Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

xarjin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Just read about this on slashdot.
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/2235257/amdati-drops-windows-xp-support
Hopefully any stragglers playing eve on windows xp will finally get updated to windows 7 so ccp can update eve to support directx11.
Nvidia likely wont be far behind ATI in dropping support for windows xp.
Update your systems windows xp users or you will be left behind to the annals of computing history. |

FlamesOfHeaven
Phantom Fenix
40
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
+1 |

Zenos Ebeth
People Who Don't Like People
112
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
The only way to stop certain people from using XP would be to physically destroy all copies of it in existence.
well since Nvidia hasn't dropped support it's not yet an issue for everyone , but xp users might as well take this as their wake up call if they don't want to log on one day and realize That Eve doesn't work anymore on their outdated OS. |

xarjin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 02:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
If the driver support ending for major videocard vendors isn't enough motivation there really is no other good reasons to continue using windows xp from a security perspective.
using 15 year old operating system software is just irresponsible and inconsiderate of other people's computer systems that don't need to be infected by every virus windows xp based pc's easily pickup and distribute. No amount of antivirus software can fix that long outstanding issue with windows xp.
The internet is a global infrastructure and ensuring your pc is not vulnerable breeding pool for malware is akin to respecting your neighbors property and belongings.
http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-26/product_id-739/cvssscoremin-0/cvssscoremax-9/Microsoft-Windows-Xp.html |

Pewty McPew
EVE Corporation 2357451
306
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 02:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
XP rocks fully 80%+ of my corporate customers sill run XP 18% Win 7 and about 2% Win 8 |

Aliventi
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
142
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 02:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Pewty McPew wrote:... and about 2% Win 8 Those poor souls... |

xarjin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 02:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Aliventi wrote:Pewty McPew wrote:... and about 2% Win 8 Those poor souls...
/agree
Windows 8: The Animated Evaluation |

Knights Armament
Yale Socialite Club
74
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 02:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
eve should use opengl
its better
also windows 8 is horrible, when are we going to be forced to use that? https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=29554516-05f9-4eca-a942-32e1701a6569&action=buddy |

Knights Armament
Yale Socialite Club
74
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 02:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
xarjin wrote:If the driver support ending for major videocard vendors isn't enough motivation there really is no other good reasons to continue using windows xp from a security perspective. using 15 year old operating system software is just irresponsible and inconsiderate of other people's computer systems that don't need to be infected by every virus windows xp based pc's easily pickup and distribute. No amount of antivirus software can fix that long outstanding issue with windows xp. The internet is a global infrastructure and ensuring your pc is not vulnerable breeding pool for malware is akin to respecting your neighbors property and belongings. http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-26/product_id-739/cvssscoremin-0/cvssscoremax-9/Microsoft-Windows-Xp.htmlThe last Windows XP pc i reinstalled with windows 7 just this past weekend was infected with around 50 malware and virus files.
Windows is the problem, if everyone used bsd or unix we wouldn't need to worry about the majority of security holes microsoft built in to spy on us. https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=29554516-05f9-4eca-a942-32e1701a6569&action=buddy |

Caldari Citizen 20120308
State War Academy Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 03:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
Pewty McPew wrote:XP rocks fully 80%+ of my corporate customers sill run XP 18% Win 7 and about 2% Win 8
lol maybe in Siberia wherever the heck that is. |
|

JamnOne
Jammin Corp
8
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 03:26:00 -
[11] - Quote
Makes sense seeing on Microshaft already dropped support.. |

Knights Armament
Yale Socialite Club
74
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 03:27:00 -
[12] - Quote
Caldari Citizen 20120308 wrote:Pewty McPew wrote:XP rocks fully 80%+ of my corporate customers sill run XP 18% Win 7 and about 2% Win 8 lol maybe in Siberia wherever the heck that is.
about 100% of my customers run linux for servers/desktop
they also switched to openoffice https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=29554516-05f9-4eca-a942-32e1701a6569&action=buddy |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
328
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 03:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
Zenos Ebeth wrote:The only way to stop certain people from using XP would be to physically destroy all copies of it in existence.
That's the sum of it.
And it's an important lesson for CCP too. Familiar UI is important. The main reason why people don't give up XP isn't just cost, it's the UI they're familiar with. Microsoft can't make even Windows 8 without a Start button after all these years with a Start button.
PC gaming is the same in controls and their UI. Having a different UI is possible, but it alienates as it's not a standard. Programming languages would fall on it's face if it didn't have standards, too. So they're quite conservative...same with UIs. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

kerradeph
THORN Syndicate Black Legion.
26
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 04:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
Knights Armament wrote:eve should use opengl
its better
also windows 8 is horrible, when are we going to be forced to use that? well, if this is any indication. probably after 2-3 more OSes come out after 8. so we can probably be assured that we will have something worthwhile to upgrade to before 7 is dropped. |

GreenSeed
528
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 04:14:00 -
[15] - Quote
if they stop supporting it means new hardware wont have drivers for xp... thats all this means. hardware that's 2+years old usually NEVER gets added features or optimizations via drivers, so already there's no point on even upgrading drivers, losing the ability to do so is hardly noticeable.
it does nothing to force people to upgrade, because if someone is running 2 year old hardware on 6 year old software he already doesn't care. i know it seems crazy, but there's people who don't have disposable income and pc hardware is hardly a priority for them. spoiled snob. |

ACE McFACE
Radical Astronauts Plundering Eve
1376
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 04:19:00 -
[16] - Quote
Pewty McPew wrote:XP rocks fully 80%+ of my corporate customers sill run XP 18% Win 7 and about 2% Win 8 How does a one man corp get those percentages
PS: Stealth post with your main You should be notified if someone quotes your post so you can continue the argument! |

FluffyDice
Kronos Research
569
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 05:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
I wish everyone would drop support for XP. Having to support something that old is just ridiculous.
Also Win 8 is fine. Stop listening to people who only tried it to look for flaws. Everyone is stuck complaining about the start menu disappearing. Hit the Windows key on your keyboard. Type the first 3 letters of the program you want. Hit enter. Put everything on your task bar and desktop and make a mess just like you used to. It isn't hard to adapt to change and act like an adult. |

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
43
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 05:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:I wish everyone would drop support for XP. Having to support something that old is just ridiculous.
Also Win 8 is fine. Stop listening to people who only tried it to look for flaws. Everyone is stuck complaining about the start menu disappearing. Hit the Windows key on your keyboard. Type the first 3 letters of the program you want. Hit enter. Put everything on your task bar and desktop and make a mess just like you used to. It isn't hard to adapt to change and act like an adult.
Windows 8 is ******* painful if you do anything technical; the server kernels are respectable though, lots of people switching over.
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
329
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 05:52:00 -
[19] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:It isn't hard to adapt to change and act like an adult.
Pro tip: Adults tend not to change as often as patches in games. Us old geezers are pretty set in our routines and ways. 
Most XP hold ons are with companies. My computing relative still maintains a lawyer office computers running Windows NT (want to talk old?). Why? Software. Mom and pop businesses don't have the cash to spend on each new OS rollout on updating their software. If you spent $50,000 on it, you're not going to keep spending $10,000 to update it. The overall expense gets to be too expensive.
It's why Microsoft had to keep maintaining XP, despite it wanted EOL it, as Microsoft caters to businesses (that's their main money source). "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Erok Careynah
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 05:54:00 -
[20] - Quote
This won't effect XP users that much. Alot of games don't work on XP as it stands, and the hardware they're using with XP generally is so old that it's trivial to actually update the drivers. If you're using a GeForce 3 from 2001 it's not going to matter if you update the drivers for it in 2013, because nVidia simply isn't building any code for that platform anymore.
PS: You can still get newer builds of nVidia/ATI drivers for Windows NT/2000, even though they "dropped" support for that OS ages ago. This doesn't effect people very much. |
|

FluffyDice
Kronos Research
569
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 05:54:00 -
[21] - Quote
I'd honestly like a specific example of a technical task made more difficult between 7 and 8. I see the argument a lot but I haven't actually seen a real situation used. |

Erok Careynah
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 05:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:I'd honestly like a specific example of a technical task made more difficult between 7 and 8. I see the argument a lot but I haven't actually seen a real situation used.
Games actually do run better on Windows 8 for me, on my hardware, atleast.
My problem with Windows 8 is that I simply didn't see the need for an upgrade, and so I reverted to Windows 7 since it was more kind to the RAM and processor. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
329
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 06:21:00 -
[23] - Quote
Erok Careynah wrote:PS: You can still get newer builds of nVidia/ATI drivers for Windows NT/2000, even though they "dropped" support for that OS ages ago. This doesn't effect people very much. Dropping support doesn't mean you won't be able to get updated drivers/software for your OS, it simply means that they won't be building code around that OS anymore.
Oh, they keep the drivers updated. But it's not pretty. My relative can spend a weekend just trying to install archaic Xerox drivers for an office. There's so many businesses out there that doesn't update their OS, support companies cater to them. But to work on them, for the techs, it's pounding heads against many a desk. Old OSes suck, they really really do.
And this makes me wonder how it is with these older MMOs. They're stuck with a really old engine and it's limitations. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5355
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 06:30:00 -
[24] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:I wish everyone would drop support for XP. Having to support something that old is just ridiculous.
Also Win 8 is fine. Stop listening to people who only tried it to look for flaws. Everyone is stuck complaining about the start menu disappearing. Hit the Windows key on your keyboard. Type the first 3 letters of the program you want. Hit enter. Put everything on your task bar and desktop and make a mess just like you used to. It isn't hard to adapt to change and act like an adult. Fine isn't good enough. It needs to be a must have and amazing. The days of changing an OS just because a new one came out are over. The apps are the things that matter and as long as I can use my familiar and perfectly functional OS to run them, I'm not going to change the OS. The benefits of changing are pretty much zero from my perspective and usually tend to be negative, since Microsoft seems to forget how to make a user friendly OS every other version and it'll take time for them to fix their mistakes. |

Inokuma Yawara
University of Caille Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 10:35:00 -
[25] - Quote
Zenos Ebeth wrote:The only way to stop certain people from using XP would be to physically destroy all copies of it in existence.
well since Nvidia hasn't dropped support it's not yet an issue for everyone , but xp users might as well take this as their wake up call if they don't want to log on one day and realize That Eve doesn't work anymore on their outdated OS.
Or just get an nVidia card.
There are still something like 40% of PC users that still use WinXP world wide. That's a crap-load of customers to lose to your competitor. What if nVidia continues to support WinXP? Wouldn't that be exactly the case? A crap-load of people are gonna start buying nVidia graphics cards for their machines, and keep using XP. |

Abon
STAHLSTURM Test Alliance Please Ignore
148
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 10:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
About 103% of all statistics are made up on the spot. No kidding! |

Obunagawe
151
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 10:38:00 -
[27] - Quote
Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT. |

Inokuma Yawara
University of Caille Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 10:41:00 -
[28] - Quote
Abon wrote:About 103% of all statistics are made up on the spot. No kidding!
Heh... Good one.
|

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
598
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 10:52:00 -
[29] - Quote
xarjin wrote:Aliventi wrote:Pewty McPew wrote:... and about 2% Win 8 Those poor souls... /agree Windows 8: The Animated EvaluationDoing any productivity tasks with windows 8 is like trying to knit a wool sweater while wearing multiple Chinese finger puzzles. Oh look, it's this circlejerk again!
That is the most ******** video I have ever seen, and I have seen some ****.
Windows 8 is basically a copy of Windows 7 who just runs a bit faster and has the metro UI. Basically nothing he says in the video is true. Yeah, it takes some getting used to, but I can use it just as fine as I could any other OS. |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
598
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 10:54:00 -
[30] - Quote
Obunagawe wrote:Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT. Oh wow, someone is misinformed.
Using more ram while idle = good thing! Things are preloaded and starts faster Clearing ram takes microseconds. Why would you want unused ram?
I can't think of a single thing that runs better on XP than on win7/8 except for outdated software that only runs on xp for some reason. |
|

Rico Minali
The Straw Men
1289
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 10:57:00 -
[31] - Quote
xarjin wrote:Just read about this on slashdot. http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/2235257/amdati-drops-windows-xp-supportHopefully any stragglers playing eve on windows xp will finally get updated to windows 7 so ccp can update eve to support directx11. Nvidia likely wont be far behind ATI in dropping support for windows xp. Update your systems windows xp users or you will be left behind to the annals of computing history.
Pretty much, since microsoft are dropping XP support from April 2014. No reason for anyone to not get on at least windows 7, can pick a legit unused license and disk on ebay for 30 quid or so.
Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Doc Spectre
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 11:04:00 -
[32] - Quote
Great, I'm still using Windows for Workgroups 3.11... |

Grimpak
Midnight Elites United Federation of Commerce
958
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 11:09:00 -
[33] - Quote
Knights Armament wrote:they also switched to openoffice
wait, isn't openoffice a bit closed up and people are shifting to LibreOffice instead? [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries Solar Assault Fleet
569
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 11:09:00 -
[34] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote: I can't think of a single thing that runs better on XP than on win7/8 except for outdated software that only runs on xp for some reason.
Outdated software that many people are required to run to get paid.
I've used win7 on my main box for over a year now and XP on my two backups.
So far I haven't noted any difference at all between them except that some old but required software still doesn't play nice with win7 (and esp with UAC).
Paying 2x840SEK (or 250 USD) to upgrade my backups to win7 (or 8) with no noticeable result doesn't feel like the first thing I'd like to spend my money on.
CCP Eterne: Silly player, ALL devs are evil. CCP Fozzie: When Veritas describes a programming challenge as "very hard" I tend to believe him.
|

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1233
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 11:13:00 -
[35] - Quote
Caldari Citizen 20120308 wrote:Pewty McPew wrote:XP rocks fully 80%+ of my corporate customers sill run XP 18% Win 7 and about 2% Win 8 lol maybe in Siberia wherever the heck that is.
Hmm, the multinational company, in the US, that's been around for over 100 years that I work for....lets see....about 95% of the productivity computers use XP. The remaining 5% is Windows 7....for low to mid level managers. High level management gets their choice of MacOS....on laptops and Windows 8....on tablets. Of course, as anyone knows, high level management doesn't really do anything but waste O2 and throw their superiority around.
So, you can say what you want. But there's a reason XP has hung on with an iron grip. That reason is, from a productivity perspective, no other Windows OS since has been able to provide compelling reasons to upgrade. Windows 8 certainly hasn't. Instead Windows 8 has ignored productivity...completely.
HTFU!...for the children! |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
598
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 11:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Lors Dornick wrote: Outdated software that many people are required to run to get paid.
I've used win7 on my main box for over a year now and XP on my two backups.
So far I haven't noted any difference at all between them except that some old but required software still doesn't play nice with win7 (and esp with UAC).
Paying 2x840SEK (or 250 USD) to upgrade my backups to win7 (or 8) with no noticeable result doesn't feel like the first thing I'd like to spend my money on.
UAC is for noobs. Just turn it off all together.
Performance and graphics in games are a lot better on newer OS's because of drivers and later versions of DX. Almost everything can be run in compatability mode on win7. I have actually never used a program that can not in some way, shape or form be run on win7/8. Heck, even command & conquer can be run on win8. |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
676
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 16:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
xarjin wrote:Just read about this on slashdot. http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/2235257/amdati-drops-windows-xp-supportHopefully any stragglers playing eve on windows xp will finally get updated to windows 7 so ccp can update eve to support directx11. Nvidia likely wont be far behind ATI in dropping support for windows xp. Update your systems windows xp users or you will be left behind to the annals of computing history.
You don't realize just how dirt poor many EvE players are, do you? 
I too am excited about trading playability for more lag and shiny pictures.....:( Petition for a Minimum bounty of 10 mil. Prevent useless bounties!
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15303
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 16:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:I'd honestly like a specific example of a technical task made more difficult between 7 and 8. I see the argument a lot but I haven't actually seen a real situation used.
edit: Cost to business and supporting old software I definitely see as valid reasons for not wanting to upgrade. People trying to argue that it is "less user friendly than DOS," not so much. The Metro interface is vastly less discoverable because it relies on unhinted touch-centric gestures that have no equivalent (and no place) on a mouse-kb-driven desktop, and which are purposefully designed around not being seen, since that kind of hinting would steal precious screen real-estate on a tabletGǪ
GǪwhich is a braindead design decision when applied to multiple-2560+ù1440-resolution screens.
It's not quite as bad as DOS, but at least in DOS you could get a list of (and get help for) the available commands with some ease GÇö not so in Win8. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
116
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 17:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
xarjin wrote:Just read about this on slashdot. http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/2235257/amdati-drops-windows-xp-supportHopefully any stragglers playing eve on windows xp will finally get updated to windows 7 so ccp can update eve to support directx11. Nvidia likely wont be far behind ATI in dropping support for windows xp. Update your systems windows xp users or you will be left behind to the annals of computing history. Nope, not all video cards running Windows 7 support Directx 11. All of them support at least Directx 10 because that was the initial release that came with 7. |

Jimmy Morane
Aurora Novae Aetatis Expoit This Mf's
67
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 17:41:00 -
[40] - Quote
Obunagawe wrote:Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT.
What are you talking about? Not even a month ago you were on here yelling something like ......you people with old shiiit are holding the cool kids back from getting new shinies in the game....GET NEW SHIIT OR GTFO RAAAAWWWRRRRR
And now you are implying that you still use XP. LOL |
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1595
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 18:00:00 -
[41] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Lors Dornick wrote: Outdated software that many people are required to run to get paid.
I've used win7 on my main box for over a year now and XP on my two backups.
So far I haven't noted any difference at all between them except that some old but required software still doesn't play nice with win7 (and esp with UAC).
Paying 2x840SEK (or 250 USD) to upgrade my backups to win7 (or 8) with no noticeable result doesn't feel like the first thing I'd like to spend my money on.
UAC is for noobs. Just turn it off all together. Performance and graphics in games are a lot better on newer OS's because of drivers and later versions of DX. Almost everything can be run in compatability mode on win7. I have actually never used a program that can not in some way, shape or form be run on win7/8. Heck, even command & conquer can be run on win8.
UAC is for anyone who likes not having everything they run (assuming they have an administrator privileged account) run with the privileges to screw up their entire system. It's also for administrators who want to go and install software onto a computer they're not logged on to. Works better than 'run as a different user'. It's a /hell/ of a lot nicer when you have to install an msi package.
Ideal world, of course, is running with an unprivileged account, using UAC for elevation when, and only when, you need the elevated privs.
People who say UAC is stupid, or recommend you turn it off, don't know what the hell they're talking about and should be ignored.
(There's two situations I've seen where it gets in the way. And that's with a: old software which doesn't know about it. b: when you're remoting in, as some remote control software really doesn't play nice with it) Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Obunagawe
153
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 18:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Obunagawe wrote:Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT. Oh wow, someone is misinformed. Using more ram while idle = good thing! Things are preloaded and starts faster Clearing ram takes microseconds. Why would you want unused ram? I can't think of a single thing that runs better on XP than on win7/8 except for outdated software that only runs on xp for some reason.
When you're hitting RAM cap due to mass amounts of multiboxing, you want that extra 1.1GB. |

Obunagawe
153
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 18:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
Jimmy Morane wrote:Obunagawe wrote:Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT. What are you talking about? Not even a month ago you were on here yelling something like ......you people with old shiiit are holding the cool kids back from getting new shinies in the game....GET NEW SHIIT OR GTFO RAAAAWWWRRRRR And now you are implying that you still use XP. LOL
I was either being sarcastic/ironic, or you confused me with someone else. I have never been a supporter of the "change for the sake of change, progress without actual progress" sort of technological growth. |

Kuronaga
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
153
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 18:23:00 -
[44] - Quote
Good.
Now maybe stubborn XP users will now stop holding the rest of us back.
Or maybe CCP will grow some balls and ditch them on principle for being so goddamned old. |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
273
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 18:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
xarjin wrote:Just read about this on slashdot. http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/2235257/amdati-drops-windows-xp-supportHopefully any stragglers playing eve on windows xp will finally get updated to windows 7 so ccp can update eve to support directx11. Nvidia likely wont be far behind ATI in dropping support for windows xp. Update your systems windows xp users or you will be left behind to the annals of computing history.
I will stay then in the backwater with a faster operating system which doesn't have File Manager bugs, doesn't lose connections over the network and is faster for development and database bashing.
Somehow, I may be able to live with that whilst Windows 8 (a bastard lovechild of WoW and My Little Pony) hogs all the resources.
There's not a lot wrong with XP and there's a lot of people going to be working on that platform for years to come. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
335
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 19:04:00 -
[46] - Quote
Myfanwy Heimdal wrote:I will stay then in the backwater with a faster operating system which doesn't have File Manager bugs, doesn't lose connections over the network and is faster for development and database bashing.
Somehow, I may be able to live with that whilst Windows 8 (a bastard lovechild of WoW and My Little Pony) hogs all the resources.
There's not a lot wrong with XP and there's a lot of people going to be working on that platform for years to come.
Only folks that are truly stuck with XP are like businesses that can't afford updating customized software every 3 years. Regular Schmoos update their computers more often (or buy off the shelf systems with OSes preloaded).
So the only stragglers in the gaming department are those with really old systems they're not updating; or laptop users of pretty outdated laptops (which come preloaded with the lasted OS). 2MB memory systems with 512MB videocards deal.
Everyone knows WoW became what it became because it could operate on almost anything (even tablets now). But even they dropped Windows 2000 support and a bunch of video cards. Tech moves on. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
273
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 19:10:00 -
[47] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Obunagawe wrote:Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT. Oh wow, someone is misinformed. Using more ram while idle = good thing! Things are preloaded and starts faster Clearing ram takes microseconds. Why would you want unused ram? I can't think of a single thing that runs better on XP than on win7/8 except for outdated software that only runs on xp for some reason.
How about some very large C++ applications written in VS6? Yes, some do complie under W7 but a lot don't. I know lots of techies in lots of different companies who can't up/down/sidegrade to W7 because of this issue. There are billions of lines of code out there which can't be migrated because W7 isn't backward compatable.
As for performance increase? Well, I am with Hannott here. I have two development machines here; the one with the most oomph and top of the range hardware runs W7 (mostly because I want to play Eve) and next to it is a crufty old PC with XP.
Which boots faster so that I can see the desktop? Why W7. But I can't do anythign with it for minutes because it's not responsive. When the XP desktop is visiible I can get into the VS6 development environment and start cutting code well before the W7 comes up and says hello.
And then it may not compile properly because the XP Compatabliity Mode certainly isn't. So edit on one machine and compile on the other.
Furthermore; I run tens of thousands of SQL statements each evening in my work each evening (I work from home running mu own business selling data to various customers and it's derived from serious number crunching) and I can start the run on the XP machine at the same time as the Win7 machine.
Which gets finished fastest? Well, it may take about two hours on the XP machine and on the W7 machine? It can take twelve hours or more to run the same stuff. The database bashing is grim under Win7.
What makes me laugh is that people say that W8 is even better because the start-up time is even faster than before. That's because a Win8 machine doesn't close down properly but actually goes into hibernation mode (the real shutdown is off on a hidden menu item) so they tell us that it's a fresh reboot but it isn't; it's a mess on top of a mess.
Every now and then, usually when a disk drive dies on one of my machines - the one in the studio seems to need replacing every six or eight months, perhaps it's due to the environment) and I install XP from scratch on there and each time I do that I am amazed how fast that operating system runs.
Getting rid of XP just because it's not as pretty as W7/8 isn't really very good. There's too much stuff out there which is well written but doesn't run on W 7/8. |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
273
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 19:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Only folks that are truly stuck with XP are like businesses that can't afford updating customized software every 3 years. Regular Schmoos update their computers more often (or buy off the shelf systems with OSes preloaded).
I am a regualr one person business. I can't afford the time to rewrite about 80,000 lines of code from C++ and VB into .Net just because a new shiny comes out.
Not everyone uses an off the shelf package you know. |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
599
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 20:14:00 -
[49] - Quote
Obunagawe wrote: When you're hitting RAM cap due to mass amounts of multiboxing, you want that extra 1.1GB.
Yeah, because ram is so expensive, and only 32 bit OS's exists. |

Setaceous
Nexus Prima
144
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 21:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
Myfanwy Heimdal wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote:
Only folks that are truly stuck with XP are like businesses that can't afford updating customized software every 3 years. Regular Schmoos update their computers more often (or buy off the shelf systems with OSes preloaded).
I am a regualr one person business. I can't afford the time to rewrite about 80,000 lines of code from C++ and VB into .Net just because a new shiny comes out. Not everyone uses an off the shelf package you know. You've had five additional years (XP had a 10 year lifetime originally) to get your code up to scratch. Who's at fault here? |
|

Kraal Utrecht
Running with Knives Nexus Fleet
10
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 22:42:00 -
[51] - Quote
Dropping support does not mean that hardware will just stop working under XP... Most of users install drivers once (after system reinstall or hardware change) and run it for as long as there are no problems with it... |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
335
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 22:47:00 -
[52] - Quote
Myfanwy Heimdal wrote:How about some very large C++ applications written in VS6?
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/install-and-use-windows-xp-mode-in-windows-7
I use it for some archaic applications that will not play well in Windows 7+. Just assign it whatever memory you need to compile. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15312
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 22:49:00 -
[53] - Quote
Setaceous wrote:You've had five additional years (XP had a 10 year lifetime originally) to get your code up to scratch. Who's at fault here? Fifteen years, huh? This just in: Microsoft patents time travel and releases Win XP two years ahead of its predecessor!
Obunagawe wrote:When you're hitting RAM cap due to mass amounts of multiboxing, you want that extra 1.1GB. GǪat which point the OS will deallocate the memory and make it available to you anyway. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Karak Terrel
As Far As The eYe can see Chained Reactions
226
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 23:07:00 -
[54] - Quote
xarjin wrote: using 15 year old operating system software is just irresponsible and inconsiderate of other people's computer systems that don't need to be infected by every virus windows xp based pc's easily pickup and distribute. No amount of antivirus software can fix that long outstanding issue with windows xp.
Tell me how your new operating system is so advanced tech to compensate for 15 years of stabilization and security issue fixing?
I'm not a fan of XP, I personally think all Windows operating systems are equally bad for various reasons. But to argue along the lines that old software somehow "decays" and gets "easy infected" because of it's age is as far from the reality as you can get. The complete opposite is the case. On the other hand, the end of support from Microsoft is a valid point to say bye to XP. |

Setaceous
Nexus Prima
144
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 00:11:00 -
[55] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Setaceous wrote:You've had five additional years (XP had a 10 year lifetime originally) to get your code up to scratch. Who's at fault here? Fifteen years, huh? This just in: Microsoft patents time travel and releases Win XP two years ahead of its predecessor! Meh, brain stall on my part. Point still stands if you use the correct timeframe. XP support was extended so companies could sort their **** out. Hell, My company is one of them, we're still struggling to update old software that was written for NT4.
MS doesn't really care, we're paying them extra for XP downgrade licences on 10,000+ PCs. |

xarjin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 00:12:00 -
[56] - Quote
Karak Terrel wrote:xarjin wrote: using 15 year old operating system software is just irresponsible and inconsiderate of other people's computer systems that don't need to be infected by every virus windows xp based pc's easily pickup and distribute. No amount of antivirus software can fix that long outstanding issue with windows xp.
Tell me how your new operating system is so advanced tech to compensate for 15 years of stabilization and security issue fixing? I'm not a fan of XP, I personally think all Windows operating systems are equally bad for various reasons. But to argue along the lines that old software somehow "decays" and gets "easy infected" because of it's age is as far from the reality as you can get. The complete opposite is the case. On the other hand, the end of support from Microsoft is a valid point to say bye to XP.
My quoted comment is purely based on experience as a network systems engineer and the knowledge that's been gained from working with operating system software as a result.
Despite the appearance that Windows XP still receives Windows updates Microsoft has publicly stated several years ago that several high risk security vulnerabilities that are avenues for remotely compromisable malware and virus infections will never be patched.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138007/Microsoft_No_TCP_IP_patches_for_you_XP
http://www.geek.com/news/microsoft-will-not-patch-windows-xp-if-rootkit-is-present-1190361/
People that keep using Windows XP either do not know about those issues or really are not as blindly irresponsible PC owners they may claim to be. Windows XP can and does easily get infected by and distribute viruses and malware.
A reasonable comparison to this scenario would be if you a homeowner with a fabulously maintained property with magnificently maintained green grass but your neighbors property was infected with weeds that constantly flowered dandelion seeds onto your magnificent green front lawn.
In some Cities homeowners that refuse to cut their grass and maintain their property are fined by the city for negligence as a result of ruining neighboring properties due to weed infested yard neglect.
If ISPs started to do this with outdated operating system software the internet would be a much less hostile place for pc owners. |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries Solar Assault Fleet
570
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 02:20:00 -
[57] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Lors Dornick wrote: Outdated software that many people are required to run to get paid.
I've used win7 on my main box for over a year now and XP on my two backups.
So far I haven't noted any difference at all between them except that some old but required software still doesn't play nice with win7 (and esp with UAC).
Paying 2x840SEK (or 250 USD) to upgrade my backups to win7 (or 8) with no noticeable result doesn't feel like the first thing I'd like to spend my money on.
UAC is for noobs. Just turn it off all together. Performance and graphics in games are a lot better on newer OS's because of drivers and later versions of DX. Almost everything can be run in compatability mode on win7. I have actually never used a program that can not in some way, shape or form be run on win7/8. Heck, even command & conquer can be run on win8.
Now this might come as surprise to you but there are people in the world who doesn't use their computers mainly to play games.
Being able to play some games is a nice addition, but very far from the main use of said machine.
And UAC is actually one of the real gems of win7 (and 8), and so far the main reason why I even ponder upgrading the backups.
CCP Eterne: Silly player, ALL devs are evil. CCP Fozzie: When Veritas describes a programming challenge as "very hard" I tend to believe him.
|

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
668
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 02:25:00 -
[58] - Quote
Where is my BeOS support! This thread has so much content it may be 'Thread of the Year' and it is only January.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15323
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 03:24:00 -
[59] - Quote
Lors Dornick wrote:And UAC is actually one of the real gems of win7 (and 8), and so far the main reason why I even ponder upgrading the backups. If nothing else, UAC is an excellent tool for weeding out incompetent programs and programmers. In fact, UAC was never a problem, even when it caused big waves during the early Vista days GÇö it was just that Windows programmers in generally had the unfortunate baggage of a decade of bad habits in terms of assuming that they had full admin access to everything on the system.
When MS finally instituted a limited environment, programs that relied on those old assumptions would get kicked in the nuts (repeatedly) as they tried to perform admin-level alternations for no good reason. Even as far back as Win98, you could trigger a similarly bad behaviour in programs by applying some limitations to the user's freedom to access all of C:.
Nexus Day wrote:Where is my BeOS support! You have to upgrade to Haiku, unfortunately. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Inokuma Yawara
University of Caille Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 05:00:00 -
[60] - Quote
Caldari Citizen 20120308 wrote:Pewty McPew wrote:XP rocks fully 80%+ of my corporate customers sill run XP 18% Win 7 and about 2% Win 8 lol maybe in Siberia wherever the heck that is.
Wrong answer.
Myfanwy Heimdal wrote:Hannott Thanos wrote:Obunagawe wrote:Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT. Oh wow, someone is misinformed. Using more ram while idle = good thing! Things are preloaded and starts faster Clearing ram takes microseconds. Why would you want unused ram? I can't think of a single thing that runs better on XP than on win7/8 except for outdated software that only runs on xp for some reason. How about some very large C++ applications written in VS6? Yes, some do complie under W7 but a lot don't. I know lots of techies in lots of different companies who can't up/down/sidegrade to W7 because of this issue. There are billions of lines of code out there which can't be migrated because W7 isn't backward compatable. As for performance increase? Well, I am with Hannott here. I have two development machines here; the one with the most oomph and top of the range hardware runs W7 (mostly because I want to play Eve) and next to it is a crufty old PC with XP. Which boots faster so that I can see the desktop? Why W7. But I can't do anythign with it for minutes because it's not responsive. When the XP desktop is visiible I can get into the VS6 development environment and start cutting code well before the W7 comes up and says hello. And then it may not compile properly because the XP Compatabliity Mode certainly isn't. So edit on one machine and compile on the other. Furthermore; I run tens of thousands of SQL statements each evening in my work each evening (I work from home running mu own business selling data to various customers and it's derived from serious number crunching) and I can start the run on the XP machine at the same time as the Win7 machine. Which gets finished fastest? Well, it may take about two hours on the XP machine and on the W7 machine? It can take twelve hours or more to run the same stuff. The database bashing is grim under Win7. What makes me laugh is that people say that W8 is even better because the start-up time is even faster than before. That's because a Win8 machine doesn't close down properly but actually goes into hibernation mode (the real shutdown is off on a hidden menu item) so they tell us that it's a fresh reboot but it isn't; it's a mess on top of a mess. Every now and then, usually when a disk drive dies on one of my machines - the one in the studio seems to need replacing every six or eight months, perhaps it's due to the environment) and I install XP from scratch on there and each time I do that I am amazed how fast that operating system runs. Getting rid of XP just because it's not as pretty as W7/8 isn't really very good. There's too much stuff out there which is well written but doesn't run on W 7/8.
^^^^^ This.
I work at a hospital in Los Angeles (not in Syberia). They depend on WinXP. All of the stuff they do on XP is, of course, critical. But I don't know how many of the software will be able to run on Win7 or Win8. When Microsucks stops supporting WinXP. I wonder what will happen here...?
I have a feeling that the answer is that very little of the software critical to this hospital's operations is compatible with Win7/8, or there would have already been partial roll-outs with tests and tweaks in preparation for a full OS upgrade-roll-out for the whole hospital. We have people helping us to upgrade our core software, but on WinXP. They're actually developing it for us ON WinXP.... So, I don't know if they're even thinking of Win7. It's not my area to worry over that, but.... That can't be good.
However, the point I'm trying to make is that businesses everywhere, large and small, are reluctant to leave WinXP for Win7, and much less for Win8 (Lose8).
|
|

Kraal Utrecht
Running with Knives Nexus Fleet
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 05:16:00 -
[61] - Quote
Inokuma Yawara wrote: ^^^^^ This.
I work at a hospital in Los Angeles (not in Syberia). They depend on WinXP. All of the stuff they do on XP is, of course, critical. But I don't know how many of the software will be able to run on Win7 or Win8. When Microsucks stops supporting WinXP. I wonder what will happen here...?
I have a feeling that the answer is that very little of the software critical to this hospital's operations is compatible with Win7/8, or there would have already been partial roll-outs with tests and tweaks in preparation for a full OS upgrade-roll-out for the whole hospital. We have people helping us to upgrade our core software, but on WinXP. They're actually developing it for us ON WinXP.... So, I don't know if they're even thinking of Win7. It's not my area to worry over that, but.... That can't be good.
However, the point I'm trying to make is that businesses everywhere, large and small, are reluctant to leave WinXP for Win7, and much less for Win8 (Lose8).
+1
It is all over the world that some specialized applications (especially in healthcare, but not only) is written for XP and does not work on win7. And we are not talking about some app for few hundred euro/dollars, but about several thousand. No one will just like that for free rewrite it to make it work with win7... Even if app would cost few hundred dollars/euro... whole hassle with "fixing what is not broken" is just unnecessary...
But still... popularity of Windows as a household computer system was ... I dare to assume ... in 99% due to its outstanding capabilities of running games. Same with fast developement of computer components. ;) |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
335
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 05:32:00 -
[62] - Quote
Setaceous wrote:MS doesn't really care, we're paying them extra for XP downgrade licences on 10,000+ PCs.
And that folks is why WoW is also #1 -- old, but runs on almost anything. The AOL of the 21st century.
Which is why these older MMOs are really cautious updating their game (plus PC gaming -- at least currently -- is declining and that's less new players to justify it).
But like there's tech companies that support these businesses that can't afford to update their custom software (legal office spent $50,000 on their internal file system...their own Library of Congress...to update today would sink a small legal office [and you can't outsource it to a foreign country like India or Russia]), there will be options for them. One is VM and independent of even MS.
For the rest of players, especially gamers, you have to update eventually. The game companies have to at least stay relevant, and will slowly close support on older operating systems to do so. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 06:02:00 -
[63] - Quote
Aliventi wrote:Pewty McPew wrote:... and about 2% Win 8 Those poor souls...
^2 cubed....
it's probably a lost cause though. Our computers will not be "ours" anymore, nor will there be any internet that is even remotely like a common carrier.
All operating systems will be walled gardens filled with App makers kowtowing to ISP (incidently Entertainment media providors) and opperating sytems providers.. who lease you access to their operating systems via T.o.S like you must log into "the cloud" and certify who you are at all times and that they own the ip that you create on "their" platform etc.
That's windows 8, bringing the iphone and google + "our way or the highway" to our pcs |

FluffyDice
Kronos Research
571
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 08:35:00 -
[64] - Quote
Sure is pretty here in the walled garden. Join usssssssssssssss |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
600
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 09:20:00 -
[65] - Quote
Inokuma Yawara wrote: I work at a hospital in Los Angeles (not in Syberia). They depend on WinXP. All of the stuff they do on XP is, of course, critical. But I don't know how many of the software will be able to run on Win7 or Win8. When Microsucks stops supporting WinXP. I wonder what will happen here...?
I have a feeling that the answer is that very little of the software critical to this hospital's operations is compatible with Win7/8, or there would have already been partial roll-outs with tests and tweaks in preparation for a full OS upgrade-roll-out for the whole hospital. We have people helping us to upgrade our core software, but on WinXP. They're actually developing it for us ON WinXP.... So, I don't know if they're even thinking of Win7. It's not my area to worry over that, but.... That can't be good.
However, the point I'm trying to make is that businesses everywhere, large and small, are reluctant to leave WinXP for Win7, and much less for Win8 (Lose8).
So it's not actually relevant to the discussion unless you play eve on said computer. And since you work in a hospital.. I sure hope not... |

Azrael Dinn
The 20th Legion Mildly Sober
140
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 12:08:00 -
[66] - Quote
who in the hell is using windows xp anymore anyways  |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
273
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 12:31:00 -
[67] - Quote
Setaceous wrote:Tippia wrote:Setaceous wrote:You've had five additional years (XP had a 10 year lifetime originally) to get your code up to scratch. Who's at fault here? Fifteen years, huh? This just in: Microsoft patents time travel and releases Win XP two years ahead of its predecessor! Meh, brain stall on my part. Point still stands if you use the correct timeframe. XP support was extended so companies could sort their **** out. Hell, My company is one of them, we're still struggling to update old software that was written for NT4. MS doesn't really care, we're paying them extra for XP downgrade licences on 10,000+ PCs.
I wouldn't mind if things were backward compatible or if MS decided to make a development environment which works.
Anyway, to demonstrate the lack of backward compatability; remember how MS told us that Active-X in browsers were the the future and that we'd all need IE-6. Lots of companies went ahead with this Active-X development and it worked well, except that the badgertwats started to break the 'security'. So another good technology lost.
The thing is that there's a lot of applications out there which uses these Active-X controls. I have a client who is a major travel agency and they need to run IE-6 because one of their suppliers has only Active-X controls on their site. It's not a case of my client having to 'fix' their code because it's not their code.
And do their supplier care less? No. They are a national railway and which have a monopoly and they say "if you want to buy our tickets wholesale on-line then you seen IE-6"
And guess where IE-6 isn't able to run any more?
As for the genius who tells me that I had 15 year to rewrite all my code. Yes, in Real Life it doesn't work like that. There wasn't a platform which I could test my code on and what would I rewrite my code for.
It's like saying that I have 80,000 lines of code running on my Windows 8 machine and I had better start rewriting it with all those tools available for Windows 9. And of course, in the years it would take me to rewrite everything that means then I couldn't expand on my own applications.
And why update when clearly it runs six times slower on the new My Little Pony Windows? |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
273
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 12:53:00 -
[68] - Quote
We've had people mention law firms running NT4 and the Los Angeles hospital running XP.
I don't know where that law firm is but if it were in London then I may have had a hand in intalling the systems, the document management software and the like. NT4 simply worked and it wasn't glamourous - it didn't run games too well and the Plug an Play tried to work.
But for business machines it was brillant and there is still no case for office administration to use anything else. Just because it's old doesn't mean that it has to be dumped. The only reason wjy MS want us to change to something new and shiny is to pay their coders. But for 99% of office life NT4 (or rather NT4.1) is more than adequate.
From that time of the NT world I bought my home office printer; that's a workhorse of an HP4000 printer. Still one of the best printers around and, no it doesn't have network capability (it does now with a dongle) and it was built before USB was heard of But is that a reason to change? No.
The LA hospital is similar to the NHS here in the UK. A lot of it runs on XP and it runs well.
My mate runs a home recording studio and he's got his stuff running through an XP machine and with the devices on firewire. Yes, he could run on Windows 7 but, guess what, it's runs better and faster on XP. This is another problem we're finding these days; the hardware is being dumbed down too. Firewire is nigh on impossible to find these days but it's better, far better, than USB.
This is the way that the worls works; go and use some crufty new piece of hardware but it's new and therefore it's "better" even though the specs tell you otherwise. But the mp3 generation will follow bleating like sheep. A good example are these new -ú200 headphones endorsed by an R&B 'musician' and the quality is crap. But who cares? It sells. It's new and it's shiny. so we must folllow bleating to downgrade.
Should I also downgrade my music collection from .flac to .mp3 because it's the thing to do? No. .flac is far superior and the same argument goes with XP/Win 7.
Win 7 is fine for playing game, it's fine for running off the shelf apps as if it were an uber-tablet for actually 'doing stuff' it's poor and as my mate testifies it's hopeless for proper music production. My step daughter, a musician*, living in the Republic of Yorkshire is negotiating a record contract now and she does her own home recording so it's fair to say that she knows a little about music as she's a singer/songwirter - guess what operating system she uses to record her music and to drive her mixing desk? Yes XP with Firewire.
(* a musician - not a DJ)
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1596
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 13:03:00 -
[69] - Quote
Firewire may have some benefits over USB. It also has some significant downsides. Such as DMA attacks (I'll admit, they require physical access. which generally means the machine is compromised anyway.)
Yes, XP is better for some tasks, because of hardware or software requirements.
Those aren't /general/ requirements however. There are few instances where this would affect the general home user. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Karak Terrel
As Far As The eYe can see Chained Reactions
226
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 17:02:00 -
[70] - Quote
Interesting, I did not know that. And this was 4 years ago?!? How can they claim they still support XP? |
|

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
273
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 17:22:00 -
[71] - Quote
Exactly.
So what difference then will this End Of Life incident have on us, other than having our machines no longer reboot in the middle of an overnight run despite the Do Not Download Updates checked?
Me, for one, I am looking forward to no more updates. |

xarjin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 18:24:00 -
[72] - Quote
Karak Terrel wrote:Interesting, I did not know that. And this was 4 years ago?!? How can they claim they still support XP?
Mainstream "retail" support for windows xp ended 4? years ago. The only support they currently offer is the "Extended" support for businesses. The extended business support ends next April.
Any home user still using Windows XP essentially has been "drinking and eating spoiled food" several years past the expiration date. |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
276
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 19:11:00 -
[73] - Quote
xarjin wrote:
Any home user still using Windows XP essentially has been "drinking and eating spoiled food" several years past the expiration date.
I love out of date stuff. The local supermarket puts mature Cheddar cheese onto the Get Rid Quick shelving because, er, it may go off.
I am still waiting for them to put the 'out of date' port on there... |

Tobias Hareka
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 19:16:00 -
[74] - Quote
xarjin wrote:Karak Terrel wrote:Interesting, I did not know that. And this was 4 years ago?!? How can they claim they still support XP? Mainstream "retail" support for windows xp ended 4? years ago. The only support they currently offer is the "Extended" support for businesses. The extended business support ends next April. Any home user still using Windows XP essentially has been "drinking and eating spoiled food" several years past the expiration date.
"Mainstream" support ended on 14.4.2009. That means no new features (Service Packs).
"Extended" ends on 8.4.2014. Only way to get support for Windows XP after this date is to pay, pay a lot of money. So pretty much all home users, small/medium sized businesses will be left behind if they don't want to upgrade. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
917
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 19:19:00 -
[75] - Quote
Pewty McPew wrote:XP rocks fully 80%+ of my corporate customers sill run XP 18% Win 7 and about 2% Win 8
Quite sure those 80% are the ones that most probably will moan and make their loud mouths when something bad happens to them, it's not XP fault, it's the other people...
Yet those ones will have to get over their bitterness and arrogance at some point or stay in their middle age stuff claiming they're special snowflakes. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
4327
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 20:21:00 -
[76] - Quote
Yes, many businesses still use XP. Primarily because many businesses still haven't learned how necessary it is to have an adequate IT budget. So they get further and further behind where they need to be until it becomes a nightmare to catch up.
This applies equally to both small and large business the world over. Eventually they will be forced to bite the bullet and start treating their computing needs with the respect it deserves. To do otherwise can do a company significant harm, and is very short sighted.
For us however the situation is much simpler.
We are gamers, and that "should" mean that we understand that we must have at least half way up to date hardware and software to be able to continue to game on our PCs.
I fully understand that everyone is on a budget, but if you game that budget needs to include OS and hardware upgrades on a semi-regular basis... at least once or twice a decade.  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |