| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
276
   |
Posted - 2013.06.21 13:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Bit confused about the desire to nerf cloaky t3s thats gonna hit some of the more pro-active wormholers who like to hunt solo or in very small numbers when the rest of the corp isn't active, etc.
Also think any changes to T3s other than bugfixes is a bit silly when T2s are still in need of considerably attention and T3s mostly work. |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
276
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 14:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Derath Ellecon wrote:
As to the cloaky T3 "recon" vs T2 recons, I honestly haven't played around to feel comfortable comparing. I will say as an example at all 5, a cloaky tengu "falcon" gets a longer jam range, but the jam strength is half that of a falcon. So while there may be an imbalance, I'm sure in time those can be adjusted appropriately.
You can't even make a proper T3 version of the falcon as the jam strength sub-system is the same slot as the cloaky one.
The prot doesn't have as long point range bonus as an arazu and neither does the loki get the web range of a rapier, can't remember the legion v pilgrim off the top of my head.
Unless the price of the ships drops hugely (and I don't think thats a good thing at all) then any significant nerf to their survivability will reduce their useage a lot also which isn't a good thing either. |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
276
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 14:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
stup idity wrote:Derath Ellecon wrote:
Legion can have a much bigger tank, but cannot field any drones, so while it can neut well it cannot apply any DPS.
Of course it can. Neuting-sub is electronic and can be combined with the drone offensive sub or the cloaky one.
The comparison was of the cloaky recons so the cloaky sub-system takes the slot of the drone offensive one. |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
276
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 14:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
From looking at more general posts on the subject of cloaky T3s it seems a lot of the reason people are asking for a wholesale nerf to cloaky T3s is due to small areas of the game where they are overpowered, just that small area of the game makes up a large part of those people's day to day life in Eve. i.e. people who like to camp null entry gates see dozens of cloaky nullified t3s escape them daily and are bitter about it. |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
284
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 17:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Shield blobs? Try shield fitting proteuses. I would tell you the results but I want some free killmails first.
Before they nerfed TEs you could do a wanabbe shield adrestia fit on a prot, with the pointless nerf to TEs you can't hold the range needed and get the dps at that range needed to make it at all worthwhile tho.
|
| |
|