|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Tisisan
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 01:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ronce wrote: Give WH's instant local intel, just like null.
I'm sorry but No, your stupidity, laziness, and desire for effort free isk does not justify removing the single most wonderful thing there is about wormhole space.
(If you are mining with opened holes, without probes out (or at very least watching for a new sig to pop up, though there seems to be a slight delay on that so probes are better), you deserve to get podded over and over and over again, till you move back to high sec.)
|

Tisisan
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 01:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ronce wrote:Tisisan wrote:Ronce wrote: Give WH's instant local intel, just like null.
I'm sorry but No, your stupidity, laziness, and desire for effort free isk does not justify removing the single most wonderful thing there is about wormhole space. (If you are mining with opened holes, without probes out (or at very least watching for a new sig to pop up, though there seems to be a slight delay on that so probes are better), you deserve to get podded over and over and over again, till you move back to high sec.) Stupidy? Nope. sorry try again. Lazy? I'm doing 3 jobs while mining. Mining, Watching for new spans, and spamming d-scan. Desire for effort free isk? No, I work for my isk just like everyone else. I've put in my time in null, pirated in low, carebear'd in high. If the risk is the same, why should there be any difference. Why is it wonderful? Effort free kills cause they can't see you? In null: I jump into a system and see miners on scan, I warp to belts. In wh's: I see miners on scan, I warp to belts. Only difference? No intel channels, and no local flash. Why bother with the difference if there is barely any distinction?
You clearly implied that is you are mining with open holes. That is stupid. No other way around it.
You want wormhole ore without wormhole risk and wormhole effort. That is lazy.
The lack of local IS the difference. (See point above regarding "stupid.")
Go back to high sec. |

Tisisan
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 02:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
vizax vonkoffer wrote: I agree with Ronce, same corp or not.
Ronce:
Kleinrock Heavy Industries 2012/10/15 13:37 Elite-Force2010/09/05 06:562011/10/20 13:07 Dark Ashes2007/04/01 01:182008/03/27 02:42 SolidLine Industry2006/08/21 06:172007/04/01 01:17
vizax vonkoffer:
Kleinrock Heavy Industries2013/01/16 17:48 Elite-Force2010/05/28 02:002012/02/18 08:30 Dark Ashes2007/04/01 01:182008/03/24 17:25 SolidLine Industry2006/08/13 14:172007/04/01 01:17
Bet most of my alts would agree with me too... funny that.
Go back to high sec.
|

Tisisan
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 02:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
vizax vonkoffer wrote: Stop being a jerk about someone's legitimate opinion, just because you don't like it.
I am stating my opinions. Wait, what's that? Only you can do that?
Go back to high sec. |

Tisisan
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 02:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ronce wrote:OK, in an effort to turn this away from just a flaming ball of troll spit...
Look. I'm venturing a point that what happened to miners in wh's...
is equally repulsive as local channel being populated automatically in wh's...
WITH THE DIFFERENCE
that miners really did take one up the ass.
I would be right there with you complaining about local in a wh being like null, if it happened.
However, the point remains, that it DID happen to miners in wh's, with just a different channel of the mechanics.
You respond with "go back to HS" and I say "why bother, ccp is turning wh's into highsec, lowsec, nullsec anyways"
Ok. Can anyone else make out what he's saying here? He agrees with me. But he's making a point. Miners got ******. He would agree with me if wormholes turned into null. But it already happened.
Wut? I'm lost.
Look. Miners got a disadvantage from the last patch, people don't have to scan down sites any more. Yup. They also got an advantage. New sigs pop up automatically. You're solution to all of this is to give wormholes instant local. So it's like null sec. But you don't want it to be...
God, I'm lost again.
But you don't mine and don't lose ships mining, but you always dscan/check for sigs.. wut? Lost again...
I have a headache.
I am going to find alcohol.
You and your 'friend' who also really likes typing random phrases and words in all caps and using "..." should just, you guessed it, go back to high sec.
I hear they have local there. |

Tisisan
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 02:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
T0SHI KONI wrote:The real question should be why would you mine in WH in the first place when it is one on the least lucrative parts of the hole. I live in a C1 and make more shooting red crosses and mining gas than punching ark.
Damn, I had meant to add that to my list of stupid I put in the earlier post, but it got lost in the crowd :(
|

Tisisan
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
134
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kira Hhallas wrote:A question what is bothering me. Does the K162 side appears at the Moment you scan it to 100% or does it appears in the Moment warp to the static WH. What i know is , that if the sigs is scanned to 100% the WH will open the K162 and the timer beguns to run....
Can some confirm it ?
The second. You can scan it down and leave it and the other side will not show up till someone warps to your side later. |
|
|
|