| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 46 post(s) |
Rain6638
Team Evil
568
   |
Posted - 2013.08.07 19:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
Fozzie.
post a fit for the Nighthawk.
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
568
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 19:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
it seems to me you're trying to get Command Ships and the Command Ships skill to act like separate Assault Battlecruiser and Command Ships skills (and two completely different roles)
You'll have an easier time by separating the two, into Assault Battlecruisers and Command Ships.
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
569
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 22:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
disambiguate.
-those command ships that didn't receive bonuses to links anyway -> assault battlecruisers (calling it a command ship previously was a misnomer, since all battlecruiser hulls can fit links. Field Command ships were literally T2, Assault BCs)
-those command ships that did receive link bonuses -> Command Ships
-if you want two racial command ships, give one a covops cloak. (Black Ops BC with bonused links; this fills a BC gap and command role in the covert line. I don't see why not--when recons have the modules used best with skirmish and info links, and have covops force recon variants)
Covops BC:
Primary Skill required
Command Ships V
Secondary Skill required
Black Ops I
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
570
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 23:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sarkelias Anophius wrote:Rain6638 wrote:disambiguate.
-those command ships that didn't receive bonuses to links anyway -> assault battlecruisers (calling it a command ship previously was a misnomer, since all battlecruiser hulls can fit links. Field Command ships were literally T2, Assault BCs)
-those command ships that did receive link bonuses -> Command Ships
-if you want two racial command ships, give one a covops cloak. (Black Ops BC with bonused links; this fills a BC gap and command role in the covert line. I don't see why not--when recons have the modules used best with skirmish and info links, and have covops force recon variants)
Covops BC:
Primary Skill required
Command Ships V
Secondary Skill required
Black Ops I I find this idea far-fetched yet incredibly rational and satisfactory
command ships should look like the damnation
assault battlecruisers should look like the sleipnir
covops command ships should look like the nighthawk
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
570
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 23:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
any chance you would consider giving tier 3 battlecruisers ("glass houses") a shot at having command link bonuses? I think the lack of tank is a good trade-off for having a covops cloak.
4x 100% damage bonused turrets, 1 covops cloak and 2 utility highs, everything else unaltered
because each race has 3 battlecruisers, not just the two you seem to be considering right now.
if you're concerned about an undeniable DPS creep by creating assault battlecruisers, let's face it: Battleships never scaled in terms of DPS vs sig radius anyway. They could use a boost.
I like the dual-"racial" type bonuses to command ships, because it allows full tank/info/skirmish for both full-armor and full-shield gangs.
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
570
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 00:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:I considered dropping the armor hp bonus from the Damnation, but in the end I think it's ok for it to have a strong identity, even if that identity makes it more popular than the others for large fleet warfare.
"that advantage is just its identity, and it's not worth changing a ship over something as superfluous as identity."
I'm just going to laugh, because I refuse to be trolled. this is just comedy, fozzie.
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
570
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 00:48:00 -
[7] - Quote
depending on how you look at it, this could be interpreted as a mere shuffle of things to give the illusion of "new", due to any number of reasons (lack of manpower/time/ideas) -or- a slight attempt at creating new SP sinks according to player metrics we don't have access to...
basically, create new reasons for people to sub and enjoy it. those types of changes would come slowly--and they're something you would expect a for-profit company to do.
...but the idea of preserving the RP of certain ships is a motivation I have not considered. and those things should be listed along with ship stats in the OP.
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
570
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 00:51:00 -
[8] - Quote
because this is a troll thread, you didn't know?
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
570
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 03:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
cap chain claymores with local reps and egress port maximizer rig. that was a fun EFT exercise.
don't bother, it was a 500hp rep tank w/ LSB and a 125k EHP buffer.
stable, but crap.
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
570
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 04:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
please don't make the claymore sound good, or fozzie will touch it
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
571
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 10:30:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Rain6638 wrote:disambiguate.
-those command ships that didn't receive bonuses to links anyway -> assault battlecruisers (calling it a command ship previously was a misnomer, since all battlecruiser hulls can fit links. Field Command ships were literally T2, Assault BCs)
-those command ships that did receive link bonuses -> Command Ships
-if you want two racial command ships, give one a covops cloak. (Black Ops BC with bonused links; this fills a BC gap and command role in the covert line. I don't see why not--when recons have the modules used best with skirmish and info links, and have covops force recon variants)
Covops BC:
Primary Skill required
Command Ships V
Secondary Skill required
Black Ops I I don't like solo pownmobiles because it's always fun at a very large number of other players unfun, it's fun 5min then I get quickly bored, no challenge whatsoever. But this could be really nice indeed to replace T3 command sub (never gonna happen anyway for what we see). I mean a T2 BC with that firepower and Cov OPs Cloak on top? -ho man I'd get a full hangar of those !!
since writing that I thought maybe the tier 3 glass houses would be a better option.
but covops only in the sense that they can take the covops bridge--and have the gimped cloak like those of the blackops battleships.
a sidetrack thought, in a muddy thread.
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
573
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 19:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
run all your links on damnations.
34.5% -> 30% max skirmish evasive/interdiction
30.2% -> 26.25% rapid deployment.
//lol soldarius i wish i had posted mine sooner (and before you)
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
573
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 20:30:00 -
[13] - Quote
15% flat was changed to 3% per level on the 7th of Aug
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
573
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 00:31:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ziranda Hakuli wrote:a bunch of name calling and no proof
post a fit
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
573
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 03:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ersahi Kir wrote:Have you ever used the live eos? Have you seen anyone use the live eos?
to support your point, yeah, i used an eos but only because it was the fleet version with the bonuses to info
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
573
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 06:12:00 -
[16] - Quote
dual tanked
it all makes sense now
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
Rain6638
Team Evil
576
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 20:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
give the nighthawk torps. then i'll be happy
[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337
yo dawg, we heard you liek industrials, so we put an industrial in yo industrial so you can loss while u loss |
| |
|