|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dianabolic
   |
Posted - 2005.11.21 20:14:00 -
[1]
We are well known for honoring agreements with those that keep them.
We demanded that ISS run internal security protocols in keeping with the fact that we're a very close knit group, that demands higher recruitment and acceptance criteria than "can fly a hauler".
We notified ISS of pilots that were quite obviouslys pies and saboteurs. These were indeed swiftly dealt with, however the agreement wasn't that they would be kicked upon discovery, it was that ISS would do everything in its power to prevent these pilots from joining their ranks in the first place.
They failed in this. As such they failed to keep to their obligations as one of our community corporations / alliances and led to them being removed from our space.
Good luck to ISS, because if they don't square up their internal security you can bet we won't be the last to revoke your standings. As it was we were one of, if not the, first group to allow them access, they borked it.
Learn from that and move on. And stay the hell out of our way.
 Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2005.11.21 20:35:00 -
[2]
Standings ftw.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2005.11.21 20:56:00 -
[3]
Nuala, read my post and stop flannelling the whole thing with rl legalese.
ISS failed to control or police their members, something we insisted they do - ergo we revoked their standings.
End of story.
It's a shame the ISS guy removed his post prior to yours, was a good one.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2005.11.21 20:59:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Nuala Reece
...as well as a lack of clarity on the part of some BoB members as to what agreements their alliance is maintining and the reasons for them.
Since when do the rank and file need to know the most intimate details of ever agreement? They don't. Too many people knowing too much leads to too many cooks.
That's not how we operate.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2005.11.21 23:37:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Jherek Cornelian
mmmmmmmm pies
I feel violated 
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2005.11.22 00:29:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Angelhunter
...meatshield...
rofl
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2005.11.22 20:34:00 -
[7]
I refuse to edit my post.
Get all the pie jokes in whilst you still have stomachs 
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2005.11.23 16:01:00 -
[8]
I ate all the pies.
Baldour - one of the key things you guys can do to secure your alliance against alt abuse is to move people away from areas they may have enemies and / or desire to have a "blue square" around them to aid in their spying.
You should also insist on pilots that have references from people that you trust.
Above all, however, due to the unique nature of your alliance, you should have an alliance police force and make sure that each corp has a member with the responsibility for ensuring that they are not being "used" by people to the detriment of themselves OR your alliance.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
|
|
|
| |
|