Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Angelique Duchemin
StarFleet Enterprises Red Alliance
602
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 19:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
The ones I found are all grossly out of date. We miss you Saede. In-depth guide on how to safely mine in High Sec |

Whitehound
1671
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 19:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
It is too slow right now.
[Arazu]
Damage Control II Medium Ancillary Armor Repairer, Nanite Repair Paste Energized Explosive Membrane II Overdrive Injector System II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Faint Warp Disruptor I Phased Muon Sensor Disruptor I, Targeting Range Dampening Script Phased Muon Sensor Disruptor I, Targeting Range Dampening Script Large Capacitor Battery II Cap Recharger II
Dual 150mm Railgun II, Spike M Dual 150mm Railgun II, Spike M Dual 150mm Railgun II, Spike M Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Light Missile
Medium Auxiliary Thrusters II Medium Capacitor Control Circuit II
Vespa EC-600 x4 (or Warrior IIs) Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Angelique Duchemin
StarFleet Enterprises Red Alliance
602
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 20:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
I was thinking more a Meta 8 disruptor for long point support. We miss you Saede. In-depth guide on how to safely mine in High Sec |

Whitehound
1671
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 21:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Angelique Duchemin wrote:I was thinking more a Meta 8 disruptor for long point support. It has got plenty of CPU/PG left, even more when you swap the missile launcher for a cloak. The meta 4 disruptor will go out to 40km, but you sure can fit a more expensive one. The problem is however that the ship is just slow. Even with overdrive and T2 thruster rig does it go only 1800 m/s (2200 m/s with a full snake set). It then has got only 10k eHP.
A Proteus might be all round better even when its e-war is not as strong as the Arazu's. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
1186
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 21:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
you fit up an Arazu, then you ditch it and get a Celestis instead. BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

Angelique Duchemin
StarFleet Enterprises Red Alliance
602
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 21:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Shouldn't level 5 recon plus overheating get the domi long point to at least 72 km? We miss you Saede. In-depth guide on how to safely mine in High Sec |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
591
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 21:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Arazu hasn't changed in the last few years how can the fits be out of date?
It's just a long point support ship, if you wanted damps you get a maulus. |

Whitehound
1671
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 21:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Angelique Duchemin wrote:Shouldn't level 5 recon plus overheating get the domi long point to at least 72 km? I have just checked, Republic Fleet (140m ISKs) and Domination (167m ISKs) go as far as 60km, 72km with overheating.
I cannot recommend it. The faction points cost as much as the ship and the ship can barely deal with the DPS of 5 Warriors. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Ong
Born-2-Kill
82
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 23:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Urg those fits are so bad.
The ship is designed as all recons to be used in gangs, as such a good recon pilots knows that they should be warping in at a different range to the rest of the gang. If FC calls for planet II at 30 recons warp at 50, that way the enemy gang has to come though your dps to get to you, and if they manage that then its time to gtfo.
Just as the rapier should have faction webs the arazu should have faction point and scram, turning off people mwd's at 37k and keeping point to 107k is just to useful to cheap out.
This fit is pretty fast, agile, and has a decent buffer. Reason for projectiles over rails is pretty simple, they dont use cap, with rails its almost half's the burn time (5m 38s down to 3m 50s with 1 250mm rail) , and a recon is not their for dps so any gun is only their to ***** on stuff anyway. Smarty is pretty obviously for anti ecm drone work.
[Arazu, Shield Nano] Nanofiber Internal Structure II Nanofiber Internal Structure II Capacitor Power Relay II Power Diagnostic System II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Dread Guristas Warp Scrambler
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II Medium 'Vehemence' Shockwave Charge 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP M Salvager II
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Warrior II x4 Hornet EC-300 x4
|

Whitehound
1671
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 23:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ong wrote:Urg those fits are so bad. Yours is just as bad. You are not even trying to dampen the lock range of your target. Scram and a disruptor is one too much. And that one Howitzer is a joke. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
591
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Ong wrote:Urg those fits are so bad. Yours is just as bad. You are not even trying to dampen the lock range of your target. And that one Howitzer is a joke, right?
White, you're out of your depth here, stop before you embarrass yourself any further.
You're trying to fit damage and tank on your arazu: that's not it's purpose.
You're a support ship that prevents kiting fleets from working in conjunction with other recons like the rapier and like all recons work best with skirmish links.
The one howitzer is most likely for km whoring.
Arazu job: point something at 80km and damp out snipers. |

Whitehound
1671
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:White, you're out of your depth here, stop before you embarrass yourself any further.
You're trying to fit damage and tank on your arazu: that's not it's purpose.
You're a support ship that prevents kiting fleets from working in conjunction with other recons like the rapier and like all recons work best with skirmish links.
The one howitzer is most likely for km whoring.
Arazu job: point something at 80km and damp out snipers. Nonsense. I usually do not judge the fittings of others, because I know that everyone has different goals, but two can play the game. He likely just used my fitting as a template and changed it for his needs and then trolls. I can just as easily say his fitting is bad and point out the weaknesses. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
591
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
still doesn't change the fact you're posting a failfit yourself =S |

Whitehound
1671
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:still doesn't change the fact you're posting a failfit yourself =S I do not see you posting fits. Just trolling again. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1022
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Angelique Duchemin wrote:The ones I found are all grossly out of date.
Probably but what are you trying to achieve with?
Tandem with bomber to pop low sec ratters/missioners?
Hot drop?
The heck syndrome?
If tandem you need speed (tank is secondary unlike falcon) damp range as hell = 3damps +long range point, let your buddy dps the thing and eventually add your drones (ecm are cool on top) to hoar on km or just shot your poor 200's with pike to do ridiculous dmg.
If hotdrop you're 100-¦x better shield fitting+point (about 80K EHP with high resist profile), point the thing open cyno and let them do the job.
*removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
591
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:20:00 -
[16] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tsukino Stareine wrote:still doesn't change the fact you're posting a failfit yourself =S I do not see you posting fittings. You are just trolling again.
One could also classify your fits as trolling since they are so bad. |

Whitehound
1671
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 00:27:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:Whitehound wrote:Tsukino Stareine wrote:still doesn't change the fact you're posting a failfit yourself =S I do not see you posting fittings. You are just trolling again. One could also classify your fits as trolling since they are so bad. Post a fitting!
Mine at least dampen the lock range and thereby avoid taking damage. An Arazu has got a terrible tank. Fitting three LSEs or wanting to turn off an MWD from 20km range will not stop it from dying. It is a recon and meant to operate alone for a longer time. It needs to be able to hold point for as long as is necessary and stay alive.
He would be better off with a Proteus and Friction Extension subsystem than with an Arazu with no sensor dampeners. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
592
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 01:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
I didn't say his fit was any good either, just so we're clear.
Firstly you have to understand the reasoning behind flying a force recon: the one advantage they have over their combat recon brothers is the ELEMENT OF SURPRISE.
You don't ever fly a force recon unless you're going to utilise that cloak in some way.
So this logic breeds 3 types of razus:
1. Kiting support 2. Anti kiting 3. Hot drop o'clock
Your kiting support razu is going to be cloaked at a tac within warp range of the main fleet and where they are engaging, looking on until this happens:
Fleet baits enemy into fight, they chase. You uncloak, warp to your blob and hold point on what your fleet is sniping at. You damp out any long range threats they may have. Anything that gets close, you use your superior scram range to shut it down.
Taking all this into account you get something like this:
[Arazu, kiter] Damage Control II Beta Reactor Control: Capacitor Power Relay I Beta Reactor Control: Capacitor Power Relay I Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Republic Fleet Warp Scrambler Phased Muon Sensor Disruptor I, Targeting Range Dampening Script Phased Muon Sensor Disruptor I, Targeting Range Dampening Script Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Cap Recharger II
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II [empty high slot] [empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Medium Particle Dispersion Projector II Medium Particle Dispersion Projector II
Highs and drones to taste. Some put salvager/cyno/gun, some put 3 rails to just add some damage. Personally I go with one heavy missile launcher and covert/regular cyno and salvager.
|

Whitehound
1673
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 02:53:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:I didn't say his fit was any good either, just so we're clear. Very well. And the next time you see someone posting a fitting then do not judge it unless someone thinks they need to judge yours. It only derails into ego trips and "who's got the best" trolls, when we all get our ideas from looking at fittings of others and it is all handed-down information.
That said, I still do not like the idea of fitting 280m ISKs worth of faction gear onto a ship with only 8k eHP and no repair rate or shield recharge and then to kite within less than 20km range. I prefer to fight another day than to tell my mates that I lost the target and my ship.
I have also no idea why I would want to fit an AB onto it. It will be the ship that a target will likely try to kill first. Any target this slow that I could dampen out the damage will have lots of drones and I will only fail again. Honestly, your idea behind the second fitting sounds like it is better suited for a Combat Recon or, again, to use a Proteus. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Jayka Kyer
M1N
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 11:12:00 -
[20] - Quote
Hey, I was gonna play with an Arazu with a friend in a rapier, it was just for ganks in a wormhole but it may work for what ever your doing.
[Arazu, Jayka 2] Internal Force Field Array I Reactor Control Unit II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Shadow Serpentis Warp Scrambler X-Large Ancillary Shield Booster, Cap Booster 400 Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Covert Ops Cloaking Device II
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Medium Hybrid Burst Aerator II
Hobgoblin II x2 Hammerhead II x3
Please note i roll with these implants (yes i know people don't like them but the fit was originally for me)
ca-1 ca-2 eg-603
i would also use but not needed - sm-703 mh-803 ss-903
stats with my implants and heat - effective hp 30,399 tanks 920 dps 470
|

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
596
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 11:17:00 -
[21] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:[quote=Tsukino Stareine] That said, I still do not like the idea of fitting 280m ISKs worth of faction gear onto a ship with only 8k eHP and no repair rate or shield recharge and then to kite within less than 20km range. I prefer to fight another day than to tell my mates that I lost the target and my ship.
I have also no idea why I would want to fit an AB onto it. It will be the ship that a target will likely try to kill first. Any target this slow that I could dampen out the damage will have lots of drones and I will only fail again. Honestly, your idea behind the second fitting sounds like it is better suited for a Combat Recon or, again, to use a Proteus.
Who said anything about 20km? Once again proved you don't know this ship. The boosted point range of the faction point is just under 80km and you should be aiming to be around 60-70km away, this ensures your threats are only limited to sniping ships which you can counter by damping. The scram is purely defensive, you NEVER want to be that close in an arazu if you can help it. If you're taking damage in the first arazu, you're doing it wrong.
The AB on the second arazu as the anti-kiting fit means you can speed tank a little bit combined with the low sig provided by no shields. If you're that worried about drones against a kiting fleet (lol) you can put smartbombs on it. |

Whitehound
1674
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 12:12:00 -
[22] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:Who said anything about 20km? Once again proved you don't know this ship. The boosted point range of the faction point is just under 80km and you should be aiming to be around 60-70km away, this ensures your threats are only limited to sniping ships which you can counter by damping. The scram is purely defensive, you NEVER want to be that close in an arazu if you can help it. If you're taking damage in the first arazu, you're doing it wrong.
The AB on the second arazu as the anti-kiting fit means you can speed tank a little bit combined with the low sig provided by no shields. If you're that worried about drones against a kiting fleet (lol) you can put smartbombs on it. You are only proving my point. When you never want to be this close then why fit something worth 140m ISKs in the first place? It may make you feel good or save, but I still prefer cheap and reasonable over an expensive feeling. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
596
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 12:13:00 -
[23] - Quote
fine, then use a regular scram. It's far besides the point though |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 14:59:00 -
[24] - Quote
Here's how a full-time Arazu pilot fits his ship: https://zkillboard.com/detail/31379899/
|

Mr Morita
Calamitous-Intent
85
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 15:25:00 -
[25] - Quote
Basically, for a kiting gang I prefer the Lachesis. It has an extra midslot, and is a bit faster which will help you stay alive longer. The Lach also applies a bit more DPS at range due to the ability to use heavy missiles and fit drone range augmentors, so the lach can basically kill tackle better than the Arazu since scrams + nanofleet typically = death.
Armor fleets and BLOPS fleets are where the Arazu shines, due to it's ability to armor tank and light covert cynos. Due to the armor tank, you can fit damps or more points/scrams depending on the situation. If you're going against a longer range gang, fit damps to make them have to come in closer or to damp our ECM/logi.
But if you're coming to this thread to find a fit, use Cameron's or Tsukino's. It's better to live one day as a lion than a hundred years as a sheep.
|

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
598
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 15:30:00 -
[26] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:
erm, not quite sure what happened in that. The razu looked like it was fit for hot drop surprise but it met 3 sniping ships with no damps.
|

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 18:51:00 -
[27] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: erm, not quite sure what happened in that. The razu looked like it was fit for hot drop surprise but it met 3 sniping ships with no damps. Whatever. The point of the post is the fit. This is a pilot who flies Arazus regularly and has for many years. It's DNS, so obviously its fit for a drop. OP wants a fit, and I can't think of any pilot who flies them as much as this one. |

Donbe Scurred
University of Caille Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:18:00 -
[28] - Quote
Seems OP needs to further define the purpose of the fit. Otherwise people are just posting "whatever". All I can see is that she intends on using a long point. But for doing what? |

Mr Morita
Calamitous-Intent
85
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:20:00 -
[29] - Quote
Donbe Scurred wrote:Seems OP needs to further define the purpose of the fit. Otherwise people are just posting "whatever". All I can see is that she intends on using a long point. But for doing what? Snorkeling. It's better to live one day as a lion than a hundred years as a sheep.
|

Ong
Born-2-Kill
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 23:16:00 -
[30] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tsukino Stareine wrote:White, you're out of your depth here, stop before you embarrass yourself any further.
You're trying to fit damage and tank on your arazu: that's not it's purpose.
You're a support ship that prevents kiting fleets from working in conjunction with other recons like the rapier and like all recons work best with skirmish links.
The one howitzer is most likely for km whoring.
Arazu job: point something at 80km and damp out snipers. Nonsense. I usually do not judge the fittings of others, because I know that everyone has different goals, but two can play the game. He likely just used my fitting as a template and changed it for his needs and then trolls. I can just as easily say his fitting is bad and point out the weaknesses.
Im sorry but anyone that posts a fit that involves 2 cap mods a t2 ccc, an active tank that tanks 150 dps (ie can be solo'd by pretty much all t1 frigs), have a meta 4 point and not even have a covert ops cloak on it needs to htfu and not call troll on someone that calls them out on it. Your obviously a bad and should feel bad. Jesus all that thing needed was a few civilian modules and your golden.
|

Whitehound
1678
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 23:56:00 -
[31] - Quote
Do not be sorry. You just called yourself out. Nobody stops you from fitting more expensive gear, unless you need a cookie cutter for it. You still have not explained how you are going to hold point for more than 5 minutes. I am still curious what your excuse for that is. I believe I wrote that one can take the launcher off and fit a cloak. You however fit yours without dampeners and then pride yourself with a bigger tank. You really are the cleverest here. 
And soloing with a single Howitzer and 4 Warrior IIs. I am out of words. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Ong
Born-2-Kill
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 00:12:00 -
[32] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Do not be sorry. You just called yourself out. Nobody stops you from fitting more expensive gear, unless you need a cookie cutter for it. You still have not explained how you are going to hold point for more than 5 minutes. I am still curious what your excuse for that is. I believe I wrote that one can take the launcher off and fit a cloak. You however fit yours without dampeners and then pride yourself with a bigger tank. You really are the cleverest here. 
You seem fixated on damps, I and most people that do :elitesmallgangpvp: have realised that damps are of absolutely no use outside of pointing and damping a solo pve'er and waiting on your gang mates to come gank them.
5 vs 30 and guess what you cant damp **** that is worth anything to the fight, having a buffer to b able to kyte away outside their dps, or for your logy to catch you is far more important then damping one of their bc's to like 30km lock range.
Typical gang comp for the arazu is itself, a rapier, a couple of nano hac's/cynabals/tier 3's and maybe a scimi. If your using it to catch/gank **** then tbh fit doesn't really matter. If your using it for actual non risk adverse pvp then you'll come up with a fit similar to mine.
|

Whitehound
1678
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 00:14:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ong wrote:You seem fixated on damps Yes, it has got a strong bonus to it. Otherwise is the Proteus better. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Ong
Born-2-Kill
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 00:16:00 -
[34] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Ong wrote:You seem fixated on damps Yes, it has got a strong bonus to it. Otherwise is the Proteus better.
Nope proteus cant kyte and has like half the point range
|

Whitehound
1678
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 00:22:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ong wrote:Whitehound wrote:Ong wrote:You seem fixated on damps Yes, it has got a strong bonus to it. Otherwise is the Proteus better. Nope proteus cant kyte and has like half the point range Sure it can kite. It is maybe 500m/s slower on MWD, but with a far better tank and damage. The Arazu needs its long range, because it would otherwise only die. The slightly shorter point range is irrelevant. Then add covert and nullifier subsystem to it and it is all round the better recon. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Ong
Born-2-Kill
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 00:31:00 -
[36] - Quote
Whitehound wrote: soloing
Im going to stop right here, anyone that even thinks solo, recon and kyting proteus in the same discussion is not worth my time. Feel free to continue being a bad tho o/ |

Whitehound
1678
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 07:39:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ong wrote:Whitehound wrote: soloing Im going to stop right here, anyone that even thinks solo, recon and kyting proteus in the same discussion is not worth my time. Feel free to continue being a bad tho o/ You mentioned it and you still have not explained your fitting.
I guess your idea is to sit as far away from the fight, let your mates do the job, ***** on the killmail and fly off after 5 minutes. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Eka Lawrencia
Different Drummers
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 07:45:00 -
[38] - Quote
Ong wrote:Whitehound wrote:[quote=Ong]Im sorry ... I and most people that do :elitesmallgangpvp: have realised that damps are of absolutely no use outside of pointing and damping a solo pve'er and waiting on your gang mates to come gank them.
Quite a strong and absolute statement. So absolute that it can't be true.
|

Danny John-Peter
Stay Frosty.
229
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 08:06:00 -
[39] - Quote
ITT Bads who havent realised damps are **** in gangs.
While this statement isnt true for armour or cov ops gangs, the Lach is better for shield gangs, I fly the following fit.
[Lachesis, Standard Nano] Damage Control II Nanofiber Internal Structure II Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Small Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 400 Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I True Sansha Medium EMP Smartbomb
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Medium Core Defense Field Extender I |

Whitehound
1678
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 08:46:00 -
[40] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:ITT Bads who havent realised damps are **** in gangs Do yourself a favour, watch the alliance tournament (back today at 13:30) and do not tell anyone. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Eka Lawrencia
Different Drummers
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 10:51:00 -
[41] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:ITT Bads who havent realised damps are **** in gangs Do yourself a favour, watch the alliance tournament (back today at 13:30) and do not tell anyone.
But that's not elitesmallgangpvp. It's set up to give similar numbers/strengths to each team. What would you say are the strengths of the damping tactics employed there, and how can they be translated into the real tranqility world?
|

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
603
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 10:52:00 -
[42] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:ITT Bads who havent realised damps are **** in gangs.
While this statement isnt true for armour or cov ops gangs, the Lach is better for shield gangs, I fly the following fit.
[Lachesis, Standard Nano] Damage Control II Nanofiber Internal Structure II Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Small Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 400 Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I True Sansha Medium EMP Smartbomb
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Damps are absolutely required in gangs when dealing with long range ships, either on your side or theirs. Plus I would also say in most situations damps are stronger than ECM in ruining Logistics' lives since it's not random.
The DNS fit is for covert hotdrops which means no logi (unless some T3 goes logi which is never) so has a buffer plus ASB to burst tank any damage they might throw at it, it's a VERY specialised situation |

Whitehound
1682
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 12:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
Eka Lawrencia wrote:Whitehound wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:ITT Bads who havent realised damps are **** in gangs Do yourself a favour, watch the alliance tournament (back today at 13:30) and do not tell anyone. But that's not elitesmallgangpvp. It's set up to give similar numbers/strengths to each team. What would you say are the strengths of the damping tactics employed there, and how can they be translated into the real tranqility world? If you want to discuss dampeners then better start a new thread so this can stay an Arazu thread. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Eka Lawrencia
Different Drummers
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 13:53:00 -
[44] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Eka Lawrencia wrote:Whitehound wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:ITT Bads who havent realised damps are **** in gangs Do yourself a favour, watch the alliance tournament (back today at 13:30) and do not tell anyone. But that's not elitesmallgangpvp. It's set up to give similar numbers/strengths to each team. What would you say are the strengths of the damping tactics employed there, and how can they be translated into the real tranqility world? If you want to discuss dampeners then better start a new thread so this can stay an Arazu thread.
An Arazu thread is a dampener thread and vice versa.
|

W0lf Crendraven
The Tuskers
87
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 14:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
You dont use a arazu when you want damps, a celestis does pretty much the same job for way less isk, yes you can fit a damp on it but if you do that is for utility, never the primary role 8and you give up cap or tank for it, i.e bad choice).
For any kind of armour gang or brawling leet you want a proteus as it simply is way way more tanky and way more usefull.
All the fits in this thread suck, bar the one from Ong, altho there are some things i would change:
I am not a fan of the no dcu tank and the fit lacks resitances to benefit from logis, and even if you fly in a alpha heavy environement, drop at least one nano for a DCU. I also wouldnt go for a scar, if you are in scram range (37km) you either are ****** (if lots is there) and a scram woulldnt help you or your anti support will blap it quickly. " long range points are very nie to have tho.
[Arazu, Pointer] Damage Control II Capacitor Power Relay II Capacitor Power Relay II Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II Medium 'Vehemence' Shockwave Charge Medium 'Vehemence' Shockwave Charge Salvager II
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Equalish (a bit less) ehp, way better resitances, pretty equal cap, as usual 2 higslot up to choice (altho 1 sb is minimum id say). ***** gun is valid too.
Cure the lack of nanos with snakes, its probably one of the fastest ships in thegang anyways (unless you run with machs or tengus).
For alpha high evorenements id go with something like this
[Arazu, Shield Nano ichanged] Damage Control II Nanofiber Internal Structure II Capacitor Power Relay II Power Diagnostic System II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II Medium 'Vehemence' Shockwave Charge 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP M Salvager II
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Warrior II x4 Hornet EC-300 x4
Can drop both point to t2 if you are poor, but 107km is very nice, 86 isnt bad either but still in range of quite a few ships. |

Whitehound
1683
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 14:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
Eka Lawrencia wrote:Whitehound wrote:Eka Lawrencia wrote:Whitehound wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:ITT Bads who havent realised damps are **** in gangs Do yourself a favour, watch the alliance tournament (back today at 13:30) and do not tell anyone. But that's not elitesmallgangpvp. It's set up to give similar numbers/strengths to each team. What would you say are the strengths of the damping tactics employed there, and how can they be translated into the real tranqility world? If you want to discuss dampeners then better start a new thread so this can stay an Arazu thread. An Arazu thread is a dampener thread and vice versa. No. The forum is called Ships & Modules. You really should make a separate thread when you want to talk about dampeners. If it is tactics you want to talk about then try the Warfare & Tactics forum. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
604
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 14:32:00 -
[47] - Quote
W0lf Crendraven wrote:You dont use a arazu when you want damps, a celestis does pretty much the same job for way less isk, yes you can fit a damp on it but if you do that is for utility, never the primary role 8and you give up cap or tank for it, i.e bad choice).
For any kind of armour gang or brawling leet you want a proteus as it simply is way way more tanky and way more usefull.
All the fits in this thread suck, bar the one from Ong, altho there are some things i would change:
I am not a fan of the no dcu tank and the fit lacks resitances to benefit from logis, and even if you fly in a alpha heavy environement, drop at least one nano for a DCU. I also wouldnt go for a scar, if you are in scram range (37km) you either are ****** (if lots is there) and a scram woulldnt help you or your anti support will blap it quickly. " long range points are very nie to have tho.
[Arazu, Pointer] Damage Control II Capacitor Power Relay II Capacitor Power Relay II Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II Medium 'Vehemence' Shockwave Charge Medium 'Vehemence' Shockwave Charge Salvager II
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Equalish (a bit less) ehp, way better resitances, pretty equal cap, as usual 2 higslot up to choice (altho 1 sb is minimum id say). ***** gun is valid too.
Cure the lack of nanos with snakes, its probably one of the fastest ships in thegang anyways (unless you run with machs or tengus).
For alpha high evorenements id go with something like this
[Arazu, Shield Nano ichanged] Damage Control II Nanofiber Internal Structure II Capacitor Power Relay II Power Diagnostic System II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II Medium 'Vehemence' Shockwave Charge 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP M Salvager II
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Warrior II x4 Hornet EC-300 x4
Can drop both point to t2 if you are poor, but 107km is very nice, 86 isnt bad either but still in range of quite a few ships.
I feel that is just your opinion on the matter, damps can completely negate all damage while a shield buffer, while giving you more ehp leaves you far more open to being switched on and alphaed because of the enlarged sig of the already quite large (162m) base of the arazu. |

W0lf Crendraven
The Tuskers
87
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 14:37:00 -
[48] - Quote
If you want damps bring a celestis (or throw them into the utility mids of your fleet ships, no non sensor boosted ship can lock you at 100km with 2 unbonused damps on it).
Damps are the strongest form of ewar but on a not even 60k ehp ship you really dont want to lose 15/20k ehp to be able to damp out one single enemy ship, thats a huge drawback for almost no gain. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
604
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 14:39:00 -
[49] - Quote
W0lf Crendraven wrote:If you want damps bring a celestis (or throw them into the utility mids of your fleet ships, no non sensor boosted ship can lock you at 100km with 2 unbonused damps on it).
Damps are the strongest form of ewar but on a not even 60k ehp ship you really dont want to lose 15/20k ehp to be able to damp out one single enemy ship, thats a huge drawback for almost no gain.
Your razu fits cap out at 44k ehp with every boost imaginable, not sure where you get 60k from.
Sure you would bring a celestis as well and leave the arazu as a point machine if you had the choice, the fits I posted were on the assumption one celestis-based hull per gang.
And I wouldn't bring a celestis for damps, a Maulus does the job better since it's pretty hard to snipe at and also a lot cheaper. |

W0lf Crendraven
The Tuskers
87
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 14:46:00 -
[50] - Quote
The resitance fit has 49k ehp with heat, the triple lse has 58k.
And if you only bring one hull you still would be better off without it (and even if youd use a lach you would not bring damps), you give up to much. And a maulis dies the second people notice what is happening, a celestis is a lot better (it also gets a huge range bonus which is very important.
(edit, quite a lot more with every boost imaginable, but im not including titans) |

God's Apples
The Tuskers
93
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 16:02:00 -
[51] - Quote
Tsuk and whitehound, have you ever been in a gang with an arazu? Do you understand its role?
The role of an arazu is pointing and pointing only. If you want damps get a celestis. Celestises are better damping ship than arazus and don't need to use their mids for a point and scram. If you think a single damp will save you from being alpha'd it won't. If you're going to get alpha'd then you're fighting a very large gang which also means that you're probably in a large gang which means that you shouldn't be in an arazu (barring BLOPs but you don't drop BLOPs looking for a ~gudfite~).
The primary role of damps in a gang are for logi to increase lock time when swapping between targets rapidly such that you kill the target before the logi even locks it, or reducing its range so that it has to get closer and you can kill it. Damping long range ships is effective as well, but a secondary role.
I'm glad I could clear everything up for you guys. |

Whitehound
1698
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 16:10:00 -
[52] - Quote
God's Apples wrote:Tsuk and whitehound, have you ever been in a gang with an arazu? Do you understand its role? I can only speak for myself, but yes, I have. When you then only use it for pointing then say so and get on with it. Or is there a problem? Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
613
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 07:06:00 -
[53] - Quote
God's Apples wrote:Tsuk and whitehound, have you ever been in a gang with an arazu? Do you understand its role?
The role of an arazu is pointing and pointing only. If you want damps get a celestis. Celestises are better damping ship than arazus and don't need to use their mids for a point and scram. If you think a single damp will save you from being alpha'd it won't. If you're going to get alpha'd then you're fighting a very large gang which also means that you're probably in a large gang which means that you shouldn't be in an arazu (barring BLOPs but you don't drop BLOPs looking for a ~gudfite~).
The primary role of damps in a gang are for logi to increase lock time when swapping between targets rapidly such that you kill the target before the logi even locks it, or reducing its range so that it has to get closer and you can kill it. Damping long range ships is effective as well, but a secondary role.
I'm glad I could clear everything up for you guys.
It's all well to say "get a celestis" but sometimes you just don't have the people
the arazu has the fitting and bonus to damps and it can be effective performing in a multi-role capacity, obviously if you told me someone was bringing a celestis I would forget the damps. |

Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
65
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 10:20:00 -
[54] - Quote
Here is a SG Armor Arazu we have been using, it might give you some ideas. Some of the fits in this thread are pretty terrible.
[Arazu, Arazu P-3p]
1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I True Sansha Armor Explosive Hardener Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Damage Control II
Small Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 400 True Sansha Warp Disruptor True Sansha Warp Disruptor Dark Blood Warp Scrambler Conjunctive Magnetometric ECCM Scanning Array I Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Null M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Null M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Null M Covert Ops Cloaking Device II
Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II
Vespa EC-600 x4
Use your on grid bookmarks to fly separate from the gang or insert in the grid cloaked as per standard support ship procedure. CB stable all running, the electrons are used for drone defense. The ECCM can be exchanged for a defensive web, another scrambler or a meta damp. Upgrade points to higher range meta according to your balls/wallet stats. Cheers..C: |

Whitehound
1707
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 10:33:00 -
[55] - Quote
Bertrand Butler wrote:... Some of the fits in this thread are pretty terrible.
[Arazu, Arazu P-3p]
1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I ... Being the slowest so far I think is yours sure one of them. Anything from AB frigates to MWD BCs can slip out from under its point.  Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
65
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 10:41:00 -
[56] - Quote
Absolute speed is not an issue in a support ship, hell ~ this is viable with an AB too. Your best defense is a healthy range buffer, pre-aligning to the next on grid bookmark and bouncing when primaried (while having the buffer to sustain alpha). It seems like you are trying to fly this as a combat ship...this is an armor gang setup that stays with the oneiri/guardians.
Anything with an MWD is stopped cold @32km. Fly more, theorycraft less. |

W0lf Crendraven
The Tuskers
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 10:45:00 -
[57] - Quote
It isnt, however you could also just use a proteus if you fly armour. |

Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
65
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 10:47:00 -
[58] - Quote
W0lf Crendraven wrote:It isnt, however you could also just use a proteus if you fly armour.
Yep, pretty much. The Arazu is in desperate need of re-balancing, celestis and proteus is the way to go in the current meta. |

Whitehound
1707
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 10:56:00 -
[59] - Quote
Bertrand Butler wrote:Absolute speed is not an issue in a support ship, your best defense is a healthy range buffer, pre-aligning to the next on grid bookmark and bouncing when primaried (while having the buffer to sustain alpha). It seems like you are trying to fly this as a combat ship...this is an armor gang setup that stays with the oneiri/guardians.
Anything with an MWD is stopped cold @32km. Fly more, theorycraft less. Judge the fittings of others as terrible and fly yours anyway you like, but it is you who failed to hold the point. If you run out of cap or have gimped your speed makes no difference to the outcome of the failfit. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
65
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 11:05:00 -
[60] - Quote
Quote:Judge the fittings of others as terrible and fly yours anyway you like, but it is you who failed to hold the point. If you run out of cap or have gimped your speed makes no difference to the outcome of the failfit.
I'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense. I just explained to you that speed is almost irrelevant in a SG armor role. And I really CANNOT take seriously someone who posts the following as a valid Arazu fit.
Whitehound wrote:It is too slow right now.
[Arazu, PvP armor]
Damage Control II Medium Ancillary Armor Repairer, Nanite Repair Paste Energized Explosive Membrane II Overdrive Injector System II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Faint Warp Disruptor I Phased Muon Sensor Disruptor I, Targeting Range Dampening Script Phased Muon Sensor Disruptor I, Targeting Range Dampening Script Large Capacitor Battery II Cap Recharger II
Dual 150mm Railgun II, Spike M Dual 150mm Railgun II, Spike M Dual 150mm Railgun II, Spike M Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Light Missile (or cloak)
Medium Auxiliary Thrusters II Medium Capacitor Control Circuit II
Vespa EC-600 x4 (or Warrior IIs)
A 200mil 10k EHP active tanked support ship, complete with a capacitor battery, no cloak, split DPS, a meta ******* long point and an OIS. Please.
|

Whitehound
1708
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 11:53:00 -
[61] - Quote
Bertrand Butler wrote:Quote:Judge the fittings of others as terrible and fly yours anyway you like, but it is you who failed to hold the point. If you run out of cap or have gimped your speed makes no difference to the outcome of the failfit. I'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense. I just explained to you that speed is almost irrelevant in a SG armor support role. And I really CANNOT take seriously someone who posts the following as a valid Arazu fit. ... A 200mil <10k EHP active tanked support ship, complete with a LCB (!), no cloak, split DPS, a meta4 ******* long point and an OIS. Please. There is a cloak. I had added it in brackets. I did not think anyone would complain about it when one can just take the launcher out, which I did mention, but the crying of the trolls wants to heard and so I added it into the comment. Keep thinking I would not use cloaks. I do not care.
You either do not decloak when you see multiple ships before your gang arrives, or you decloak to tackle a solo ship, which you then can either try to kill on your own or you wait for your gang. You do however try to hold tackle for as long as it is necessary and use damps to avoid getting locked up. This is by far the safest way. You only need to watch the speeds, watch out for drones, some you can outrun, others you can kill with your own drones, and sometimes do you need to run for it, because other ships show up.
The cap battery and recharger only makes it carefree by being cap stable.
I agree with you that it needs a rebalance, but until then is it a slow ship and gimping its speed (and inertia) for a tank when one can just use damps is a bad trade. You only invite your target to try. You do not need expensive points when you can dampen down a target's lock range to a few kilometres.
And the Arazu will eventually die. Why sweeten someone else's killmail when you can avoid it? Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

W0lf Crendraven
The Tuskers
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 12:40:00 -
[62] - Quote
That is pure bull m8. |

Tung Yoggi
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Verge of Collapse
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 15:54:00 -
[63] - Quote
Im sorry whitehound, i have been browsing the forums recently, came across some of your posts, and seriously, most of the fits you posted are almost all horrible EFT nightmares, like you never undock or something.
It is very tempting to post numbers and careful chosen modules, yet the results are practically terrible. Also whats with that MAAR fetish ? It's puzzling. |

Whitehound
1712
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 16:07:00 -
[64] - Quote
Tung Yoggi wrote:Im sorry whitehound, i have been browsing the forums recently, came across some of your posts, and seriously, most of the fits you posted are almost all horrible EFT nightmares, like you never undock or something.
It is very tempting to post numbers and careful chosen modules, yet the results are practically terrible. Also whats with that MAAR fetish ? It's puzzling. Then please say what your problem is or bring a fitting of your own and explain how you use it, because I think you are just trolling me. Until then can nobody help you. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 16:16:00 -
[65] - Quote
Do you have any killmails with that Arazu fit? Perhaps on another character? Whitehound |

Whitehound
1712
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 16:34:00 -
[66] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:Do you have any killmails with that Arazu fit? Perhaps on another character? Whitehound What you do is getting a bit creepy, you know? Just stop. See the above comment.  Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 17:42:00 -
[67] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote:Do you have any killmails with that Arazu fit? Perhaps on another character? Whitehound What you do is getting a bit creepy, you know? Just stop. See the above comment.  lolwut?
In case you've never seen one before, it's called a killboard. I know it might be difficult to decipher, but all you have to do is type a character name in and you can see a person's kills and losses. When I type "Whitehound" into zkillboard, I see 2 kills and a bunch of losses, none of them involving an Arazu. I'm not sure what would be creepy about that, since it's the single most commonly used tool by every PvP pilot in EVE.
This tells me that you don't know WTF you're talking about, which I kind of already knew, since your Arazu fit didn't even include a cloak. The point of a covert recon is to cyno in the DPS, not to dish it out. I'm not a solo pvp'er and my experience is mostly medium to large gang hotdrops (brought in by an Arazu), but... it sure looks like someone with a MWD, scram, and TD could own you pretty easily. Toss in a neut and you're done. But my knowledge is far too limited to be certain of that. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
617
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 17:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Bertrand Butler wrote:... Some of the fits in this thread are pretty terrible.
[Arazu, Arazu P-3p]
1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I ... Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II ... Being the slowest so far I think is yours sure one of them. Anything from AB frigates to MWD BCs can slip out from under its point. 
You're not supposed to hold point, you uncloak and have 80km point range, they have to burn out of that point range instead of immediately warping away giving your fleet time to grab secondary tackle on them. |

W0lf Crendraven
The Tuskers
105
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 17:49:00 -
[69] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:Whitehound wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote:Do you have any killmails with that Arazu fit? Perhaps on another character? Whitehound What you do is getting a bit creepy, you know? Just stop. See the above comment.  lolwut? In case you've never seen one before, it's called a killboard. I know it might be difficult to decipher, but all you have to do is type a character name in and you can see a person's kills and losses. When I type "Whitehound" into zkillboard, I see 2 kills and a bunch of losses, none of them involving an Arazu. I'm not sure what would be creepy about that, since it's the single most commonly used tool by every PvP pilot in EVE. This tells me that you don't know WTF you're talking about, which I kind of already knew, since your Arazu fit didn't even include a cloak. The point of a covert recon is to cyno in the DPS, not to dish it out. I'm not a solo pvp'er and my experience is mostly medium to large gang hotdrops (brought in by an Arazu), but... it sure looks like someone with a MWD, scram, and TD could own you pretty easily. Toss in a neut and you're done. But my knowledge is far too limited to be certain of that.
Never bring killboard stats into an argument, they dont tell you that much and if someone with 0 kills and 5k losses is right that doesnt change a thing, they mean as much in an argument as you can judge a corp/player by its battleclnic rank ("lol my corp is higher ranked then you thus i am right").
You of course are right but still its bad manners. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 17:55:00 -
[70] - Quote
W0lf Crendraven wrote:Never bring killboard stats into an argument, they dont tell you that much and if someone with 0 kills and 5k losses is right that doesnt change a thing, they mean as much in an argument as you can judge a corp/player by its battleclnic rank ("lol my corp is higher ranked then you thus i am right").
You of course are right but still its bad manners. I wasn't interested in stats and it's not the win/loss that I'm focused on (he could easily have a different PvP main). I just wanted to see what he was going up against to get an idea of how his fit is supposed to work. What I should have said was "I can tell by your answer here that you don't know what you're talking about, because you're talking crazy about... something... I have no idea what you're saying, but it's nothing to do with defending the fit and clearly just a dodge." |

Whitehound
1713
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:19:00 -
[71] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:Whitehound wrote:Bertrand Butler wrote:... Some of the fits in this thread are pretty terrible.
[Arazu, Arazu P-3p]
1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I ... Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II ... Being the slowest so far I think is yours sure one of them. Anything from AB frigates to MWD BCs can slip out from under its point.  You're not supposed to hold point, you uncloak and have 80km point range, they have to burn out of that point range instead of immediately warping away giving your fleet time to grab secondary tackle on them. Nonsense. You might as well fly some other ship. I get the idea, but this is what you use a Combat Recon for, a Stealth Bomber or a Proteus. You could just bump it with the Proteus. You do want to hold point, because your mates can be several jumps away. Bertrand's Arazu does like 1200 m/s with that fitting. Anything that can shoot from range will attack it and most everything else will try to burn away. If that it is his thing then fine, but telling others their fittings are terrible when his could easily win the price of being the most terrible here deserve to be commented. Maybe do not start with the nonsense. Just as an idea... Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
617
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 18:27:00 -
[72] - Quote
You have no idea how to fly the razu
unless you're bait fit you're never going to be the first thing that the enemy sees on grid
|

Tung Yoggi
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:00:00 -
[73] - Quote
On topic, Arazu took another serious hit with the cyno change on T3s. Armor fitted, an Arazu is basically what you can fly if you don't have the money for a Proteus. I suppose if you shield fit it, it's still an 'ok' scout boat that can reach decent speed, but will not use both ewar bonuses decently. Get a short and long point, shield tank, nano, cloak and probe launcher and it will do its job fine. Well, not that great, until the fabled recon ships rebalance (please).
Now whitehound, please resume trolling.  |

Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
65
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:02:00 -
[74] - Quote
Quote:Bertrand's Arazu does like 1200 m/s with that fitting. Anything that can shoot from range will attack it and most everything else will try to burn away. If that it is his thing then fine, but telling others their fittings are terrible when his could easily win the price of being the most terrible here deserve to be commented. Maybe do not start with the nonsense. Just as an idea...
Again, you are missing the point man. I posted a - fairly standard when T2ed - support arazu for armor gangs. I tried to explain to you how it is flown, where to pay attention when fitting it and how much speed is irrelevant when its used as a support ship. You don't seem to understand it. Your obsession over speed is both illogical and unfounded.
Another thing. If you really want to damp someone, you keep a ~30m isk Celestis 100km away from him and gather the tears, not use a 200m+ force recon. You are trying to use the arazu as a fl combat ship, its simply not designed for it. |

Whitehound
1713
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:09:00 -
[75] - Quote
Bertrand Butler wrote:Again, you are missing the point man. I posted a - fairly standard when T2ed - support arazu for armor gangs. I tried to explain to you how it is flown, where to pay attention when fitting it and how much speed is irrelevant when its used as a support ship. You don't seem to understand it. Your obsession over speed is both illogical and unfounded.
Another thing. If you really want to damp someone, you keep a ~30m isk Celestis 100km away from him and gather the tears, not use a 200m+ force recon. You are trying to use the arazu as a fl combat ship, its simply not designed for it. Do not worry. I get you. I only would not fly it like you do but still respect individuality. I do not really judge you for it, but when you challenge me then it is "what goes around, comes around".  Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 22:56:00 -
[76] - Quote
Fraps it in action and show us how it's done. With the miracle of video, there's really no reason for these sorts of arguments. |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2298

|
Posted - 2013.07.29 23:11:00 -
[77] - Quote
Quote:22. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting. Thread closed. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |