| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Maya Rkell
   |
Posted - 2005.12.03 03:48:00 -
[1]
Interdictors.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.03 03:51:00 -
[2]
Absolutely. 10% cap penalty per.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.03 04:01:00 -
[3]
Doubt it. 4 damage mods, 3 tracking mods, 1 armour rep.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.03 04:05:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: skilz
Originally by: Maya Rkell
Doubt it. 4 damage mods, 3 tracking mods, 1 armour rep.
Can you please stop speculating and add constructive posts to this board.
And you added?
I've made several suggestions in this thread, but your reading comprehension...
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.03 04:14:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Maya Rkell on 03/12/2005 04:15:09
Neur0n,
Not going to happen, and if it does then all you've done is make people less likely to fight. Which is just annoying.
A sensible penalty which further cripples your fighting power compared to someone without? Quite possible.
In actual fact, I like the idea of each WCS costing you, say, 20 energy per WCS when hit with a scrambler or disruptor. Per cycle.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.03 04:25:00 -
[6]
Maybe you need a better class of enemy?
Or just use the tools provided? I agree that they need a penalty, but something where a single one cripples your setup? Bleck.
As I said, it would just inhibit PvPing
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.03 20:06:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Jim Raynor
How about a penalty to capacitor, like 15% per warpcore, cause it has to redirect capacitor energy to strengthen your warp field or some technobabble like that.
Jim? Page 1 called, it wants my suggestion back. (I suggested 5-10% tho).
And stop with the "if you mount WCS you can't fight" suggestions. which make up 90% of the thread. It's not gonna happen (and don't claim that's not precisely what you're asking for either, please). Losing 20% cap is massive for combat, AND it slows travel (since less cap = shorter warps).
Given interdictors, warp bubbles and the T2 scramblers/disruptors....
If you want to "fight or flight..." you want to make numbers count, not skill, ships or similar factors. Meh.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.03 20:36:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Maya Rkell on 03/12/2005 20:36:52
Originally by: neur0n
Originally by: Maya Rkell
If you want to "fight or flight..." you want to make numbers count, not skill, ships or similar factors. Meh.
So basically what you are doing here is encouraging gank squads. That still doesnt fix the problem of small fights being useless.
No, that'd be CCP encouraging them by making tanking better, and changing the stacking penalty.
I'd of expected certain OTHER changes alongside them which haven't happened.
(And a lock penalty? Meh. When they have 2 targeting computers, like they'd care about a 40% lock time penalty. Cap, on the other hand...)
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.04 01:07:00 -
[9]
Actually, the artificial chokepoints of gates are why ganking happens.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.04 23:42:00 -
[10]
Not in favour of highslot. Not only would it mean adding utility slots to haulers (T2 battle haulers with nos, UGH), sniper Tempests with 6 1400, 2 WCS, etc.
Just make em knock 5-10% off cap each allready.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.12.05 00:00:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Redblade
Originally by: Maya Rkell
Not in favour of highslot. Not only would it mean adding utility slots to haulers (T2 battle haulers with nos, UGH), sniper Tempests with 6 1400, 2 WCS, etc.
Just make em knock 5-10% off cap each allready.
Think they can make them wcs only or restrict offensive mods in them.
And i think your cap penalty will be unbalanced considering the difference in cap recharge between ships and the use of cap booster is beeing boosted with next patch wich makes it even less of a penalty to anything big.
Er...look, making them non-combat won't happen, and would seriously screw up a good bit of PvE too.
And a cap penalty is a cap penalty. It allways hurts...3 WCS at 10% would do more than the MWD penalty which is constantly moaned about.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
| |
|