| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8604
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 19:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:I very rarely disagree with you Tippia, but here I have to. In the vast majority of cases, you don't have time to shoot a suicide ganker back, and even if you did it wouldn't help. If a decent group of suicide gankers wants one of your ships dead there is literally nothing you can do about it. It is the only area in Eve where someone gets to PvP risk free.
"it's risk free because I say it is" Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8605
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 20:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Psychedelic Faynin wrote:Goons were getting spanked.
They refused to come up to the ice belts after a while.
L O S E R S
look at you talking trash hiding behind an npc alt
lol Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8605
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 21:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Psychedelic Faynin wrote:Sorry, this is my main lamer. I was up in Osmon most of the weekend along with you goonpussies. Just ask the ones that were there.
congratulations, you killed one catalyst
that one catalyst loss is a significant setback for our suicide ganking campaign Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8605
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 21:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Dyvim Slorm wrote:If you're using a throwaway alt then the only risk is one of a known cost if it all goes wrong. Simply put, there is only the cost of the ship you will lose in a suicide gank versus the unknown return in loot from the destroyed ship.
In other words its just a cost of doing business, not risk.
most people don't suicide gank with throwaway alts, sorry Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8605
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 23:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Wow, a lot of Suicide Ganker tears in this thread. Epic PvPers with a point to prove.
"omg suicide ganking does take some skilz!"
No, it really doesn't. It's all pre-calculated. Scan the ship first, warp in with one more catalyst than is strictly required (use a cloaked warp-to), blow them up and then dock up. Worried about ECM or logi? Why? It's not a viable tactic. Unless they baited you there, they are not going to have anything like that. As for people killing gankers, yea I do it myself if I can catch one. If you got caught then your a complete idiot.
"Guys suicide ganking is super easy" - people who have never suicide ganked Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8605
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 23:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Psychedelic Faynin wrote:As for goons. How does anyone in this organization come out as being a skilled gamer? You would never convince me of anyone in goons being or having any skill in this game. You all hide behind and have more than half of the server population in either the alliance or clusterfuck.
yes hisec ice mining is a skill-intensive profession Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8607
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 09:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
Arduemont wrote: "people who have never suicide ganked" - people who don't check their facts.
Edit: Just to get things streight, I think suicide ganking is an important part of the game. I have no problem with suicide gankers. I have suicide ganked myself. Couple of times with my main, a great deal more than a couple of times on alts, and I have frequently been in corps who have regularly suicide ganked.
The problem I have, is when people whine that suicide ganking is hard, or requires any skill. No one I have ever suicide ganked with has been under the illusion that it's difficult. People make the argument that it's difficult to make a profit now, but frankly I never knew anyone who suicide ganked for profit, at least not on a single person scale. It's about the grief. Also, when people argue that miners deserve it for being afk, that pisses me off because that's just stupid. I don't even like mining. I haven't mined in literally years. Basically, people spreading crap so confidently pisses me off.
yes, dumb afk ice miners are the only ones who are suicide ganked in hisec ever Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8607
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 21:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
Murk Paradox wrote:That's untrue. Miners RISK losing their ships. They MIGHT get blown up.
With suicide gankers there is no "might" unless there is no target. IF they do their job poorly, or well, they will still get blown up.
Concord can no longer be tanked or avoided unfortunately.
There's also the risk of nothing of value being dropped in a hauler gank. You also risk your looting ship being blown up, even moreso now that you have suspect flags for looting wrecks. There's also the risk of getting your hauler alt suicide ganked on the way to Jita while moving the loot.
Anybody who says this is "risk-free" is just posting fanfic. In the case of miner ganking, how can one argue that it's "risk-free" when you inherently operate at a loss when doing this? Even if it's sponsored by somebody else, somebody is taking a loss unless the secondary effects (i.e. the supply constraint and speculators driving the price of ice and isotopes up) outweigh that loss. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8608
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 23:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Its not really risk. Its the "cost of doing business". You know what you are going to pay upfront. There is the risk of failing, but generally that is not the case if you do your home work.
Nonsense. If I fly a Sabre on a fleet op, I'm only risking that Sabre plus the value of my implants plus my clone cost. There is no way that I can lose more than that unless I don't update my clone.
By your arbitrary BS definition of "risk" every activity in this game is inherently risk-free because in every case you choose how much to put at risk and you simply don't lose more than that. That does not make sense. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8609
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 01:21:00 -
[10] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Ganking has no risk other than failure and with 15 catalysts this is 0%.
Dictionary.com defines risk as "exposure to the chance of injury or loss; a hazard or dangerous chance"
I bolded the word "chance" so you know that risk requires a chance which assumes possible survivability. When death or destructionis 100% guaranteed, then there is no risk, because it is outcome that has no chance of survivability.
So if CCP changed hisec aggression mechanics and introduced a diceroll that determines whether you get CONCORDed after getting a GCC, or removed CONCORD entirely and put the onus of dealing with criminal flagged players on other players, you'd shut up about suicide ganking being risk-free?
We'll take that! Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8609
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 01:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
Like really what you're saying here is that suicide ganking is risk-free because there's no chance of the aggressor surviving the event Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8609
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 01:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
"It's risky to mine in hisec because you might get suicide ganked. On the other hand, if you're suicide ganking, getting your suspect flagged looter blown up or having the loot diceroll work against your favor is just the cost of business" - Captain Tardbar Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8615
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 11:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Yes but lets be realistic here. When the probability falls so low its not a discernible factor there is little to no risk to the person ganking. But if you like than I'll say
"The risk experienced by suicide gankers blowing up miners in barges and so on is so low it could be considered non-existent for anyone not super pedantic".
Does that satisfy you?
And the reward for blowing up miners in barges is next to nothing Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8615
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 11:50:00 -
[14] - Quote
lol, moral high ground in a video game Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8617
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 18:39:00 -
[15] - Quote
clearly CCP needs to give you the tiniest chance of surviving CONCORD by design so that suicide ganking will be a "high-risk activity" Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8626
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 18:37:00 -
[16] - Quote
suicide ganking has its risks and the only way to mitigate those risks is to increase the cost of the gank
fly away Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8627
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 19:11:00 -
[17] - Quote
Let's say I decide to gank a freighter. I don't want the gank to fail through the target surviving, so I use significantly more DPS than what is needed to take down the freighter before CONCORD arrives. That leaves me two options: use a small number of pilots in tier 3 BCs or use a large number of pilots in destroyers. The former option is more expensive ISK-wise, but I only end up with around a dozen dudes stuck in GCC limbo, but even 2-3 dudes failing to engage on time can fail the gank. With destroyers, I end up with a lot more pilots stuck in GCC limbo, and there is a lot more room for error if a few guys fail to engage on time.
If I end up with too many pilots stuck in GCC limbo, I risk not having enough numbers to gank a lucrative target that may show up within the next 15 minutes. If I minimize the number of pilots in GCC limbo, the gank costs more, which means that I'd throw away a lot more ISK if the drop isn't in my favor. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8627
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 19:21:00 -
[18] - Quote
Murk Paradox wrote:You would have a 100% of succeeding at suiciding and dying, yes. Without fail you became a wreck.
The goal in a suicide gank is the destruction of the target, not the loss of your ship. The self destruct function does the latter just fine. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8628
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:In my view, the two activies are seperate. I could simply fuel my ganking activities by buying plex. I don't really care about making money through ganking. Its not the point of it in my view.
Your view is irrelevant, a lot of players fund their PvP through piracy. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8629
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 17:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Yep. There it is again with everyone saying "Players who don't play like me are inferior and are my lessers."
there it is again with "i should be able to play this game however i want without anybody affecting me" Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |
| |
|