecting DUST and help CCP get rid of it. |

Charles Javeroux
INTERSTELLAR CREDIT Interstellar Trade Syndicate
58
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:I love EVE, I think most of all for it's sandbox. Also because of the space genre. They fit perfectly and there's so much to do with this, my mind imagination is constantly exploding from it as I know other people's are as having spoken to them over the years. That being said the DUST issue brings up an interesting problem. Even though I love EVE and want CCP to do well with it, everything I know tells me DUST is a failure.
So is it more morally right to support EVE and DUST until it bleeds EVE dry and dies, or to call it out as it is now and ask CCP to put an end to it?
What is your opinion on DUST?
Dust514 is a cool game and it's already a success. When EVE started, there were lot's of peeps who told pretty much the same story like the OP - " EVE is a failure and going to die some horrible death".
Well EVE has been dieing for 10 years now, but as a long there's still one pilot flying or one merc stomping the grounds, EVE and DUST514 will be around. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Charles Javeroux wrote:Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:I love EVE, I think most of all for it's sandbox. Also because of the space genre. They fit perfectly and there's so much to do with this, my mind imagination is constantly exploding from it as I know other people's are as having spoken to them over the years. That being said the DUST issue brings up an interesting problem. Even though I love EVE and want CCP to do well with it, everything I know tells me DUST is a failure.
So is it more morally right to support EVE and DUST until it bleeds EVE dry and dies, or to call it out as it is now and ask CCP to put an end to it?
What is your opinion on DUST? Dust514 is a cool game and it's already a success. When EVE started, there were lot's of peeps who told pretty much the same story like the OP - " EVE is a failure and going to die some horrible death". Well EVE has been dieing for 10 years now, but as a long there's still one pilot flying or one merc stomping the grounds, EVE and DUST514 will be around.
The problem is DUST is living off of EVE and these are two completely different genres in two completely different eras of both gaming and the internet. |

Niko medes
Sonoran Shadow
70
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
Give it time. Beta is a beta and it has barely been out of launch for a month.
Hell it isn't even in effect in Null yet, lets see what comes of it then.
|

Lykouleon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
805
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:50:00 -
[10] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:The problem is DUST is living off of EVE and these are two completely different genres in two completely different eras of both gaming and the internet. No, its not. And no, not really. Wow really does show how pathetic Goonswarm is, u drop 8 blackops onto a logi ship in the middle of nowhere, maybe when goonswarm gets some skilled pilots then mayb just mayb you'll be able to compete with TEST.
I would fully support account bans by ccp for meta type stuff like this. |
|

Ryuu Shi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
Dust is awesome and has the potential to be even more awesome. It takes time to develop and implement all cool things ccp is aiming for with the game. Ganking miners has gone too far. Ganking is wrong, and bad. There should be a new, stronger word for Ganking like badwrong or badong. Yes, Ganking is badong. From this moment, I will stand for the opposite of Ganking, gnodab. - Said no-one, ever. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
Lykouleon wrote:Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:The problem is DUST is living off of EVE and these are two completely different genres in two completely different eras of both gaming and the internet. No, its not. And no, not really.
You think DUST is supporting itself? Not sure how to respond to this without violating forum rules.
(Notice how I stopped reading at your first word, the rest are even worse)
Ryuu Shi wrote:Dust is awesome and has the potential to be even more awesome. It takes time to develop and implement all cool things ccp is aiming for with the game.
But that isn't exactly how I understand the gaming market to work? Care to elaborate how this is good for EVE or even DUST? |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Just a reminder that this is your money going to a console game you probably don't even play. |

Lykouleon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
805
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:You think DUST is supporting itself? Not sure how to respond to this without violating forum rules. Do you even understand how video games get funded, outside of the "HURRR HURRR KICKSTARTAR" system? Wow really does show how pathetic Goonswarm is, u drop 8 blackops onto a logi ship in the middle of nowhere, maybe when goonswarm gets some skilled pilots then mayb just mayb you'll be able to compete with TEST.
I would fully support account bans by ccp for meta type stuff like this. |

Torakenat
Substandard industries Insidious Associates
58
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote: But there's a difference between a symbiotic relationship and a parasitic one. DUST will never be able to bring to EVE what EVE is bringing to it.
I know CCP is given to pie in the sky projections, and that isn't necessarily a bad thing. But I know DUST will never be a success in it's own right, I know that as a fact, as I'm sure many people do. I really wish people who already know this, would stop protecting DUST and help CCP get rid of it.
What facts? Projections are based on theory and are at best educated guesses. A fact is a tangible idea that can be proven. Since, you cannot prove what the future holds for either product without living it, your statement is false and incohorrent.
No one wants to see CCP fail, and many people will grandstand to show support.
CCP are not foolish enough to allow their core product be substantially impacted by their side venture.
Eve is a resounding success and Dust is still a baby. Let's see what happens after Dust learns how to walk and run before we start condeming and pitchforking.
It's great that you are passionate about EVE..we all are...well most of us :P However, I strongly feel you need to learn when to chill, sit back and relax to see what happens. Being ethnocentric in thinking that eve online cannot grow and expand without dying is at best disturbing. |

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
133
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:
Dunno about yours, but my money is going to a company in return for access to a game they made. How they spend it, well that's their affair :P |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Lykouleon wrote:Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:You think DUST is supporting itself? Not sure how to respond to this without violating forum rules. Do you even understand how video games get funded, outside of the "HURRR HURRR KICKSTARTAR" system?
I know you have a solemn duty to defend other internet users who paid 10 US , 13 euro to join the same internet forum , but DUST is clearly being funded by CCP based on EVE and it's projected revenue. Our money was and has been used on DUST. Now please shave your neck. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
Torakenat wrote:
What facts?
"I know it as a fact" is an expression people without autism use. |

Remiel Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
1509
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:27:00 -
[19] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Torakenat wrote:
What facts?
"I know it as a fact" is an expression people without autism use.
Don't even start that ****. I'm autistic, and I've never said "I know it is a fact". Instead, I say "it is a fact because [insert evidence here]". You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
664
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:32:00 -
[20] - Quote
Quote: But there's a difference between a symbiotic relationship and a parasitic one. DUST will never be able to bring to EVE what EVE is bringing to it.
If its failing then Eve isn't bringing anything to it?
So which is it? From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |
|

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
134
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Torakenat wrote:
What facts?
"I know it as a fact" is an expression people without autism use.
Or, in this case, people without facts..
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
232
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:36:00 -
[22] - Quote
Torakenat wrote:What facts? Projections are based on theory and are at best educated guesses. A fact is a tangible idea that can be proven. Since, you cannot prove what the future holds for either product without living it, your statement is false and incohorrent.
The fact is tether a new product to an established product and most will fail.
Why?
The tethered product doesn't have it's own identity. It's own brand.
It's like Bethesda adding Fallout3 to Skyrim. It wouldn't sell to either market, and probably annoy both.
When CCP makes a PC version, maybe then they can unlink the two, and let DUST develop into it's own brand.
It doesn't need to piggyback onto EvE for EvE players to play it. Fans will play it because they're CCP fans, genre fans or just want to try something different. And from there it grows it's own wings and becomes it's own.
If it existed in 2007 I may have played it then, but Battlefield 2142 got there first, and now I like the brand and play the series (and hoping for BF2143). If DICE added it as a DLC to BF2, I would never have gotten it. Got sick quick of the 1000000000001 modern warfare or WWII games at the time, and wouldn't even give it a second looks. Was there at Wal-Mart one day, and BF2 box and a BF2142 box were side by side. Walked out with BF2142, as that's more interesting. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
134
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:41:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Torakenat wrote:What facts? Projections are based on theory and are at best educated guesses. A fact is a tangible idea that can be proven. Since, you cannot prove what the future holds for either product without living it, your statement is false and incohorrent. The fact is tether a new product to an established product and most will fail.
That's.. not really a fact.
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1929
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:42:00 -
[24] - Quote
CCP are spending my subscription money on developing features in highsec. As a 0.0 player, I want them to abandon highsec. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Lost True
Paradise project
2335
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:I love EVE, I think most of all for it's sandbox. Also because of the space genre. They fit perfectly and there's so much to do with this, my imagination is constantly exploding from it as I know other people's are as having spoken to them over the years. That being said the DUST issue brings up an interesting problem. Even though I love EVE and want CCP to do well with it, everything I know tells me DUST is a failure.
So is it more morally right to support EVE and DUST until it bleeds EVE dry and dies, or to call it out as it is now and ask CCP to put an end to it?
What is your opinion on DUST? I play EVE. I don't care about Dust. I won't play WoD.
But it's too late to whine about it. It's already happen. The money are spent. in 2007 i've thought it's a sci-fi simulator, not an "e-sports" game. I'm not a teenager, how would i like it much?
|

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:45:00 -
[26] - Quote
If there's just a few people on the forums speaking out against it it really doesn't matter. They say only 10% of the population can thin for themselves .. but in EVE I think the number is much smaller. When DUST fails and it will.... you can think of what EVE could have been. It's not like I'm the first person in 6 years to ask CCP to rethink their trajectory, possibly the only one who still bothers.
|

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy
410
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:45:00 -
[27] - Quote
I'm still hoping Dust leads Eve to something more interesting in station eventually. but abandon Dust..? nope. I wish there was a pc version but that's a different matter. -á-á- remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not-á "afk" cloaking-á-
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
232
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:46:00 -
[28] - Quote
Delen Ormand wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote:Torakenat wrote:What facts? Projections are based on theory and are at best educated guesses. A fact is a tangible idea that can be proven. Since, you cannot prove what the future holds for either product without living it, your statement is false and incohorrent. The fact is tether a new product to an established product and most will fail. That's.. not really a fact.
Ask Coca-Cola that lessen when they tried to market new Coke as Coke.
Name was there, the taste wasn't, and consumers were irate (the Cola war of the 80s). "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Odhinn Vinlandii
Meltdown.
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:47:00 -
[29] - Quote
DUST is good, and when all of it's features are turned on, it will be great.
---Seven year EVE bittervet. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:48:00 -
[30] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Quote: But there's a difference between a symbiotic relationship and a parasitic one. DUST will never be able to bring to EVE what EVE is bringing to it.
If its failing then Eve isn't bringing anything to it? So which is it?
How do you think DUST came about, just curious |
|

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
134
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:52:00 -
[31] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Delen Ormand wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote:Torakenat wrote:What facts? Projections are based on theory and are at best educated guesses. A fact is a tangible idea that can be proven. Since, you cannot prove what the future holds for either product without living it, your statement is false and incohorrent. The fact is tether a new product to an established product and most will fail. That's.. not really a fact. Ask Coca-Cola that lessen when they tried to market new Coke as Coke. Name was there, the taste wasn't, and consumers were irate ( the Cola war of the 80s).
That.. still doesn't make it a fact.
|

DRGaius Baltar
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:55:00 -
[32] - Quote
Niko medes wrote:Give it time. Beta is a beta and it has barely been out of launch for a month.
Hell it isn't even in effect in Null yet, lets see what comes of it then.
My friend in the console market time is everything, people get bored quick and there's a lot of competiton out there so CCP cant afford be dicking around for another 4 to 5 yrs on one game trying to figure out how DUST will work. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
664
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Soundwave had a grand vision for integrating flying in space and first person for Eve and DUST is whats leftover after the budget cuts.
From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

Lost True
Paradise project
2336
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
One thing that many ppl don't understand is that abandoning Dust now will not help EVE at all.
Because the money is already invested. And even if we don't need this console crap, we should hope that Dust will be successful. Because if it's not, it'll be a huge money loss for CCP, and EVE will be developing even slower. If not closed. in 2007 i've thought it's a sci-fi simulator, not an "e-sports" game. I'm not a teenager, how would i like it much?
|

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
Anyway, in the world of people who make projections of this temporal prison we call earth, facts can be derived from present circumstances. DUST is a drain on EVE development and the only reason you aren't angry at it (as you were with WiS) is because your earth lords didn't tell you to be (Mitannit, RaindowJudenIII, whoever, Redditcat).
You know it's true |

Cecil Montague
PCG Enterprises THE ROYAL NAVY
6
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:07:00 -
[36] - Quote
So far I have seen no proof of anything. Unless you have access to CCP's accounts you cannot know how much money Dust is making let alone conjecture that it is "bleeding" EvE dry. People have cited anecdotal evidence about previous similar experiments that aren't actually very similar, mainly due to the fact that linking two different genres on two different platforms into one game world has never been done before.
CCP is not spending your money on DUST. They are spending theirs. The money they earnt by renting access to their game to the players of EvE. Now if they neglect EvE and do not evolve the game to your satisfaction then by all means make your voice heard. We've just had a major (free) expansion and not once has someone said "Odyssey is crap, it must be Dust's fault" in this thread though. So how about we give it a chance.
Edit: Proof read next time Cecil
"There is no such thing as an effective segment of Totality" - Bruce Lee: The only man with a Chuck Norris killmail. |

DRGaius Baltar
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
Lost True wrote:One thing that many ppl don't understand is that abandoning Dust now will not help EVE at all.
Because the money is already invested. And even if we don't need this console crap, we should hope that Dust will be successful. Because if it's not, it'll be a huge money loss for CCP, and EVE will be developing even slower. If not closed.
Not necessarily, as long as there is a constant revenue stream it wont die |

Xinivrae
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
417
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:If there's just a few people on the forums speaking out against it, it really doesn't matter. They say only 10% of the population can think for themselves .. but in EVE I think the number is much smaller. When DUST fails and it will.... you can think of what EVE could have been. It's not like I'm the first person in 6 years to ask CCP to rethink their trajectory, possibly the only one who still bothers.
Quote:DUST is a drain on EVE development and the only reason you aren't angry at it (as you were with WiS) is because your earth lords didn't tell you to be (Mitannit, RaindowJudenIII, whoever, Redditcat).
You know it's true Ah yes, the enlightened shepherd has come to awaken us sheeple from our ignorance. Clearly if only we were capable of actually thinking, we would be high-fiving each other and telling op how right they are. |

DRGaius Baltar
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
Cecil Montague wrote:So far I have seen no proof of anything. Unless you have access to CCP's accounts you cannot know how much money Dust is making let alone conjecture that it is "bleeding" EvE dry. People have cited anecdotal evidence about previous similar experiments that aren't actually very similar, mainly due to the fact that linking two different genres on two different platforms into one game world has never been done before.
CCP is not spending your money on DUST. They are spending theirs. The money they earnt by renting access to their game to the players of EvE. Now if they neglect EvE and do not evolve the game to your satisfaction then by all means make your voice heard. We've just had a major (free) expansion and not once has someone said "Odyssey is crap, it must be Dust's fault" in this thread though. So how about we give it a chance.
Edit: Proof read next time Cecil
Well i'll tell you i sure as hell wouldn't pay RL money for virtual items and i work 40 hrs a week. theres no value in it |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:14:00 -
[40] - Quote
Cecil Montague wrote:players of EVE
Who would probably like that money spent on their hobby rather than some inane, derivative console shooter which is going nowhere. |
|

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1577
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:14:00 -
[41] - Quote
Lost True wrote:One thing that many ppl don't understand is that abandoning Dust now will not help EVE at all.
Because the money is already invested. And even if we don't need this console crap, we should hope that Dust will be successful. Because if it's not, it'll be a huge money loss for CCP, and EVE will be developing even slower. If not closed.
True, but at the same time continuing to pour resources into a lost cause can have a greater long term negative effect. Sometimes you just need to cut your losses before they spiral out of control.
Is this true for Dust? Maybe, maybe not.
CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:16:00 -
[42] - Quote
Xinivrae wrote:Ah yes, the enlightened shepherd has come to awaken us sheeple from our ignorance. Clearly if only we were capable of actually thinking, we would be high-fiving each other and telling op how right they are. 
I completely agree, I might screencap this or something. You people are so trapped in your fanboism that it's hurting you , someone should do a study. |

Amitious Turkey
The Red Circle Inc.
117
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:16:00 -
[43] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:If there's just a few people on the forums speaking out against it, it really doesn't matter. They say only 10% of the population can think for themselves .. but in EVE I think the number is much smaller. When DUST fails and it will.... you can think of what EVE could have been. It's not like I'm the first person in 6 years to ask CCP to rethink their trajectory, possibly the only one who still bothers.
In Eve it's smaller? Try saying that again when you've played any other game. Eve is the most free-thinking playerbase out there. That's the only reason I've stayed with this game for so long. The game changes because players push the boundaries, not (just) because of CCP's creativity. Yes, they have the potential to royally screw this up, but that's the same with any risk. No one can predict the outcome. Lots of failures are successes in disguise.
Also, how does one determine whether someone can think for himself? That statistic sounds too prone to opinion to be worth quoting.
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Anyway, in the world of people who make projections of this temporal prison we call earth, facts can be derived from present circumstances. DUST is a drain on EVE development
How long have you played? I've played since the beginning and seen how Eve has developed. If anything, DUST has a head start. I remember when battleships were as rare as titans. How do you think the market looked? Nowhere near as robust as it is now. DUST faces a similar problem as EVE did, but DUST has the EVE market to (help) sustain it (in a limited, roundabout way) until it can sustain itself, whereas EVE never had any access to outside help at all.
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote: and the only reason you aren't angry at it (as you were with WiS) is because your earth lords didn't tell you to be (Mitannit, RaindowJudenIII, whoever, Redditcat).
You know it's true
I've been living under a wormhole POS for the past 2 years. Who the **** are those guys?
I like to lick things.
Haunting the forums since 03. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
Amitious Turkey wrote:
ect. other stuff
I've been living under a wormhole POS for the past 2 years. Who the **** are those guys?
The internet and gaming changes, can you accept this as an objective reality? EVE doing well over 10 years ago has no bearing on DUST, ok? It's being created with EVE dollars.. right? All I'm saying. Did you know the people at CCP in charge of EVE right now aren't the same as the ones who developed EVE? Did you know that?
( and it's failing but that hardly needs to be argued eve-offline was already linked for you, you only need your mind beyond that you have it right?) ) |

Castor II
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
105
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
And I want to kick you in the teeth.
But we can't all have what we want, can we? |

Malak Dawnfire
Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS
238
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:33:00 -
[46] - Quote
How does Dust effect EVE, exactly? I can't answer that question but I know exactly how EVE effects dust.
Our money went to this?
Edit; Still, as a past console player I wouldn't say abandon Dust, just give it a chance to effect EVE as much as we effect it. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:40:00 -
[47] - Quote
Castor II wrote:And I want to kick you in the teeth.
But we can't all have what we want, can we?
eve message me your location
It's obvious to anyone with an objective mind that DUST is silly, this goes back to before it even launched, and now proof..... If you think 4000 players online on the PSN in CCP numbers is good then every game is a success really. |

Baby ChuChu
Ice Cream Asylum
1502
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:52:00 -
[48] - Quote
Eve. Launched than less to glowing reviews. Given a chance. Decade later, one of the most popular MMOs in existence.
Dust 514. Launched than less to glowing reviews. Not more than a month after release, people (specifically fans of Eve) want it taken behind a shed and shot in the face.
Console gamers. When they complain about something, they're whiny little babies.
PC gamers. When they complain about something, they're doing the Lord's work.
Conclusion: I don't know, but I can't stop listening to this song. |

Amitious Turkey
The Red Circle Inc.
118
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:00:00 -
[49] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Amitious Turkey wrote:
ect. other stuff
I've been living under a wormhole POS for the past 2 years. Who the **** are those guys?
The internet and gaming changes, can you accept this as an objective reality? EVE doing well over 10 years ago has no bearing on DUST, ok? It's being created with EVE dollars.. right? All I'm saying. Did you know the people at CCP in charge of EVE right now aren't the same as the ones who developed EVE? Did you know that? ( and it's failing but that hardly needs to be argued eve-offline was already linked for you, you only need your mind beyond that you have it right?) )
Eve wasn't doing well 10 years ago, compared to how well it's doing now. I'm not one of those bitter vets who can't see the positive differences between then and now. That was my point. :facepalm:
This does have bearing on DUST because the ingame markets are similar and tied together. They are also based on a similar, if accelerated, growth model.
The faces in CCP have changed. That's normal for any company, or any kind of gathering really. Some like the new faces, some don't, some like the changes, some don't. A company isn't doomed to failure because it's core people have changed or when the focus changes; it's doomed when core ideals become unrecognizable. As long as the glimmer of the idea that spawned Eve in 2003 is there, the game, and the company, will continue. Continuation=success.
Of course it's being created with Eve dollars. My money for Starcraft 2 goes to Diablo 3 which I won't touch with a ten-foot pole. It is also going toward WoW, and WoW money is going toward Starcraft 2 production. What's your point? CCP isn't a government collecting tax money. It's their choice where to spend it, and it's our choice to continue paying for it or not.
As for Eve Offline. When Eve was a month old, it barely had 3,000 players online. Few would call that a successful launch. Again, what's your point? May I see your crystal ball? I like to lick things.
Haunting the forums since 03. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
232
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:27:00 -
[50] - Quote
Baby ChuChu wrote:Eve. Launched to less than glowing reviews. Given a chance. Decade later, one of the most popular MMOs in existence. Dust 514. Launched to less than glowing reviews. Not more than a month after release, people (specifically fans of Eve) want it taken behind a shed and shot in the face. Console gamers. When they complain about something, they're whiny little babies. PC gamers. When they complain about something, they're doing the Lord's work. Conclusion: I don't know, but I can't stop listening to this song.
All this talk about DUST has me yearning for more of this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CintJYMqCbU
Or the legend itself...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDsruLR1qag "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|
|

Torakenat
Substandard industries Insidious Associates
59
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:28:00 -
[51] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Anyway, in the world of people who make projections of this temporal prison we call earth, facts can be derived from present circumstances. DUST is a drain on EVE development and the only reason you aren't angry at it (as you were with WiS) is because your earth lords didn't tell you to be (Mitannit, RaindowJudenIII, whoever, Redditcat). You know it's true
I think you are confusing fact with deductive reasoning/educated guesses/forecasting Should Dust be an area of business concern? Absolutely, as a concerned player any new venture or risk a company makes, whom you enjoy their services is worrisome. However, we do not OWN the company.
We are not INVESTING in the company with our monthly subscriptions. It may seem to many that with simply playing the game we are investing our time and money, however there is no "cash out" option. Services and obligations are forthright dispensed.
As for the direction of the game? Eve is great and I like the direction it is going. If at anytime I feel they are not delivering what I consider enjoyable content, I'll leave. Just because for years I have made monthly contributions, does not mean that EVE is obligated to deliver the same service year after year.
I can understand the passion and drive some fanatical gamers have toward anygame, however I fail to understand that simply because you are a customer you feel entitled and know what's best for the company. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:44:00 -
[52] - Quote
Torakenat wrote:[quote=Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO] I can understand the passion and drive some fanatical gamers have toward anygame, however I fail to understand that simply because you are a customer you feel entitled and know what's best for the company.
There is passion yeah, but some of us live real lives and some of the things we see in EVE actually conflict with things either illusory in our minds or more so as it were. |

Arkenai Wyrnspire
Turalyon Plus
1674
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:50:00 -
[53] - Quote
Oh look, it's a 'Dust is dying' thread. I'm sure we have quite a few of these for both games. Sig'd.-áGallente FW best FW. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:53:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Quote: But there's a difference between a symbiotic relationship and a parasitic one. DUST will never be able to bring to EVE what EVE is bringing to it.
If its failing then Eve isn't bringing anything to it? So which is it?
I can't respond to meaningless reddit **** like this all day.
Bye, maybe someone appreciated my concern |

Torakenat
Substandard industries Insidious Associates
60
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:00:00 -
[55] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote: There is passion yeah, but some of us live real lives and some of the things we see in EVE actually conflict with things either illusory in our minds or more so as it were.
I can't respond to meaningless reddit **** like this all day.
But, maybe someone will appreciate if i tried. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
232
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:10:00 -
[56] - Quote
Torakenat wrote:We are not INVESTING in the company with our monthly subscriptions. It may seem to many that with simply playing the game we are investing our time and money, however there is no "cash out" option. Services and obligations are forthright dispensed.
Fail white knighting.
Let me give you a clue, Torakenat about funding:
no players = no money = no game (the devs got to eat).
players + money = game.
That $180/year for a game gives a player a say in what he likes to see in the game, as his money is pooled in with other gamers, which is the capital used to build the game.
In business the company that can deliver a product the cheapest, and treat their customers well, dominates. The company who cusses out their customers and milks them, becomes at best like a niched P2W game or dies on the vine.
"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:22:00 -
[57] - Quote
Most of the people in this thread I think are used to a reddit/instagrm/twitter/tumbr internet to many people this is what the internet is. But I want to tell you, you don't need to castrate yourself here, you don't need to become a slave to hipsterism or a 'bugchaser' (liberals ect) you don't need to suckle at the teet of authority.
You're allowed to question them. For god sake just as a hobby question something in your black nail polish soaked lives. |

Aria Ning
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:39:00 -
[58] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Torakenat wrote:What facts? Projections are based on theory and are at best educated guesses. A fact is a tangible idea that can be proven. Since, you cannot prove what the future holds for either product without living it, your statement is false and incohorrent. The fact is tether a new product to an established product and most will fail. Why? The tethered product doesn't have it's own identity. It's own brand. It's like Bethesda adding Fallout3 to Skyrim. It wouldn't sell to either market, and probably annoy both. When CCP makes a PC version, maybe then they can unlink the two, and let DUST develop into it's own brand. It doesn't need to piggyback onto EvE for EvE players to play it. Fans will play it because they're CCP fans, genre fans or just want to try something different. And from there it grows it's own wings and becomes it's own. If it existed in 2007 I may have played it then, but Battlefield 2142 got there first, and now I like the brand and play the series (and hoping for BF2143). If DICE added it as a DLC to BF2, I would never have gotten it. Got sick quick of the 1000000000001 modern warfare or WWII games at the time, and wouldn't even give it a second looks. Was there at Wal-Mart one day, and BF2 box and a BF2142 box were side by side. Walked out with BF2142, as that's more interesting.
Your comparisons are Wayyyy off. It's not like WoW trying to tie in Diablo III they're not even in the same world or much less universe same for you bad Fallout 3 and Skyrim Analogy. The more appropriate comparison would be Warcraft series to World of Warcraft and look how that turned out? |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
347
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:47:00 -
[59] - Quote
Dust is a console game, there isn't much crossover in demand, and actually the DUST culture is having a hard time dealing with veteran eve players who play the game. If you have the time and desire to hop on dust and get to a good point, i can only imagine awoxing is much more sweet when you do it to people who don't consider it a part of the game.
Its impact on eve is also minimal, and if they ever merge the economies, I can't see any situation where eve players don't profit unless CCP pulls some bullshit magic to convert eve dollars to dust dollars. |

Aria Ning
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:49:00 -
[60] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Cecil Montague wrote:players of EVE Who would probably like that money spent on their hobby rather than some inane, derivative console shooter which is going nowhere.
So how would you feel if someone paid you for your services and then told you how to spend the money you earned from providing a service?
Yeah same goes for CCP. You paid to play EvE not to tell CCP how to spend their money, sorry but the the money is no longer yours.
|
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
232
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:52:00 -
[61] - Quote
Aria Ning wrote:[Your comparisons are Wayyyy off. It's not like WoW trying to tie in Diablo III they're not even in the same world or much less universe
Play Diablo III and then WoW, and let me know if Azeroth is in Diablo III...it isn't...let alone the RMT auction house.
And while you're at it, check to see if Azeroth is in StarCraft too!
Separate brands. Separate play styles. Separate games. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

knobber Jobbler
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
238
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 10:02:00 -
[62] - Quote
Charles Javeroux wrote:Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:I love EVE, I think most of all for it's sandbox. Also because of the space genre. They fit perfectly and there's so much to do with this, my mind imagination is constantly exploding from it as I know other people's are as having spoken to them over the years. That being said the DUST issue brings up an interesting problem. Even though I love EVE and want CCP to do well with it, everything I know tells me DUST is a failure.
So is it more morally right to support EVE and DUST until it bleeds EVE dry and dies, or to call it out as it is now and ask CCP to put an end to it?
What is your opinion on DUST? Dust514 is a cool game and it's already a success. When EVE started, there were lot's of peeps who told pretty much the same story like the OP - " EVE is a failure and going to die some horrible death". Well EVE has been dieing for 10 years now, but as a long there's still one pilot flying or one merc stomping the grounds, EVE and DUST514 will be around.
Eve has no competition, dust on the other hand has planetside 2, a vastly better game.
|

Count MonteCarlo
The Deliberate Forces HYDRA RELOADED
26
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 11:02:00 -
[63] - Quote
eve dota m8 |

Dorothy Michelle Reigh
Mastermind Enterprises
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 11:12:00 -
[64] - Quote
I have to admit: This has been one of the most interesting tug-of-war forum debates I've seen in a while. I'm more than willing to admit that I haven't invested as much time into EVE as most of you here, but I'm also more than willing to admit that if I hadn't actually played DUST I never would've given EVE a chance. It's kind of funny how that works. My question to the OP, who doesn't even seem passionate enough about the cause to post under his or her main character is: Have you actually tried DUST? Have you taken the time out to see how many people play it or even glanced at the DUST forums? I mean maybe you're right about the long term future of EVE, but presently DUST is doing pretty well and I can tell you that CCP probably won't abandon a project that's been years in the making. You're free to think what you will and so is anyone else that believes what you're saying, but I think it's a bit short sided. As for "your money" well... it was no longer yours when you opted to pay CCP to access their servers. They're free to do whatever they wish with it and all we can do is hope that they make positive business decisions. It's not our place however to tell them how to run a successful business. I'm sure they've gathered a fair amount of experience in the past 10 years wouldn't you agree? |

Kitty Bear
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Tribal Band
688
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 11:24:00 -
[65] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:It won't bleed EvE dry. Two different markets.
The problem is DUST isn't a standalone MMOFPS. It needs it's own space, literally. Not piggybacked on an established IP.
The gaming world is littered with such attempts. They fail because it's half of what they could've been if not tethered to an established IP.
It's like Blizzard tying Diablo III into WoW. It wouldn't work, and it hampers both franchises if it were linked. Two different worlds, two different play styles. Best in their own.
I agree with your first point. And disagree with everything else you said.
What litter where ?? please provide links to the these historical attempts, but I remember nothing like this and i've been gaming since the 70's.
The Dust concept is built on and extends the Eve Online IP There is scope for further expansion, a certain project displayed at fan-fest showed as much. Different play styles maybe, but they are the same worlds as they are within the same universe Just because you do not like it, does not mean that it has no place within eve
The eve player base is supposed to be smarter than average, yet the dust project and every expansion CCP release sees countless threads and posts, that merely show that a majority of the eve player base is simply narrow minded, self centred and incapable of understanding broad concept thinking. |

Xessej
Darqsyde Exploration Limited Mass - Effect
17
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 12:13:00 -
[66] - Quote
Connecting Dust to Eve while a novel approach was a terrible idea.
Console games have very short lifespans. Console systems even have short lifespans, what is CCP going to do when Sony shuts down the PS3 servers?
Add to that they made a mediocre FPS at a time when the market had many FPS that were more than mediocre.
I understand CCP's desire to have more than one product but this is not the way to go. |

Zane Tekitsu
D.I.C.A.D. Solutions
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 12:16:00 -
[67] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:
Just a reminder that you paid money to CCP for entertainment. That is now CCP's money to do with as they choose. For example a console game that you may or may not choose to play. A game that CCP has invested it's resources into to entertain a wider audience, and make more money. Everybody wins.
I srsly do not understand communists. |

Stetson Eagle
ROC Academy The ROC
41
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 12:27:00 -
[68] - Quote
Dust is a terrible failure and soon a cash sink for CCP. Reviews say the full story as far as an fps game is received at it's core. The sandbox dwindles to being limited to only the best of the best players due to the 16vs16 limitations and numbers making no difference.
Pull the plug imho, before the p2w filth corrupts eve sandbox and ships can be created ingame for cash.
Greed is good, but purity is better. |

Ari Laveran
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
53
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 12:42:00 -
[69] - Quote
There are a lot of us having tons of fun with Dust, console games only have short lifespans because no one has ever tried to support a console game past its launch date. I'm not really going to spend a lot of time arguing with the doom sayers but I'll say it again classifying PC gamers and console players as some type of separate species is a colossal mistake, and one I'm glad to see CCP is not making.
Pay 2 win it is not(try some math),
Duster out. \o |

Adunh Slavy
934
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 13:12:00 -
[70] - Quote
Delen Ormand wrote: That.. still doesn't make it a fact.
It's a concept known as brand dilution. Feel free to look it up and see how it applies to Dust and Eve. |
|

Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
238
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 13:14:00 -
[71] - Quote
Screw DUST (we're stuck with that I thinks)...I want them to abandon the vampire WoW game...World of Twilight or something? |

Aria Ning
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 13:54:00 -
[72] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Aria Ning wrote:[Your comparisons are Wayyyy off. It's not like WoW trying to tie in Diablo III they're not even in the same world or much less universe Play Diablo III and then WoW, and let me know if Azeroth is in Diablo III... it isn't...let alone the RMT auction house. And while you're at it, check to see if Azeroth is in StarCraft too! Separate brands. Separate play styles. Separate games.
I know that's my point. Diablo III and WoW have NOTHING in common, thus they're completely separated even the IPs, however, Warcraft 1-3 have a lot in common with WoW, they're not separated. DUST and EVE have A LOT in common, therefore they work in cohesion, but they don't have a huge game impact on each other. That's why your bad analogy of D3 and WoW doesn't make any sense.
The problem you're getting confused with is that EvE is a spaceship game not a first person shooter. Sure that's separate, just like Warcraft was a RTS and WoW is an MMO but the point is the base of both games Eve & DUST and even Warcraft and WoW their IPs are the same, the story between the two are the same, the connections are relevant to each other, and they both make references to each other.
In fact if DUST was a complete stand alone shooter with no ties or connections to EvE, it probably wouldn't do well at all, I mean worst than it currently is.
But then again if they had both PC port and even had the game on all consoles it probably would be doing a lot better than it currently is. For me that's the flaw I see in DUST because there are a lot more PCs sold than Playstation 3's. Since 7/26/2012 there's only been 57 million units of PS3's sold and that number includes all the PS3 that have been sold since it's birth in 11/2006. In 2011 over 94 million units of PCs were sold and this is just in one year if you count 2010, another 93 million units of PCs were sold. So yeah I don't understand why DUST is on PS3 only, and not on the PC or heck even on the other consoles like Xbox360
Here are my links for PC and PS3 Data: http://www.statisticbrain.com/computer-sales-statistics/ http://www.statisticbrain.com/playstation-statistics/ |

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
143
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 15:24:00 -
[73] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Delen Ormand wrote: That.. still doesn't make it a fact.
It's a concept known as brand dilution. Feel free to look it up and see how it applies to Dust and Eve.
I'm fully aware of what brand dilution is, thanks. But a concept is not the same thing as a fact, is it? |

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
261
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 15:25:00 -
[74] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:I love EVE, I think most of all for it's sandbox. Also because of the space genre. They fit perfectly and there's so much to do with this, my imagination is constantly exploding from it as I know other people's are as having spoken to them over the years. That being said the DUST issue brings up an interesting problem. Even though I love EVE and want CCP to do well with it, everything I know tells me DUST is a failure.
So is it more morally right to support EVE and DUST until it bleeds EVE dry and dies, or to call it out as it is now and ask CCP to put an end to it?
What is your opinion on DUST?
You can go hump yourself. I love sending orbital bombardments. "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |

darmwand
Repo.
132
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 16:19:00 -
[75] - Quote
What's with the anger? If you don't care about Dust ignore it and go shoot things.
Maybe try mining, it's said to be quite relaxing. darmwand Repossession Agent http://www.repo-corp.net/
Recruitment is OPEN |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
245
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 16:46:00 -
[76] - Quote
First of all, as many others have said: You paid CCP for a service. Now it is their money.
Yesterday I stumbled over one of the systems Dusties are in between games. Curious I took the chance and talked with them for a few hours, asking about the game, etc.
The five big points that came out of almost 3 hours talk were:
1. A LOT of them wanted to know more about EVE. Many of them plan to try it. Some were a bit scared because of EVEs complexity. But agreed that with a corp to show you the ropes they would be able to cope.
2. Many of them formerly played BF or other of the prominent shooters, but were looking for something new, something more persistent. Most said that DUST could use more development, but also most agreed that DUST was on the right track.
3. All - capsuleers & Dusties - were very much looking forward to the market integration. EVE players wanted to be able to supply DUST players. They wanted a realistic market with player driven economy. And generally all wanted more integration between the two games.
4. Also, there seems to be little knowledge on what options there currently are for Space-Ground support. CCP should make this clear on both sides. The only thing I know is you can somehow do it as part of faction warfare.
5. There was a fear on both sides that this will be a game dominated by major EVE Alliances. Both on the DUST side and the EVE side most players agreed that there should be an opportunity for smaller corporations to have a DUST contingent (... or DUST merc corps having their own 'air support' and enjoy the full scope of the game, including setting up bases, etc.. Also both EVE players & DUSTies agreed it should NOT only be part of factional warfare. They are mercs. We can all use mercs to harass our neighbors. ;)
Until yesterday I didn't really care about DUST that much. As many others I would play it if there was a PC version. But I do see a lot of dreams there and a lot of inspiration. Which means that CCP has a great chance to make DUST a second EVE.
It will never be a BF or COD replacement. And in my opinion we should be happy about that. It could be another slowly & steadily growing game. Just like EVE never had and never will have the subscription numbers that WOW has. |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
8511
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 16:46:00 -
[77] - Quote
Your name is my reply to your wish for them to abandon DUST.
/c
|
|

Cat Casidy
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
148
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 16:48:00 -
[78] - Quote
....Is it some enlightened persons first year in college again? I hate when this happens, time to go find food then. . |

Robus Muvila
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
421
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 16:50:00 -
[79] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Your name is my reply to your wish for them to abandon DUST.
/c
[stoned voice] Your reply is Robus Muvila?.... Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?[/stoned voice] TMC Senior Developer http://themittani.com - Because EvE has needed a proper news site for ages |

Marxzo Andoun
EVE University Ivy League
19
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 17:08:00 -
[80] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:I don't want them to abandon it, I want them to port it to PC so I can play it. I would probably be all over that.
This. Plus I think the currently lame Eve-Dust links have boundless future potential. |
|

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1075
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 17:11:00 -
[81] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:I don't want them to abandon it, I want them to port it to PC so I can play it. I would probably be all over that.
i second that with ps2 going to ps4 then dust should also go to computer.
that and port dust to the occular rift.
There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Hybrid tech I ammo boost |

Lilliana Stelles
746
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 17:24:00 -
[82] - Quote
"Incarna/dust/world of darkness/etc is killing eve"
It's all the same argument. Eve as it is won't last forever, CCP needs to diversify and stay focused on these little side projects if they don't want to slowly die along with an aging fanbase. Incarna from 2009. 3 Years later and what we have doesn't look half as good as this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n41s1Iox18A |

Lykouleon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
809
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 18:06:00 -
[83] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Barakkus wrote:I don't want them to abandon it, I want them to port it to PC so I can play it. I would probably be all over that. i second that with ps2 going to ps4 then dust should also go to computer. The one thing everyone glosses over from the Planetside 2 going to PS4 reveal is that PS2 on the console will not interact with PS2 on the computer's servers. They'll be, for all intensive purposes, different games. Wow really does show how pathetic Goonswarm is, u drop 8 blackops onto a logi ship in the middle of nowhere, maybe when goonswarm gets some skilled pilots then mayb just mayb you'll be able to compete with TEST.
I would fully support account bans by ccp for meta type stuff like this. |

Tarpedo
Incursionista
37
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 18:09:00 -
[84] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:I don't want them to abandon it, I want them to port it to PC so I can play it. I would probably be all over that.
If you are not all over Planetside 2 at the moment - most likely you won't be all over Dust after PC release.
(shooters become very boring very fast)
P.S. Stupid posts like this one killed WiS development. Now I'm waiting for Star Citizen. |

Freakdevil
Aliastra Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 18:09:00 -
[85] - Quote
Lilliana Stelles wrote:"Incarna/dust/world of darkness/etc is killing eve"
It's all the same argument. Eve as it is won't last forever, CCP needs to diversify and stay focused on these little side projects if they don't want to slowly die along with an aging fanbase.
Aging fanbase? Oh yes we are all in retirement hooked up to life support. Thanks for the laugh.
DUST is fine for what it is. I would have preferred something for mobile to play while on the go. Oh well. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1075
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 18:12:00 -
[86] - Quote
Lykouleon wrote:MeBiatch wrote:Barakkus wrote:I don't want them to abandon it, I want them to port it to PC so I can play it. I would probably be all over that. i second that with ps2 going to ps4 then dust should also go to computer. The one thing everyone glosses over from the Planetside 2 going to PS4 reveal is that PS2 on the console will not interact with PS2 on the computer's servers. They'll be, for all intensive purposes, different games.
i did not know that... There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Hybrid tech I ammo boost |

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
146
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 18:17:00 -
[87] - Quote
Tarpedo wrote:Barakkus wrote:I don't want them to abandon it, I want them to port it to PC so I can play it. I would probably be all over that. If you are not all over Planetside 2 at the moment - most likely you won't be all over Dust after PC release. (shooters become very boring very fast)
I quite like shooters, personally. Plus there are quite a few older multiplayer shooters that are still popular on PC. But what stopped me getting into Planetside 2 was, apart from the system requirements, the fact that it appeared you had quite limited overall impact on the game. Basically, it' seemed to be just about shooting people in the face - which is admirable, but not enough on it's own to support long-term enthusiasm for it. Conversely, what makes me more interested in DUST is that you actually can have an effect on the wider universe.
|

Xavier Liche
ACME Mineral and Gas
30
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 18:18:00 -
[88] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:I love EVE, I think most of all for it's sandbox. Also because of the space genre. They fit perfectly and there's so much to do with this, my imagination is constantly exploding from it as I know other people's are as having spoken to them over the years. That being said the DUST issue brings up an interesting problem. Even though I love EVE and want CCP to do well with it, everything I know tells me DUST is a failure.
So is it more morally right to support EVE and DUST until it bleeds EVE dry and dies, or to call it out as it is now and ask CCP to put an end to it?
What is your opinion on DUST?
I like the concept, in the big picture having a space ship game and a planet based shooter interact is cool.
I think PS3 was a fatal error, console in general, the console culture is not to play the same game long term.
They should have started PC, no heavy vendor deals, then branched out later.
At a minimum they were not ready with enough interaction and could have easily waited and targeted PS4, more features, new platform.
Now, if it drops below the profit line, if it ever made it there, I say kill it. |

Lykouleon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
810
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 20:18:00 -
[89] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Lykouleon wrote:MeBiatch wrote:Barakkus wrote:I don't want them to abandon it, I want them to port it to PC so I can play it. I would probably be all over that. i second that with ps2 going to ps4 then dust should also go to computer. The one thing everyone glosses over from the Planetside 2 going to PS4 reveal is that PS2 on the console will not interact with PS2 on the computer's servers. They'll be, for all intensive purposes, different games. i did not know that... Its mostly for the same reasons you'll likely never see DUST on the PC.
It's like there's a valid, thought-out reason behind it or something... Wow really does show how pathetic Goonswarm is, u drop 8 blackops onto a logi ship in the middle of nowhere, maybe when goonswarm gets some skilled pilots then mayb just mayb you'll be able to compete with TEST.
I would fully support account bans by ccp for meta type stuff like this. |

Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
66
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 21:20:00 -
[90] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:I love EVE, I think most of all for it's sandbox. Also because of the space genre. They fit perfectly and there's so much to do with this, my imagination is constantly exploding from it as I know other people's are as having spoken to them over the years. That being said the DUST issue brings up an interesting problem. Even though I love EVE and want CCP to do well with it, everything I know tells me DUST is a failure.
So is it more morally right to support EVE and DUST until it bleeds EVE dry and dies, or to call it out as it is now and ask CCP to put an end to it?
What is your opinion on DUST?
it should have been included in the existing client, so if people want to go to the planet and shoot stuff they can go there, doing a stand alone fps with the competition out there seems to be hard OMG! the asteroid is depleted! |
|

Swidgen
Republic University Minmatar Republic
73
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 21:49:00 -
[91] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote: That's not true. Once you pay your monthly subscription fee the money isn't yours anymore. It's CCP's. At that point they are free to do whatever they want with it, whether that's spending it on fancy cars, giving it to their investors, reinvesting it into EVE, eating it for lunch, developing other projects (like dust), or rolling it up into gerbil access tunnels just for fun.
If your point of view was correct the EULA would look very different than it does. Nowhere does CCP say they promise to take your EVE subscription money and only use it for EVE development. In conclusion, once you pay your money to CCP they owe you ONLY a month of game time on the EVE servers. That's it. You have no say or input into their decision on what to do with that money. |

Sri Nova
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
120
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 21:59:00 -
[92] - Quote
CCP heard those that decried dusts development loud and clear.
Yet that developed it any way , they figured they had a pretty good idea and for some reason they needed the console experience.
What they have done is done . Tranquillity is now better for it . ( more robust game engine with extended capabilities rather they are used or not)
All we can do is hope that some how it ends up benefiting us all, and in the end makes eve a more awesome product .
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |