| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Oninous
   |
Posted - 2005.12.11 18:00:00 -
[1]
You make a valid point GM Arkanon. The question in this situation is if the F-E pilots got stuck and you got stuck how where the 5 fleet able to jump in and not only be unaffected but also able to gank someone who was stuck at the gate?
|
Oninous
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 18:15:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Garnerius De'Nugent
Originally by: Amparo
We just wanted some sort of explanation ... how can some players be stuck and others not? ... several players managed to kill a ship in a system that other players got stuck in ... Not accusing anyone of anything here i'd just like to know how some people can be stuck and others not?
Just like how 80 .5. members got lagged out when 200 PA/NBSI/FE jumped into H-PA... how did the 200 northerns not get any lag, but 80 .5. members did? You all seem to have very short memories.
I remember this fleet battle... There was 150 ppl in local... All i saw that day was a blank screen for 30 minutes after the fight was over... but the 12 F-E that weren't looking at a blank screen said they saw one of your cargo cans warp away after they popped one of your ships LOL... We lost a few ships also. I don't get the .5. They come to fight us in our own space and complain of us blobbing...
|
Oninous
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 18:24:00 -
[3]
And i don't get FE.
.5. didn't get any ships back from the H-PA lagfest. FE don't get any ships back from this mess, and the GM's are biased in favour of .5.?
Education > Ranting tbh.
And your saying that F-E got back the ships they lost in the H-PA lagfest?
|
Oninous
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 18:35:00 -
[4]
No, and that's what proves the GM's have no bias. If they did, the GM's would have shown bias towards F-E.
Now when did I say the GM's were biased? In all my previous posts, I stated this needed to be looked into due to the fact that re-imbursement was refused even though there was a clear indication of a bug that gave the pilots a clear disadvantage. Qoute me one post where I said any of the GM's were alts or anything related to the .5. Don't confuse my posts with other ppl's posts. It's pure BS when someone loses because of a similar situation.
Your right, the H-PA lagfest stunk. We took equal losses. We notched it up to the recent inability of the server to manage significant sized fleet battles. Neither side complained because we knew the issue. In this case we just contested the denial of re-imbursement due to the obvious one sided disadvantage of 13 F-E pilots being stuck, scattered, relieved of their drones and ammo. On top of that, 12+ .5. pilots were able to log on 2 system over, hop in fast frigs, jump into the system and attack a "stuck" ship in a system on a "crashed node". To cap it off, we didn't get a pop-up warning window until the pilot was in a pod.
|
Oninous
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 18:48:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Garnerius De'Nugent
Originally by: Oninous
Now when did I say the GM's were biased? blah blah blah....
Errr.... you didn't. Whatsmore, I never said you did 
Re-read my post (numbered 35 in this thread) and maybe think to yourself that i've quoted more than one person. Maybe think to yourself that i wasn't actually aiming my comments at you.
And yet you keep quoting me and posting.... >.>
Not typical for somone to respond to comments regarding a post they quoted?
|
| |
|