EVE Search - Jag, Vengeance, Hawk + AS 4th bonus!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Jag, Vengeance, Hawk + AS 4th bonus!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
Sarmaul	Posted - 2005.12.14 20:25:00 - [1] Originally by: CCP Hammer Weirda no love Hammer? stop trolling and fix the assault frigates Originally by: Testy McTest Artillery Extreme Ammo - fires typhoons that launch claws with autocannons that launch guys in space suits that have machine guns that fire ninjas
Sarmaul	Posted - 2005.12.25 18:52:00 - [2] Originally by: Grimpak Originally by: Zippy Pinno In addition to the fix/balance we might need a third AF per race. For Minmatar there is a cool little number called a Blade in the DB - it has a 5-4-5 slot layout. and 99% EM resist (or was it 100%?) 100% - those ships are classed as escort ships in the DB, and each race had their enemy's primary damage output resisted to 100% (i.e. amarr 100% exp resistance, caldari 100% thermal, gallente 100% kinetic, minmatar 100% em). ------------- Please make Minmatar overpowered, CCP
Sarmaul	Posted - 2005.12.28 17:34:00 - [3] Originally by: Forsch Originally by: Weirda is the Jag 'just fine' with the same slot as MK2 Rifter? I knew this would be brought up after all the love the rifter got. (Offtopic: The rifter was a well used frigate before RMR, now it's even better. Imo it's not the jaguar having too few slots, it's the rifter having too many. But that's just me. ) the jaguar is technically missing a slot though. ------------- Please make Minmatar overpowered, CCP
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.05 16:32:00 - [4] still signed assaults seem half finished. you made stealth bombers much better - a class of ship that hardly anyone uses - so why not the assaults? Turn interceptors into dedicated tacklers (screw the 50% damage, give them 50% scrambling + web range) and turn assaults into the proper combat ships like hacs are for cruisers. oh, and add the missing slots :)
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.07 15:14:00 - [5] bump
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.07 19:27:00 - [6] Originally by: Kuolematon Originally by: Malthros Zenobia AFs do need fixed. As do inties. I peroanlly never understood why CCP felt the need to give so much damage to a ship class that is ment to be a good tackler(inties). They needto lose ALL damage-related bonuses, and get ones for tackling. Scram/webber range, webber strength (maybe 5% per level so at lvl 5 you'd get a 25% boost to your web power (thus a 50% web would become 62.5%, plus other web-related skills, and it'd probably have more range). Hear hear!! QFT!!! Why CCP, why? not all frigates are tacklers. we have mining frigates, tackling frigates, combat frigates, ewar frigates, logistics frigates, just like cruisers. I agree that interceptors should do no more damage than their tech1 counterpart, and that they should be given tackling bonuses. Assault frigates on the otherhand ARE designed to be combat frigates.
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.09 21:46:00 - [7] And while you're at it, introduce passive multi-resist shield hardeners (same stats as energised adaptive nanos, but they boost shield resists) Jaguar 150mm AC II x 3 Small Dim Nos x 1 Gistii a-type MWD x 1 Gistii a-type Booster x 1 Faint -2 scrambler x 1 Shield Multi Resist thingy x 1 Gyro II x 2 Co-Pro II x 1 81.25% EM, 70% EXP, 55% KIN, 70% THEM, 9.6pg, 4cpu Go on CCP, you know you want to...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.13 16:07:00 - [8] bumping again, because we're never going to let you forget about this until it's done :)
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.13 16:34:00 - [9] Originally by: Weirda Edited by: Weirda on 13/01/2006 16:21:32 Originally by: Sarmaul bumping again, because we're never going to let you forget about this until it's done :) bless you my child, you have seen the light. no, I've seen the evil things I can do with a jag + 4th midslot that I can't do with a wolf. on the other hands, the jag still wouldn't be able to do the things the wolf can, i.e. load up with 280mms and 2-volley everything
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.16 20:17:00 - [10] bumpety bump. come tux, we'll even forgive you touching the thorax

Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.16 22:27:00 - [11] Originally by: Garrick Amorr Bump! This isn't going to go away! Closing your eyes and Lalalalaing is gonna work ;) ISN'T
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.16 22:34:00 - [12] Originally by: Shin Ra Give the Jaguar a speed bonus. Give the vengeance a nos bonus. Good to go. and give the jaguar it's missing slot (preferably in the mid).
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.17 10:46:00 - [13] Jaguar Resistances not considered a bonus but part of the ships design (like hacs, command ships, etc). More CPU Higher base speed An extra midslot to give it the correct number of slots Minmatar Frigate bonus changed to 5% ROF and 5% tracking per level (i.e. same as the rifter) Assault Ships bonus changed to 5% damage and 10% falloff per level
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.17 14:20:00 - [14] how many ******* times THE MANTICORE IS NOT A T2 KESSIE
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.17 16:54:00 - [15] Originally by: Miss Awful Edited by: Miss Awful on 17/01/2006 16:29:02 Originally by: Sarmaul how many ******* times THE MANTICORE IS NOT A "T2 KESSIE" Then id suggest you taking a look at this ship. Ive been talking about the MODEL. If the model of a manticore doesnt look much like a kestrel (with some minor changes ofc), well ... Reading and understanding a context takes more skill than writing stupid comments with font size 6, doesnt it? I never said that a manticore would be a replacement for a missile af. sorry, it wasn't aimed at you (I didn't actually see your post above so I can see the confusion), but to the people in this thread who don't want a hawk to be a missile ship because they think manticore is a t2 kessie, thereby implying that the manticore is a missile-based assault frigate with full assault resists and bonusus, which it is not.
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.18 16:41:00 - [16] OMG IT FELL OFF THE PAGE
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.19 10:32:00 - [17] Originally by: Stephen HB Originally by: Kaylana Syi Me thinks they will do something about this problem when they address the typhoon. I.e. never. the phoon is getting a makeover, we have dev quotes to back it up :). optimal range bonus is becoming a missile bonus.
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.21 19:51:00 - [18] second page? I DON'T THINK SO
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.01.29 16:16:00 - [19] sorry, weirda - I would've bumped it earlier but I was forum banned for 48 hours :/ still needs looking at
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.02 09:38:00 - [20] bump

Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.07 09:28:00 - [21] bumpety bumpety bump
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.17 23:26:00 - [22] Originally by: Tuxford Originally by: Vox Virilis Originally by: Zippy Pinno And another thing: We dont need the stinking optimal range bonus on Jaguars and Wolfes. It discriminates against Auto Cannons. Make it a falloff bonus. Guns have equal rights too. Agreed! should definitely be changed to falloff bonus. Oh now everybody wants my falloff bonus. yes, on minmatar ships that fight in their falloff, not amarr ships that fight in their optimal also, bump Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Sarmaul 4tw.
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:16:00 - [23] A man walks into a bar... bump Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 10:23:00 - [24] Originally by: Weirda sweet mother! back from the dead! damn right, I want a reason to use a jaguar over a rifter Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 13:34:00 - [25] zomg I bumped it again
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 22:28:00 - [26] Originally by: Zippy Pinno Lets face it, AF use for pvp is dying out. My corp mates who lose AFs dont replace them. I see everyone flying cruisers, the only people flying frigs anymore are noobs like me (intys excluded). We need to boost these fun little ships. actually, the issue is more that interceptors go faster and do more damage than assault frigs. The biggest thing assault frigs have going for them is their tank, but tbh the role of a frig in pvp isn't to tank, it's to slap as many damn scramblers on the target as fast as possible.
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.03.03 23:55:00 - [27] weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee bump ______________________________________________ Please do not discuss actions taken by forum moderators, even in your sig. By the way, I love you and want to have your babies --Jorauk
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.03.04 00:09:00 - [28] I believe tomb has said the less crap assault frigs will be rebalenced with the not-so-crap ones in the next "non-bug-fix patch". of course, I'm not going to stop bumping this thread until it's sorted :) ______________________________________________ Please do not discuss actions taken by forum moderators, even in your sig. By the way, I love you and want to have your babies --Jorauk
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.05.24 15:55:00 - [29] Originally by: Weirda 'le cry don't take it personally weirda, after our initial enthusiasm with tux it seems CCP still hates all minmatar equally click here for a seizure

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.