Monitor this thread via RSS [?]
 
Author Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ArcticWolf
ArcticWolf

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.11.12 20:38:00 - [1]

Edited by: ArcticWolf on 12/11/2005 20:38:02
The dreadnaught DPS outside of seige mode is way too low (vs battleships, i realise uour post is about POS), i did the figures in the first post i made stating 132 DPS, not by using the guns stats themselves, but doing extensive testing vs battleships, stationary and moving, to find diffrences, then averaged out the normal hit data. All dreadnaught skills at that date were lv 3... in siege mode that means i would do about 660 dps vs battleships.

For fun i went to test server and fit a gank setup, with the mid slots 2 webbers and 2 target painters, used the close range guns with EMP and thermal, then went into seige mode. As a result of my gank setup, i had the cap to run my rep nonstop in seige mode for about 2 mins max. I could tank only 12 battleships before i started loosing structure. Because of this gank setup i had no hardeners, just the rep. I did win the battle yes, but on tranquility who will fight a dread with 12 battleships? And who would take a dread vs 12 and not have any hardeners? I did the same battle more or less, with a more sustainable tank and 2 hardeners, with this i was barley able to kill the battleships and stood a higher chance of dieing due to reinforcments could come in.

oh heres my link http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=241653
ArcticWolf
ArcticWolf

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.11.12 20:38:00 - [2]

Edited by: ArcticWolf on 12/11/2005 20:38:02
The dreadnaught DPS outside of seige mode is way too low (vs battleships, i realise uour post is about POS), i did the figures in the first post i made stating 132 DPS, not by using the guns stats themselves, but doing extensive testing vs battleships, stationary and moving, to find diffrences, then averaged out the normal hit data. All dreadnaught skills at that date were lv 3... in siege mode that means i would do about 660 dps vs battleships.

For fun i went to test server and fit a gank setup, with the mid slots 2 webbers and 2 target painters, used the close range guns with EMP and thermal, then went into seige mode. As a result of my gank setup, i had the cap to run my rep nonstop in seige mode for about 2 mins max. I could tank only 12 battleships before i started loosing structure. Because of this gank setup i had no hardeners, just the rep. I did win the battle yes, but on tranquility who will fight a dread with 12 battleships? And who would take a dread vs 12 and not have any hardeners? I did the same battle more or less, with a more sustainable tank and 2 hardeners, with this i was barley able to kill the battleships and stood a higher chance of dieing due to reinforcments could come in.

oh heres my link http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=241653
---
I'm going to relate every post I make to Force Recon Ships being bugged.

Force Recon Ships Bugged
   
 
Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,03s, ref 20250111/0442
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.