Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Jennifer Starling
Imperial Navy Forum Patrol
317
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 09:21:00 -
[121] - Quote
DarkJacena wrote:If only the Raptor or Crow were somewhat useful in comparison to their counterparts... Are they getting buffs at least? Even a 4th launcher slot like my crusader has 4 turrets .. or a little extra PG/CPU? |

Rae Endashi
Diversified Astronautic Solutions Group
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 14:30:00 -
[122] - Quote
It looks like the most recent test build has an updated version of the old Crow model... does that mean the prototype model won't make it into the upcoming expansion? |

Sarmatiko
178
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 14:46:00 -
[123] - Quote
Rae Endashi wrote:It looks like the most recent test build has an updated version of the old Crow model... does that mean the prototype model won't make it into the upcoming expansion? No one stated that it will make it in this expansion or it will make it anywhere at all  I dont think that we will see this model in current form because this model is controversial - too many people hate it or like it. But yes right now anyone equipped with TriExporter can view this model in current SISI client (build 316767). |

Black Dranzer
107
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 15:03:00 -
[124] - Quote
I heard "Probably not this patch" from a CCPer on sisi. I won't name names, because that would be impolite. |

Demarcus
Killjoy.
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 15:06:00 -
[125] - Quote
If any Caldari ship gets a new model I hope it is the Blackbird (the new model is worse than the old one), Osprey, or Moa. The Caracal is one of the few original Caldari models that still looks perfectly fine to me.
That said I would love for this to be the new Condor model. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
330
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 16:41:00 -
[126] - Quote
Chances are they are going to decide if they are going to give us missiel turrets or not.
If they do decide yes that crow model is scrap.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
200
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 16:50:00 -
[127] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:Chances are they are going to decide if they are going to give us missiel turrets or not.
If they do decide yes that crow model is scrap.
See, people like you who just make stuff up, amaze me.
1) They're not 'deciding', they're working out the animations and physics for all the different points that would have to spawn missiles (because each missile is actually tracked by the server)
2) Why would that have any outcome on that crow model?
3) Do you drink bleach before you post?
I mean literally everything in your post is just made up rubbish. |

Jacob Stov
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 01:37:00 -
[128] - Quote
Just wanted to say I absolutely love this new model. |

Kilobar
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 02:02:00 -
[129] - Quote
I like it although I'm kind of fond of the broken Klingon bird-of-prey look my crow currently has |

Icarus Helia
Fine Goods for Fine Gentlemen
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 22:44:00 -
[130] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:I'm just saying if they are going to add missile turret models then why redo a ship with the missile pods installed?
Unless the texturing is off and those arent box launchers and are cooling intakes instead.
what exactly would it intake in space? |

Spr09
Purdue Engineering and Technology Talocan United
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 22:48:00 -
[131] - Quote
if it's fake, damn. if it's not, it looks good |

Hiram Alexander
Seraphim Securities
102
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 22:54:00 -
[132] - Quote
Spr09 wrote:if it's fake, damn. if it's not, it looks good Oh, it's no fake, it's already been admitted as real (though it was originally, and mistakenly, declared fake -- having said that, some people missed the offical 'retraction' though, and still claim it as fake.)
Every new build they put up on Sisi, I look to see if they fly past on the loading screen, but nothing so far... I think it's a fantastic improvement - especially the cockpit design... :) |

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 23:39:00 -
[133] - Quote
Any new info on this model at all, some CCP responce would be great. |

Solun Malleus
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 23:27:00 -
[134] - Quote
I think it looks 1000% better than the original model. There is room for improvement but I sincerely hope this or something similar makes it into the game this development cycle. |

Huan Claer
101st Covert Ops C. O. R. E.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 12:22:00 -
[135] - Quote
I'd love to see this in game, if only to use as a cheap runabout.
It's interesting to see the different comments, where some people are decrying the model for not being asymmetrical. I much prefer the more symmetrical hull forms, the Scorpion redesign was good, the new Raven less so as it didn't go far enough in evening out the model. To each his own. |

Tornicks
SQUINGEL The G0dfathers
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 07:17:00 -
[136] - Quote
This is brilliant model, I really hope it makes it to the game. Symmetry, exhausts and new cabin design are just great. |

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
234
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 07:19:00 -
[137] - Quote
Holy necropost batman! |

Kopfy
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 09:29:00 -
[138] - Quote
Destroying one more perfectly asymetrical ship... where will this madness end? Wasn't Caldari suposed to be the most asymetrical race? Gallente is beating us by one model as it is and you want to take away our lovely crow? Treachery!
On a more serius note i actually like the condors model, yes it needs a renewal but doing it symetrical isn't the right path. So if you would take that new symetrical thing and modify it slightly into asymetrical perfection i'd be more than pleased.
just my two cents. |

Tornii
The Green Cross Controlled Chaos
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 06:25:00 -
[139] - Quote
It.looks.brilliant. This new cabin, exhausts and overall symmetry would make it one of the best-looking frigates. |

Pulgy
Spiritus Draconis
36
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 08:01:00 -
[140] - Quote
Bryant21 wrote:Someone on reddit is claiming to have found another remake of a eve ship for the winter expansion. The said poster will not verify how they got this image, but I thought it was worth sharing. It certainly looks legit, but would love some more proof... Enjoy. Click For PictureReddit Original Link
that ship looks like it's giving me the finger. Monkeys writing-á Shakespeare? That's like putting CCP in charge of game balance and content updates. |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
192
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 08:10:00 -
[141] - Quote
Its still in the build as it was when we first posted pictures of it. I did notice they updated the dds textures. The crow is listed as cf2, and this ship is under cf2a.
Anyhow.. go further back into the thread. It was confirmed as a ccp design. (Not A surprise siince it was pulled straight from the Res package).
They just didn't confirm as to what they plan on doing with the model.
How did this thread get revived anyhow? This entire discussion thread spawned well before the winter expansion.
This is it with it's actual textures... I used the numbers from the red file to build the material to get an idea as to what it would look like in-game.
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1110/crow.jpg |

Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 09:36:00 -
[142] - Quote
You can tell its not a CCP design.... it looks good. It would never pass their 'lower-quality assurance' policy. |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
837
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 09:56:00 -
[143] - Quote
Sade Onyx wrote:You can tell its not a CCP design.... it looks good. It would never pass their 'lower-quality assurance' policy.
so CCP devs are lying? ok, it would not be the first time, but... https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=285333#post285333
You see... sometimes CCP too can make something good looking... by accident. |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
837
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 10:00:00 -
[144] - Quote
sorry. |

Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 10:33:00 -
[145] - Quote
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:
Ah, thanks for pointing that out.
But as he said, its a prototype... which means they still have yet to drape it in a sheet of fail 
As you can tell I dont have a very high opinion of ccp's ship models. I dont care what galaxy your from, what dimension or fantasy world you live in, no human's would ever construct some of the vessel's that CCP would have us believe.
Some of the recent ships are indeed much better, but whats the point in creating beautifull works of art buried in steaming piles of compost.
Clean out the s hit first pls.
|

Tornii
The Green Cross Controlled Chaos
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 21:37:00 -
[146] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:How did this thread get revived anyhow? This entire discussion thread spawned well before the winter expansion. I had marked the thread as favorite and decided to put down my opinion on the matter. |

Zirse
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
263
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 21:43:00 -
[147] - Quote
Tornii wrote:JC Anderson wrote:How did this thread get revived anyhow? This entire discussion thread spawned well before the winter expansion. I had marked the thread as favorite and decided to put down my opinion on the matter.
Just curious, do you have an opinion on the Falklands War? Or maybe the moon landing? We're all dying to know. |

Tornii
The Green Cross Controlled Chaos
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 22:27:00 -
[148] - Quote
Zirse wrote:Tornii wrote:JC Anderson wrote:How did this thread get revived anyhow? This entire discussion thread spawned well before the winter expansion. I had marked the thread as favorite and decided to put down my opinion on the matter. Just curious, do you have an opinion on the Falklands War? Or maybe the moon landing? We're all dying to know. Sure, if you ask in all seriousness, like the author of the quoted question did. Oh wait, I forgot some people can't properly read before posting stupid stuff. |

Droodid
Antec Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 22:54:00 -
[149] - Quote
I want this. Make a new t2 frigate class just so you can use this model! :D |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |