| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mary Kingsley
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 16:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://www.twitch.tv/zbezz/b/435055648
How can ccp look the other way as they press |

Ripley13
Scrub Fleet
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 17:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
I don't see anything wrong with what he is doing. The same can be done even without isboxer, just takes a tad bit more effort with having several more monitors set up. Like this guy: https://sites.google.com/site/khromtor/ |

Charadrass
AngryGermans
68
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 17:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
ripley13, don't feed the troll. there are hundreds of threads about this. ccp stated clear, that if you don't do something not wanted by the terms of use, you can use this software.
|

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
723
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 04:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mary Kingsley wrote:http://www.twitch.tv/zbezz/b/435055648
How can ccp look the other way . This has to be wrong
Then explain why or GTFO. Eve is Real |

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
95
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 04:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Then explain why or GTFO.
It's generally bad for a game if third party software gives some players a huge advantage (automated or not). The Eve community has such a dense developer/IT component that CCP can get away with semi-integrated third party tools, but the OP's intuition is fairly reasonable given that almost every other game takes a stricter stance. |

bloodknight2
Talledega Knights PLEASE NOT VIOLENCE OUR BOATS
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 05:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
If isboxing is so OP, do it too and stop crying. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
723
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 07:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
S Byerley wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Then explain why or GTFO. It's generally bad for a game if third party software gives some players a huge advantage (automated or not). The Eve community has such a dense developer/IT component that CCP can get away with semi-integrated third party tools, but the OP's intuition is fairly reasonable given that almost every other game takes a stricter stance.
Whats the advantage?
10 way split with 10x the loot is 1x rate of gain.
It gives CCP 9 extra subs.
Eve is Real |

Colonel Hans Landa
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 11:32:00 -
[8] - Quote
S Byerley wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Then explain why or GTFO. It's generally bad for a game if third party software gives some players a huge advantage (automated or not). The Eve community has such a dense developer/IT component that CCP can get away with semi-integrated third party tools, but the OP's intuition is fairly reasonable given that almost every other game takes a stricter stance.
What, you mean like World of Warcraft?
No. You are wrong. There is a an infamous player (and a handful like him exist) who multiboxes 40+ accounts at a time and completely locks down PvP areas for the opposite faction. I can't be bothered finding you a twitch link but trust me he exists and also used to stream his activites on the regular. Blizzard are completely happy to allow this, who, like CCP, also have a very strict and no tolerance policy when it comes to "hacks", exploits, bots and all other sorts of illegitimate activities against the TOS.
I personally see no problem with it, as long as nothing is automated. It takes a bit of research and practice to get your Isboxer setup running efficiently and well, and there is no automation whatsoever. |

Annunaki soldier
Segmentum Solar Nulli Secunda
80
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 12:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
He still pays 40 accounts and have to click. No botting in that Ride hard, live with passion-á |

Charadrass
AngryGermans
70
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 14:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
besides that an equal fleet on numbers easily kills the 40+ multiboxer.
|

Hopelesshobo
Red Dwarf Mining Corporation space weaponry and trade
65
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 14:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Charadrass wrote:besides that an equal fleet on numbers easily kills the 40+ multiboxer.
Unless its a 40+ multibox alpha fleet. Lowering the average to make you look better since 2012. |

Shave Well
PT RESEARCH INSTITUTE
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 14:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
ISBoxer and macros a gray area that CCP neglects
Both, with 1 click can do multiple actions automatically: ISBoxer do it simultaneously on several selected pre-defined accounts, macros do it for a certain amount of time and have to be called on any selected account you want to run it. Very few diferences, for the same result: automation, less click stress. First is not against the rules, but the second is. The major difference is macros can be run while player is afk and ISBoxer needs a human in front of PC as far as i know
CCP wants ele online players to be social, however they permit the use of programs like ISBoxer that (insert shock face).
Finally, the only reasons i can figure to the legality of this program are: they can't detect it (yet) or they want to catch the remaining bot users that still use ISBoxer on their bots. |

Cambarus
Veni Vidi Vaselini
328
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 19:01:00 -
[13] - Quote
Shave Well wrote: Finally, the only reasons i can figure to the legality of this program are: they can't detect it (yet) or they want to catch the remaining bot users that still use ISBoxer on their bot programs
CCP supports the use of multiboxers because for every guy running 20 accounts, they're getting paid 20 times over. THey've supported ISBoxing specifically for years now; this is not something that will be going away any time soon. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
723
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 20:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
Shave Well wrote:ISBoxer and macros a gray area that CCP neglects Both, with 1 click can do multiple actions automatically: ISBoxer do it simultaneously on several selected pre-defined accounts, macros do it for a certain amount of time and have to be called on any selected account you want to run it. Very few diferences, for the same result: automation, less click stress. First is not against the rules, but the second is.  The major difference is macros can be run while player is afk and ISBoxer needs a human in front of PC as far as i know CCP wants ele online players to be social, however they permit the use of programs like ISBoxer (insert shock face). Finally, the only reasons i can figure to the legality of this program are: they can't detect it (yet) or they want to catch the remaining bot users that still use ISBoxer on their bot programs
Less button clicks aren't against the eula, gaining things and a disproportionate rate are.
Example ; You have a macro keyboard. You set it up to do the pseudo covert ops cloak trick that can be done manually quite easily. You are not gaining anything except not having to do the same repetitive motions. That's legal.
Eve is Real |

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
95
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 21:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
Colonel Hans Landa wrote:What, you mean like World of Warcraft?
No. You are wrong. There is a an infamous player (and a handful like him exist) who multiboxes 40+ accounts at a time and completely locks down PvP areas for the opposite faction. I can't be bothered finding you a twitch link but trust me he exists and also used to stream his activites on the regular. Blizzard are completely happy to allow this, who, like CCP, also have a very strict and no tolerance policy when it comes to "hacks", exploits, bots and all other sorts of illegitimate activities against the TOS.
I personally see no problem with it, as long as nothing is automated. It takes a bit of research and practice to get your Isboxer setup running efficiently and well, and there is no automation whatsoever.
WoW is a terrible example and it doesn't even support your point. ISBoxer falls under the "we can ban you for 3rd party software if we feel like it" bit of their EULA. Similarly, Blizzard's official stance is:
"some behavior of multiboxers can be reported"
Which translates to: "We'll ban you for it if you're pissing people off"
There are numerous instances, for example, of people ISBoxing most of a group and getting banned for pissing people off (by virtue of ISBoxer because it's fairly inefficient) in the auto-group-thingy-queue.
Cipher Jones wrote:Whats the advantage?
10 way split with 10x the loot is 1x rate of gain.
It gives CCP 9 extra subs.
Obviously, 10x manpower doesn't equate to 10x loot. I mean, the posted video is of soloing incursions. I'm all ears if you can't teach me to run incursions efficiently in a solo apoc.
He's also presumably buying PLEX with all the incursion money. I don't feel like having a bad economics discussion, but buying 9x PLEX does NOT directly equate to paying CCP 9x subscriptions.
(to reiterate: I have no problem with ISBoxer in Eve, but these arguments are terribad) |

Charadrass
AngryGermans
70
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 21:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
i actually buying gtc for my 20+ accounts. my Impact on the market is Zero, on the contrary.
so go on with your flames. |

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
95
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 22:46:00 -
[17] - Quote
Charadrass wrote:i actually buying gtc for my 20+ accounts. my Impact on the market is Zero, on the contrary.
so go on with your flames.
I know this isn't strictly an English speaking game and I try not to insult people based on their 2nd language, but I have no idea what you were trying to write.
|

Charadrass
AngryGermans
70
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 23:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
Google translator is able to understand my bad english. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
591
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
One guy is doing what whole "incursion alliances" refuse to do as a result of being giant pussies
|

Tauranon
Weeesearch
209
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:30:00 -
[20] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:S Byerley wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Then explain why or GTFO. It's generally bad for a game if third party software gives some players a huge advantage (automated or not). The Eve community has such a dense developer/IT component that CCP can get away with semi-integrated third party tools, but the OP's intuition is fairly reasonable given that almost every other game takes a stricter stance. Whats the advantage? 10 way split with 10x the loot is 1x rate of gain. It gives CCP 9 extra subs.
Presuming he makes 70mil/character and plays 10 hours a week at it, he'll be seeing ~30bil a month, with a bit over 5bil / mo costs if plexing the characters.
Consider it currently the same as holding 10 R64s for the month.
|

Rolstra
Moo's Mudpit
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:47:00 -
[21] - Quote
With careful investments, and persistent incursion running ISK I have managed to amass over half a trillion ISK with just one toon in the last 18 months.
Imagine how much someone could get running 20 at a time.
Nothing wrong with it, just figured some real numbers might help with the perspective. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
725
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 04:29:00 -
[22] - Quote
Tauranon wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:S Byerley wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Then explain why or GTFO. It's generally bad for a game if third party software gives some players a huge advantage (automated or not). The Eve community has such a dense developer/IT component that CCP can get away with semi-integrated third party tools, but the OP's intuition is fairly reasonable given that almost every other game takes a stricter stance. Whats the advantage? 10 way split with 10x the loot is 1x rate of gain. It gives CCP 9 extra subs. Presuming he makes 70mil/character and plays 10 hours a week at it, he'll be seeing ~30bil a month, with a bit over 5bil / mo costs if plexing the characters. Consider it currently the same as holding 10 R64s for the month.
And he'll have the same amount of ISK leftover per toon as everyone else in New Eden who makes 70 mil an hour. And he'll spend the same amount of time farming PLEX as anyone who makes 70 mil an hour.
Quote:Obviously, 10x manpower doesn't equate to 10x loot. I mean, the posted video is of soloing incursions. I'm all ears if you can't teach me to run incursions efficiently in a solo apoc.
He's also presumably buying PLEX with all the incursion money. I don't feel like having a bad economics discussion, but buying 9x PLEX does NOT directly equate to paying CCP 9x subscriptions.
I can teach you to run vanguards in 10 ships on 10 accounts total. You cant run Incursions efficiently in any amount of Apocs.
Buying PLEX, GTC, or Subs does equate to money CCP is collecting. All 3 of those items can be purchased and activated at a later date so save the economics rhetoric. Eve is Real |

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 05:35:00 -
[23] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Buying PLEX, GTC, or Subs does equate to money CCP is collecting. All 3 of those items can be purchased and activated at a later date so save the economics rhetoric.
PLEX equates to money that CCP collected in the past. Buying PLEX increases the demand, but that doesn't necessarily increase the supply - let alone directly equate to paying CCP money. I hate over complicated economic nonsense more than the next guy, but this is a pretty fundamental thing you can't assume. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
725
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 05:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
S Byerley wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Buying PLEX, GTC, or Subs does equate to money CCP is collecting. All 3 of those items can be purchased and activated at a later date so save the economics rhetoric. PLEX equates to money that CCP collected in the past. Buying PLEX increases the demand, but that doesn't necessarily increase the supply - let alone directly equate to paying CCP money. I hate over complicated economic nonsense more than the next guy, but this is a pretty fundamental thing you can't assume.
You can buy single PLEX directly from CCP. Eve is Real |

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 05:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:S Byerley wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Buying PLEX, GTC, or Subs does equate to money CCP is collecting. All 3 of those items can be purchased and activated at a later date so save the economics rhetoric. PLEX equates to money that CCP collected in the past. Buying PLEX increases the demand, but that doesn't necessarily increase the supply - let alone directly equate to paying CCP money. I hate over complicated economic nonsense more than the next guy, but this is a pretty fundamental thing you can't assume. You can buy single PLEX directly from CCP.
OK? We were talking about someone buying it off the market with ISK to renew their subscription,
|

Tobias Hareka
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 06:06:00 -
[26] - Quote
S Byerley wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:S Byerley wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Buying PLEX, GTC, or Subs does equate to money CCP is collecting. All 3 of those items can be purchased and activated at a later date so save the economics rhetoric. PLEX equates to money that CCP collected in the past. Buying PLEX increases the demand, but that doesn't necessarily increase the supply - let alone directly equate to paying CCP money. I hate over complicated economic nonsense more than the next guy, but this is a pretty fundamental thing you can't assume. You can buy single PLEX directly from CCP. OK? We were talking about someone buying it off the market with ISK to renew their subscription,
Where do you think that PLEX came from in the first place? Yes, someone bought hat PLEX from CCP earlier. |

Tauranon
Weeesearch
209
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 07:48:00 -
[27] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Tauranon wrote:
Presuming he makes 70mil/character and plays 10 hours a week at it, he'll be seeing ~30bil a month, with a bit over 5bil / mo costs if plexing the characters.
Consider it currently the same as holding 10 R64s for the month.
And he'll have the same amount of ISK leftover per toon as everyone else in New Eden who makes 70 mil an hour. And he'll spend the same amount of time farming PLEX as anyone who makes 70 mil an hour.
He's never going to spend the money evenly across toons.
|

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
596
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 11:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:And he'll have the same amount of ISK leftover per toon as everyone else in New Eden who makes 70 mil an hour. And he'll spend the same amount of time farming PLEX as anyone who makes 70 mil an hour.
How can you even write this and act like it's correct?
The guy has 25bil left over to do with what he wishes, he has no obligation to spend it on each of the characters evenly.
Can you make 25bil in 40 hours? |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
2481
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 12:56:00 -
[29] - Quote
Cipher is right as usual. Those characters aren't free. Eash additional character is another 550 mil isk per month (or whatever plex costs right this moment) or $15 per month of pure overhead.
It's not hard to make a profit though. I use at most 3 accounts at a time (i don't use ISBoxer, tried it but is to me seemed more tedious than just using fof missiles or assigning drones), but usually only 2 doing PVE and I make enough to plex 4 accounts and have more than that left over to do other things with. You only need to make 70 mil a day to plex 4 accounts a month like I do, anything more than that (and ammo and maybe sometimes ship replacement costs) is "profit" so to speak.
Isboxer guys make isk it's true, but I don't have a problem with it. It's not like they are taking anything from me. |

Jack Earthfire
Everse Defense Initiative
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 14:03:00 -
[30] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:How can you even write this and act like it's correct?
The guy has 25bil left over to do with what he wishes, he has no obligation to spend it on each of the characters evenly.
Can you make 25bil in 40 hours?
But it is okay to farm with Moon Mining 25bil a month just by doing 1-2 hours logistic movements? At least he spend 40 hours to earn the ISK. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |