quit the hippy-dippy stuff Anatole, you're making our corp look silly.

I like this. GÖÑ

I like your signature too, Anatole.

This coming from the man who flaps his gums at problems until they go away and whose staple ingredient in his diet is Veldspar, with roughly the equivalent threat of a Fedo.

If you're going to chastise your corporation members in such an unprofessional and public manner you may want to reconsider the statements you yourself make over this easily observable medium.

If you're going to chastise your corporation members in such an unprofessional and public manner you may want to reconsider the statements you yourself make over this easily observable medium.

Here's the person who can finally answer my question about raves at Amamake.

Why do I feel like Laurienne and Anatole should date?

I don't get it...

Sorry to burst your bubble Verin, but I'm already happy in a relationship.

I'll just send you an invite when the time comes. How about that?

I don't get it...

Is it a...club? If it's a club sure why not. A corp?..eh no thanks.

It's neither, and yet maybe a bit of the first if you feel the need to categorize it. No strings attached, no contracts, the only agreements are no hate, no discrimination.

Sorry to burst your bubble Verin, but I'm already happy in a relationship.

I don't get it...

Our politics of choice is none.

This sentence seems to be at odds with the entire rest of your original post. Could you please explain how a non-political political movement makes sense?

I'll just send you an invite when the time comes. How about that?

We are not a political movement, we represent no government, we do not allign ourselves to specific believes.

So we get to be non political, when you visit regardless of descent, status, race, gender, preference, and any other label you can think of.

Quite the contrary, Captain. For all its vagueness, your original post is clearly a political statement, albeit a very diffuse one. Any statement which identifies a "society of choice" is inherently political in nature. The same goes for any movement which lays claim to a goal of "shaking the foundations of society". A movement does not need to represent a government in order to be political in nature, and appealing to a wide and varied audience does not make it apolitical, only populist.

Why are you nit picking?

It's IGS, what do you expect?

Quite the contrary, Captain. For all its vagueness, your original post is clearly a political statement, albeit a very diffuse one. Any statement which identifies a "society of choice" is inherently political in nature. The same goes for any movement which lays claim to a goal of "shaking the foundations of society". A movement does not need to represent a government in order to be political in nature, and appealing to a wide and varied audience does not make it apolitical, only populist.

Why are you nit picking?

Because I happen to be of the opinion that when people make political statements, they should admit as much both to themselves and to others.

Think for a moment, imagine if you will and I understand this is difficult to phantom because I myself am not even able to picture it clearly how it would work out.

But imagine a universe without borders, a world without governing body, a society of people based in the ideal that we all are people, and by that ideal we are all equal.

That is a political vision.

Does his statement negatively effect you in any way beyond your control?

My suggestion: I send you an invite when the time comes, and I'll leave it up to you to come over when and where. And you can see how political we are?

You can still score when there's a goalie~.

GÖÑ

Dangerous for the ball though when the goalie has wormhole psychosis and loves nothing more than using HAMs to perform the spaceship equivalent of a double-mastectomy on random travelling salewomen who encroach on her holes.

Whoa easy there cheri. No hate, alright?

And you were already on the list even before I started making it.

Dangerous for the ball though when the goalie has wormhole psychosis and loves nothing more than using HAMs to perform the spaceship equivalent of a double-mastectomy on random travelling salewomen who encroach on her holes.

There's a legal status for people in a long-term, committed relationship: marriage.

Perhaps you should pursue that instead of going on a murderous rampage when someone hits on your boyfriend.

Imagine ; a tribal village, half-naked people tilling maize, bringing home the day's hunt, a giant pot cooking, families laughing, loving, splashing in the water, grandma washes her grandson, chieftain passes down old myths

Imagine ; a dark club, silhouettes in cages, writhing, speakers drive bass, feels like blast-pressure, bits of neon, sweaty bodies, pressing close, pulsing throbbing, hot breath, whiff of musk, whiff of vanilla, 4am eternity

Put those two images together. That's my nation.

It'll never be, that's why I'll never give a schit.

We are one massive.

Who are we?

We don't have one identity,

You seem to be under the impression that it is governments and politics that make up society. But in all honest it isn't so. We've been made to believe this, we've been fed this from the moment we were born and many continue to believe this till the moment we die.

Think for a moment, imagine if you will and I understand this is difficult to phantom because I myself am not even able to picture it clearly how it would work out.

But imagine a universe without borders, a world without governing body, a society of people based in the ideal that we all are people, and by that ideal we are all equal.

As I also stated. Our society of choice is utopian though we know it will never be.

Now I am all for frollicing around in meadows naked, but civilizations require governments.

If you're interested in theory, Mr. Madullier, a text for you; http://mobilecanteens.pbworks.com/f/Hakim+Bey+TAZ_.pdf

His writing is engaging, though at times he seems to have had a bit too much mindflood. Mind, I suspect -any- is a bit too much, but as you will.

While I agree with Evi with regards to the dangers of anarchy, there is a danger in an authoritarian society wherein the citizens are not allowed even a small measure of individuality.

Ms. Polevhia, out of curiosity, how heavily do your implants moderate your personality?

7. Use of profanity is prohibited.

The use of profanity is prohibited on the EVE Online forums. This includes the partial masking of letters using numbers or alternate symbols, and any attempts at bypassing the profanity filter.

Directly? None. Indirectly I suppose it could be argued my new connections with others alters my perspective which in turn alters my personality. The main alteration in my behavior as compared with, for example, a year ago would be due to the things I have witnessed and learned. I would hope everyone would be so open minded to changing their views when presented with new information.

I have however been looking into additional implants with behavioral modification intent. If I have the tools to improve myself, I see no reason not to.

While I have no doubt that this is just dandy for you personally, the average True Slave is given no such choice.

Considering the CONCORD signatories history of unprovoked attempted genocide against Nation, I don't see why my attitude towards Outsiders should change.

And this is exactly what is wrong isn't it. We are so opposed, so at odds ends with each other that we can not see clear anymore.

If only we could for a few seconds, all of us at the same time do away with the hate, the anger, the resent.

What a glorious universe we would live in.

Dude...you joined Alexylva? And suddenly EVERYTHING makes sense.

I like how you think you can speak from a position of knowledge on such subjects. It's cute, really.

People of the Universe!

The location is set!

Are you ready to shake the foundations of your existence!

Are you ready for a world beyond this world, space beyond this space, a time beyond this time.

Are you ready for The Massive!

Invites will be sent out tonight, let me know if you still want an invite.

Just get on with it.

I'm guessing... Soothsayer?

quit the hippy-dippy stuff Anatole, you're making our corp look silly.

you're making our corp look silly.

Wait, when did Sansha's Nation become pacifists? Not that I'm complaining... (that was a joke).

Still, I'm curious as to what is really going on here. It could prove... useful... (that was not a joke).

This is... quite disturbing. Are none others reminded of the promises delivered by Sansha during his Nation's rise to power? A century has passed, but we cannot have forgotten such important historical lessons. We should be greatly suspicious of those who promise "utopia."

Ms. Roseburn is, as her corporation would attest, a supporter of Sansha's Nation. I find that even the worst of Amarr slavers are nothing compared to the abominations the nation puts forth as "aiding humanity." Though I possess limited capacity to fight the Nation's mighty warships at this moment, I can promise that as I gain in skill, I will take every opportunity to fight that abominable organization.

Ms. Roseburn is, as her corporation would attest, a supporter of Sansha's Nation. I find that even the worst of Amarr slavers are nothing compared to the abominations the nation puts forth as "aiding humanity." Though I possess limited capacity to fight the Nation's mighty warships at this moment, I can promise that as I gain in skill, I will take every opportunity to fight that abominable organization.

I'm sorry you couldn't make it. But there will be more. As for simply stating 'I'm going to hold a rave". I could have done that, if my intention was to simply hold a rave.

But my intentions are beyond a rave, I want to promote tolerance and love throughout the cluster.

I will make sure to send you an invite again next time well in advance.

I think you're reading a little too much into my attendance Anatole. I came because I was intrigued by what you had planned, and stayed because it was a bloody good party. Peace is something we can all subscribe to, it's when you start discussing how to get there that the opinions differ into conflict.

You will probably find it regrettable that you haven't managed to "open my eyes", and that is understandable; your zeal for Alexylva Paradox's movement is admirable, but you will have to present your argument in a fashion that doesn't provide ample means for distraction if you wish to change my mind.