| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Peter Armstrong
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:09:00 -
[1]
OK now guys who just seen top gear about the Bugatti Veyron . I mean ú5 mil each and OMG what a awesome car. So who seen it? and what u think?
The car i talking about
So anyone going to buy me one then??   
'Invictus maneo' Remain unvanquished |

wierchas noobhunter
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:10:00 -
[2]
blah looks stupid  i have better :P
|

Gericault m0id
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:15:00 -
[3]
Just watched top-gear too 
ú5m / car to produce (including development costs I guess)
They're making a loss selling for less than a million 
|

Asestorian
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:17:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Asestorian on 11/12/2005 21:16:43
Originally by: Gericault m0id Just watched top-gear too 
ú5m / car to produce (including development costs I guess)
They're making a loss selling for less than a million 
yes but only to prove it could be done..
Oh and.. wierchas.. i really doubt you have a better car than that 
I Make Sigs
|

System God
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:20:00 -
[5]
just looks like another ricer POS
CCP's Sig Sizes suck |

Peter Armstrong
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:21:00 -
[6]
yer man talk about wish list but least i can respect him that he had the once in the life time for that car. I mean WOOT   
ok now time to kick my mum car  
'Invictus maneo' Remain unvanquished |

Berneh
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:24:00 -
[7]
Top gear pwnz.
Even thought the fuel costs terrify me 
It was somehing like ú100 every 15minutes
|

Trey Azagthoth
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:35:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Trey Azagthoth on 11/12/2005 21:37:15
Originally by: System God just looks like another ricer POS
The term "ricer" denotes Asian built cars (mainly Japanese). Bugatti's are Italian/German/French made my friend, they are the furthest thing from "ricer" you can get. Put down the Fast and the Furious DVDs.
|

Princess Beefcurtains
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:39:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Berneh Top gear pwnz.
Even thought the fuel costs terrify me 
It was somehing like ú100 every 15minutes
ú100 every 12 minutes flat out... which is 12 minutes using up all 1000hp at the 'limited' top speed of 256mph
Quote: The term "ricer" denotes Asian built cars (mainly Japanese). Bugatti's are Italian made my friend, they are the furthest thing from "ricer" you can get. Put down the Fast and the Furious DVDs.
*cough* Brittish designed etc... get it right me ole china 
Click here to find weapons of mass destruction |

Trey Azagthoth
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:46:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains
Originally by: Berneh Top gear pwnz.
Even thought the fuel costs terrify me 
It was somehing like ú100 every 15minutes
ú100 every 12 minutes flat out... which is 12 minutes using up all 1000hp at the 'limited' top speed of 256mph
Quote: The term "ricer" denotes Asian built cars (mainly Japanese). Bugatti's are Italian made my friend, they are the furthest thing from "ricer" you can get. Put down the Fast and the Furious DVDs.
*cough* Brittish designed etc... get it right me ole china 
*cough* read article *cough* German designed 
|

Princess Beefcurtains
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:49:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Trey Azagthoth
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains
Originally by: Berneh Top gear pwnz.
Even thought the fuel costs terrify me 
It was somehing like ú100 every 15minutes
ú100 every 12 minutes flat out... which is 12 minutes using up all 1000hp at the 'limited' top speed of 256mph
Quote: The term "ricer" denotes Asian built cars (mainly Japanese). Bugatti's are Italian made my friend, they are the furthest thing from "ricer" you can get. Put down the Fast and the Furious DVDs.
*cough* Brittish designed etc... get it right me ole china 
*cough* read article *cough* German designed 
*cough* I read the article *cough* ignored it as I got the info of David Clarkson on Top Gear and trust that man more *splutter*
Click here to find weapons of mass destruction |

Monty Burns
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 21:59:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains .... at the 'limited' top speed of 256mph .....
 Thats the LIMITED top speed?!?!?!? Whats it actually capable of then   Darwin 4tw
|

Princess Beefcurtains
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 22:13:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Monty Burns
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains .... at the 'limited' top speed of 256mph .....
 Thats the LIMITED top speed?!?!?!? Whats it actually capable of then  
450km/hr+ ... not sure what that is in mph sorry
Click here to find weapons of mass destruction |

Verone
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 22:15:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains *cough* I read the article *cough* ignored it as I got the info of David Clarkson on Top Gear and trust that man more *splutter*
It'd help to know the guy's name before you trust him...
JEREMY CLARKSON.
Oh, and the bugatti is nice... nothing wrong with the way it looks at all.
|

Peter Armstrong
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 22:24:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Verone
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains *cough* I read the article *cough* ignored it as I got the info of David Clarkson on Top Gear and trust that man more *splutter*
It'd help to know the guy's name before you trust him...
JEREMY CLARKSON.
Oh, and the bugatti is nice... nothing wrong with the way it looks at all.
      
'Invictus maneo' Remain unvanquished |

Justus Imperius
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 22:25:00 -
[16]
450 km/hr = 125 m/s
that thing is faster than some bs's :D
- Justice handed by the bomb and the gun is terror elsewhere in the world I'm from. |

qrac
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 23:36:00 -
[17]
Edited by: qrac on 11/12/2005 23:37:35 the bugatti veyron is definately NOT faster than a formula 1 car. a f1 car would eat it in acceleration, cornering and top speed. the bugatti veyron is definately NOT capable of doing 450 km/h and it's not limited. ------------------------------------------- Insanes numquam moriuntur! |

My grandfather
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 23:39:00 -
[18]
Originally by: qrac the bugatti veyron is definately NOT faster than a formula 1 car. a f1 car would eat it both in acceleration, cornering and top speed. the bugatti veyron is definately NOT capable of doing 450 km/h and it's not limited.
F1 cars are regulated to drive around 350 I believe. They just aren't allowed to go faster on the tracks. This thing drives 412 on a good road. Is still faster then 350 I think. 
|

Verone
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 23:47:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Car Site Babble In the real world, this 736kW and 1250Nm combines with the 7-speed, all-wheel drive transmission and a 1600kg kerb weight to propel the Bugatti Veyron to 100km/h from rest in 2.9 seconds.

4 wheel drive, 7 speed box.
Turn off all the driver aids in that thing, as well as in the F1 car and it would eat an F1 car for breakfast through a quarter mile, and probably handle a track better.
Formula One relies too much on driver aids like Traction control, Clutchless semi-auto boxes, Launch control, and lots of other silly stuff.
Remove all that, and all you have is a really expensive carbon fiber go-kart that can't get it's power transmitted to the road without spinning it's rear wheels through every gear.
The Bugatti has the weight to get it's power to the road effectively, and therefore the downforce to hold the road at lower speeds without the driver aids if driven properly.
[center]
|

Trey Azagthoth
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 23:49:00 -
[20]
Fun fact for j00z peeps. F1 cars produce so much downforce, that they would infact be able to race upside down and stick to the surface on which they drive.
|

Verone
|
Posted - 2005.12.11 23:51:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Trey Azagthoth Fun fact for j00z peeps. F1 cars produce so much downforce, that they would infact be able to race upside down and stick to the surface on which they drive.
Yeah, pretty cool... 
Shame it's only at high enough speed to be effective though.
|

qrac
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 00:17:00 -
[22]
Edited by: qrac on 12/12/2005 00:18:12
Originally by: My grandfather
Originally by: qrac the bugatti veyron is definately NOT faster than a formula 1 car. a f1 car would eat it both in acceleration, cornering and top speed. the bugatti veyron is definately NOT capable of doing 450 km/h and it's not limited.
F1 cars are regulated to drive around 350 I believe. They just aren't allowed to go faster on the tracks. This thing drives 412 on a good road. Is still faster then 350 I think. 
umm... this year kimi raikkonen did 370 km/h down the straight in monza. i think some were even faster in practice and the speed trap is a bit before the braking zone which means he was well over 370.
didn't the veyron only reach 407 km/h. even the 412 km/h is slower than the speed the bar honda f1 car reached at the airport in mojave.
the veyron had some problems braking the 400 km/h limit when a swedish journalist was driving it because he had the ac on  ------------------------------------------- Insanes numquam moriuntur! |

Filan
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 00:19:00 -
[23]
translation of what this car really is......
|

Princess Beefcurtains
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 00:26:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Verone
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains *cough* I read the article *cough* ignored it as I got the info of David Clarkson on Top Gear and trust that man more *splutter*
It'd help to know the guy's name before you trust him...
JEREMY CLARKSON.
Oh, and the bugatti is nice... nothing wrong with the way it looks at all.
Oh Sh*t... wtf... where did David come from   ermmm... *Beefy points to all the empty boor cans and the half bottle of vodka*
Click here to find weapons of mass destruction |

qrac
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 00:27:00 -
[25]
Edited by: qrac on 12/12/2005 00:29:01
Originally by: Verone Edited by: Verone on 11/12/2005 23:50:00

4 wheel drive, 7 speed box.
Turn off all the driver aids in that thing, as well as in the F1 car and it would eat an F1 car for breakfast through a quarter mile, and probably handle a track better.
Formula One relies too much on driver aids like Traction control, Clutchless semi-auto boxes, Launch control, and lots of other silly stuff.
Remove all that from an F1 car, and all you have is a really expensive carbon fiber go-kart that can't get it's power transmitted to the road without spinning it's rear wheels through every gear, purely because it's so light, and has little or no downforce at low speed.
The Bugatti has the weight to get it's power to the road effectively off the line, and therefore the downforce to hold the road at lower speeds without the driver aids through low speed corners if driven properly.
there is no launch control on f1's nowadays. there is no way in hell that the veyron would even be close to a f1 on a track even with the f1 in low downforce mode and the traction control turned off.
here's the proof of a lola champ car beating the veyron's claimed figures: http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0509_mile_spread_carts.pdf
we all know that a f1 accelerates faster than a champcar. ------------------------------------------- Insanes numquam moriuntur! |

Princess Beefcurtains
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 00:35:00 -
[26]
Originally by: qrac Edited by: qrac on 11/12/2005 23:37:35 the bugatti veyron is definately NOT faster than a formula 1 car. a f1 car would eat it in acceleration, cornering and top speed. the bugatti veyron is definately NOT capable of doing 450 km/h and it's not limited.
Yes, it is limited to 400km/h, Yes an F1 would win in cornering and poss acceleration (veyrons best 0-60 in tests was just over 2.5 seconds) however, with the rear spoiler on the veyron retracted it can get to 300km/hr in just over 14 seconds and unlimited has reached 448km/hr before it ran out of test track, at this point the car was still accelerating. There has been speculations about taking one to the same place the land speed record was set to find actual top speed, but because of the cost and rarity of the cars and the safety implications, nobody has yet done so.
Click here to find weapons of mass destruction |

Trey Azagthoth
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 02:39:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains
Originally by: qrac Edited by: qrac on 11/12/2005 23:37:35 the bugatti veyron is definately NOT faster than a formula 1 car. a f1 car would eat it in acceleration, cornering and top speed. the bugatti veyron is definately NOT capable of doing 450 km/h and it's not limited.
Yes, it is limited to 400km/h, Yes an F1 would win in cornering and poss acceleration (veyrons best 0-60 in tests was just over 2.5 seconds) however, with the rear spoiler on the veyron retracted it can get to 300km/hr in just over 14 seconds and unlimited has reached 448km/hr before it ran out of test track, at this point the car was still accelerating. There has been speculations about taking one to the same place the land speed record was set to find actual top speed, but because of the cost and rarity of the cars and the safety implications, nobody has yet done so.
Ok Beefy, lets just put it like this. NO ROADCAR can ever match an F1 racer on the circuit, ever. Its a simple power to weight ratio.
|

Thomus
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 09:46:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains nobody has yet done so.
right you lot, lets all make PayPal donations to... me, so that i can buy one, and go test it. 
---------------- Tom |

solidshot
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 09:51:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Thomus
Originally by: Princess Beefcurtains nobody has yet done so.
right you lot, lets all make PayPal donations to... me, so that i can buy one, and go test it. 
thought you were whining the other day that speed was bad?
|

Nekhad Jormuzzar
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 10:10:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Nekhad Jormuzzar on 12/12/2005 10:10:26
As others have mentioned, F1 cars use a lot of downforce to be able to balance speed along the whole track, which is generally dominated by curves. In circuits like the old Hockenheim, downforce was not needed as much, and top speeds were higher, while in Monaco, for example, corner speed is the prevalent concern. If you were to lighten the downforce created by one of these cars it would beat hands down the Veyron and any other road car in existance, even with the limits the FIA puts on F1 car performance (for safety, mostly, since F1 cars are getting faster by the week at an alarming pace).
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |