| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Colt Blackhawk
Nasranite Watch OLD MAN GANG
173
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 19:55:00 -
[31] - Quote
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. Really if you want to look at nice graphics and burn your brain then go away and play a shooter. I have already so much to monitor during a fight that there is no time to enjoy he graphics. Eve is okay. POINT. |

Alundil
Seniors Clan Get Off My Lawn
214
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 21:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Nope - let the devs continue to work on the only "EVE" there is. This is where everything is anyway. I was years into Asheron's Call when Turbine released AC2. It cannibalized the AC1 population and AC2 never lived up to the expectations of a sequel to the original. Consequently, AC2 died with 2-3 years (iirc). AC1 is still going, but it's severely diminished from its heyday.
No EVE Online II. |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2230
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 21:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
Howabout, instead of an "EvE II", they update the original EvE with free expansions, updating ships, updating graphics, adding new content, etc?
Oh wait....
|

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
468
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 22:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Who says isk and assets can't be cloned into Eve II? I see a lot of people assuming this, but none bothered to ask why not. Or would you feel better to just call it "Eve" as opposed to Eve II?
Yes, theorically can be done. But if you make "EVE II" this mean you're going to redesign not only graphic, user interface and all this but also review/change core game mechanics, is not avoidable. This lead to redesign/rebuild your playerbase. Is a great risk/cost.
A company like Sony can face this risk. They can undo and trash good title, they always have resources and backup.
CCP is different, cause their main pillar is just EVE and EVE foundation is just in the long-term loyality of their playerbase. They should risk their main asset in the operation.
I agree that since Crucible EVE is on a mantainence status. I dislike to see as their new gameplay devlopement is focused on something else, other games, other platforms, I'd rather prefer to have all that focus on EVE, EVE gameplay need to be expanded, but this have to be done definining new areas and at the same time not destroying/dismantelling what is already consolidated.
Step by step.
|

sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
1164
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 23:07:00 -
[35] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:sabre906 wrote:Who says isk and assets can't be cloned into Eve II? I see a lot of people assuming this, but none bothered to ask why not. Or would you feel better to just call it "Eve" as opposed to Eve II?
Yes, theorically can be done. But if you make "EVE II" this mean you're going to redesign not only graphic, user interface and all this but also review/change core game mechanics, is not avoidable. This lead to redesign/rebuild your playerbase. Is a great risk/cost. A company like Sony can face this risk. They can undo and trash good title, they always have resources and backup. CCP is different, cause their main pillar is just EVE and EVE foundation is just in the long-term loyality of their playerbase. They should risk their main asset in the operation. I agree that since Crucible EVE is on a mantainence status. I dislike to see as their new gameplay devlopement is focused on something else, other games, other platforms, I'd rather prefer to have all that focus on EVE, EVE gameplay need to be expanded, but this have to be done definining new areas and at the same time not destroying/dismantelling what is already consolidated. Step by step.
What are you talking about? Seriously, get a clue...
Most game mechanics are superficial, you can already make changes with minor value changes to code, you don't need a Eve II for that. Nothing, especially not graphics, need to change. Graphics engine is ran clientside, separate from server program. The only user client running out of server would be a text only thin client, I'd imagine.
The overgrown primeval jungle that is Eve's core code needs to be rebuilt to move on, or every addition will just get harder and harder, glitcher and glitcher as time goes on. Everything superficial, like graphics and (lol) game mechanics, can remain exactly the same. Unless you consider stuff like lag and 1 sec server ticker to be intentional game mechanics. Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
468
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 23:31:00 -
[36] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:
Most game mechanics are superficial, you can already make changes with minor value changes to code, you don't need a Eve II for that. Nothing, especially not graphics, need to change. Graphics engine is ran clientside, separate from server program. The only user client running out of server would be a text only thin client, I'd imagine.
Oh, really, the grapic engine run client side?! Separate by the server?! lol, what a new :)
Yes, and is what they already did and doing since years.
The one talking about an "EVE II" redesign (with transfer of ISK, assets and so on) was you. Improvements client side and server sides, optimizing databases, updating/rewriting the code and so on is not "EVE II", is not a game redesign. It's simply what they alrready doing step by step. But the topic of the thread was not this.
|

sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
1164
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 02:47:00 -
[37] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:sabre906 wrote: What are you talking about? Seriously, get a clue...
Most game mechanics are superficial, you can already make changes with minor value changes to code, you don't need a Eve II for that. Nothing, especially not graphics, need to change. Graphics engine is ran clientside, separate from server program. The only user client running out of server would be a text only thin client, I'd imagine.
The overgrown primeval jungle that is Eve's core code needs to be rebuilt to move on, or every addition will just get harder and harder, glitcher and glitcher as time goes on. Everything superficial, like graphics and (lol) game mechanics, can remain exactly the same. Unless you consider stuff like lag and 1 sec server ticker to be intentional game mechanics.
Yes, and is what they already did and doing since years.
They have, in fact, done none of that. Everything they've done is either superficial or bolting on new sections with as little changes to the core as possible, afraid of the bugs it would introduce, for good reason. It's an aged can of worms that should be thrown away instead of opened.
The most drastic thing they've done is time dilation, a band-it on the 1 sec server ticks that everything is based on. It should just be done away with, and everything from that point forward will be far easier. Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |

Robert Saint
Playright
77
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 04:10:00 -
[38] - Quote
I could see planet exploration as a pretty cool add on, but that's about it... but would only make sense if it was inside this game... like land your ship on a moon or planet, get out and explore in a space suit.
the dust thing really is just a FPS like so many others. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
157
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 05:37:00 -
[39] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:I could see planet exploration as a pretty cool add on, but that's about it... but would only make sense if it was inside this game... like land your ship on a moon or planet, get out and explore in a space suit.
the dust thing really is just a FPS like so many others. Check out infinity the quest for earth, theres a video that shows what it can do. Its incredible. Seamless space to planet flight, millions of clickable stars in space, no zoning / session changes. Its just an engine but its amazing. |

Vherana
Valkyrie Industries Valkyrie Coalition
11
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 09:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Check out infinity the quest for earth, theres a video that shows what it can do. Its incredible. Seamless space to planet flight, millions of clickable stars in space, no zoning / session changes. Its just an engine but its amazing. Infinity is about 2 to 3 years from release, and they are aiming at making an "arena style game" first (that's MOBA, not MMO)
Even if they succeed with their arena, the planned MMO will not be on the same scale as EVE Online, not at release and not in the near future.
On their site, they are not talking about the server technology, if they try to use a clustered solution, they'll be hit by the same obstacles as CCP. Reality is a *****.
From the site: Real-time fighting ( twitch based ) - good luck with that, latency will hit hit you in the face, more than 30 players at once will not work.
|

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
468
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 09:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: Check out infinity the quest for earth, theres a video that shows what it can do. Its incredible. Seamless space to planet flight, millions of clickable stars in space, no zoning / session changes. Its just an engine but its amazing.
I think everyone would love seamless game world. But even more advanced and "modern" game architetture still go some kind of zoning/session change. EVE system is maybe the more consistent and less annoying. And the only one able to handle thousand of players in the same "zone".
Infinity is just that: some cool video. But doesn't exists as product, not even an early game prototype. having good ideas is easy, the hard part is transforming ideas in operative projects and products.
Btw CCP already produced an atmospherical flight demo back in 2006: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Pg1dzAvL2M
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
157
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:00:00 -
[42] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Check out infinity the quest for earth, theres a video that shows what it can do. Its incredible. Seamless space to planet flight, millions of clickable stars in space, no zoning / session changes. Its just an engine but its amazing.
I think everyone would love seamless game world. But even more advanced and "modern" game architetture still go some kind of zoning/session change. EVE system is maybe the more consistent and less annoying. And the only one able to handle thousand of players in the same "zone". Infinity is just that: some cool video. But doesn't exists as product, not even an early game prototype. having good ideas is easy, the hard part is transforming ideas in operative projects and products. Btw CCP already produced an atmospherical flight demo back in 2006: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Pg1dzAvL2M Infinity is an actual existing engine. It procedurally generates a single universe zone based on an initial seed. Each player is a bubble as they move from one location to the other the engine generates the same universe by running the procedural code, each player is its own solar system if you like When two players are in the same location the engine generates the same location and the players can interact with each other. Theres no session changes other than rendering other players, static objects as they appear to other players.
|

Radhe Amatin
Caldari High Prime SpaceMonkey's Alliance
19
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 14:29:00 -
[43] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:EvE is a great game. But its an old game. CCP have proven its a viable game. Screw dust, vampires and develop EvE II already. A lot of people will respond that its constantly updated but its core is 10 years old, its grid system is borked, its full of legacy code thats not loosely coupled, its restricted by old design concepts that relied on old hardware and software limitations that dont exist or have been largely mitigated by new hardware software and faster net speeds.
Give us EvE II. Ill give you my firstborn.
Oh yeah and please look at the infinity quest for earth system. Procedural universe generation and planetary flight.
yeah sure why not, but they should make it with naked goblins wielding swords in one hand and lazors in the other (dual wield ftw). |

Jason Itiner
Sectatores Pax
19
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 14:49:00 -
[44] - Quote
Kirimeena D'Zbrkesbris wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:EvE is a great game. But its an old game. CCP have proven its a viable game. Screw dust, vampires and develop EvE II already. A lot of people will respond that its constantly updated but its core is 10 years old, its grid system is borked, its full of legacy code thats not loosely coupled, its restricted by old design concepts that relied on old hardware and software limitations that dont exist or have been largely mitigated by new hardware software and faster net speeds.
Give us EvE II. Ill give you my firstborn.
Oh yeah and please look at the infinity quest for earth system. Procedural universe generation and planetary flight. For games it is sequels that kill them because: 1. they take Dev time 2. they are the reason of playerbase segmentation. 3. they are rarely better than original.
That's true for MMOs, like EVE. I suspect the second point is the most serious, but for an offline game, this listing is likely moot, since player base will move with the version, even if it's not (significantly) better.
I'm against an EVEII, though. I like this version just fine, they can keep patching and expanding it, and there are a lot of places they can go without making a new installment... |

Meditril
T.R.I.A.D
295
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 14:59:00 -
[45] - Quote
I prefer having an step-by-step evolving EVE instead of an EVE II which splits player base and where you have to start again from the scratch with both skills and bugs and inbalances to be found. |
|

CCP Falcon
3321

|
Posted - 2013.07.02 15:25:00 -
[46] - Quote
Technically, this is EVE XIX

CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á Live Events Organizer
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Serithin
Rage Against Machine
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 15:48:00 -
[47] - Quote
well this thread has turned its ugly head not for a long time though I like it.
But honestly back in '03-'04 we didn't even know if this game would still be around in '06 and now look were still here 10 years later literally on eve version 18 yes there has been 18 versions of eve and god damn I wish more people were there at the beginning, If more people had been there at the start then they would appreciate this game a lot more for what it is now.
so yea screw eve 2 that one sucked I like that were on eve 18, DOWN WITH THE NAYSAYERS!!! CCP your awesome love ya keep doing what you do and make my vargur better. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
159
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:14:00 -
[48] - Quote
Serithin wrote:well this thread has turned its ugly head not for a long time though I like it.
But honestly back in '03-'04 we didn't even know if this game would still be around in '06 and now look were still here 10 years later literally on eve version 18 yes there has been 18 versions of eve and god damn I wish more people were there at the beginning, If more people had been there at the start then they would appreciate this game a lot more for what it is now.
so yea screw eve 2 that one sucked I like that were on eve 18, DOWN WITH THE NAYSAYERS!!! CCP your awesome love ya keep doing what you do and make my vargur better. Been here since 2003. Same game. Expansions do not make it a new game. Just an old game with expansions. |

Serithin
Rage Against Machine
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:19:00 -
[49] - Quote
yea its no where near the same game k thanks bye |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
159
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:23:00 -
[50] - Quote
Serithin wrote:yea its no where near the same game k thanks bye You are incorrect. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
921
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:33:00 -
[51] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Technically, this is EVE XIX 
Still doesn't uses above 2GB Ram and works on a single thread when our average hardware can handle thrice this with no much effort and 2 YO GC's with techs already obsoleted by newest already cheap. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Blastil
The Reblier Alliance
79
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Serithin wrote:yea its no where near the same game k thanks bye You are incorrect.
I have this suspicion that the percentage of source code that makes up EVE that is retained from 2nd genesis is relatively small... We have no need for EVE II. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
723
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:34:00 -
[53] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Screw dust, vampires ... Screw that ..
CCP, buy up EGOSOFT and put their staff to work on Eve. The two worlds (X2 + X3 and Eve) already have such an immense shared pool that it can only be glorious.
Automated mining operations with programmable (simple if/when type of things) AI controlled ships? - Never again need a human go elsewhere in order to play the game (silly isn't it?).
Player created and owned but AI controlled manufacturing base? - Use players to supply it or program AI ships to do the hauling but prepare to defend the lines and assets.
Boarding of hostile capitals. - Never again need ground humpers thumpers be denied the thrill of claustrophobia in zero-G .. put the to work fighting deck-by-deck to capture or destroy that enemy Titan (art department needs a challenge anyway, they are too comfy with space).
Etc.
PS: X-Universe has a steeper learning curve than Eve had in its infancy .. as in practically zero in-game help while being more complex ... how hard-core is that!  |

Blastil
The Reblier Alliance
79
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:34:00 -
[54] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:Technically, this is EVE XIX  Still doesn't uses above 2GB Ram and works on a single thread when our average hardware can handle thrice this with no much effort and 2 YO GC's with techs already obsoleted by newest already cheap.
this is... a bad thing?
|

Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks The Volition Cult
481
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:35:00 -
[55] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Serithin wrote:well this thread has turned its ugly head not for a long time though I like it.
But honestly back in '03-'04 we didn't even know if this game would still be around in '06 and now look were still here 10 years later literally on eve version 18 yes there has been 18 versions of eve and god damn I wish more people were there at the beginning, If more people had been there at the start then they would appreciate this game a lot more for what it is now.
so yea screw eve 2 that one sucked I like that were on eve 18, DOWN WITH THE NAYSAYERS!!! CCP your awesome love ya keep doing what you do and make my vargur better. Been here since 2003. Same game. Expansions do not make it a new game. Just an old game with expansions. Do you honestly think that posting on the EVE forums that EVE isn't good enough and you want a different computer game and CCP make me a new computer game cos your old one sucks and is old and I want one that's better so you make me one that's better and anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong and I've been here since the start so I know everything and I'm not bitter and and and....
doesn't make you seem like a douche? |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
159
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Blastil wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Serithin wrote:yea its no where near the same game k thanks bye You are incorrect. I have this suspicion that the percentage of source code that makes up EVE that is retained from 2nd genesis is relatively small... We have no need for EVE II. Only devs know I guess. Its still constricted by old game design (discrete zones) and consequent session changes to jump between those. Its also built on a time where 100 v 100 was game breaking. I doubt they imagined thousands vs thousands would ever happen. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
159
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:45:00 -
[57] - Quote
Tchulen wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Serithin wrote:well this thread has turned its ugly head not for a long time though I like it.
But honestly back in '03-'04 we didn't even know if this game would still be around in '06 and now look were still here 10 years later literally on eve version 18 yes there has been 18 versions of eve and god damn I wish more people were there at the beginning, If more people had been there at the start then they would appreciate this game a lot more for what it is now.
so yea screw eve 2 that one sucked I like that were on eve 18, DOWN WITH THE NAYSAYERS!!! CCP your awesome love ya keep doing what you do and make my vargur better. Been here since 2003. Same game. Expansions do not make it a new game. Just an old game with expansions. Do you honestly think that posting on the EVE forums that EVE isn't good enough and you want a different computer game and CCP make me a new computer game cos your old one sucks and is old and I want one that's better so you make me one that's better and anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong and I've been here since the start so I know everything and I'm not bitter and and and.... doesn't make you seem like a douche? Lol no I don't think it does at all. Im always polite and try to be constructive in my posts. How about you? :) |
|

CCP Falcon
3324

|
Posted - 2013.07.02 16:51:00 -
[58] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:Technically, this is EVE XIX  Still doesn't uses above 2GB Ram and works on a single thread when our average hardware can handle thrice this with no much effort and 2 YO GC's with techs already obsoleted by newest already cheap.
So you're complaining that EVE is light enough on resources that you can run it on a mid range to low end PC?
Um... why?
CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á Live Events Organizer
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Alundil
Seniors Clan Get Off My Lawn
217
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 17:47:00 -
[59] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:Technically, this is EVE XIX  Still doesn't uses above 2GB Ram and works on a single thread when our average hardware can handle thrice this with no much effort and 2 YO GC's with techs already obsoleted by newest already cheap. So you're complaining that EVE is light enough on resources that you can run it on a mid range to low end PC? Um... why?
Yeah - I'm not sure if that worked out the way he intended it. |

Omnathious Deninard
The Scope Gallente Federation
1225
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 17:55:00 -
[60] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:Technically, this is EVE XIX  Still doesn't uses above 2GB Ram and works on a single thread when our average hardware can handle thrice this with no much effort and 2 YO GC's with techs already obsoleted by newest already cheap. By 2015 market sales of tablets will surpass both PCs and Laptops combined. This is the future of computing and eve in its current state will run on it.
Ideas for Drone ImprovementTwitter Account-á @Omnathious |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |