| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Robert Saint
Playright
93
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 20:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
So EVE is a difficult game to figure out, as I try to balance my personal understanding of what Player Vs Player is.
Although, I have my personal view of what PVP, I would very much like to hear what anyone who is brave enough to post in GD.... as would others who read these threads.
Post with your MAIN, otherwise you're missing the point.
1) What is PVP to you? 2) Why do you like it?
|

Darth Khasei
Wavestar Business Ventures Inc.
90
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 21:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Respect. 
The Market is my main pvp that I participate in personally. I have a econ degree and have always enjoyed numbers and business deals and EVE is perfect for that in the fact that as there is a ton of great competition.
I also fund some forms of ship to ship pvp to help those that enjoy EVE combat continue to do so at reasonable rates. 
|

Anna Djan
Banana Corp
54
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 21:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
I try and solo pvp.
The game i like is if i can out think my opponent or achieve over the odds and win, based upon my knowledge of what i'm sporting compared to what they are bring and their experience. It doesn't always work out, but it's fun none the less :) |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15461
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 21:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
1) It is exactly that: player versus player. No more, no less. 2) Because other players can offer a level of opposition that scripting can never dream of. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Robert Saint
Playright
93
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 21:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tippia wrote:1) It is exactly that: player versus player. No more, no less. 2) Because other players can offer a level of opposition that scripting can never dream of.
You post often and I enjoy your well rounded thoughts.
Tell me, describe your ideal Player VS Player scenario where you find the most gaming thrill? |

BiscuitMonsterr
University of Caille Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 21:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:So EVE is a difficult game to figure out, as I try to balance my personal understanding of what Player Vs Player is.
Although, I have my personal view of what PVP, I would very much like to hear what anyone who is brave enough to post in GD.... as would others who read these threads.
Post with your MAIN, otherwise you're missing the point.
1) What is PVP to you? 2) Why do you like it?
1) To me, PvP is difficult, complicated, boring and pointless. I don't enjoy it, I'm no good at it, and in 10 years of MMOs, I've not yet ever felt I'm missing out on much by avoiding it. The closest I come to 'participating' in PvP is when I successfully come back from losec after a ninja mining trip without encountering another player; I consider those times PvP victories.
2) I don't. |

Robert Saint
Playright
93
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 21:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
BiscuitMonsterr wrote:
1) To me, PvP is difficult, complicated, boring and pointless. I don't enjoy it, I'm no good at it, and in 10 years of MMOs, I've not yet ever felt I'm missing out on much by avoiding it. The closest I come to 'participating' in PvP is when I successfully come back from losec after a ninja mining trip without encountering another player; I consider those times PvP victories.
2) I don't.
This is a fantastic and honest answer..
thank you!
Question though: You most likely have played a game of Monopoly with someone before on the kitchen table. That is PVP in a sense, why is online so different? Is it the bully mentality that comes across? |

Verunae Caseti
Viziam Amarr Empire
105
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 21:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
Any gameplay element, combat or otherwise in which the skills, experience and abilities of one player are pitted against another and one emerges the benefactor or victor.
Market trading is PvP (you're pitting your trading abilities and industrial abilities against other traders).
Avoiding PvP is PvP (you're pitting your ability to avoid combat against another's ability to hunt you down).
Scamming is PvP - your ability to be an ******* against other players' ability not to be gullible jackanapes.
Even "PvE" in low/null sec is really PvP, because you're pitting your ability to complete some piece of automated content before real players track you down and interfere.
And, yes, of course basic combat PvP is PvP. This, for some reason, seems to be what some people think is the be-all-end-all of PvP is, but of course they're wrong and I'm right.
|

Whackx
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 21:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Winning through knowledge, creative thinking and timing rather than critical hits or grinded leet loot. That's what PVP means to me as an EVE and Quake player. |

Schmata Bastanold
Keep It Burning Stupid
880
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:01:00 -
[10] - Quote
Eve has sound? I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
459
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
To me, PvP is pitting myself in an adversarial role against another player directly. Yes, the market is PvP, hell yes it is. But face-to-face, or at least ship-to-ship combat, is what it's all about.
Why do I like PvP? Knowing that on the other end of it, is a person. Not some bullshit (oh, no, I said that word, someone make a thread about it) AI program, but another human. It's competition, and I enjoy that. I enjoy the hunt, I enjoy roaming around looking for people to kill. And I enjoy knowing that my actions have an actual effect on a person, not simply some program that will respawn soon anyway.
In particular, I like the PvP in EVE because it represents actual loss. I like costing somebody a ship, or having to go get myself another one after I get blown up. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Robert Saint
Playright
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
Verunae Caseti wrote:Any gameplay element, combat or otherwise in which the skills, experience and abilities of one player are pitted against another and one emerges the benefactor or victor.
Verunae, I agree with your above statement.
Do you feel that it is more rewarding to win in a PVP matchup if the odds are somewhat technically equal, and your skill was the deciding factor? Or are you perfectly comfortable being part of a gang that defeats a solo player that didn't have a chance?
Which is more rewarding to you? Or are they the same value?
|

Seven Koskanaiken
Clan Steel Wolves
254
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
"It is not enough to succeed. Others must fail." |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
1331
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
It's like when a fly is caught in the spider's web, struggling silently to save his life. There's something morbidly charming about that. Oh god. |

Skeln Thargensen
The Scope Gallente Federation
188
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:27:00 -
[15] - Quote
I'm pretty new to PvP myself. I mostly enjoy skulking around in my SB looking for soft targets or black ops fleets.
i should really get in scrub ship fleets and get better but my god i love bombers. freelance space bum |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
459
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:Verunae Caseti wrote:Any gameplay element, combat or otherwise in which the skills, experience and abilities of one player are pitted against another and one emerges the benefactor or victor.
Verunae, I agree with your above statement. Do you feel that it is more rewarding to win in a PVP matchup if the odds are somewhat technically equal, and your skill was the deciding factor? Or are you perfectly comfortable being part of a gang that defeats a solo player that didn't have a chance? Which is more rewarding to you? Or are they the same value?
To me, a kill is a kill. It means someone failed, and/or someone succeeded. Whether I succeeded in scouting him out and hunting him down with my gang, or whether I beat him straight up, it's still a kill.
Most people don't take the thought into account that there are a lot of factors besides "Oh they just had more people". No. They were better prepared than you, they batphoned faster/more efficiently than you did, they had a better fleet comp.
Or, you just didn't watch where you were going. A failure on your part is as good as a success on your adversary's part.
[Edit: Also, I reject the concept of equality as far it goes to "fair fights". No fights are fair and equal, except things like chess. And chess is boring as hell. Things being mixed up, different capabilities across the board, that's what make thing interesting. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Alavaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:I'm pretty new to PvP myself. I mostly enjoy skulking around in my SB looking for soft targets or black ops fleets. PvP has taken a new turn in which I shoot torpedos at TEST Alliance Please Ignore (and various pets) structures.
I hear it "generates content" for them when they need to show up for the resulting timer.
Loyalty is a virtue, participation brings reward. Join Siegefleet, shoot structure, click participation link.
My main is out of sub ... NO, STOP BEING POOR |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
433
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
PvP to me is the classic FPS definition: Player (human) vs Player (human) duking it out on a battlefield.
Not bots.
Not IsBox.
Not markets.
When I'm in arenas in WoW, that's not a NPC I'm fighting. He's not a BG IsBoxer. He's not playing the AH on his Android. He's a human in the same arena looking to kill an opponent. He has his UI and all setup for higher level of play; got his PvP addons and macros; and I'm there with my own (and in WoW if you don't have them, you're going to be clobbered). Who wins is who either came in with better/novel comps or more clever in countering attacks (which takes a lot of studying and you got to really know your class). The thrill is acing a higher ranked team as they're suppose to fight better.
Anything less is automation or non-fighting activities and just might as well call it PvE.
Markets I consider PvE, as well as Tradeskilling, as it's activity without direct armed combat. Something to do after the war, not the war itself.
"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Robert Saint
Playright
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:36:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
To me, a kill is a kill. It means someone failed, and/or someone succeeded. Whether I succeeded in scouting him out and hunting him down with my gang, or whether I beat him straight up, it's still a kill.
Most people don't take the thought into account that there are a lot of factors besides "Oh they just had more people". No. They were better prepared than you, they batphoned faster/more efficiently than you did, they had a better fleet comp.
Or, you just didn't watch where you were going. A failure on your part is as good as a success on your adversary's part.
[Edit: Also, I reject the concept of equality as far it goes to "fair fights". No fights are fair and equal, except things like chess. And chess is boring as hell. Things being mixed up, different capabilities across the board, that's what make thing interesting.
That's a Fair answer.... although I do not agree with the weighted value/thrill of the kill as you do. My nephew thinks as you do, and he's a good kid.
|

Djana Libra
DAB Black Legion.
261
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:36:00 -
[20] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Eve has sound?
no |

Cpt Arareb
DisturbedGamers.
52
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:36:00 -
[21] - Quote
pvp for me is solo/ micro gang pvp |

Skeln Thargensen
The Scope Gallente Federation
188
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
Alavaria wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:I'm pretty new to PvP myself. I mostly enjoy skulking around in my SB looking for soft targets or black ops fleets. PvP has taken a new turn in which I shoot torpedos at TEST Alliance Please Ignore (and various pets) structures. I hear it "generates content" for them when they need to show up for the resulting timer.
i hear you guys generated a lot of content for a bomber recently.
i can only commend this. freelance space bum |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
459
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:40:00 -
[23] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
To me, a kill is a kill. It means someone failed, and/or someone succeeded. Whether I succeeded in scouting him out and hunting him down with my gang, or whether I beat him straight up, it's still a kill.
Most people don't take the thought into account that there are a lot of factors besides "Oh they just had more people". No. They were better prepared than you, they batphoned faster/more efficiently than you did, they had a better fleet comp.
Or, you just didn't watch where you were going. A failure on your part is as good as a success on your adversary's part.
[Edit: Also, I reject the concept of equality as far it goes to "fair fights". No fights are fair and equal, except things like chess. And chess is boring as hell. Things being mixed up, different capabilities across the board, that's what make thing interesting.
That's a Fair answer.... although I do not agree with the weighted value/thrill of the kill as you do. My nephew thinks as you do, and he's a good kid.
So, if I understand you correctly, you find more gratification in say, a 1v1 frigate/cruiser/whatever fight than in a gang roam killing singles? Fair enough, certainly.
I find as much gratification getting on comms, rolling out with the bros and going to make somebody have a bad day, whoever is unlucky enough to get caught, lol. As far as PvP goes, I have always believed in "different strokes". Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Robert Saint
Playright
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:42:00 -
[24] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:PvP to me is the classic FPS definition: Player (human) vs Player (human) duking it out on a battlefield.
I've read many of your posts and you seem to find value in the match up? Like any good superhero story, it's boring if one side is too OP..
Where in EVE can you find a good match up, where you feel it was a good fight and not a "gank", but one where you and your opponent chat afterwards about the battle. Is there a magic place for this?
|

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
1331
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:one where you and your opponent chat afterwards about the battle. Is there a magic place for this?
No, Horde and Alliance aren't allowed to talk to eachother in case they hurt each other's feelings by saying mean things.
Oh god. |

Samillian
Angry Mustellid
267
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:46:00 -
[26] - Quote
ZOOMDAKADAKDAKDA 'SPLODE!!!!!
Yup.....I think that covers it. NBSI shall be the whole of the Law |

Robert Saint
Playright
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:49:00 -
[27] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
So, if I understand you correctly, you find more gratification in say, a 1v1 frigate/cruiser/whatever fight than in a gang roam killing singles? Fair enough, certainly.
I find as much gratification getting on comms, rolling out with the bros and going to make somebody have a bad day, whoever is unlucky enough to get caught, lol. As far as PvP goes, I have always believed in "different strokes".
I get the kicks factor you are talking about, and EVE certainly has that part covered.
It's the game of minds I find most challenging though in a PVP experience, chess or spaceships. If you don't want a challenge, then roam with a gang looking for solos to own. If you get lucky, you will find another gang and then you have a real challenge or at least close to it. I would argue the later is much more memorable to your game play and gets a rewind moment in local.
|

Jyuno Terkar
Blackwater Federation Dark Tide Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 22:52:00 -
[28] - Quote
PvP to me is a means to an end. I enjoy PvP when it's in pursuit of something, not just for the sake of doing it. What that PvP can be is many things, running from the honorable 1v1 to the ganks, from the small gang warfare to the blob, miners competing for asteroids to the traders selling it on the market. |

Carribean Queen
Vadimus Quarrier Works The Big Dirty
21
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 23:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
PVP, or also known as Player Vs. ***** occurs after getting blue balled multiple times by FW people who cloak and/or stab their ships. The only option to repair this is vigorous ************. |

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
557
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 23:35:00 -
[30] - Quote
It's something that lost ym interest slowly but surely ever since it became apaprent that a **** ton of people who participate in it spend more time/energy **** talking than actually playing the game. Win ro lose, success or defeat, you will always find someone to question your sexuality or insult your mother. I'm playing video games to chill and let the BS of a real life day go out. Not to have yet another kind fo BS to deal with.
I don't mean to say everybody is like that of course but the bad apples are still numerous. I let the people interested have fun at it and they can even interact with me when the game rules permit it but I am not really actively looking for it. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
459
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 23:42:00 -
[31] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
So, if I understand you correctly, you find more gratification in say, a 1v1 frigate/cruiser/whatever fight than in a gang roam killing singles? Fair enough, certainly.
I find as much gratification getting on comms, rolling out with the bros and going to make somebody have a bad day, whoever is unlucky enough to get caught, lol. As far as PvP goes, I have always believed in "different strokes".
I get the kicks factor you are talking about, and EVE certainly has that part covered. It's the game of minds I find most challenging though in a PVP experience, chess or spaceships. If you don't want a challenge, then roam with a gang looking for solos to own. If you get lucky, you will find another gang and then you have a real challenge or at least close to it. I would argue the later is much more memorable to your game play and gets a rewind moment in local.
Ah, so you objected to my chess comment then, that makes sense.
It isn't that I have no aptitude for it, merely that I do not, nor have I ever, found chess to be challenging/enjoyable for the challenge. Particularly since, by the 5th or 6th move of the game, the game has been determined. The rest of it is just the losing player figuring it out eventually. Same reason I hate StarCraft-style RTS games, they are so build order oriented that the game is won or lost before the players even make contact. It just rubs me the wrong way.
Yeah, perhaps gang roaming isn't a challenge when you jump on one guy. But it is PvP, and it's part of what I consider to be fun about it. It is always particularly good fun when you manage to jump another gang. Funny enough though, even flying a 7-8 man cruiser gang, I have seen even battlecruiser gangs twice our size scatter just because we managed to jump to 0 on them. (scouting RULES) Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
434
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 01:07:00 -
[32] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote:PvP to me is the classic FPS definition: Player (human) vs Player (human) duking it out on a battlefield.
I've read many of your posts and you seem to find value in the match up? Like any good superhero story, it's boring if one side is too OP.. Where in EVE can you find a good match up, where you feel it was a good fight and not a "gank", but one where you and your opponent chat afterwards about the battle. Is there a magic place for this?
EvE isn't a good "match up", considering it's a skills game, but quickly throws it away to make it like a FPS game.
In FPS games they have gear normalization. You can unlock more powerful weapons, but that buck private can kill a general with his pistol just as easy as the general can with an AK-47. That is how EvE operates in fighting mechanics.
In WoW, gear matters along with skill. To "match up" in arenas you are rated by the difficulty of your opponents based on previous wins. Kill a team with higher MMR, your rating goes up and vice versa if you're defeated. The odds are that the higher MMR players will win, because not only gear matters (top arena players are in 2200 gear which has better stats) their proficiency (knowing their class abilities well and counter tactics). EvE doesn't even have a rating system to judge proficiency like a true FPS game. EvE just scores who killed what and what was lost, no other stats apply.
At best EvE is a hybrid. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Forum Clone 77777
State War Academy Caldari State
127
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 01:10:00 -
[33] - Quote
Guys.. I think.. I really think this thread is a trap.. o,O |

Robert Saint
Playright
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 01:19:00 -
[34] - Quote
Forum Clone 77777 wrote:Guys.. I think.. I really think this thread is a trap.. o,O
Are we all being too civilized, is that it?
It is difficult to understand what motivates others to do things and why they enjoy this or other PVP gaming activities.
It is rather clear from my posts in this and other threads that I am more of the "We fight with honor" type of player, but since that is not all that obvious in EVE, it is also helpful to new players, PVE players and the general understanding of what PVP means to EVE's player base as a collective.
This understanding really helps those adverse to participating in PVP in EVE.
Most PVE players just think the PVP crowd players are jerks.....so this is a chance to talk about it.... that's all.. we're all gamers!
|

Rells
Fusillade.
32
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 02:23:00 -
[35] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:So EVE is a difficult game to figure out, as I try to balance my personal understanding of what Player Vs Player is.
Although, I have my personal view of what PVP, I would very much like to hear what anyone who is brave enough to post in GD.... as would others who read these threads.
Post with your MAIN, otherwise you're missing the point.
1) What is PVP to you? 2) Why do you like it?
With PVP you are fighting a thinking opponent, not a computer that can be mapped out and defeated with either the right setup or force. You can change a setup but your opponent can counter that setup. You can bring significant force but the other oponent can counter with tactics. Its ever changing, moving, difficult to perfect and that is what makes it worth doing.
Any person with half a brain can excel in PvE. It takes exceptional strategists and tacticians to excel at pvp.
To take out a fleet of 50 hacs with less than 20 players, takes skill. To hit and destroy ships of superior power with a coordinated frig attack takes skill. To modify tactics to allow 15 destroyers to decimate a 30 person mixed HAC, BS, Inty, Interdictor, Cruiser fleet takes exceptional skill, communication, guile and perseverance. Add to that the risk of losing your ship and clone and you have an experience unlike any other.
In short, PVE is boredom of the kind that kills people. Those who excel at pvp do pve because they have to to make money. They would much rather be out fighting. |

Verunae Caseti
Viziam Amarr Empire
108
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 03:12:00 -
[36] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:Do you feel that it is more rewarding to win in a PVP matchup if the odds are somewhat technically equal, and your skill was the deciding factor? Or are you perfectly comfortable being part of a gang that defeats a solo player that didn't have a chance?
That absolutely depends on what type of game I'm playing and what my goals are.
If you consider sports to be PvP, then balanced games are much more fun. I'd rather have a challenging game of pick-up basketball where the other team gives me a good run for my money than play a bunch of n'er-do-wells with two left feet who can't dribble the ball or find the backboard with a GPS.
But, take a game like No Limit Texas Hold'em with a few thousand dollars on the table, and I would MUCH rather go up against a bunch of rank-ass amateurs who wouldn't know a flush if they were trying to get rid of a bad case of post-Taco-Bell diarrhea.
In video games, again - it varies. Quick-twitch games like Team Fortress or Counterstrike tend to be more fun if the competition is rather even and games can go either way, then it feels exhilarating to win a match. But games like EVE can paint a different picture. Here "fairness" is more of a long-term concept, whereas individual encounters I seek to have an "unfair" advantage over my opponents whenever possible. If they want to even the playing field, they have every opportunity to join a corporation/alliance larger and more powerful than mine and come back and serve me a piping-hot or icy-cold dish of revenge. The game plays out over a much longer time frame and therefore the "evenness" of individual encounters is not as important as the balance of the game in the long run, and the ability of players to move within the social structure of the game and affect change.
This is one of EVE's great successes. By sticking to a single server, actions tend to have far-reaching and long-lasting consequences that you can't just run and hide from with a "name change" or a "server transfer." |

BiscuitMonsterr
University of Caille Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 04:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:BiscuitMonsterr wrote:
1) To me, PvP is difficult, complicated, boring and pointless. I don't enjoy it, I'm no good at it, and in 10 years of MMOs, I've not yet ever felt I'm missing out on much by avoiding it. The closest I come to 'participating' in PvP is when I successfully come back from losec after a ninja mining trip without encountering another player; I consider those times PvP victories.
2) I don't.
This is a fantastic and honest answer.. thank you! Question though: You most likely have played a game of Monopoly with someone before on the kitchen table. That is PVP in a sense, why is online so different? Is it the bully mentality that comes across?
I play a lot of boardgames (not monopoly though, its engine is broken), and I'm as good at them as my regular gaming group, which enables me to enjoy wins on occasion. With MMO PvP, I'm for some reason unable to attain a level of skill high enough to not just repeatedly be defeated in short order, which obviously isn't much fun. I don'mt play chess with a good friend because he's simply so much better than me that it's pointless. Chess is also a good example of a boardgame I don't really enjoy because it has no narrative, really, and MMO PvP also doesn't have any story, whereas a PvE mission or quest does (however poor they are). I need narrative to enjoy content if it's confrontational, usually. I don't play multiplayer CoD because it's repetitive and has no narrative.
Another aspect which turns me off is the bully/smacktalk/immaturity of a lot of PvPers. Talk of 'harvesting tears' makes me /facepalm tbh. I'm a big fan of comicbooks, and I've never seen Spiderman teabag the Green Goblin whilst saying 'loloHTFU noob u fail!' etc.
PvP all too often looks like 12-yr olds chest-pounding in a sandpit. |

Robert Saint
Playright
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 06:57:00 -
[38] - Quote
BiscuitMonsterr wrote:
PvP all too often looks like 12-yr olds chest-pounding in a sandpit.
I completely agree, and as a father of 5 kids, it's sad that PVP gamers think ganging up on solo players is winning, and they somehow did something amazing.
It's the publisher fault I feel for giving players so much freedom and not adding a more structured and entertaining PVP experience in game.... at least on some level.
I don't think it's actually possible in this game since it's so deeply convicted to open world only after ten years of the same thing, it's not changing. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
1332
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 06:59:00 -
[39] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:PVP gamers think ganging up on solo players is winning It is.
Oh god. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
173
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 07:01:00 -
[40] - Quote
PvP is any combat or activity in game that leads to combat. Market trades are not really PvP imo because they are consentual. Both side agree to the outcome whereas in true PvP both side are in conflict and the outcome is determined by other factors - ship, skill, luck.
Likewise PvE in null low high is not PvP until a player attacks and transforms it into PvP. Avoiding PvP is not PvP it is the inverse of PvP and while highly difficult and requiring skill at times still not PvP until you fail at it.
My PvP is war decs against alliances, I engage in cat and mouse games, and the occasional hit and run on a member who makes a mistake and becomes separated vulnerable. I use spies, locator agents, research each member often taking weeks of prep. My goal is to kill as many as possible without getting killed. I enjoy the thrill of the hunt and outsmarting the many. |

Sol Kal'orr
TLSG
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 09:33:00 -
[41] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Market trades are not really PvP imo because they are consentual. Both side agree to the outcome.
I bought up all the 'Item X' in region and now you have to pay 3x market to buy it. Did you consent to that? Sure you can buy it at the new price or go to another region, but either way, I have cost you ISK or time. Seeing as all you can lose in ship pew is ISK or time, I'd call it PVP.
|

Burl en Daire
The Ecstatic Cult of Dionysus Trifectas Syndicate
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 09:44:00 -
[42] - Quote
Alavaria wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:I'm pretty new to PvP myself. I mostly enjoy skulking around in my SB looking for soft targets or black ops fleets. PvP has taken a new turn in which I shoot torpedos at TEST Alliance Please Ignore (and various pets) structures. I hear it "generates content" for them when they need to show up for the resulting timer.
This is PvP, PSYOPs is an entertaining form of PvP and it works. These types of PvP are not in other games and to me everything is PvP in one form or another. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
174
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 09:55:00 -
[43] - Quote
Sol Kal'orr wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Market trades are not really PvP imo because they are consentual. Both side agree to the outcome. I bought up all the 'Item X' in region and now you have to pay 3x market to buy it. Did you consent to that? Sure you can buy it at the new price or go to another region, but either way, I have cost you ISK or time. Seeing as all you can lose in ship pew is ISK or time, I'd call it PVP. You may call it anything you wish. It doesnt change it to that. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1213
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 10:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
174
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 11:07:00 -
[45] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious.
The generally accepted definition in the gamer community is combat. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy SpaceMonkey's Alliance
549
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 11:10:00 -
[46] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious.
If I drop a fleet of 50 macks on your ass and mine the ice out from under you, it's most certainly PvP. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
462
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 11:13:00 -
[47] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious. The generally accepted definition in the gamer community is combat.
In the gamer community, yes. In EVE? No. And if you don't think the market counts, then you haven't been on the recieving end of some good market PvP. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
174
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 12:17:00 -
[48] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious. If I drop a fleet of 50 macks on your ass and mine the ice out from under you, it's most certainly PvP. No, its not. |

Seven Koskanaiken
Clan Steel Wolves
256
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 12:23:00 -
[49] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:BiscuitMonsterr wrote:
PvP all too often looks like 12-yr olds chest-pounding in a sandpit.
I completely agree, and as a father of 5 kids, it's sad that PVP gamers think ganging up on solo players is winning, and they somehow did something amazing. It's the publisher fault I feel for giving players so much freedom and not adding a more structured and entertaining PVP experience in game.... at least on some level. I don't think it's actually possible in this game since it's so deeply convicted to open world only after ten years of the same thing, it's not changing.
If you want entertaining pvp then create your own RvB entity with pvp rules that suit you and others who join you. No need to wait for the devs.
|

Norm Tempesta
The Konvergent League Sev3rance
38
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 12:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
"If I drop a fleet of 50 macks on your ass and mine the ice out from under you, it's most certainly PvP."
Haha, for some reason a fleet of 50 macks 'on my ass" cracks me up. It might cause a wardec if you did it consistently to the wrong corp, but I don't consider it PVP. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
435
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 13:29:00 -
[51] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong
Considering how PvP is so borked, yeah, I can see how PvPers can consider anything PvP.
I mean they gank. That's the sum of MMO PvP. Everything must be PvP then!
At least in a FPS game there's some objective to fight for. A cause.
Guy asleep at a gatecamp for 8hrs only objective is having a ship when he wakes up. 
People are putting too much into PvP being "harder" and more "challenging". Even in WoW you can see the difference of an average raider vs an average PvPer...
Raider -- gemmed/enchanted/stats optimized and farms for better gear to get into HM raids.
PvPer -- No gems. No enchants. Never learned to optimize stats. He only wants to farm BGs. PvE is too hard.
Had an arena partner that was a great example that's even seen in EvE. 15 year-old kid. Naga mouse. Got every macro known programmed on it. Learned all of the tricks to look kewl among peers. But in arena, couldn't close...and he's DPS. Blamed everyone else, would even heal me (a healer) because he wasn't playing as a partner anyway -- but the basic arena strats, too hard to learn. He jumped into the BGs and that's all he knows and how he plays. To this day, does the same thing. All that talk and even macros, couldn't get past 1800 rating.
It's not PvP vs PvE. It's about applying yourself to be the best in things that you do. To have that self-respect to be an asset in a group, not just an ass. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Manfred Hideous
TOHOKU 9.0
43
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 13:38:00 -
[52] - Quote
Besides the obvious shoot people answer, I consider the following to be a form of PVP.
Exploration in null owned or claimed by alliances who aren't blue. Anything wormhole. Hauling through null/low. (If you don't agree, try running camps in a T1 hauler; It's fun) Ratting with reds nearby or in system.
Basically, anything where you know you are risking being shot at. If you're afk hauling through highsec, you're probably not PVPing, though you might run into someone who is anyway.
Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model. It might not be *fair* PVP but that doesn't make it less than PVP. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
2215
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 13:40:00 -
[53] - Quote
Manfred Hideous wrote:Besides the obvious shoot people answer, I consider the following to be a form of PVP.
Exploration in null owned or claimed by alliances who aren't blue. Anything wormhole. Hauling through null/low. (If you don't agree, try running camps in a T1 hauler; It's fun) Ratting with reds nearby or in system.
Basically, anything where you know you are risking being shot at. If you're afk hauling through highsec, you're probably not PVPing, though you might run into someone who is anyway.
Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model. It might not be *fair* PVP but that doesn't make it less than PVP.
Beautifully put. Allow me to be frank. You will not like me. You will not like me now, and you will not like men++ a good deal less as we go on. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
435
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 13:46:00 -
[54] - Quote
Manfred Hideous wrote:Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model.
Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP.
Easy kills. For lazy killers. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
2219
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 13:52:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Manfred Hideous wrote:Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model. Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP. Easy kills. For lazy killers.
And the alternative in World of Pandacraft is? Pet battles?
I am sincerely asking, since you are such a know-it-all and foretell prophecies like no one else can. Allow me to be frank. You will not like me. You will not like me now, and you will not like men++ a good deal less as we go on. |

Grimpak
Midnight Elites United Federation of Commerce
990
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 14:00:00 -
[56] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Manfred Hideous wrote:Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model. Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP. Easy kills. For lazy killers. oh no look at me. I expect people to go against their human condition and fight honourable battles and not bring ICBMs to their knife fights.
no sir, we can't have that! all fights must be at dawn at a 30 pace distance with flintlock pistols. have at thee! [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Manfred Hideous
TOHOKU 9.0
45
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 14:12:00 -
[57] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Manfred Hideous wrote:Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model. Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP. Easy kills. For lazy killers.
You must never have PVP'ed then. There are two wars going on right now with fleet fights being has and fun by all, or at least the winning side. There are plenty of people mutually shooting each other in space and many more performing in the subjects I listed earlier.
PVP is what you don't want. You wish that CCP would make ganking impossible and nul/low should have Concord. I've said it before; Perhaps this is not the game for you.
I imagine there are other games in space you could find that wouldn't offend your sensibilities. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
2222
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 14:14:00 -
[58] - Quote
Manfred Hideous wrote:
I imagine there are other games in space you could find that wouldn't offend your sensibilities.
Star Trek Online? Allow me to be frank. You will not like me. You will not like me now, and you will not like men++ a good deal less as we go on. |

Solutio Letum
Terpene Conglomerate
145
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 14:31:00 -
[59] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Manfred Hideous wrote:Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model. Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP. Easy kills. For lazy killers.
So if i was to gank your ganking fleet but you also had a gank support fleet waiting incase someone was about the gank your would that make all of us gankers?.......
Ganking is only taking such a uper hand and fisting it into an unsuspecting target, so yes, all of us would technically be gankers. But this is what pvp is about, trying to have a uper hand.
Ganking is only a word that was invented to try to blame the attackers for bringing to much ship or to high of a opposing force. |

Linna Baresi
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 14:57:00 -
[60] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:So EVE is a difficult game to figure out, as I try to balance my personal understanding of what Player Vs Player is.
Although, I have my personal view of what PVP, I would very much like to hear what anyone who is brave enough to post in GD.... as would others who read these threads.
Post with your MAIN, otherwise you're missing the point.
1) What is PVP to you? 2) Why do you like it?
1) Player vs Player combat, whether 1v1, in small groups or in large groups, whether in war games or in the open world. I'd like to exclude Arena style combat though... too artificial and static.
2) Fighting humans is entirely different from fighting scripted NPC's, and it's a lot more fun. I like the adrenaline rush of 1v1 and small group PVP. I LOVE outsmarting the other side in large group PVP. Member of <Fated> since 2003 fated.europefreeforum.com |

Robert Saint
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
99
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 15:32:00 -
[61] - Quote
Seven Koskanaiken wrote: But Open world and freedom is pretty much the fundamental basis for the whole game. I don't know why you would play if you disagreed with that aspect?
Well Seven, you're right 100% regarding the PVP in this game. So, that is exactly why I don't play the PVP part of this game. That's okay though, since I do enjoy the High Sec game play which includes missioning and selling toons on the bazaar. I personally just feel there is no PVP for me in this game, since I pretty much need a consensual combat scenario to enjoy that part of the gaming experience. It's a bit frustrating that much of the new content that CCP puts out is only in PVP areas, but I just don't get to play that part... Ships are cool though. To me, if there is no fairness or balance to it, it is a pointless activity.
In RL, my son (19) and two of his friends got jumped by a group of 15 guys who where having a drunken party. He did pretty well considering the odds and all three fought back - gave as much as they could, but my son looked like "rocky balboa" when I saw him after the battle. I wish so much that I was there to help him, but he remembers that day with his friends like it was Normandy, and actually loves the memories of the glory in battle. He was a hero to me for defending his friends, but the guys who jumped him on St. Patricks Day were "ALL COWARDS" period!!! Does Gaming life model Real Life mentality? Why did those 15 party guys feel it was acceptable. Sorry friends if there is no honor in gaming, then there is no point to play that part of it...
I love all the answers though in this thread, it's turning out to be great!!!!
Everyone is so different, in what they think is playing against other players...
I don't think anyone is really wrong, just some are a little too specific. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1213
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 22:21:00 -
[62] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious. The generally accepted definition in the gamer community is combat. other games offer a more limited variety of pvp activities. this does not change the meaning from 'player versus player'
(that's what pvp stands for just fyi)
this ~generally accepted definition~ [citation needed] is wrong |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1213
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 22:22:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong Considering how PvP is so borked, yeah, I can see how PvPers can consider anything PvP. I mean they gank. That's the sum of MMO PvP. Everything must be PvP then!At least in a FPS game there's some objective to fight for. A cause.Guy asleep at a gatecamp for 8hrs only objective is having a ship when he wakes up.  People are putting too much into PvP being "harder" and more "challenging". Even in WoW you can see the difference of an average raider vs an average PvPer... Raider -- gemmed/enchanted/stats optimized and farms for better gear to get into HM raids. PvPer -- No gems. No enchants. Never learned to optimize stats. He only wants to farm BGs. PvE is too hard. Had an arena partner that was a great example that's even seen in EvE. 15 year-old kid. Naga mouse. Got every macro known programmed on it. Learned all of the tricks to look kewl among peers. But in arena, couldn't close...and he's DPS. Blamed everyone else, would even heal me (a healer) because he wasn't playing as a partner anyway -- but the basic arena strats, too hard to learn. He jumped into the BGs and that's all he knows and how he plays. To this day, does the same thing. All that talk and even macros, couldn't get past 1800 rating. It's not PvP vs PvE. It's about applying yourself to be the best in things that you do. To have that self-respect to be an asset in a group, not just an ass. wtf |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
442
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 22:42:00 -
[64] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:other games offer a more limited variety of pvp activities. this does not change the meaning from 'player versus player'
(that's what pvp stands for just fyi)
this ~generally accepted definition~ [citation needed] is wrong
And EvE is no different.
Hiding under the skirt of "sandbox" doesn't excuse the definition: PvP is non NPC combat.
It's human PLAYER vs human PLAYER.
It's not fighting through the market.
It's not ship spinning in a PvP game.
It's not building ships in a PvP game.
It's actual non-NPC combat. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1213
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 22:55:00 -
[65] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:other games offer a more limited variety of pvp activities. this does not change the meaning from 'player versus player'
(that's what pvp stands for just fyi)
this ~generally accepted definition~ [citation needed] is wrong And EvE is no different. Hiding under the skirt of "sandbox" doesn't excuse the definition: PvP is non NPC combat. It's human PLAYER vs human PLAYER. It's not fighting through the market. It's not ship spinning in a PvP game. It's not building ships in a PvP game. It's actual non-NPC combat. no, 'versus' does not mean combat
anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong |

Manfred Hideous
TOHOKU 9.0
47
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 00:17:00 -
[66] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:other games offer a more limited variety of pvp activities. this does not change the meaning from 'player versus player'
(that's what pvp stands for just fyi)
this ~generally accepted definition~ [citation needed] is wrong And EvE is no different. Hiding under the skirt of "sandbox" doesn't excuse the definition: PvP is non NPC combat. It's human PLAYER vs human PLAYER. It's not fighting through the market. It's not ship spinning in a PvP game. It's not building ships in a PvP game. It's actual non-NPC combat.
Incorrect. Any time I can get the advantage of you (oh baby) I have PvPed. You have as well, even if you lost. I broaden that definition to it being PvP whenever you knowingly risk your ship and pod (or isk, reputation, ect) in whatever situation. If you take your retriever into 0.4 space to mine rocks, you can be owning peeps just by denying them a kill by being smart (and a bit lucky). |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
443
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 01:44:00 -
[67] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:no, 'versus' does not mean combat
anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong
Anyone who can't distinguish what is played in a solo game ISN'T PvP needs to see a neurologist. 
Manfred Hideous wrote:Incorrect. Any time I can get the advantage of you (oh baby) I have PvPed.
Missioning in EvE with NPCs is PvE.
Trading in EvE is PvE.
Mining in EvE is PvE.
Hauling goods in EvE is PvE.
Why?
Because it has nothing to do with another human fighting. It's activities you'll find in PvE games as well (can't be PvP in a solo PvE game, there isn't another human ingame to fight).
When fighting occurs with another human being during those activities, then, it's considered PvP. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Alaric Faelen
Sabotage Incorporated Executive Outcomes
139
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 02:39:00 -
[68] - Quote
The reason I play this game, and have for a few years now- is specifically because of the core pillars that Eve stands on. 1) Non-consensual PvP 2) real consequence for loss 3) it's hard
No other game offers that like Eve, and it makes PvP have real impact. Who cares about death in a game where the only consequence is a boring run as a ghost from a graveyard? Or where 200 deaths a night in an FPS game means nothing at all? Why bother putting any effort into anything so meaningless?
All the videos on YouTube about causality and one player making a real impact on possibly the entire game's population, are pretty much true. You just have to DO IT, actually undock and do it., but it's right there. This entire Fountain war came down to a few individuals and their personalities, but all of Eve is affected to some degree.
Fleet warfare in Eve is amazing. It scales incredibly well and rewards flying in fleets with other people. Specialized roles have enormous depth and variety. There is a big difference between being ABLE to do something in Eve, and being GOOD at it.
PvP is why I even log in. I do the absolute minimum PvE required to fund PvP. I made PvP my 'job' by flying for a sov alliance with an SRP. By flying alot and dying for the cause. |

Manfred Hideous
TOHOKU 9.0
47
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 02:41:00 -
[69] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Robert Saint wrote:Verunae Caseti wrote:Any gameplay element, combat or otherwise in which the skills, experience and abilities of one player are pitted against another and one emerges the benefactor or victor.
Verunae, I agree with your above statement. Do you feel that it is more rewarding to win in a PVP matchup if the odds are somewhat technically equal, and your skill was the deciding factor? Or are you perfectly comfortable being part of a gang that defeats a solo player that didn't have a chance? Which is more rewarding to you? Or are they the same value? [Edit: Also, I reject the concept of equality as far it goes to "fair fights". No fights are fair and equal, except things like chess. And chess is boring as hell. Things being mixed up, different capabilities across the board, that's what make thing interesting.
Pretty much what I taught my kids. No fight outside a ring is fair, so do what you have to do to win conclusively and as fast as possible. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
443
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 03:26:00 -
[70] - Quote
Alaric Faelen wrote:No other game offers that like Eve, and it makes PvP have real impact. Who cares about death in a game where the only consequence is a boring run as a ghost from a graveyard? Or where 200 deaths a night in an FPS game means nothing at all? Why bother putting any effort into anything so meaningless?
Because you don't play responsible roles. If you did, it isn't meaningless.
You're used to dying because if you die, so what? YOU need the challenge of what a tank or healer in those games get by default, and are blamed if anything goes wrong. YOU have the luxury to sit back and just fight without care.
Without responsibilities you can be carefree. Nice isn't it?
Turn that around, yeah, you'll learn that dying is easy but if you die, all the rest dies. That's not fun.
See I play both sides of the coin. Be it a raider or a PvPer. But I'm not blinded to see PvP is carefree. It's not designed to have responsibilities, and for the most part, objectives. When I PvP it's about fun, it's about chilling. All of the work that is needed for a successful raid for example isn't needed. I still play a responsible role, but PvPers die so readily and healers are #1 targets, they hardly complain. If that's the players daily diet they would want something more challenging. But when I PvP it's to relax. The pressure isn't there in PvP. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
2233
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 06:37:00 -
[71] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Alaric Faelen wrote:No other game offers that like Eve, and it makes PvP have real impact. Who cares about death in a game where the only consequence is a boring run as a ghost from a graveyard? Or where 200 deaths a night in an FPS game means nothing at all? Why bother putting any effort into anything so meaningless? Because you don't play responsible roles. If you did, it isn't meaningless. You're used to dying because if you die, so what? YOU need the challenge of what a tank or healer in those games get by default, and are blamed if anything goes wrong. YOU have the luxury to sit back and just fight without care. Without responsibilities you can be carefree. Nice isn't it? Turn that around, yeah, you'll learn that dying is easy but if you die, all the rest dies. That's not fun. See I play both sides of the coin. Be it a raider or a PvPer. But I'm not blinded to see PvP is carefree. It's not designed to have responsibilities, and for the most part, objectives. When I PvP it's about fun, it's about chilling. All of the work that is needed for a successful raid for example isn't needed. I still play a responsible role, but PvPers die so readily and healers are #1 targets, they hardly complain. If that's the players daily diet they would want something more challenging. But when I PvP it's to relax. The pressure isn't there in PvP.
Perhaps you should tell people that your PVP experiences is from WoW and not EVE. Allow me to be frank. You will not like me. You will not like me now, and you will not like men++ a good deal less as we go on. |

Call Rollard
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve The Fourth District
60
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 11:24:00 -
[72] - Quote
PVP in EVE is a challenge. It's mostly about the tactics you use and ships etc. Especially if you go to FC fleets you take responsibility for the ships and members of your fleet and you need to decide what to do next fast.
I've PVP'd mostly in 0.0 which is where I prefer it most, usually medium sized and small fleets I've flown in. i'm not really a fan of massive scale PVP.
You also have limited supplies, you can't just keep attacking with all your Battleships all the time for example otherwise you'd eventually run out of ISK etc. |

Velarra
256
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 13:37:00 -
[73] - Quote
1. Logging in. 2. Because of Eve. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
449
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 14:23:00 -
[74] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Perhaps you should tell people that your PVP experiences is from WoW and not EVE.
I will tell them that I play or have played...
WoW EvE EQII RIFT DDO A lot of F2P MMOs Assortment of MuDs Deus Ex Battlefield series (and quite well) Quake/Quake II Hexxen Homeworld series Age of Empires series Commandos series Silent Hunter series And yeah, even The Sims and Motorhead (good COMPUTER game music!)
And still have the DOS games on 5.25" from the old days of computer gaming with a computer that still works that can play them as is.
So I play WoW and damn proud of it.
Your excuse again? Scared of some goblins?
   "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Kitty Bear
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Tribal Band
729
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 14:39:00 -
[75] - Quote
to me it's a matter of semantics and there are a vast, vociferous hoard of players in eve who play the semantics card most frequently
pvp is blowing up stuff, that is owned/controlled or operated by another player everything else is merely aggressive competitive play
on the market, you compete with other players in ships you fight other players (this is where the semantics fanbois get there jollies)
I enjoy pvp, because fighting against another real person is so much more challenging than fighting against a scripted npc ship but i'm not very good at it, which can get a little frustrating, but it's still good entertainment |

Manfred Hideous
TOHOKU 9.0
47
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 15:48:00 -
[76] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:[quote=Ace Uoweme][quote=Alaric Faelen]
Perhaps you should tell people that your PVP experiences is from WoW and not EVE.
And that presumes that WoW PVP even *is* PVP. There's no consequence to losing in 99% of MMOs. That's why I continue to play this terrible game. :) |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
2235
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 16:19:00 -
[77] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Alpheias wrote:Perhaps you should tell people that your PVP experiences is from WoW and not EVE. I will tell them that I play or have played... WoW EvE EQII RIFT DDO A lot of F2P MMOs Assortment of MuDs Deus Ex Battlefield series (and quite well) Quake/Quake II Hexxen Homeworld series Elder Scroll series (from Morrowind) Age of Empires series Commandos series Silent Hunter series And yeah, even The Sims and Motorhead (good COMPUTER game music!) And still have the DOS games on 5.25" from the old days of computer gaming with a computer that still works that can play them as is.So I play WoW and damn proud of it. Your excuse again? Scared of some goblins?   
No excuse. Just saying that if you if you want to engage people in a conversation about PVP, you should just say that your experience is based only on previous MMOs, like WoW, where you have PvPed if you want to contribute.
To say anything else would just be dishonest, I think. Allow me to be frank. You will not like me. You will not like me now, and you will not like men++ a good deal less as we go on. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1213
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 23:48:00 -
[78] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:no, 'versus' does not mean combat
anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong Anyone who can't distinguish what is played in a solo game ISN'T PvP needs to see a neurologist.  noone was talking about solo games |

Mark Androcius
157
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 00:20:00 -
[79] - Quote
Robert Saint wrote:So EVE is a difficult game to figure out, as I try to balance my personal understanding of what Player Vs Player is.
Although, I have my personal view of what PVP, I would very much like to hear what anyone who is brave enough to post in GD.... as would others who read these threads.
Post with your MAIN, otherwise you're missing the point.
1) What is PVP to you? 2) Why do you like it?
Many options. 1: you live somewhere and somebody wants to take that away from you or make it unsafe, so you kill the dude. 2: You live somewhere, but you have so many friends, that the amount of space you occupy is not big enough anymore, so you try to take some away from someone else and that someone else will take option 1. 3: I build a LOT of ship components and modules and ammo, if i or my friends or anybody else for that matter, didn't kill each other often enough, who's gonna buy those? 4: I like your space, 2 people can not occupy the exact same space. 5: Making ships go boom makes me.... i dunno, it just makes me feel good. 6: the new podding scene..... WOW 7: You build the same things i do, DIE COMPETITION DIE!!!!! :P 8: If your corporation can't mine that ice, it will be worth more iskies to me ( seeing as i now can, if i wanted to )
O btw, when i say you, i do not specifically mean you, just whoever i or we are up against. If a man speaks his mind in the forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong? |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3082
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 00:39:00 -
[80] - Quote
PVP to me is a lot of fun, but unfortunately something I have to make time for. Lately, thanks to incursions highsec is making into nullsec, I do more of that.
The problem is, I like a good encounter and not "stupid ship loss", so when I die, I want to get into another ship, and fight again. But I also like to look into why I lost - and that takes time I don't have.
So it's like the high-hanging fruit that tastes real good, but you really gotta reach for it.
Note that there's no sleep being lost over this situation, nor am I bleeding out my butt from the pain of not being able to do PVP for every moment I'm logged in. But it does make me reserved, asking "Do I have time for this tonight or should I just update the skill queue and log out?"
Oh well. It's a happy problem. Merely a game and all in good fun. |

Boober Fraggle
Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 00:48:00 -
[81] - Quote
Its takin that otha ****** chain and pawning that ************.
I would like to give a shout out to Ice-T, for teaching me how to PvP. #FLTG |

BiscuitMonsterr
University of Caille Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 08:35:00 -
[82] - Quote
Alaric Faelen wrote: This entire Fountain war came down to a few individuals and their personalities, but all of Eve is affected to some degree.
You say this as though everyone in New Edens thinks that's important. To hisec carebears like me, the only reason I know there's a 'Fountain War' going on is because people like yourself sometimes refer to it on the boards.
As far as its effect on the market, pff. An algorithm cpuld simulate all those fighting bots. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |